Free Essay

Parliament

In:

Submitted By
Words 2558
Pages 11
Parliament:
Parliament:

Parliament = the legislature. It is main way in which citizens are represented. It controls the power of the government, forcing it to be accountable. Above all, Parliament exists to grant formal consent to legislation even though it is dominated by the government.
Features of a Parliamentary Government: * Parliament is the highest source of political authority – political power has to be authorised by Parliament * Government has to be drawn from Parliament * No strict separation of powers between legislative and executive – fusion of powers * Government must be accountable to Parliament
Features of a Presidential Government: * Legislature and executive have separate sources of power – separately elected * President is not part of the legislature * The President (and therefore executive) is accountable directly to the people, not the legislature * Clear separation of powers between executive and legislature – there is therefore codified constitutional arrangements that separates those powers
What is parliamentary sovereignty? * Parliament in the UK is legally sovereign * It is the source of all political power * It may restore to itself any powers that have been delegated to others * It may make any laws it wishes and they shall be enforced by the courts and any other authorities * It is not bound by its predecessors – laws passed by parliaments in the past are not binding on the current parliament – neither can it bind its successors * In reference to political sovereignty, Parliament has lost much of its sovereignty * Parliament in the UK is legally sovereign, but the political sovereignty is less clearly located (it lies with the people at elections, with the government between elections)
The erosion of Parliamentary sovereign: * Legislative power has been moved to the EU – European law is superior to British law * EU law prevails * Parliament cannot pass any law that conflicts with EU law * Executive power has grown considerably in recent decades – there has been a transfer of political not legal sovereignty * Increasing the use of referendums means that sovereignty lies with the people – Parliament would not ignore the popular will of the people. However, results are not technically binding * ECHR is not binding but they do treat it as higher authority * Devolution has taken power away from Westminster Parliament

The three main parts of Parliament: House of Commons | House of Lords | The Monarch | * All Mps elected by the citizens in the General Election – each MP represents their own constituency | * All of the peers * Nominated experts in their field * PM has a large say in who becomes a peer | * King/Queen at the time * Less power now, but still have the final sign-off and on peerages |

* Basic structure: * HoC = lower house * HoL = upper house * Queen-in-Parliament = ceremonial role

* The different roles: Shared functions | House of Commons only | House of Lords only | * Granting formal consent to legislation * Calling government to account * Scrutinising proposed legislation and amending it where necessary * Debating key issues * Representing the interests of different sections of society | * Granting popular consent to proposed legislation * Refusing to approve items of legislation which are undesirable * Representing the interests of constituencies * Bringing attention to the grievances of individual constituents | * Deliberating at length on important issues * Providing specialist expert advice on proposed legislation * Delaying legislation, forcing government to reconsider |

* Composition and structure of the House of Commons: * 650 MPs * Frontbench MPs – prominent members of the political parties who tend to sit on the benches in the centre of the chamber: made up of ministers of the government and leading members of the other parties * Backbench MPs – all the other MPs who do not have a ministerial position post and/or who are not senior members of their party * The Speaker – elected by all MPs and must become politically neutral: keeps order and organises the business of the House in conjunction with the party leaderships. The speaker is also concerned with the conduct of MPs and may discipline them * Legislative committees – examine proposed laws and put forward amendments * Department select committees – permanent check for efficiency of government departments * Public Accounts Committee – examines government finances * Whip offices – respected MPs who’s role is to inform MPs who’s role is to inform MPs about the business of the house, ensure MPs turn up when required

* Composition and structure of the House of Lords: * Life Peers * Hereditary Peers * 25 Bishops/Archbishops from Church of England * Socially Homogeneous

