Premium Essay

Moral Consideration In Animal Testing

Submitted By
Words 1467
Pages 6
Worldwide, 500 million animals are subjected to inhumane experiments in the name of scientific research (Linzey, 2013). Evidence to support the practise of vivisection is confronting and highly criticised. However, it is essential society apply careful consideration in regard to the positive ground-breaking outcomes of these experiments and the encouraging positive impacts they have on human life. Nonetheless, rationalization is warranted for inflicting unnecessary treatment to innocent animals who cannot represent themselves. Strong advocacy provided by animal protections and research scientist, both contribute valid arguments for and against the practise of vivisection. A central determinant to these claims is questioning morality, who …show more content…
Any being who has life, has intrinsic value, therefore they have rights that need to be defended and morally considered (Gruen, 2014). Firstly, it must be determined whether animals deserve moral consideration. A contentious topic that requires critical analysis into what is the necessary criteria for which animals need to be considered in regard to morally relevant issues, such as scientific research. Numerous views have stated, non-humans have no moral status, therefore do not deserve moral consideration (Gruen, 2014). Research highlights humans and animals have shared characteristics, therefore animals must also be morally considered in morally relevant circumstances and therefore are believed to also have moral status like humans. Animal’s rights, as human rights, are guiding principles for justifiable treatment in today’s society, a foremost example is right to life. Animals are put under extreme experimental conditions are at the mercy of humans, and require the morality of human advocacy (Linzey, 2013). Without the consciousness for understanding or predicting pain and without their consent, inflicting pain and suffering on animals are …show more content…
As rational human beings, we have a moral obligation to represent the millions of animals used in scientific research each year (Rollin, 2011). Animals suffer cruel and painful experimentation, this practise is morally wrong. The assumption that animals, being non-human, are considered to be exempt of moral status is another example of the bias claims and weak justifications toward innocent animals and the atrocities endured for scientific progress (Gruen, 2014). . Experimental research inflicts inhumane acts of pain and suffering on animals. Peter Singer (1975), author of ‘Animal Liberation’ and preferences based utilitarian, indicates the field of Psychology as a significant supporter of inhumane experimental research on animals. In addition, Singer exposes numerous examples of cruel and demoralizing research techniques inflicted on animals. Firstly, experiments to examine the detrimental effects of powerful drugs on behaviours. Secondly, invasive brain manipulation on conscious, as per researcher terminology, animal models (Linzey, 2013). Thirdly, subjecting animals to psychological suffering,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Animal Rights

...Animal Rights Priscilla Peterman University of Phoenix Com/156 Instructor James Christianson This research paper is going to discuss a major concern with the issue of animal rights and how people view this critical issue. Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the many problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Animals deserve the same rights as humans. Animals, subsequently dating back to the days of Ancient Greece, have always held a place in the hearts of humans. And for so long as this animal human relation existed, so did the realism of taking care of the animals, whether it be in the form of love, care and equal rights. The idea that we are all born with essential rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is important to our society, mainly to the ideas stated in the United States Constitution. Though, humanities inconsiderately demean this principle by denying that animals share these rights. Animals are just as titled to the rights of living, avoiding pain, and pursuing happiness as humans are. Yet still we exploit and abuse them cruelly, most often without a second thought. The use of animals in biomedical research, segmentation, testing and education, deprives animals of their natural rights and is a great injustice. We must believe that this is completely intolerable, and we should find more humane as well as...

Words: 2013 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Lush

...nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are being treated.” –Mahatma Gandhi. Animal cruelty needs to be prohibited from testing in laboratories because its bad science, there are other humane ways of testing out drugs and substances, and lastly, if companies were to better advertise animal cruelty, consumers would be more informed about how procedures are taken into consideration when it comes to testing on animals. Buyers need to become more mindful of who they are supporting when it comes to animals being poisoned and killed through barbaric testing. By doing so, consumers would benefit in devoting their money into companies that care to test their products in humane ways and simply, joining the cause and fight to help stop animal cruelty. To begin with, the amount of procedures and science put into animal testing are essentially unreliable and are not one-hundred percent effectible. People who test on animals want us consumers to be certain that if they gave up their outdated habits, sick children and other disease and accident sufferers would drop dead in multitudes. The food and drug administration (FDA) says there are about ninety-two passable drugs out of one-hundred that will work on animals but will fail on humans because they are either hazardous or solely would not be of any affect. As well with the very few amount of drugs that were permitted for human use, at least half were relabeled because of the side effects the animal tests did not...

