...Questions 1. Taking into account information above, what type of organizational structure does the company belong? Why? Please explain. Mechanistic vs Organic Grand Candy is an Organic company as there are few rules. There is also an informal communication. 2. What type of organizational design will better suit to this firm? a) Simple b) functional c) divisional d) team structure The organization use team structure design both in stores and factory. A team consists of professionals with various skills. According to company's CEO (chief executive officer Hovhannes Aidinyan) if one member of a team should be fired all team members should give an agreement. 3. What type of departmentalization does the company use in the factory? a) functional b) customer c)process d)product In the contrary of stores and cafes the factory creates teams using a product departmentalization. It is necessary as and most suitable way of departmentalization as company produces more than 400 products. Questions 1. Taking into account information above,what type of organizational structure does the company belong? Why? Please explain. Mechanistic vs Organic MTS uses mechanistic organizational structure. First of all it is very big for being organic. Which is characteristic for mechanistic organizations, it has many rules, formulized communication channels in order to manage behavior and performance of huge amount of employees. According to changes given above,...
Words: 481 - Pages: 2
...and Discuss Mechanistic vs. Organic Structures Vance Conyers Organizational Theory 360A 28 September 2012 Organization structure is “The formal system of task and authority relationships that control how people coordinate their actions and use resources to achieve goals”. (Jones 8) The structure that an organization forms can determine its ultimate success of failure. It sets the foundation for how the organization will function, make decisions, and respond to change. The two types of structures an organization can use are mechanic and organic. Mechanistic and organic structures both have advantages and disadvantages, and neither one is a perfect solution. Depending on the product, tasks to create the product, and people to create the product, make the decision very challenging. In most cases, elements of both types are implemented to ensure a successful business. The executive management is responsible for formulating the right mix in order to achieve success. They use organizational design to process information to select the best options. Every aspect of this decision will play out from how much power middle managers have, to the scope of responsibility direct supervisors encompass. The type of organization directly affects the culture and moral of employees. Implementation of the wrong type or mix of structure can cause mismanagement of resources (both human and physical), a toxic culture, and ultimately a failed institution. The mechanistic structure thrives in a...
Words: 3496 - Pages: 14
...Design and Structure The target of our presentation will be to comply with the main objectives listed on the first page of chapter 16 from the course’s recommended book, regarding “Organizational Design and Structure”. Consequently, our goals are to be able to properly explain the following topics: I. The relationship between organizational design and an organization's structure. II. The main contingencies that affect the process of organizational design and the differentiation between mechanistic and organic structures. III. The pros and cons of the main forms of organizational structures from which any organization can choose. IV. Why coordination and communication becomes a more present problem with the growth of the organizations and provide tools to overcome this situation. V. The impact IT has had on organizational design and structure. In order to achieve the above mentioned objectives, our strategy is to schematically explain every concept, illustrating them with contrasting, fresh and real examples. The topics to be treated are to be presented in the following order: A. Introduction. A.1 What is Organizational Structure? A.2 What is Organizational Design? A.3 Brief reference to contingency theory’s concept and its approach on organizational design and structure. A.3.1 Contingencies affecting Organizational Design: A.3.1.1 Environment. A.3.1.2 Technology. A.3.1.3 Human Resources. A.3.1.4 Organic and Mechanistic structures...
Words: 355 - Pages: 2
...Explain the contingency viewpoint. Give an example from your own work experience. Then, using concepts from Chapter 8, discuss how a contingency viewpoint might impact the organization as a whole. Use supporting references. The contingency viewpoint is a point of view where a manager, or a supervisor, has to take an approach to a situation that is contingent upon the individual or the environment (Kinicki, 2016, p. 252). When taking this approach, you as a manager must ask the question: “What method is the best to use under these circumstances?” (Kinicki, 2016, p. 252). In my experience, work and life in general, I always use this viewpoint. I think to that my background in psychology somewhat forces me to use this viewpoint. My psychology background forces me to use this viewpoint because it has given me a deeper understanding into how different every person is. So I know that each person is going to respond to things differently, and that must be taken into consideration when managing people. When I am faced with a situation and I have to make a decision, I almost always take into consideration the individual and the environment. A common one is with my toddler and why she might be acting a certain way when we are somewhere. Maybe we are in a new place and she is scared and starts crying, how do I handle the situation? I have to take into account the individual (my toddler) and the environment (the mall). To get handle on the circumstances, or the situation, I would talk...
