Free Essay

Nasser and Arab Unity

In:

Submitted By adsy97
Words 1040
Pages 5
To what extent were the actions of Nasser the most important factor in encouraging Arab unity in the years 1954-70?
Overall, it seems that Nasser was an important figurehead in uniting the Arab population because he managed to unite Arab thought into being independent both in terms of within The Middle East and on the world stage. Nasser managed to gain Egypt and the concept of Arab nationalism an increased status through his running and appeal of Egypt. It could however be argued that hostility against Israel and the effects of this, as well as the fact that Arab unity was not exceptionally strong during this period may also have meant that his attempts to encourage Arab unity may have been unsuccessful.
It is clear to a large extent that between 1945 and 1970, Nasser was at least partially responsible for fuelling feelings of Arab nationalism in Egypt that caused other countries to wish to join him in his cause. Nasser rose to power when he overthrew the Egyptian government in 1952 following Egypt’s humiliating defeat during the War of Independence. In 1954, Nasser managed to negotiate less British control on the Suez Canal. The West, specifically Britain and the USA tried to convince Nasser and the Egyptians to move into an anti-Soviet alliance, The Baghdad Pact, in 1955. Instead, Nasser founded a radio channel, the ‘Voice of the Arabs’, which spread ideas about Arab nationalism by broadcasting them across the Arab world. In 1956, Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal, in order to show the world he was not aligned with any power: West or East. After securing arms from the Czechs, Nasser took control of the Canal in an anti-imperialist stance. Britain and France then used Israel to try and start a war with Egypt and to try and reclaim the Canal. Their actions were strongly condemned by the UN and the US, and they were forced to withdraw. This withdrawal made Nasser even more popular, convincing Syria to wish to unify with Egypt, which it did in 1958, forming the United Arab Republic. By standing up to perceived Western imperialism and refusing to align with either of the major powers during the height of the Cold War, Nasser managed to convince other Arabs that there was a hope for Pan-Arabism that all Arabs could unify together. As his actions and propaganda made Egypt and Syria unify in 1958, Nasser was the most important factor in encouraging Arab unity between 1945 and 1970.
Whilst it is clear that Nasser made a huge contribution to Arab unity in this period, feelings of hostility towards Israel may have also caused some unity within the Arab world, and eventually weakened Egypt and Nasser’s power. In two of the major wars in the Arab-Israeli conflict up to 1970, there was unity among Arab states in order to fight Israel. Israel was declared in 1948, and was immediately faced with conflict with the Arab League. The Arab League was set up in 1945, formed of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan, and set about fighting against Israel. In the War of Independence in 1948/49, the Arab states attempted to destroy the newly created State of Israel. They were defeated. In 1964, the PLO was set up by Yasser Arafat, in order to try and liberate the refugees in Palestine, showing further Arab unity in the face of Israeli hostility. They fought again with Israel in 1967, during the Six Day War. However, once again, thanks to the USA, Israel had a military advantage and reflected all the attacks from Arab states. This was a huge blow to the Pan-Arab cause, as it showed that Egypt, previously a strong state, was now in ruins. As hostility in Israel unified the Arab cause, and showed the weaknesses of Nasser during this period, then Israel, not Nasser, may be the main cause of Arab unity between 1945 and 1970.
Whilst it could be said that Nasser did manage to cause some Arab unity, during this period, the Arabs were not necessarily unified in their aims. Whilst the ‘Voice of the Arab’s was broadcast across the Arab world, it did not encourage the Arabs to completely unify. Whilst they did fight together against Israel in the War of Independence and the Six Day War, they often had divided aims. For example, in 1958, after the formation of the UAR, tension began to rise between Egypt and Syria because they began to disagree because Syria began to feel inferior to Egypt. In 1961, Syrian forces issued a coup and the UAR split back into two separate countries. Iraq, who were invited to join the UAR in 1958, had declined this show of Arab unity in order to protect their own interests. Also, no other countries came to Egyptian aid during the Suez crisis, leaving them on their own. The PLO, established thanks to Nasser in 1964, were supported by some countries such as Syria and Jordan, whilst not by others. However, in 1970, Jordan turned and expelled the PLO from their country thanks to interference in the country. All of this meant the Arabs were not unified on any front, particularly after their humiliating defeat in the Six Day War by Israel in 1967. As some of Nasser’s actions to attempt to unify the Arab world did not succeed, and the Arabs were not as unified by 1970 as they were in 1945, Nasser’s actions were not the most important factor in encouraging Arab unity in this period.
In conclusion, Nasser’s actions were the most important in encouraging Arab unity between 1945 and 1970. He succeeded in unifying Egypt with Syria and encouraging Arabs by refusing to align with the Cold War powers and defying imperialism, more than any other Arab leader of the period. Whilst hostility towards Israel did unify the Arabs somewhat, the states were too different to fully unify in this period as they had different interests in the world, and different priorities. As Nasser did however do the most to try and produce unity amongst the Arabs, his actions were the most important factor, even if not the strongest, in encouraging Arab unity between 1945 and 1970.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gamal