Words: 985 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Bioethics: Modern Science and Ethics

...ancient sages told people human life is extremely valuable and sacred, as a religious doctrine in the Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not kill.” Moreover, when people talk about ethics, they will think about rules to differentiate right and wrong. It might be wise maxims of Confucius or religious beliefs. The most general way to define “ethics” is that “moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior” (American English in Oxford Dictionary). Bioethics is a pretty young interdisciplinary study, which is considered with ethical questions related to the relationships among human beings, animals, and environments in the late twentieth century. Based on this, bioethics derived three main subdisciplines, which are medical ethics, animal ethics, and environmental ethics. Although each sub-discipline has particular study area in bioethics, there still are overlaps of ethical considerations and approaches. This makes it difficult to easily discuss ethics questions such as stem cell research, xenotransplantation, the ethical status of animals and the ethical status of the environment. Further discussion about the vital issue of moral status solutions is necessary at the same time. In the rapid development of the natural sciences and biotechnology has greatly promoted better living conditions and improve the living standards of people around the world. On another hand, there are opposite consequences, like water and air pollution, nuclear waste, tropical deforestation, as well...

Words: 2352 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Explain Why We Should Be Taken To Regulate The Rights Of Animals

...All around the world, animals have played a huge role in human society and have suffered greatly at the hands of humans whether it was for experimental, domestic, medical, or fashion purposes. The notion of animal rights has become a foreign concept to many people as more and more animals are abused and killed each day for a wide range of socially acceptable purposes. However, animals deserve the right to live free from unnecessary pain or suffering because they are conscious and sentient beings that have intrinsic value. Therefore, measures should be taken to regulate the treatment of animals in order to recognize their rights, to favor animal welfare, and to diminish the amount of suffering they have to endure. Although humans have the right to use animals for their use and benefit, humans also have a moral obligation to recognize animal rights and to treat all living...

Words: 1131 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Administrative Officer

...There has been tremendous advancements in the realm of genetic testing, especially in the field of autosomal dominate diseases. Major breakthroughs in this field have produced ethical and moral dilemmas for physicians; conflicts between a patients’ autonomy vs. beneficence and nonmaleficence (doing what’s best for the patient), which has made counseling patients who have severe genetic disorders like Huntington’s disease very difficult. Do you tell a patient that he/she will likely die from a fatal disease? Do you tell the relatives? Do you choose the benefits of notifying the patient over the Psychological harm it may cause? These are so many questions and ethical considerations that arise for a provider when genetic testing predicts a serious, life-threatening disease. One question of particular interest for this case is whether or not a child should be informed or not of his increased genetic risk of a fatal disease, which sparks another round of ethical and moral consideration. Should parents have the right to tell their child that he/she is likely to contract a fatal disease? Does the provider have a duty to inform? Many legal arguments can be made to support a child’s right to decide whether or not they want to reveal genetic testing, and many arguments can be made to support the right for a provider to withhold the devastating results of the fatal disease because of the potential adverse effects. Despite the legal impacts, the decision to inform or not will always vary...

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Animal Testing

...Animal Testing: Pros and Cons An Exploratory Research Paper Dallin P. Curtis Arizona State University Main Body "There will come a day when such men as myself will view the slaughter of innocent creatures as horrible a crime as the murder of his fellow man- Our task must be to free ourselves- by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature and its beauty." -Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Animal testing is an issue in today's general public that, regardless if anybody understands it, does influence each of us. Is some some testing needed by law? Medical advances, for example, transplants, antibodies, and drugs were all tried on animals before they were utilized on people. However, does government law guarantee that creatures utilized as a part of examination and testing are dealt with compassionately? Today there are a lot of individuals who are against animal testing in lab research. Frequently asking what are other options for utilizing animals as a part of therapeutic studies? Animal testing is expected to advance the wellbeing of people, yet the procedures often include hurting innocent creatures. The individuals who are for animal testing for the most part bolster investigative examination and medical advancement. The two principle ideals with respect to animal testing is that it is heartless and oppressive to creatures, while others feel that there are insufficient willing individuals that organizations need to better help...

