...OJ Simpson Case Study Psychology 410 November 17, 2000 Gregory E. Haymon OJ Simpson Case Study Forensic DNA is a way to explain a crime, but it has to be gathered and stored properly to be counted pure. The OJ Simpson case, the defense claimed that the murder incident and the Simpson estate were not divided when evidence was collected. The defense stated that the bloodstains were found in the Bronco and on OJ's socks. DNA can be beneficial when determining who the killer was and who was at a scene, but the collection has to be done according to standards. The Simpson case was a displayed wrong and the way forensic DNA works when crimes are solved. The OJ Simpson case demonstrates the most challenging evidence created by the forensics scientists. This evidence may not be enough to convince a jury beyond a realistic doubt that an accused individual is guilty. It is well-defined that with highly trained agents who work on a high profile cases or any other cases, it must be accompanied by well-trained crime scene investigators to collect evidences. Therefore, progress of accreditation programs that train police officers and crime scene technicians in the appropriate approaches to handle the evidence in a crime scene investigation should be on-going. The two main points to consider when examining the case study of OJ Simpson is first to provide an overview of selected case. The second step is to explain the emotional, biological, behavioral components, and...
Words: 1668 - Pages: 7
...All summer, the case against Casey Anthony in an Orlando courtroom had audiences discussing her life as if she were the star of a reality television show. The narrative became familiar: Hard-partying single mother fails to report her toddler missing for a month, then lies to police about a kidnapping by a non-existent nanny. Then there was the suspiciously foul smell in the trunk of the mother's car before Caylee Anthony's remains were found in a wooded area. Inside Courtroom 23, however, the seven women and five men of the jury in the Anthony case had to look beyond the salacious details and decide: Was there enough evidence to prove Casey Anthony killed her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee? Their answer was no. On Tuesday, the jury acquitted Anthony, 25, of murdering her child in June 2008. The reason, legal analysts and court watchers said, is that despite the seemingly endless hype surrounding the investigation and trial, the prosecution's case simply didn't hold up. There was no forensic evidence — such as DNA or fingerprints — directly linking Anthony to her daughter's death. In fact, the precise cause of the girl's death was unclear. "The prosecution put out a lot of dots, but they couldn't connect them," says Lawrence Kobilinsky, chairman of the Department of Sciences at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. Kobilinsky had advised Anthony's attorneys on the forensic case against her but was not involved in the trial. After a trial of a month and a half, jurors...
Words: 2260 - Pages: 10
...Simpson’s Book and TV Special Are Canceled. Eric Ingram Chapter 11: Terrorism Critical Thinking Questions 1. Could the adoption of isolationism as a foreign policy for the United States be practical and economical while maintaining a defensive position against foreign and domestic enemies? 2. Political biases aside, after more than a decade of the Patriot Act in effect, is the United States better protected from terrorism than before the 9/11 attacks? Dan Osgood-Ch.17 1. Should public policy be solely formed on research data and scientific evidence compared to the moral entrepreneur policymaking process? 2. Assuming the author is correct: that moral entrepreneurs base their motivations off of single case phenomenon’s, and not common occurrences, the question can be asked is this justifiable when the benefit only helps out the select few while limiting the liberties of many? Example: Banning all cell phone use while driving. Joe Atchue 1. What are some cultural formations that exist within structural conditions that both enable and constrain individual action? 2. Being a part of a cultural environment that seems to justify criminal behavior does not by itself explain why only some people raised in such cultures actually become criminals while many others do not. How can this be explained? Arshdeep Singh- Virginia Tech Shooting 1. Could gun control prevent crime as appose to making the gun license stricter...
Words: 388 - Pages: 2
...O.J. Simpson Case Analysis The O.J. Simpson case is a landmark case in several ways. In the American legal system, this should have been an open and shut case because the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson committed this crime and in the American legal system, the prosecution has the burden of proof to which prove the defendant committed a crime. The evidence collected in the Simpson case was sufficient for prima facie case to be presented to a Grand Jury for indictment. In other words, prima facie, or first look at the evidence was enough to prove that Simpson was involved in the murder of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. From the beginning the Simpson case had many different undertones, such as political in regards to jury selection, which is why the prosecution choose to pursue the case in Los Angeles as oppose to Santa Monica. This became a pivotal decision that would probably affect many future cases where race could be involved. The list of evidence such as 911 calls to police by the victim Nicole Simpson six months before occurrence of actual crime is in a way, testimony to the fact that Simpson’s behavior was not civilized and that Nicole Simpson was feeling threatened. The “trace evidence” found at the crime scene near the body of the victims, such as bloody shoe prints, which were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, and the blood from the gate, matched genetically with Simpson. Police also noticed a cut on Simpson’s left middle finger...
