Premium Essay

Nike vs Underarmour Innovation Strategy Analysis

In:

Submitted By eugeneem
Words 2728
Pages 11
Table of Contents Introduction 3 Nike, Inc. 3 Under Armour 4 Porter’s five forces analysis 5 Nike, Inc. and Under Armour innovation strategies comparison 7 Conclusion 9 References 10

Introduction
Nowadays, more and more people become concerned about health; they develop special diet that include vitamins and advanced nutrition supplements, and of course they do sports. Any kind of sports demand at least basic sports outfit: a T-shirt, shorts or pants, and a pair of shoes. Industry of sports apparel and footwear is an important part of today’s global business, where big companies have to compete for a customer. It is rather hard to differentiate on this market, because all the goods have to fulfill only one goal: make a person feel comfortable during a workout. Thus, companies have to work harder to develop new innovative products to gain market share advantage. The market of sports apparel is now dominated by several big companies: Nike, Inc., Adidas group (which includes Adidas and Reebok), and Puma. But there is also a new fast-growing and very promising player - Under Armour that managed to enter this saturated market. The key success factor for Under Armour was their innovative approach in creating sports apparel. Observing Under Armour’s success Nike has reconsidered their strategy and made innovation the core part of their mission, and in 2013 Nike was announced a #1 innovative company by fastcompany.com. So now there are two key innovators on the market of sports goods: big and powerful Nike and scientifically advanced fast growing Under Armour. This paper represents the comparative analysis of innovation approaches of Nike and Under Armour.
Nike, Inc.
Nike, Inc. is an American multinational company that designs, develops, and markets sports apparel, footwear, and sports equipment worldwide. The company was founded by Bill Bowerman and

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Underarmour

...Opportunity UnderArmour Timothy S. Shreck Averett University UnderArmour vs Competitors Comparison Nike has a very clear cut business strategy and specific goals it wants to accomplish. Innovation is at the heart of Nike’s business growth strategy. Nike uses this innovation in order to become a more sustainable company, which is the second key aspect of its business strategy. We live in a world where natural and human resources are constrained and Nike realizes that this could greatly affect its business. The cost of competition for resources will increase as these resources become increasingly scarce. Coupled with emerging trends, such as customization, a push to be closer to multiple markets, and shifting labor markets, Nike sees a new opportunity to create business growth for the future. A big aspect of Under Amour’s growth strategy is expanding abroad, which also ties into how they plan to manage competition. Under Armour has established a solid position in the United States and Europe is a big opportunity to continue expanding. By expanding in Europe, Under Armour hopes to try and gain some market share from Nike, who is their largest competitor. Under Armour may need to adjust its messaging for Europeans, who are less impacted by its traditional football and baseball based marketing. Nike has a slight advantage because it is coming at Europe from a running and basketball perspective, which are much more international sports. Both Nike and Under Armour...

Words: 1452 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Under Armour Case

...Saiful Chowdhury 9/27/2015 Global Operations and Policy Under Armour’s Strategy in 2014 1. Describe the major components of the company’s strategy in the following areas: a. Product Line - Under Armour’s product line consists of apparel, footwear, accessories, and licensing. Under the apparel section, the company designed three lines of apparel gear: HeatGear, ColdGear, and AllSeasonGear. HeatGear was designed to be worn under equipment in warm to hot temperatures. It was engineered to make the body stay cool, dry and light. To satisfy all consumers, Under Armour offered their HeatGear in a variety of tops and bottoms as well as in a variety of colors. To satisfy those consumers who participate in sports or recreational activity in cold weather, Under Armour designed ColdGear. ColdGear provided warmth and dryness to the body while wicking away moisture. ColdGear could be worn under a uniform or jersey, and it could also be worn as an outerwear. Lastly, Under Armour designed the AllSeasonGear for those who play in changing temperatures. AllSeasonGear kept the wearer cool and dry in warmer temperature while keeping them warm in colder temperature. In 2006, Under Armour began marketing footwear products to men, women, and youth. They offered footwear for sports such as football, basketball, soccer, lacrosse, softball, and many more. Their footwear was designed to provide cushion, stabilization, comfort, control, and moisture management. In 2013, Under...

Words: 2132 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Value Creation

...“We are one team” – H&M Executive Summary Sitting on top as the 3rd largest fast fashion producer in the world, H&M has enjoyed a spectacular 10% growth in the last five years. With its 600 million garments produced every year, H&M is a large player in the race to becoming a sustainable fashion house. After embracing sustainability at large in the last decade, H&M has made significant changes internally towards adopting and embedding sustainability into all their operations and value chain – but it’s still a work in progress. H&M’s CSR initiatives have a strong track record and involve various stages and stakeholders of its value chain, including their design team, suppliers of raw materials and fibers, as well as customers. Some of these renowned initiatives include the Better Cotton Initiative, the Conscious Collection, the Fashion Against AIDS collection and the Garment Collecting Initiative to name a few. All which have in common the involvement of different stakeholders, from suppliers to customers and designers. In this context, our challenge was to find what more can H&M do? Where and how should value be created, and which opportunity would create the most value for H&M and its stakeholder, all while increasing the company’s triple bottom line. The company’s core values, its strong customer focus and its business vision to provide customers with “fashion and quality at the best price in a sustainable way”, has driven many of H&M’s...

Words: 10942 - Pages: 44