...Gamal Abdel-Nasser was an excellent and a great leader and in fact he was one of the charismatic Arab Leaders who emerged within the military group inside the Egyptian army that was called “Free Officers’ Movement” in the early 1950s. In addition, Gamal Abdel-Nasser was an Egyptian and a national leader among the United Arab Republic. He wanted to get rid of the corruption, bribery, and governmental instability found during King Farouk’s reign and to regain all the rights of the Egyptian citizens at that time and under the British control. Nasser’s ambitions were obvious in eliminating the British influence and interference within the Egyptian internal affairs as well as the exploitation of the country’s resources. When the British threatened the king and forced resignation into assigning Moustafa El-Nahas, a pro-Britain government, Gamal Abdel Nasser refused to be quiet about that and considered it a shameful event. Many officers regretted being unhelpful for their country and decided to help Gamal and sacrificed their blood for their nation. As a result, revolution began and the king was forced to exile while Gamal Abdel Nasser was elected as president of Egypt who successfully drove out the British troops. At that moment, he was considered a national hero who gave Egypt its independence and got rid of the corruption that was existed during the king’s reign. His efforts to regain Egyptians’ rights from British control were successful when he announced the nationalization...

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Was Israel so Successful in Dealing with Threats to Its Survival in the Years 1948-73? (30)

...Why was Israel so successful in dealing with threats to its survival in the years 1948-73? (30) Israel was very successful in dealing with threats to its survival during the years 1948-73 mainly because of their military strength, US support and the lack of Arab leadership and unity. Israel were militarily strong as they were well trained and developed, US support came from the huge number of American Jews applying pressure on the government while the lack of Arab leadership and unity was a mess caused by all states. Having been continuously faced with the threat of war from fellow Arab states as they refused to recognise Israel as a separate country, Israel built a very strong army over the years. The 1948 war was the first test and opportunity to build up their army. In this case, the Arabs were the ones to start war so in theory; their army should’ve been stronger especially as they were several nations who were supposed to be fighting together. However the ceasefire that the UN had called gave Israel an opportunity to build up, strengthen and organise their army as well as the chance to receive weapons from Eastern Europe. Some of their army had gained experience during WWII so that helped them out greatly as well. Although the UN had called for an end on fighting, Israel ignored this and broke ceasefire anyway, and focused on defeating Egypt. This showed that they were a very organised military country and quite clever seeing as their army developed so well in so little...