Words: 1723 - Pages: 7
...society. Social Scientists argue that legally authorized executions and abortions of unborn children can also be classified as murder. There are a number of cases where murder has gone from being a criminal case to a civil case of wrongful death. Many murder cases where a Jury did not convict a suspect of murder went further to become a wrongful death law suit in which the family sued the Defendant. Such cases have made major headlines such as the case in which OJ Simpson was acquitted of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The families of Goldman and Nicole Simpson then sued OJ Simpson in civil court and received a judgment against Simpson for approximately $30 million dollars. This case was appealed and the judgments were affirmed by the Appellate Court in California. Cases of this nature set the stage for these actions and the types of remedies that are available to victim’s families. Should families of victims have the ability to sue a Defendant for the murder of another? Should the murder suspect be sued for wrongful death even if they are not convicted in criminal court? Murder cases in criminal court must have evidence proving that the alleged suspect committed the murder. Civil cases involving wrongful death based on a murder case should have the same standards as the same case in criminal trial. Cases of these types are a great burden on court systems and society in general. Murder Murder, is the unlawful killing of another human...
Words: 3583 - Pages: 15
...The O.J. Simpson Trial: How The Media Effects High Profile Criminal Cases Noah Norwood Florida State University Abstract This paper goes over the effects the media had on the O.J. Simpson case and how the media interfered. The O.J. Simpson murder case is touted as the most televised criminal trial in history and from the second the murders were discovered there was a media frenzy. On the night of June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole Brown and her waiter Ronald Goldman were found outside of Nicole’s condo both stabbed to death. The suspect, former athlete, icon, and actor Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson was the main suspect of the crime. On June 16th, 1994 the LAPD pressed murder charges against him and placed a warrant for his arrest on which he agreed to turn himself in on June 17th 1994 at 11 A.M.. He would not show up to turn himself in and eventually the infamous White Ford Bronco police chase would ensue. Eventually O.J. would be brought in and face trial in what would subsequently lead to him being found not guilty. Throughout this paper we will go over the historical setting and the phases of the incident from the crime committed to the end of the trial. Along with this the effect the high volume of media coverage and publicity will be covered. Also research on how race and gender affected the outcome of this trial will be displayed. To conclude the O.J. Simpson murder trial was highly effected by the media interference from day 1, which caused a racial stir and a certain...
Words: 2197 - Pages: 9
...O.J Simpson murder case is what some people will say is the case of the century. Many people will debate whether O.J Simpson murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. All the evidence at the crime scene, the Bronco chase and the history with his wife. Will determine if O.J Simpson murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The first argument point there was quite a bit of evidence. One of the gloves was found right next to the bodies and the other glove was also found on the side of O.J’s house. Nicole’s blood was found on and inside of O.J’s Bronco. Blood was also found on the socks of O.J was wearing. But on the first week of March, 2016 when the estate was destroying his house they may have found the knife that O.J used to...
Words: 460 - Pages: 2
...The Oj simpson case was an unforgettable case.It was so many details and clues to the case. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson, the ex-wife of former professional football star O.J. Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were found murdered on the steps of her Los Angeles home. Suspicion immediately fell on Simpson as the primary suspect in the murders: he had a history of domestic violence against his ex-wife, his temper was known to be explosive, and there were no other obvious suspects for the brutal attack. Five days later Simpson and his friend, Al Cowlings, led police on a lowspeed, sixty-mile chase on the Los Angeles highways before surrendering. An estimated 23 of the of American homes ninety five million viewers were tuned in, Simpson who was jailed while he awaited trial for the murders, assembled an impressive "Dream Team" for his legal defense....
Words: 1759 - Pages: 8
...his hands swell up. Other reasons was that the blood had shrunk them, or that they did not fit because he was wearing rubber gloves underneath. This is where the famous phrase said by Simpson`s lawyer, Johnnie Cochran: "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Not too long ago a knife showed up. A LAPD officer confirmed that a knife had been found on Simpson`s estate. It was handed in to the former LAPD officer who . The knife has not affected the case. Simpson is now in jail. He was charged for armed robbery and kidnapping. O.J is serving 33 years in prison at Lovelock, Nevada. In 1997 he was found liable for wrongful death and battery against Brown and Simpson. O.J had to pay 33,500,000 dollars in damages. I believe that the reason this case was so big is because of the fame Simpson got after his football career and as an actor. It is always interesting when someone famous does something wrong. I also think that him not turning himself and the drama surrounding all of this sparked an extra interest for the media, who then blew up the case. When you mix drama with action you will almost always get a good story. ...