Words: 1636 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Animal Rights

...issues of animal rights. Some believe that exploiting animals for uses such as, medical, cosmetics and domestic testing there is also a growing concern about the abuse and use of animals in some such as blood sports and zoos. Although, there is animal rights in place, animals till get exploited and abused Within this essay I will outline how traditional Christians view animals and how modern day christens view animals and how both views conflict; I will also outline philosopher’s views of animal rights. The traditional Christians view is that animals should be preyed on and eaten but others, this is known as ‘nature red in tooth and claw’. Traditional Christian’s downgraded animals in three ways, god created animals for the use of human beings so, therefore, believe that humans could do as they pleased with animals, Also, they thought that animals were worth little moral consideration as animals don’t have souls or reason, whereas, humans do, However, they also thought that animals were in relation to humans but not on the same terms. Although, not all traditional Christian’s believed that not all animals were regarded with little worth some saints demonstrated that Christian’s should treat animals with respect and kindly. Stt Anton of Padua preached to fish’s and St Francis of Assisi preached to the birds and became a popular pro-animal Christian. Throughout the bible we are taught that we should stewards of the earth and that we are superior of all animals and that we...

Words: 1435 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

John Locke Animal Testing

...contemporaries disagreed with this ethical standpoint on how to treat animals. John Locke, an English physician, philosopher, and contemporary, openly disagreed and stated that humans should not conduct these painful biomedical experiments on animals, and that animals contain some human-like characteristics and are capable of feeling pain. Locke believed that conducting these harmful experiments and mistreating animals could potentially lead to a path of also harming humans. Immanuel Kant, another important contemporary, also expressed his views against pointless harmful experiments against animals. He stated that animals were indeed conscious beings which could feel pain and it would be unethical and...

Words: 1818 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Cost Benefit Analysis

...ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE REVIEW OF COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT IN THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH JUNE 2003 REPORT OF THE COST-BENEFIT WORKING GROUP OF THE ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE PREFACE Letter to the Minister from Michael Banner, Chair of the Animal Procedures Committee 17 June 2003 Dear Ms Flint ANIMAL PROCEDURES COMMITTEE: RECOMMENDATIONS ON COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT UNDER THE ANIMALS (SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES) ACT 1986 On behalf of the Animal Procedures Committee I enclose the Committee’s report on cost-benefit assessment. In it we address the adequacy of the current cost-benefit assessment performed in the course of evaluating project licence applications. We have sought to look at the many issues which arise in relation to this important element of the regulation of the use of animals, but would draw attention to three particular aspects of our work. In the first place we have addressed the fundamental question as to scientific validity of the use of animals. We believe that our considerations and conclusions offer an important clarification of the debate and fulfil the request made by your predecessor, Mike O’Brien, to provide advice on this issue. Secondly, while we conclude that some uses of animals may yield scientific knowledge, we argue that this does not settle the question of justification. We go on to elucidate the full range of factors which must be considered for there to be a rigorous application of the cost-benefit assessment. Thirdly, we also consider how...

Words: 56267 - Pages: 226

Premium Essay

Phi 208 Week 2 Quiz 85% Grade

...Student Answer: | x | That if we say that it would be wrong to perform experiments on such humans but not on non-humans then we are showing bias based upon species alone |   | | | That a good speciesist would not perform experiments on any being |   | | | That we should test upon mentally disabled human infants because the results would be more reliable than tests on animals |   | | | That anyone who would consider testing on a human infant is a monster |   | Instructor Explanation: | The answer can be found on p. 6 of Peter Singer’s “All Animals are Equal.” | | |   | Points Received: | 1 of 1 |   | Comments: | | | | Question 2. | Question : | Peter Singer’s “basic principles of equality” applied to animals means: | |   | Student Answer: | | Animals should be given all the same rights as human beings. |   | | x | Animals are not entitled to not all the same rights but to an equal consideration of interests. |   | | | Animals should not be given the same moral consideration because they are do not have the same power to reason as humans. |   | | | Animals do not have rights unless they can demonstrate the same abilities as humans. |   | Instructor Explanation: | The answer can...

Words: 1923 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...kill animals! ‘’Thousands of animals are killed per annum to check out new medicine or procedures on them to envision if they're safe or effective’’ (Animalequality). The result with animal testing is that we've several new medicines that facilitate save several our lives and keep United States functioning properly. Although it's going to kill several animals within the finish it's a sacrifice we've to decide on to form for the higher of our race. It’s additionally higher to use animals than its humans. There is also no alternative to using other than using animals for testing. Living systems like persons and animals are extraordinarily complicated. Finding out cell cultures in a very Petri dish, whereas generally helpful, doesn't...