Words: 1292 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Essay

... ID: 115743 Gamal Abdel Nasser is an Arabic leader not only an Egyptian leader who made a lot of achievements for Egypt, the Middle East and Africa. Nasser was an important figure in the recent history of Egypt and had a great role in 23 July revolution; he was one of the leaders of the free officers’ movement. Gamal Adel Nasser was a brave solider who fought against Israel. Nasser was a significant leader who had revolutionary ideas that supported the free officers’ movement. Nasser was the most popular Arabic leader in his era and had a big role in all Arabs’ revolutions and also made an Arabian nationalism, which included a short period of unity between Egypt and Syria (The painful presidency of Egypt's Nasser, 1969). Nasser also encouraged a number of revolutions in the Arab countries and a number of other countries. Nasser as a magnificent leader had an affective role in the political and social life during his judgment and after his death. (Nowaira, 2010) In July 26 1956 Gamal Abdel Nasser took a great political decision. Nasser announced nationalizing the Suez Canal Company SAE to finance the Aswan high dam after the World Bank refused to finance the construction of the high dam. Nasser took that decision several years before the end of Britain’s contract of benefiting from the canal, which led to tension and escalation and bring hostility to Egypt. Nasser also increased tensions with France due to his support...

Words: 1352 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Understanding the Modern Middle East

...particulars of the evolution of history. (Lecture 2/1) Politics are central to history. Geography matters, it is important to the evolution of history. A religion is traditional and provides prologue. The role of ideology plays a huge part in my understanding of the modern Middle East. Saddam Hussain wanted a secularized government. The issue with his ideology is that secularism is modern, however religion is traditional. Palenstine historically a struggled with existed between secular and theocratic values. Secularism clashes orthodox Judaism and Israeli society. (Video 2/21) He was opposed to Islamic interest. (Lecture 3/20) Gamal Abdul Nasser , the second president of Egypt, and reigned from 1956 until his death. He introduceNassism to us because of these fundamental reason: he wanted to bring unity to all. Abortion of boundaries and is where Nasser wanted to rid the middle east of these boundaries because they do not...

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Israel

...The Jewish people had waited long enough to resettle in the land of Israel where they were once able to enjoy a national existence. Many believed that by achieving this national existence once again, the Jewish people may be able to avoid any future calamities. It was the harsh living situation of the Jews in the many different host-countries that they inhabited that led to the development of the idea of Zionism. Zionism seeks to establish in Palestine, for such Jews as choose to go and remain there, and for their descendants, a legally secured home, where they may live together and lead a Jewish life, where they may expect ultimately to constitute a majority to the populations, and may look forward to what we should call home rule. The Zionists seek to establish this home in Palestine because they are convinced that the undying longing of Jews for Palestine is a fact of deepest significance; that it is a manifestation in the struggle for existence by an ancient people which has established its right to live, a people whose three thousand years of civilization has produced a faith, culture, and individuality which will enable it to contribute largely in the future, as it has in the past, to the advance of civilization; and hat it is not a right merely but a duty of the Jewish nationality to survive and develop. (Brandeis) Having a national existence by creating their home in Palestine would be extremely beneficial to the Jewish people. A national existence enables such...

Words: 2233 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Egyptian Sharia Law

...Egypt has been well known throughout history for major significant monuments, but in the 1900’s Egypt was under the control of the British. They had one major leader (Nasser) in Egypt who helped Egypt declare their independence from Britain conquest. Gamal Abdel Nasser, who formed and established the Arab Socialist Union (ASU), was the second President of Egypt serving from 1956 until his death. He planned the 1952 overthrow of the monarchy, and was deputy prime minister in the new government. While Nasser was controlling the state of Egypt it was still a secular state, leaving the minority religions under somewhat stable state under the constitution of Egypt. Nasser kept the state secular such as having an one-party system which prevented religious groups like the Muslim Brotherhood from an opportunity to voice their political views. This made the Arab Socialist Union the sole party in parliament under the Nasser era. After the death of Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1970, there was a huge shift once Anwar Sadat seized control as being the secretary of the former Prime Minister Nasser. Anwar Sadat drafted a new constitution, which included the principles of Sharia into the Egyptian constitution. The state changed from being a secular state to becoming a religious state. Anwar Sadat abolished certain views of Nasser, which he did not agree with. He abolished the one party rule, which gave an opportunity to Islamic groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood to influence their ideas politically...

