Premium Essay

LEED V4 Rating System

Submitted By
Words 1644
Pages 7
One of the significant change in the LEED v4 rating system is the implementation of Acoustic Performance credit in Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) category. The new construction building will receive 1 point for its compliance. The credit added the requirements for room noise levels, speech privacy and sound isolation, reverberation time, and paging, masking, and sound reinforcement systems harmonized ANSI and ASHRAE standards. Effective acoustic design provides classroom and workspaces that promote occupant communication, productivity, and well-being. The ASHRAE (American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Condition Engineers) has been developing a standard for high performance buildings in conjunction with Illumination Engineering …show more content…
Use of Glass. Utilizing daylight to reduce electric lighting energy and to improve lighting quality requires a greater number of windows in the building enclosure and in some cases use of interior glass partitions. Interior glass partitions helps to transmit daylight further into buildings but also lead to decreased sound isolation between interior spaces. Unfortunately, windows and glass partitions have significantly lower sound isolating capabilities than the opaque wall and roof elements they are replacing. An additional problem with the increased use of glass is the fact that glass has very low acoustic absorption and when used for daylighting and views, cannot be covered with an acoustic absorbing material. As a result, reverberation can be significant in rooms with large amounts of glass leading to speech privacy and speech clarity issues. Furthermore, the increased use of daylight can led to an increased transmission of outdoor noise to the building’s interior. The conflict between the use of glass for daylighting and the acoustic problems glass creates cannot be avoided. However, many building designs use extreme amounts of glass for architectural purposes, far beyond what is necessary for views and daylighting. A more careful design of the building enclosure can minimize the amount of required glass and still provide the desired amount of daylight and outdoor views by replacing some glass with more conventional solid wall construction (not simply using spandrel glass). The remaining opaque sections of the enclosure must then be carefully designed to provide very high sound isolation to help compensate for the poor sound isolation of the glass that has been

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

LEED Pilot Project Program

...building industry require a system to define and measure “green buildings.” The members acted on the initial findings by establishing a committee. The composition of the committee was diverse; it included architects, real estate agents, a building owner, a lawyer, an environmentalist, and industry representatives. The first LEED Pilot Project Program, also referred to as LEED Version 1.0, was launched at the USGBC Membership Summit in August 1998. After extensive modifications LEED Green Building Rating System released Version 2.0 in March 2000. LEED Version 2.1 was then officially released in 2002, followed by LEED Version 2.2 in 2005. In April 2009, the USGBC launched v3.0, which included a new building certification model, a new LEED Online, and an improvement to the LEED rating system (LEED 2009)....

Words: 1422 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Work, Culture and Identity in Mozambique and Southafrica 1860-1910

...Acknowledgments ix Acknowledgments This book owes a great deal to the mental energy of several generations of scholars. As an undergraduate at the University of Cape Town, Francis Wilson made me aware of the importance of migrant labour and Robin Hallett inspired me, and a generation of students, to study the African past. At the School of Oriental and African Studies in London I was fortunate enough to have David Birmingham as a thesis supervisor. I hope that some of his knowledge and understanding of Lusophone Africa has found its way into this book. I owe an equal debt to Shula Marks who, over the years, has provided me with criticism and inspiration. In the United States I learnt a great deal from ]eanne Penvenne, Marcia Wright and, especially, Leroy Vail. In Switzerland I benefitted from the friendship and assistance of Laurent Monier of the IUED in Geneva, Francois Iecquier of the University of Lausanne and Mariette Ouwerhand of the dépurtement évangélrlyue (the former Swiss Mission). In South Africa, Patricia Davison of the South African Museum introduced me to material culture and made me aware of the richness of difference; the late Monica Wilson taught me the fundamentals of anthropology and Andrew Spiegel and Robert Thornton struggled to keep me abreast of changes in the discipline; Sue Newton-King and Nigel Penn brought shafts of light from the eighteenthcentury to bear on early industrialism. Charles van Onselen laid a major part of the intellectual foundations on...

Words: 178350 - Pages: 714