* Committees: Committee | Roles | Strengths | Weaknesses | House of Commons departmental select committees | * Investigate the work of government for efficiency and effectiveness * Consider major departmental policies * Consider proposed legislation * Investigate matters of public concern * Investigate errors made | * Act largely independently of party control * Have the power to call ministers, civil servants and outsiders as witnesses to their hearings * Given time for extensive questioning and investigation * Respected by policy makers | * Have relatively little research back-up * Have no ability to enforce their recommendations * Sometimes put under pressure by party whips to take a particular view – not always independent | House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) | * Checks that public spending has been used for its intended purpose * Investigate financial arrangements of the government * Search for any corruption | * Always act independently * By tradition, the chair is a member of the opposition * Has full access to details of government financial arrangements * Highly respected by policy makers | * Cannot enforce its recommendations | House of Commons Legislative Committees | * Examine proposed laws * Put forward amendments which may improve legislation | * Have the opportunity to examine legislation in detail | * Nearly always divide on party lines – not independent * Lack expertise and research back-up * If they take too much time, the government can curtail their debates * Their decisions may be overturned by the whole House |
Legislative Committees: * Formed for each proposed piece of legislation * Contain between 15-40 backbenchers * Examine proposed laws and to put forward amendments (need approval of whole HoC)
Departmental Committees: * 19 such committees (e.g. – Health and Home Affairs) * Members are elected, but expected to behave in a non-partisan way * Reports carry significant weight * Have considerable powers, such as calling for ministers/civil servants/external witnesses/official papers in their investigations * E.g. – March 2010. Environment and Rural affairs committee released a report of ‘Waste strategy for England’
Functions of Parliament: * Scrutiny: * Involves close inspection, and where necessary, amendments may be proposed * Detailed scrutiny carried out by standing committees of both Houses * Ensures various interests are represented * Doesn’t normally involve blocking legislation but important changes can be proposed and accepted * Can also scrutinise ministers decisions
(e.g – Home Affairs Committee – Detention of terrorist suspects report 2006: rejected government case for up to 90-day detention without trial for terrorist suspects: suggested 28 days maximum – recommendation accepted by whole House of Commons) * Reserve Powers: * Two powers that it rarely uses: 1. Veto government legislation (e.g. – 1986 second reading deficit of Sunday trading bill due to religious opposition and workers rights) 2. Dismiss government (e.g. - 1979 Callaghan’s Labour Government dismissed in a vote of no confidence) * Legitimation: * For any law or executive action to be implemented and respected, it requires parliamentary sanction * This effectively grants popular consent and makes legislation legitimate * Opposition: * Only applies to parties * Traditional power * Hold government to account but do not overturn decisions (e.g. – gay marriage) * Ensures government are working effectively * Accountability: Individual ministerial responsibility | Questions to ministers | Debates | Select committees | * Ministers responsible for all activities including themselves(e.g. – David Blunkett resigned due to trying to get his partners nanny’s visa fast tracked) * Serious mistakes means that MPs have to resign | * Every minister to appear in House regularly * Questioned * Make an impact * PMQ – used to be to hold PM accountable, now just contest between party leaders(e.g. – 2010 Mike O’Brien – free health care for athletes?) | * 2 times debate * Ministers must justify legislation * Bad to lose votes on bill * ALL MPs can pose questions on bills * Pressure groups also het a say through MPs(e.g. – Tom Brake S.O.S!) | * Committees can question legislation, finance and departments * Bring in outside speakers from organisations * No time limit on questions * MPs can develop specific knowledge to be on specific committees * E.g. – Defence Select Committee from 2010 – criticised Afghanistan war | * Deliberation: * Parliament can debate on vital issues * Make critical decisions affecting the future of the country
(e.g. – HoL: holding terrorists without trial) * Representation: * Parliament represents constituencies: bring up key issues from electorate – represent party and manifesto
(e.g. – 2006-2007 MPs showed dislike for plans to build casinos in their constituency) * Redress of grievances: * Varies from MP to MP – from their constituents * Private members legislation: * Present their own private legislation if they win from ballot * Nearly always blocked
(e.g. – David Steele’s Abortion Act of 1967 – legalised abortion for the first time) * Financial control: * One of the weakest functions but one of the oldest * Government need to gain taxes to carry out functions – need to be renewed every year * Do have PAC that focuses on spending – some reports can cause government policy changes
Evaluation of the domination of the legislature by executive government: Advantages of this: | Disadvantages of this: | * Government is rarely removed from office prematurely * Governments are generally able to carry out virtually all their manifesto | * Governments can become dictorial – legislation may not be properly scrutinised * Have been times where the government has lost the confidence of the public, but can still survive if the whips can maintain control |

Why is the government able to dominate parliament? * Party loyalty – ensures that MPs support legislation * Voting system – FPTP ensures an absolute majority in the House of Commons (e.g. – 2005: Labour’s 3% lead over Conservatives translated into a majority of more than 60 seats) * Party whips – keep party members in support of government policies (sanctions in place) * Prime Ministerial patronage – posts demand loyalty from aspiring MPs who want to be in ministerial office, so rarely defy the government * Threat of dissolution of Parliament – HOWEVER, fixed-term parliament has effectively removed this threat * House of Lords will nearly always have to bow to the authority of government – can only delay legislation