Words: 4140 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Suez Canal

...Assignment #3 By Rajiv Ravishankar One month after Gamal Abdel Nasser (President of Egypt from June 23, 1956 – Sept 28, 1970) took presidency, he overlooked the nationalization of the Suez Canal by issuing Law No. 285 of 1956 (Nationalization of the Universal Company of the Suez Maritime Canal). The Suez Canal connects the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea, which in turn also provides access to the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea. The Suez Canal greatly shortens the travel distance between Africa and Asia. This made it extremely important for the export of goods, especially oil. France and Britain had invested a lot in the Suez Canal Company and when Nasser had wanted to take over control, they saw it as a threat against them by the Egyptian Regime. Nasser knew fully well that nationalizing the Suez Canal would cause a mighty disruption in the oil industry as the Suez Canal was and is the only connection between Asian and Africa that ships could access. Nationalization of the canal affected most of the oil exporting countries in the area. However, his assumption that Egypt was impervious to attack from Britain, France and Israel however was completely amiss. The UK, France and Israel had an agreement to overtake control of the canal back and prevent Nasser from expanding his territory over Sudan. Nasser’s ploy of using the Suez Canal as a power play shows his dominance and leadership ability. Moreover he used the abrupt retraction of funding for the Aswan...

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

History of Lebanon

...A good period to start our timeline with is the Ottoman Empire, 1516-1916. The major crime that the Ottoman Empire committed was ruling the region and assigning local leaders. They weakened the country by dividing Lebanon to sectarian divisions and appointing rulers accordingly. In addition, they intensify the tension between diversities. As a result, in Mount Lebanon, a massacre between the Maronites and the Druze occurred and indirectly evoked wars between these two religions in 1840 and 1860. The reign of the Ottoman Empire continued, to end with the end of the World War 1 in 1916 with the victory of the allies. In 1920, the allies placed Lebanon under the French wardship and expanded its geographical area by taking parts from Syria. The French mandate was not better; the Muslims in Lebanon felt oppressed from the Maronites and refused to do the state of Greater Lebanon and wanted to be part of Syria. On the other hand, Christians were trying to take advantage of the present situation. This caused tensions between these two religions. On September 1, 1920, General Gouraud proclaimed the establishment of State of Greater Lebanon with its present boundaries after splitting few Syrian villages on the southern and western borders with Lebanon. During this period, Lebanese didn’t stop trying hard to gain their independence. In 1943, Paris was obliged to grant Lebanon its independence by reason of Lebanese people’s yearning for autonomy supported by Winston Churchill’s government...

Words: 635 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

An Analysis Into the Rise of Arab Nationalism Following the Establishment of the State of Israel Post-1948 and Its Impacts

...An analysis into the rise of Arab Nationalism following the establishment of the State of Israel post-1948 and its impacts November, 2012 The main catalyst for the rise of Arab nationalism throughout the Arab world stemmed from the creation of the state of Israel in 1948. Israel's creation as the result of Zionist Jewish nationalism led to a counter-reaction in the peoples of Arab states - including Palestine - which was focused on removing Zionism from Arab lands and uniting Arabs to defeat Israel with the Palestinian cause being the central call of Arab nationalist intellectuals. By 1919 the Palestinian people had already established their identity as Arab, Palestinian, Syrians during the Paris Peace Conference as part of their process in developing their own nationalism. This longing for a more defined identity had increasingly become a matter of concern for Arab intellectuals especially after a growing Jewish community in Palestine and an absence of one formal representative of the people. Such occurrences led to a reaction and a will to reunite and regain the people’s dignity through the idea of Arab Nationalism. Examples of notable early nationalist thinkers include Sate’ al Husari, Michel Aflaq who were greatly influenced by prominent 19th century European thinkers. One of the earliest forms of Arab Nationalism was embodied in the Syrian Socialist National Party that was founded in 1932 by Antoun Saadeh, which started off by fighting French colonialism from...