Words: 524 - Pages: 3
... 5th May. 11 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION: 3 PART 1: - SELF ASSESSMENT USING SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISES 3 IPIP Introversion-Extroversion Scale 3 The scales of money attitudes 4 TWO “TEAM PROCESSES” SELF-ASSESSMENTS 4 Team Roles Preference Scale 4 Team Player Inventory 5 TWO “ORGANISATIONAL PROCESSES” SELF-ASSESSMENTS 5 Tolerance of Change Scale 5 EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE 6 Emotional Empathy Scale 6 PART 2: - OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURE 6 Job Satisfaction and Performance Practices 6 Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation 6 Zest in the Workplace 7 Prima Donnas” in the Workplace 8 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 8 Mechanistic vs. Organic Structures 8 Tolerance to Change 9 PART 3: - APPLICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS 9 Organisational Structure and Tolerance to Change 10 CONCLUSION 10 REFERENCES: 11 INTRODUCTION The point of this report is to develop some insights into self-assessment tools as a technique for self-evaluation and improvement, as part of continual improvement and professional learning. In addition, through use of the self-assessment tools, areas of interest can be explored with regards to my own self-awareness and self-evaluation, but firstly it will define what emotional intelligence is. Emotional Intelligence is defined as “a set of abilities to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in oneself and others”...
Words: 2924 - Pages: 12
...AMBA 610 Question 1 Week 4 University of Maryland University College 1. What are the differences in the design models? Compare and contrast the standard airline organizational functional structure model with the hybrid structure based on independent business units Functional Structure: • All functions report directly to a CEO (centralized authority) • People with the same set of skills are group together (individual specialization) • Characterized by horizontal differentiation • Peers in the same function can supervise each other (as per Jones, chapter 15) • Likely to develop norms to increase effectiveness and develop core competencies, and to use standards as a measure of productiveness. • As business becomes more differentiated, the functional model can develop problems with effective communication, measurements, locations, new customer groups, and strategic problems. Hybrid/Business Unit Structure: • Each “unit” reports to a manager, who is then responsible to the corporate center and CEO (decentralized authority) • People are grouped into “functions” according to market/customer demands, and work to achieve goals together (joint specialization) • Characterized by an increase in both vertical AND horizontal differentiation from the functional model. (vertical is 3 levels instead of 2, horizontal is 12 functional groups instead of 9) • Tasks are coordinated through mutual adjustment, with the different business units working together to increase efficiency...
Words: 466 - Pages: 2
...Organizational Structure and Roles | “All the world's a stage And all the men and women are merely players They have their exits and their entrances And one man in his time plays many parts” – by William Shakespeare | | | | | 06-May-12 | Contents Title 3 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 3 Roles 3 Attitudes and relationship of Attitudes with Roles 3 Organizational Structures 3 Organizational Structures Effect on Roles and Attitudes 3 Mechanistic Structure 3 Organic Structure 3 Moderate Mechanistic and Organic Structure 3 Phases of innovation, Mechanic versus Organics 3 Case study, Sunshine Real Estate 3 Sunshine Real Estate organizational design 3 Sunshine Real Estate organizational culture 3 Implications of Sunshine Real Estate’s three structural properties on employee role perception and attitudes 3 Work Specialization 3 Centralization 3 Formalization 3 Conclusion 3 References 3 APPENDIX 3 A: Organizational Structure Elements and Types of Structures 3 B:Elements Associated with Roles and Attitudes 3 C: Survey Analysis 3 Title The project attempts to explore the relationship between organizational structure, roles and attitudes under distinct corporate structural conditions. Executive Summary Organizational design in a sense is similar to the structure of bones in human body. It is a skeleton or framework upon which organizations are built and maintained. Organizations in creating organizational designs...