How effective is Parliament in controlling the executive? Does control executive power | Doesn’t control executive power | * Select committees can act independently and scrutinise departments effectivelyFor example: * Defence Select Committee from 2010 criticised war in Afghanistan and urged future governments to learn the lessons of Iraq, and in particular, plan for post-war peace, as well as the war itself | * HoL – lacks democratic legitimacy and some of the other weaknesses of the commons. The Lords will nearly always have to bow down to the authority of government and even through the Parliament Act of 1949, even if the Lords reject legislation up to 3 times, it can still become law if the commons pass it in the next session | * Parliament does ultimately have a veto on legislation and has used it in the past For example: * 2006 – HoC rejected government plans to increase the period of time that terrorist suspects could be imprisoned for without trial for up to 90 days | * Collective responsibility inhibits Parliaments’ ability to call government to account – must all take public responsibility for all policies of the government, even if they disagree privately or had nothing to do with the formulation of policy. If a minister disagrees with government policy they are expected to resign or face rapid dismissal. This restricts the flexibility of parliament to defy the government and control the executive powers | * Parliament can dismiss a government through a vote of no confidenceFor example: * 1979 Callaghan’s Labour government was dismissed through a vote of no confidence of the HoC | * Government usually has overall majority – means that it is very rare for government legislation not to go through and leaves a minority of opposition for which cannot control the executive effectively | * Under circumstances such as government majority or no majority, effectiveness of parliament may be increased | * Power of Prime minister patronage is strong – means that MPs have to remain loyal to their party if they aspire to hold a ministerial post in the future | * HoL has been effective in amending and delaying legislationFor example: * In 2000, the Lords rejected Clause 28 of the Education Act twice. It was eventually passed in the Local Government Act 2003 | * Party loyalty is strong and so will support legislation that the executive propose – it is rare for members to vote against their party | | * Whips have great influence and so rarely defy government in fear of sanctions |

Is parliament representative? YES | NO | * Elected – therefore received consent | * Not socially representative | * MPs contact external groups and constituents | * FPTP (plurality system), can result in tactical voting – not what the people truly want | * Involvement in committees allows MPs to make legislation fairly representative | * Party whips push MPs to vote in party lines, instead of the good for constituents | * Pressure groups can help representative nature of Parliament | * Wealthy/insider groups have more influence | * MPs can join pressure groups | * Small parties are under-represented |
Evaluation of Parliament: REPRESENTATION | CALLING GOVERNMENT TO ACCOUNT | * Each MP represents a constituency and its constituents * Free and fair elections | * Not socially representative * Party loyalty to the party line rather than national/group interests | * PMQs * Select committees are extremely active and independent – examine legislation closely and can be very critical | * PMQs have become a media sideshow with little relevance to real policy examination * Many MPs are reluctant to be critical of their own party | | | | | DELIBERATION | SCRUTINY | * HoL can extensively deliberate * HoL members have expertise and knowledge * Debates help to keep government accountable | * Little time to debate in HoC * Government controls most of timetable – possible to avoid and cut short debates which might embarrass it | * Departmental select committees have proved to be effective in scrutinising the government | * Don’t have to implement the amendments * Little time for scrutiny | LEGISLATING | CHECKING GOVERNMENT POWER | * Key role of the HoC is to make legislation legitimate through consent * HoC can block legislation which is against the public interest | * Procedures of Parliament in respect of passing legislation are ancient and considered to be inefficient and ritualised | * Consent to legislation * Can veto legislation * Can pass vote of no confidence | * Party loyalty and discipline means that many MPs are reluctant to challenge government * Government rarely loses a major vote in the commons |

Agencies supporting Parliament: * The Parliamentary ombudsman: * An extensive office staffed by experienced officials * Investigate complaints that are routed through MPs from constituents – where government departments are accused of not dealing fairly of thoroughly enough with a member of the public * Receive around 2,000 complaints a year * Where a claim is upheld, the ombudsman makes a report to a select committee that deals with their work – may order that compensatory action be taken by the department concerned * The Comptroller and auditor general: * Works directly for the PAC * Two functions: 1. Ensure government revenues are spent on parliament approved purposes 2. Checks the government accounts to check for careful and effective spenditure * Can summon ministers/civil servants if major criticisms are reported to PAC

