“The greatest of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are being treated.” –Mahatma Gandhi. Animal cruelty needs to be prohibited from testing in laboratories because its bad science, there are other humane ways of testing out drugs and substances, and lastly, if companies were to better advertise animal cruelty, consumers would be more informed about how procedures are taken into consideration when it comes to testing on animals. Buyers need to become more mindful of who they are supporting when it comes to animals being poisoned and killed through barbaric testing. By doing so, consumers would benefit in devoting their money into companies that care to test their products in humane ways and simply, joining the cause and fight to help stop animal cruelty.

To begin with, the amount of procedures and science put into animal testing are essentially unreliable and are not one-hundred percent effectible. People who test on animals want us consumers to be certain that if they gave up their outdated habits, sick children and other disease and accident sufferers would drop dead in multitudes. The food and drug administration (FDA) says there are about ninety-two passable drugs out of one-hundred that will work on animals but will fail on humans because they are either hazardous or solely would not be of any affect. As well with the very few amount of drugs that were permitted for human use, at least half were relabeled because of the side effects the animal tests did not show. Most would argue that if we take away animal testing, we would have to test unfamiliar drugs on humans. What most people do not understand is that we already do test new drugs on humans. Regardless of how many animal tests are being commenced, there will always be a human to be tested on first. As animal tests are deemed to be unreliable, they make human trials