Words: 8879 - Pages: 36
...several sections. Table 15-1 Elements of Organizational Structure 15.2 What are the major elements of an organizational structure? WORK SPECIALIZATION. Work specialization is the way in which tasks in an organization are divided into separate jobs. In some organizations, this categorization is referred to as a company’s division of labor. How many tasks does any one employee perform? To some degree, work specialization is a never-ending trade-off among productivity, flexibility, and worker motivation. Take an assembly line worker at Ford as an example. Henry Ford was perhaps the earliest (and clearly most well-known) believer in high degrees of work specialization. He divided tasks among his manufacturing employees to such a degree that each employee might only perform one single task, over and over again, all day long. Having only one task to perform allowed those employees to be extremely productive at doing that one thing. It also meant that training new workers was much easier when replacements were needed. However, there are trade-offs when organizations make jobs highly specialized. Highly specialized jobs can cause organizations to lose the ability associated with employees who can be flexible in what they do. By spending all their time performing specialized tasks well, employees fail to update or practice other skills. Accounting majors, for example, might specialize in taxes or auditing. Some larger companies might hire these graduates for their ability to do...
Words: 5802 - Pages: 24
.............................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 History of the Company ......................................................................................................... 4 Turning Point ...................................................................................................................... 4 Structure of the Company ...................................................................................................... 6 Functional Structure ........................................................................................................... 6 New Organisational Structure............................................................................................. 7 Structure and Performance: Correlation ................................................................................ 9 Oticon’s Organic Structure.................................................................................................. 9 Business Contingencies .................................................................................................... 10 Results ................................................................................................................................. 12 Problems in the Long-Term and Limiting Risks ..................................................................... 12...
Words: 2184 - Pages: 9
...Analysis5 Force Field Analysis6 Concept Fan8 Recommendations9 Process Based Structure9 Integrated Strategic Process11 High Involvement Organization12 Knowledge Management System14 Conclusion15 Appendix16 References22 Executive Summary Australia’s biggest hardware chain, Templeton Hardware acquired two reputable businesses in caravan and landscape but what they did not expect was a shortage in sales. Using the old strategy for their new business had an adverse effect. Other factors like structure and human resource practices also contributed to the negative results. The 3 diagnostic tools; SWOT, Force Field Analysis and Concept Fan are used to identify primary and secondary problems in Templeton case study. Primary problem in this case would be poor structure. Secondary problems are the lack of product knowledge, high employee turnover and poor business strategies. In view of the poor structural issue, we will recommend Templeton to adopt the process-based structure to adapt to environmental changes, thus increasing the current customer's satisfaction and enhance employees’ involvement. By using the Integrated Strategic Change model, it will allow the management to have a clearer view of implementing the...
Words: 3978 - Pages: 16
...Why have Marxist’s predicted that the state would wither away? * ‘Withering away of state’ – term coined by Engels, definition: Disappearance of the state as a political instrument of class rule due, due to the disappearance of social classes. * 1st reason: * ‘State’ is part of Superstructure– rooted from Marx’ theory of Historical Materialism (Superstructure vs Infrastructure) – Is part of the superstructure. * Therefore it reflects the class structure of the economic system – In capitalism, the state is the political guardian of the bourgeois society, the political agent of the economic ruling class = the instrument of class rule. * It will use both coercion and economic consensus to protect status quo, regardless of which party is in power. * 2nd Reason * State is Reformist: According to Marx, the most reformist parties (Labour) are most successful in protecting capitalism. (Hailsham Quote: ‘if you do not give the people reform…. revolution’) * Marxists reject the Parliamentary road to socialism - Revolution is true ‘people power’. State advocates to reform and therefore withering away of state expected in order to establish full communism. * Reforms can only alleviate the worst aspects of capitalism – they cannot, by definition, remove the exploitative roots of class conflict which will ultimately bring about the complete overthrow of capitalism. Therefore state loses its reason for existence and in order to...