* Audit Commission: * Investigates the operations of local government to check for effectiveness on basis of best value * Reports are used by central government to control the activities of local government and Parliament may use them to monitor quality of services at local level * National Audit Office: * Checks for efficiency, guards against wastefulness and ensures that services serve the public effectively * Looks especially at ‘front-line’ services, such as the NHS * Its reports are often highly critical and are used by government to improve its performance, and by select committees as a basis for their own investigations

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Parliament Notes

...govern if it retains the confidence of the House of Commons. * It the executive loses the vote of confidence, it has no option but to resign and hence provoking a general elections. * Given that there are two Houses of Parliament, the system is called Bicameral. Composition, Role and Powers of the House of Lords: * It compromises of four types of Lords. * The vast majority is Life Peers, where they have been appointed to the House of Lords by the Prime Minister on his own recommendations and that of other party leaders. * While a smaller number of People’ Peers have been appointed by the House of Lords Appointments Commission. * There are 92 Hereditary Peers. * There is Lords Spiritual, the 26 Bishops of the Church of England. * However they are not elected and therefore does not enjoy democratic legitimacy the powers of the Lords are inferior to those of House of Commons. * This means all they can do to proposed legislation that they disapprove of its delay it for one year. * But they cannot do this to the budget. * According to the Salisbury Convention, they will not oppose proposals that were in the manifesto that the governing party was elected upon. * However they play an important role in parliament: The Lords have a wealth of experience the amendments that they suggest to bills can be taken very seriously by the government. Especially because these amendments are generally made without an obvious party political bias. Lords...

Words: 3407 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Parliament House

...Parliament House Location : Delhi Also Known As : Sansad Bhavan Area : 6 Acres Houses : Chambers of Rajya Sabha & Lok Sabha And A Library Hall Parliament House : A marvellous piece of architecture where the bicameral legislature of India meets for its sessions. Lok sabha, the lower house and Rajya Sabha the upper house. Close to Rashtrapathi Bhavan, is a domed almost circular structure almost a kilometer in circumferance, and was designed by the famed architect Lutyens. It is the seat of the Indian Parliament and during the sessions of Parliament there is a flurry of activity in and around the structure. Parliament House Estate Parliament House Estate comprises the Parliament House, Reception Office building and Parliament House Annexe, 36 Gurdwara Rakabganj Road, 23 Mahadev Road and the extensive lawns around it where ponds with fountains have been provided. Special floral decoration is done at important points in the building during sessions of Parliament as well as on other important occasions. By the very nature of things, Parliament House Estate as a whole and the Chambers of the two Houses in particular are subject to strict security precaution all round the year. Parliament House of Delhi, generally known as the Sansad Bhawan is located at the end point of theSansad Marg in New Delhi. Parliament House of Delhi is a circular construction designed by Herbert Baker and was opened in 1927. The massive structure of the Parliament House in Delhi has 247 pillars with wide corridor...

Words: 641 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

European Parliament

...ELECTIONS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (JUNE 2014) The UK is allocated a total of 73 seats in the European Parliament[1] which means that we elect 73 of the members of the European Parliament’s (MEPs). Since the electoral reforms of 1999, British MEPs are elected by the electoral system of Proportional Representation[2]. As you may already know, there are different variants of PR and the one used for the European elections is called the Regional Closed Party List System or simply Party List. The United Kingdom is split into 12 multi-member regions (9 English regions + Scotland, Wales and NI[3]). The English regions are London, East Midlands, West Midlands, Eastern, North East, North West, South West, South East and Yorkshire + Humber[4]). Each region sends a different number of representatives (MEPs) – London, for example, will elect nine MEPs whereas Northern Ireland sends only 3 candidates. In each region, the parties prepare a ranked list of candidates. The number of candidates that each party puts forward will normally be the same number of seats to be filled in that region (e.g. each party will have a list of 8 candidates in London because the London region sends 8 MEP to the European Parliament). Since this is a closed system, the voters have no influence over which individuals are elected from the party list. The order of the list is determined by the party leadership. Under this system, voters cast one vote for the party (rather than a candidate) of their choice...