Words: 1432 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethics Problems in Cosmetic Industry

...economy’, which includes the make-up, skincare and hair production and so on. Due to the beauty of nature, there is a huge demand for the cosmetics in the economic market. The corporations of cosmetics are the main supplies of the beauty products. As the blooming development of cosmetics industries, some phenomenon is involved in argument, which have exert an harm on people and the society even though they do not violate the current law. In this research paper, three main ethics problem will be discussed. This paper will give a brief background on each phenomenon, and then give the arguments and problems of it by using the ethics theories and case. Finally, some suggestions and measurement will be given to each problem. Key words: ethics, animal-test, advertising manipulate, double standard, Corporate social responsibility Introduction Cosmetics industry is called “the beauty economy”, devoted to develop the products of skincare and make-up both for woman and man. Due to the pressure from employment and mating (lipstick effect), people, especially woman most likely tend to spend their money on buying cosmetics, in order to enhance their beauty on their appearance and body. Consumers in America spend $45 Billion on cosmetics and beauty products the cosmetics industry makes billions of dollars each year from people's quest for great skin. Different from other industries like clothing or automobile, beauty products are directly applied to consumer and absorbed by people...

Words: 3394 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Animal Rights

...A debate about animal rights has been an ongoing problem around the world for generations. For the first time, according to Singer (2003), the Australian philosopher Peter Singer proposed the assertion that animals have ‘rights’ in the 1970s. Ever since then, this claim has been the topic of many emotional and ardent discussions. There are many areas in which the issue of animal right’s is an acute topic. For example, there are moral aspects of keeping animals in zoos, eating them, using for testing etc.? I tend to think that animals should not have rights because they are not humans, and they are not able to fight for those rights. I agree with the point of view of Linker (2014) that people should treat animals respectably. However, it should be because they are not like humans rather than because they are similar to human beings. Human dignity is associated with some the moral qualities that are often difficult to explain, and certainly cannot be seen in the behavior of animals. Obviously, people have to take care of animals and not hurt them because they are living beings also experiencing emotions. However, this cannot be the basis for granting them rights equivalent to the human. People are beings endowed with sympathies and emotions, and any normal society cannot be indifferent to the suffering of the animals. A cruel treatment of pets, like dogs and cats, will induce revulsion even from people who had never had pets and are not planning to. However, Schultz (2013)...

Words: 862 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Genetic Engineering

...Genetic Engineering Wesley Rupe, Jawad Rana, Layli Stroia, Charles Taiwo, Mariella Velasquez, Mark Young DeVry University Genetic Engineering Table of contents Title page ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Table of contents ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 1. A brief description of the technology and an explanation of the associated science (Mariella Velasquez) ………………………………………………..……………. 3 2. Psychological considerations and sociological effects (Mariella Velasquez) …………. 3 3. The historical development and context of the technology (Wesley Rupe) …………. 13 4. Political and legal influences (Mark Young) (Not Complete) 5. Economic questions and considerations (Jawad Rana)………………………………….…… 21 6. The technology in its cultural context, media influence (Charles Taiwo) (Not Complete) 7. Implications for the environment (Charles Taiwo) (Not Complete) 8. Moral and ethical implications (Layli Stroia) ……………………………………………………..… 30 Outline A brief description of the technology and an explanation of the associated science Definition: What is Genetic Engineering? Genetic engineering (GE) is the process of manipulation of an organism genome to create a new DNA. The new DNA might be implanted in a totally different DNA species. It is widely used to create hybrids (some species are not able to naturally breed), correct genetic flows in any type of being. It is applied in...

Words: 8761 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

What Is Xenotransplantation?

...Fifty-four years ago in Mississippi, Dr. James Hardy transplanted the heart of a chimpanzee into a dying patient due to a lack of a human heart donor. While the patient died within ninety minutes of the transplant it brought to life a substantial moral and ethical discussion. The discussion centered around not just the animal to human transplant but also the actual organ. The heart is not just the body’s fuel pump but also having significant symbolism, “many believed that if you transplanted the heart, you transplanted the soul.” organs or tissues between different species (Oxford, 2018) has numerous medical and scientific benefits. Ethically, politically, culturally, socially, economically it is viewed as a complex issue, this will focus on how xenotransplantation is regarded as an advantage. First and foremost, xenotransplantation is practiced and is considered because of the increase in people requiring a transplant. In 2015, more than 123,000 people in the United States were waiting for an organ transplant. (Warmflash...

Words: 1365 - Pages: 6