Words: 1008 - Pages: 5
...be remanded without bail if the judge determines it is necessary. If the judge considers bail you could a bail bond or put up collateral example property such as a house or something expensive. If you leave before your trial the property becomes the property of the state (Meyers J). If you decide to skip out trail, which is known as bail jumping is a separate crime. The consequences would be that you would receive a bench warrant for your arrest. The trial could go on without your presence and if you are caught at a later time. You could give up all your right to appeal your case. It is not out of the ordinary for your attorney and the prosecutor to discuss your case. It is known as a side bar or bench conference in this meeting a plea bargin could be struck and the charges reduce. Your attorney usually discusses this after his bench conference. If the charges are serious they may not be discussed at the arraignment, and may be asked to appear in front of a grand jury. Your attorney may ask you if you want to speak on your own behalf (Cowling A.C.). If the case goes to the grand jury your lawyer has to prepare if you have any witnesses and to present you case in front of a jury...
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
...Paragraph 1 I chose Paralegal as a career path because I am very enthused and, passionate about law, the legal system and, legal research. Being able to work for Finnegan & Wicker Law Firm will help me to hone my skills, to grow and learn more in this field. As a paralegal, to be able to assist lawyers with depositions, drafting of pleadings, subpoenas and, other legal documents is a very fulfilling task. There is one particular event that inspired me and propelled me into pursuing a career as a paralegal and that’s – watching and reading the civil case brought against Orenthal James Simpson (O.J), by the family of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson in 1997 - (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson_murder_case). The depth in which the depositions were done and the discovery process led to a successful win in the civil trial. The success of the civil suit in my opinion was mainly due to the adequate and proper research that was done, no stones were left unturned and, even though O.J was found not guilty in criminal court for the death of Ron Goldman and, Nicole Brown Simpson respectively he was held responsible for their deaths in civil court. Seeing the outcome of the civil trial against O.J, I knew that I would really enjoy being a paralegal and, to be able to work for some of the best lawyers here at Finnegan & Wicker Law Firm, makes becoming a paralegal worthwhile. I sincerely hope that I can become a part of your prestigious organization and team. Nickey Simpson ...
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...Simpson is guilty of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. There is an enormous amount of evidence that proves that he did. He had a motive, but not a solid alibi. There are lab results dealing with blood, DNA, and fibers that place him at the scene of the murders. If that is not enough to prove him guilty, then there are also the witnesses that can place O.J. Simpson going in and out of the Rockingham estate on the day and around the time of the murders. Others have testified of threatening remarks they heard O.J. Simpson say against Nicole and police reports of violent actions he committed against her. Evidence proves that O.J. Simpson is guilty of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O. J. Simpson had motive for killing Nicole Brown Simpson. He and his wife were having severe marital problems. There is proof of how bad their relationship was. She had her sister take pictures of her bruised body and lock them in a safe for future evidence if needed. Also, there were recorded 911 phone calls in 1989 and 1993 from Nicole during brutal attacks by O.J. When the police responded to...
Words: 1466 - Pages: 6
... he was in a criminal trial because he was found to be the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Simpson due to blood stains left behind. In my opinion, I think he is guilty because according to an article based on his biography he was ordered to surrender on June 17 at 11 a.m. but instead he vanished and left. If he was innocent why would he run away? if anything he should surrender to prove that he was innocent. Later he was tracked down when he made a phone call on the Santa Ana freeway. This lead on to a full televised speed chase even though later on, he surrendered voluntarily because he pleaded to be 100% not guilty and he said he wasn't running away. According to the blood evidence Marcia Clark had a strong case against OJ Simpson because there was a glove match that was found near the dead bodies that surfaced his property. Also, there was a DNA testing that connected the blood stains that were left behind. According to a video that I watched he was trying on gloves. He put on a latex glove first and on top of it he put a black glove and from what I saw the black glove ripped meaning that anything could have gone wrong meaning there is a possible chance that while he was committing a murder he could’ve cut himself which could have led to leaving blood stains behind. Also, he had cuts on one of his hands after the murder. However, Johnnie Cochran, one of Simpson's lawyers said they needed to dismiss the glove match that they found because according...
Words: 625 - Pages: 3
...County Superior Court in California. The trials of the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson were held to try former NFL star and actor O. J. Simpson. He was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994 deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and a friend of hers, Ron Goldman. The case was later described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history. The trial and its outcomes were such a major piece of history from the late 90s, with its impact is still being discussed today as there have been numerous accounts of retelling the events....
Words: 1046 - Pages: 5
...Additionally, fate seemed to bring the circumstances of detective Mark Fuhrman being called into the case as the initial person inspecting the crime scene, the one gathering the most incriminating evidence, and the two detectives taking over the case Tom Lange and Phillip Vannatter. Their errors in interviewing Simpson, gathering evidence, and lying giving credence to a questionable integrity were major factor in O. J.’s acquittal. On the other hand, in Made in America, the policemen involved in the case, told how they conducted the investigation, was interesting. I feel that years later they are trying to cover up for the horrendous mistakes they made during the time of the murders, and made the contentions that race overwhelmed the evidence....
Words: 1760 - Pages: 8