Words: 735 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Inside the European Parliament

...Professional Training Year at THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Report submitted by Paul Preda Voicu URN: 6183487 In part fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of BSc (Honours) in International Hospitality and Tourism Management School of Hospitality and Tourism Management University of Surrey 2014 Table of Contents List of tables and figures 4 Acknowledgements 5 List of Abbreviations 6 Section A. Organisation evaluation 8 The Executive Summary 8 The Placement Overview 9 1. The Evaluation of the EP’s activities 10 1.1 The EP format 11 1.2 The History of the EP 11 1.3 Geographical Locations and Facilities 12 2. The People 16 2.1 Visions and Strategies 16 2.2 Institutional structure and management 16 2.2.1 External structure 16 2.2.2 Internal Structure 17 2.3 Management of the EP 21 2.3.1 EP’s Political management 21 2.3.2 EP’s Organisational management 22 2.3.3 EP’s Communication Management 23 2.4 Staffing, recruiting and training 24 2.4.1 Staffing 24 2.4.2 Recruiting 27 2.4.3 Training 27 3. The Numbers 27 3.1 Strict rules for efficient and transparent budget implementation 32 3.1.1 Separation of functions 32 3.1.2 Use of standard documents 32 3.2 Controls of the budgetary procedure 32 3.2.1 Internal controls 33 3.2.2 Internal audits 33 3.2.3 External controls 33 4. Evaluation and conclusion 34 4.1 SWOT analysis 34 4.2 Conclusions 35 Section B. Personal and professional development 36 ...

Words: 12462 - Pages: 50

Free Essay

Eu Parliament Influence in the Uk.

...How much influence does the EU parliament have in the EU appointments and policy making? The EU parliament has influence over EU appointments both in their democratic supervision, and also in their supervising the budget. Furthermore, they also have a great deal of control over policy making, with the ability to pass EU law. The EU parliament has a great deal of power in its ability to pass EU Law. In some areas such as protecting the environment, the EU parliament works with the council to decide on the content of the laws, then it is the parliament’s duty to pass them. As they can influence both what the laws contain and which ones are passed, this makes them highly influential in law making. Furthermore, since the passing of the Lisbon treaty, this power has been increased giving parliament more influence in a greater number of areas including agriculture and immigration. Alternatively, the EU parliament can be seen to be influential in the EU appointing. For example, when a new commission is appointed, none of the 28 ministers can take any power until approved by parliament. This makes them highly influential as they can work with the council, control the commission and have final say on what is actually passed by Law. Furthermore, the Parliament can also pass a “Motion of censure” which forces all the EU commission to resign. This makes them highly influential over the appointments in the EU commission. Finally, the EU parliament has control over what is discussed...

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Rise of Parliament in Xiii

...« THE RISE of PARLIAMENT in XIII ». Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. Magnum Cartum Liberatum. 3. Simon de Monfort and his “Parliamentum”. 4. King Edward’s Parliament. 5. Parliament nowadays. a). The Functions of Parliament. b). The Meeting of Parliament. c). The House of Lords. d). The House of Commons. e). Public Access to Parliamentary Proceedings. 6. Conclusion. INTRODUCTION I am always interested in the history of Great Britain and especially in the developing of the British Parliament. It plays the leading role in the political life of Great Britain. It passes laws, provides the means of carrying work of the government, scrutinizes government policy and administration, including proposals for expenditure; debates the major issues of the day. In my wok I try to look at the history of this undoubtedly important body of authority. The events that took place in England in the XIII century turned out to be the main influence on the formation and the rise of Parliament that exists to the very moment. THE GREAT CHARTER - MAGNA CARTA Richard I’s absence in the Holy Land and the expense of crusade the weakened power of the Crown in England. When his brother John became a king, he lacked the money to defend the English lands in France successfully. The meanness and cruelty of his character added to his unpopularity stimulated a heavy...