Words: 1745 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Tuniso Revoliucija

...«IS IT AN ARAB SPRING OR BUSINESS AS USUAL? RECENT CHANGES IN THE ARAB WORLD IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT" By Michael B. Bishku* INTRODUCTION What began in Tunisia in December 2010 and continues most violently in Syria today has been labeled by observers of and experts on the Middle East as the "Arab Spring," but is that the correct term? (It should be noted that Lebanon engaged in the Cedar Revolution in 2005 - following the assassination of Sunni Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri by Hezbollah operativeswhich resulted in the withdrawal of Syrian froops after 30 years.) While Tunisia seems to be emulating Turkey as a historically secular country with mildly Islamist politicians exercising the greatest amount of influence in their country's respective foreign and domestic affairs, Egypt, the birthplace of the Muslim Brotherhood, appears to be at the center of a struggle between the Islamists and the military, which has dominated politics in that country since the early 1950s, while secularists and the minority Copts feel as if they have been sidelined. Majority Shi'a in Bahrain were quashed in their attempt to have a minority Sunni government recognize their rights, while Yemen's longtime leader was replaced by that country's vice president. Libya toppled an erratic dictator, but has no experience with representative government and like in Yemen the population possesses tribal identities. Syria is now engaged in a brutal civil war in which at least 20,000 people have lost their lives by the...

Words: 8450 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay

Islam - the World Power of the Future?

...the Turks stood at the gates of Vienna. The struggle to free Belgrade lasted almost 200 years; and it was only a short time before the First World War when the last Balkan countries were able to shake off the Islamic Turkish yoke. For 600 years Islam and Christianity have wrestled with each other in that area. Many Christians have forgotten that Syria and North Africa were once the heartland of the Christian world! But during the first Islamic invasions in the years AD 632 to 732 they were overrun and fell under Arab control. Muslim armies swept into Western Europe and stood no more than 200 kilometres south of Paris, and near Geneva, too. If Charles Martel had not stood firm we would likely all be Muslims today! Nietzsche, the atheist, ventured to say sarcastically, "The greatest mistake in world history was the defeat of the Arabs at Tours and Poitiers." The third great attack by Islam began on October 17, 1973, during the Yom Kippur War against Israel, when the Arab kings and sheikhs suddenly quadrupled the price of oil. Since then oil has become an expensive commodity. Its price is one of the main reasons for the economic crises that are currently shaking the world from east to west, to such an extent that some countries, especially in the Third World,...

Words: 5525 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Decent Into the Abyss: the Rise and Downfall of Libyan Tyrant Muammar Ghadafi

...INTRODUCTION All through the ages human societies have been plagued with tyranny and the abuse of power. Perhaps since the dawn of civilization and government, because long before democracy existed there were only absolute monarchies. People worked together to form the soundest methods of government. Eventually it would lead us to democracy. This cooperation is in our nature and a key factor that separates us from animals that rely solely on primal instinct. It is also human nature to yearn for absolute power and control. Suffice to say we are all greedy, prideful and envious of those above us in the social hierarchy (i.e. kings, presidents, and bosses). But once a member of the populace is exposed to this power over his fellow man, his senses and values have the potential to mutate and become tyrannical. Both male and females of any ethnic or cultural backgrounds are vulnerable to this anomaly and once affected are capable of inciting atrocities. Muammar Ghadafi was born into squalor to illiterate parents in a country dominated by European powers. He died in his palace at the hands of his own people. He gained and lost power during revolutions. The following documents Muammar Ghadafi’s decent into control, madness and the metaphorical abyss. EARLY LIFE Muammar al-Qaddafi was born in 1942 in the town of Surt , in western Libya . Raised in a Bedouin tent in the Libyan desert, he came from a tribal family called the al-Qadhafah. Both parents were nomadic Bedouin, and being...