Words: 820 - Pages: 4
...in strategic analysis & formulation process from the start. * Managers who implement are usually too busy with everyday running of operations to become involved in planning process or may be excluded. * Failing the 3Cs of communication, commitment & coordination * Poor communication & lack of commitment & inability to manage change effectively. Poor or vague strategy. Lack of buy-in & ownership from key manager & employees. * Lack of coordination or alignment between an organisation’s strategy & its functional units, processes & systems. * Lack of a model, inadequate information sharing, unclear lines of responsibility & accountability, unsupportive power structure. * Paralysis by analysis * Too much focus on analysis & formulation, relaxing on way resources are allocated & way in which operational decisions are made. Leaders trained to formulate not implement. * Important not to combine financial & budgetary processes with strategic intent & direction. * Risk that strategic planning will stifle creativity & innovation. * Politics & resistance * Political pressures pose a threat. Once strategy documented it’s more accessible to rivals. * 2 forces. Rational (explicit)– openness, communication,...
Words: 2269 - Pages: 10
...Organizational Behavior (OB) is the study and application of knowledge about how people, individuals, and groups act in organizations. It does this by taking a system approach. That is, it interprets people-organization relationships in terms of the whole person, whole group, whole organization, and whole social system. Its purpose is to build better relationships by achieving human objectives, organizational objectives, and social objectives. As you can see from the definition above, organizational behavior encompasses a wide range of topics, such as human behavior, change, leadership, teams, etc. Success isn’t a destination it’s a process. And the margin between successes is often small. Ob is all about studying the principles of defining nd achieving success in your organization and life. Impact of ob Organizational behavior is an aspect of doing business within large companies that many executives have overlooked. This organizational behavior impacts every nook and cranny of a company. Thinking about the organizational behavior and how people act within a company can foster new ways of managing people that can have longer-term impacts on profitability. For example, unionized work forces may have a more negative environment then non-union work environments due to the natural adversarial relationships between company management and union officials. In unionized environments many employees may feel as though their supervisor is abusing them and therefore they regulate...
Words: 2768 - Pages: 12
...Management and Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA Abstract This paper reviews the literature on the social impacts of programmable manufacturing technology (PMT). Several perspectives on the social impact of technology are identified ranging from simple additive models that view technology as having a set of individual and independent causal impacts to a contingency perspective which views the impact of technology as dependent on technical and organizational characteristics. The paper statistically summarizes 30 empirical studies within the 1986-1990 period and finds common trends in findings as well as contradictory evidence. The common trends are that PMT tends to lead to more organic organizations, but also meets with negative employee attitudes, stress, and perceptions of reduced job security and mobility. The contradictory evidence is that most studies report simple, additive effects, while a substantial portion find that the impacts depend on a wide range of contingency variables. The authors argue that simplistic views of PMT as being a homogeneous set of technologies with unidirectional, non-contingent social impacts is neither realistic nor useful. A number of future research directions in this area are suggested. Keywords. Social impacts of technology; Programmable ing; Sociotechnical systems; Organizational design automation; CAD/CAM; Manufactur- 1. Introduction The microelectronics revolution in manufacturing...
Words: 14431 - Pages: 58
...Organizational Structure & Culture Organizational Structure What is Organizational Structure? Defines how job tasks are formally – Divided – Grouped – Coordinated Six key elements – – – – – – Work specialization Departmentalization Chain of command Span of control Centralization & decentralization Formalization Controls, coordinates & motivates employees Work Specialization Degree to which tasks in organization are subdivided into separate jobs Efficiency gains – Payment related to skill-level required skill– Increase in performance in specific task – Encouraging creation of special inventions Efficiency losses – – – – – Boredom Fatigues Stress Poor quality High absenteeism & turnover Productivity specialization Departmentalization The basis by which jobs are grouped together Possible ways – By functions performed E.g., engineering, accounting, personnel…. – By type of product E.g., fuel, waxes, chemicals – On basis of geography E.g., western, southern, midwestern, eastern… – On basis of process E.g., Casting, press, tubing, finishing, inspect, pack, ship…. – By type of customer E.g., Service retail, wholesale, government customers Large companies might combine the forms! The Chain of Command & Span of Control Chain of command – Line of authority from top of the organization to lowest part – Specifies who reports to whom – Each managerial position is given its place & degree of authority – Unity of command principle...
Words: 1932 - Pages: 8