Words: 2976 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

How Effective Is Parliament

...How effective is parliament? Parliament in the UK is mainly made up of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The ‘executive’ refers to the Government. The effectiveness of parliament is judged by how effectively the government is held to account by the Commons and Lords. One of parliament’s main functions is holding the government to account. One of the effective ways parliaments hold the government to account is it forces government ministers to justify their policies and explain why they were developed as well as explain the future effects of these policies. Debates are a perfect opportunity to hold the government to account they provide an open floor for Mps to speak and question members of the government, however this is usually unreliable seeing as PM’s get pre-prepared questions. The opposition party and everyone else within parliament have the duty to criticise and scrutinise government bills. This works to keep the government in check as it forces them to reconsider their decisions, make changes if necessary and defend their ideas from the oppositions criticism. This then works to ensure that policy is well thought out, and discussed before it is passed through the House of Lords. It is Parliaments ability to question that allows them to keep the power of government in check; this suggests that parliament is effective on government to a large extent. An example of a governments defeat would be the Hunting with dogs’ act 2001. However, Parliament is limited in its...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Parliament Doesn't Carry Out Its Functions Adequately

...'Parliament carries out none of its functions adequately.' Discuss (40 marks) In the UK, Parliament consists of the Monarchy, the House of Commons and the House of Lords. This has existed for centuries and has stood the test of time, in that it still exists. However a number of concerns have been raised about some of the functions and whether they function adequately enough (to a satisfactory or acceptable extent). Parliament currently carries out several functions and is the prime legislative body in the UK. It has many functions such as being representative, legitimising legislation, calling government to account as well as scrutinising and amending legislation. It is made up of representatives who are voted in order to represent the needs of their constituencies In the House of Commons. Government has to be drawn from Parliament as well as being accountable to it, accountability means that Parliament must justify its policies to Parliament as well as referring to representatives who are accountable for their electorates. Parliaments main function is not to obstruct and control the government as it will only do this if the government is seen to be abusing its power by not acting in the public’s interest. Predominately and most obviously parliaments “main function” is legislation and passing bills and in all fairness that’s what Parliament does, far more bills are efficiently passed through Parliament and become laws compared to the US who struggle to pass anything...

Words: 1074 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Powerful Is The UK Parliament?

...powerful is the UK Parliament? The Westminster Parliament is the UK’s highest political institution, making decisions on issues important to citizens throughout Britain. The Houses of Commons and Lords are responsible for passing legislation, scrutinising the government and debating issues. Retaining a high level of sovereignty despite devolution, seating dominating majority governments and possessing unprecedented constitutional flexibility, the UK Parliament wields a great deal of power. Political scientist Arend (Lijphart, 1999) first branded democracies as ‘consensual’ or ‘majoritarian.’ The UK parliament is said to be majoritarian, with a strong governing party and Cabinet, a lesser presence of small parties, minimal decentralisation,...

Words: 1638 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is Parliament Still Sovereign?

...To what extent is parliament still sovereign? For many years it has been argued that parliamentary sovereignty has, and still is, being eroded. As said by AV Dicey, the word ‘sovereignty’ is used to describe the idea of “the power of law making unrestricted by any legal limit”. Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution, stating that Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the UK, able to create and remove any law. This power over-rules courts and all other jurisdiction. It also cannot be entrenched; this is where all laws passed by the party in government can be changed by future parliaments. In recent years sovereignty of parliament has been a In 1972 the UK joined the treaty of accession, this was a statute law passed by parliament. It stated that the UK was now a part of the EU and therefore must abide by the laws and regulations that would be imposed; over 2,900 regulations and 410 directives were added, 43 volumes of the EU legislation. Due to having joined over 30 years after the initial EU was created, the UK has been made to accept laws that had been made without its input. Whereas now, having joined the EU, we are involved in in their creation - this is a key argument for why we should remain a member. Joining the EU has been agued as being a pinnacle point at which the UK lost its sovereignty, as this was the first time in the history of parliament where absolute power was no longer held. Research done by the TPA (Taxpayers Alliance)...

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Parliament Carries Out None of Its Functions Adequately

...Parliament is also known as the legislature, it has several roles including legitimizing legislation, passing laws, calling government to account well as scrutinizing and amending legislation. It is made up of representatives who are voted in order to represent the needs of their constituencies in the House of Commons. The UK parliament stands in the Centre of the British political system, as it is the source of all political power as well as being legally sovereign. Government has to be drawn from parliament as well as being accountable to it; accountability means that parliament must justify its policies to parliament as well as referring to representatives who are accountable for their electorates. Parliament main function is not to obstruct and control the government, as it will only do this if the government is seen to be abusing its power by not acting in the public’s interest. The main role of parliament is to support the government and to legitimize its proposals. Parliament is also bicameral, separated in to the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Representation is a crucial function of parliament; in the UK we use a system called Representative democracy where most decisions are made by elected representatives rather than the people themselves. There are arguments that representation in parliament is strong. Peers who have more expertise in particular areas of policies and can help to improve legislation, therefore represent many sections of society and associations...