Words: 3029 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Arab Spring by Ridhima

...Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafiwas the longest-serving leader in the Arab world. He ruled Libya after he took it over from King Idris I in 1969.Gaddafi was born on 7th June, 1942 in Qasr Abu Hadi located outside the town of Sirte in western Libya. He attended a Muslim elementary school in Sabha. During his schooling, he was profoundly influenced by major events in the Arab world especially the Arab nationalist movement. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser became his idol. Gaddafi joined the army in the 1960s as a supporter of Arab nationalism. In 1959, significant oil reserves were discovered in Libya. Revenue from petroleum exports moved Libya from being one of the poorest nations, to becoming a wealthy state. However, people began to resent the increased concentration of wealth in the hands of King Idris. This discontent grew with the rise of Nasserism and Arab nationalism throughout North Africa and the Middle East. In August 1969, King Idris was in Turkey for medical treatment. On September 1, 1969 a group of 70 junior Libyan military officers led by Muammar Gaddafi took the opportunity to stage a bloodless overthrow (coup d’état). The coup started in Benghazi, by members of Libyan Signal Corps. They placed the crown prince, Sayyid as-Sanussi under house arrest The coup leaders were referred to as the Free Officers’ Movement. They declared an end to monarchy in Libya and renamed the country the Libyan Arab Republic. The movement then evolved into the Revolutionary Command...

Words: 1848 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Andes Strindberg Journal

...In the U.S.-led “global war on terrorism,” al-Qa`ida and its militant affiliates have come to serve as both symbol and explanatory matrix for a range of disparate militant groups in the Middle East and beyond. Included among these are the Palestinian rejectionist factions and the Lebanese Hizballah, despite the fact that their roots, worldviews, and agendas are inimical to those of al-Qa`ida. This article argues that the scholarly and political effort to lump together diverse resistance groups into a homogenous “terrorist enemy,” ultimately symbolized by Osama Bin Laden, is part and parcel of neocolonial power politics whereby all “native” struggles against established power structures are placed beyond reason and dialogue. The authors contend that while the Palestinian rejectionist factions and the Lebanese Hizballah may be understood as local representations of the anticolonial “third worldist” movement, al-Qa`ida and its affiliates operate within a “neo–third worldist” framework, a dichotomy that entails tactical and strategic differences, both political and military. The article draws on an extensive series of author interviews with leaders and cadres from Hizballah and the Palestinian factions. In response to al-Qa`ida’s 11 September 2001 attacks, the United States declared war not merely against those who had set upon it, but against an open-ended range of “terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them.”1 Within two weeks of the attacks, U.S. President George...

Words: 9034 - Pages: 37

Free Essay

Social Meida

...the United Nations, its states that, “Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people” (UN, 1948). Articles 19 to 21 specifically target the freedom of thought, conscience and belief of human rights that a Democratic government must abide by and Egypt is no exception. Arab Spring Turmoil has been brewing in Egypt, causing great pain to its inhabitants, destroying homes and families and creating complete mayhem in the process. The first marked incident according to The Guardian is on the 1st of January 2011; a suicide bombing attempt took place outside a Coptic Church in Alexandria. By the 25th of January Egypt finally joined the Arab Spring alongside Tunisia, Yemen and Algeria. The ‘Arab Spring’ was an activist movement by several Middle-Eastern countries in an attempt at freedom from political and religious oppression and authoritarian governments. A major role in political and social affairs, which had been in play over the years, is media. From the traditional forms such as newspapers and radio to the modern day social platforms, it is very clear how influential such resources are and how influential controlling them can get an entity. It can be said that almost all the countries that took part In the Spring had...

Words: 6419 - Pages: 26