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

How and Why Should Parliament Be Made More Effective?

...How and why should parliament be made more effective? Parliament is the sovereign body in the United Kingdom and so it is vital, for the wellbeing of democracy, that parliament not only exists but is also effective. Parliament plays the role of the Legislative and, as a result, is required to be as effective as possible to assure that laws are well thought out, benefit the whole of society and most of all maintain democracy. However, many people feel that certain aspects within Parliament limit its effectiveness and they feel these features need to be reformed in order for Parliament to carry out its function correctly. Firstly, the most obvious way to make Parliament more effective would be to reform the electoral system. Currently, Westminster elections use the system of First-past-the-post where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seats. However, this system is highly disproportionate in both terms of the word as it exaggerates winning votes for example, the Conservatives received 36.1% of the vote and won 47.1% of the seats in the 2010 general election, whereas it penalises small parties such as the Liberal Democrats who won 23% of the vote but gained only 8.8% of the seats. Particularly as FPTP produces landslide majorities, it makes Parliament less effective as the party that wins the general election forms the government and therefore has a large majority in most cases. If MPs belonging to the party vote along party lines all the time, in...

Words: 1983 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Parliament Carries Out None of Its Functions Adequately (

...Parliament carries out several responsibilities. One of parliaments functions is legislation, which is making laws, as it is the major legislative body in the UK. They represent the people, as well as they are legitimate , a scrutiny and can be held or hold others accountable. They also carry out other functions. There is a significant difference between the House of Lords and House of Commons. Which is that the House of Lords is not voted in unlike the House of Commons who are more legitimate as they are voted in. Parliament is able to carry out its legislative function by passing acts of Parliament. The plans in which government are taking over the year in the queens speech, this is the legislative timetable. There is also an opportunity for the members bring forward their own bill , this is called the private members bill. Any legislation is thoroughly debated and reviewed and most go through various processes in the two houses before it is passed as a law. Though there is little to no free debates do discussion, due to various reasons such as the whips, who hold the MPs to account. A private member bill is unlikely to pass as only a few are even able to be discussed due to parliaments schedule. The House of Lords have very little to power as they have no say in any economic legislations, and can only block legislations not stop them, in which they have the powers to do this three times. It carries out functions that show it is legitimate such as taking the country...

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Effectively Does Parliament Fulfil Its Functions?

...How effectively does Parliament fulfil its functions? Parliament has several functions. It debates major issues of current interest, it makes legislation, it scrutinises the executive whilst simultaneously sustaining the government, and it represents the people and redresses their grievances. In many aspects, Parliament is usually effective in fulfilling its functions, but there are occasions where it is not as diligent in doing so. Parliament’s scrutiny function is mainly carried out through four methods; Prime Minister’s Questions, Select Committees, back bench MPs and the House of Lords. Prime Minister’s Questions are a weekly opportunity for the opposition and backbenchers to scrutinise the Prime Minister and by extension the government, and to highlight government failings or simply ask a question. This is a good way of scrutinising the Prime Minister as it puts him/her under pressure to justify their actions, and answer potentially awkward questions regardless of whether they have been pre-submitted. The main weakness of this form of scrutiny is that the questions are often submitted to the Prime Minister some time before Prime Minister’s Questions, allowing him/her to come up with an answer beforehand that might let him/her to actually evade proper scrutiny within the House of Commons. Select Committees in both Houses of Parliament investigate the work of government and produce reports on policy proposals. They can call witnesses in the course of their proceedings...

Words: 1434 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Effectiveness of the Coalition’s Plans for the Reform of Parliament?

...The Coalition has introduced a number of reforms designed to make parliament more efficient and more accountable, such as E Petitions, power of recall, the equalisation of constituencies, a reduction in the powers of the Prime Minister and Fixed Term parliaments. Select Committees have also been further reformed, while there are major plans for to make the House of Lords primarily elective. The EQUALISATIION IN THE SIZE OF CONSTITUENCIES to between 72,000 – 80, removing anomalies whereby some constituencies can have 30% more voters than others, might seem relatively un-contentious. However, critics argue that the Electoral Register has not been sufficiently updated for such a radical overhaul of voting, while the new constituencies will often have to cross county borders and urban / countryside boundaries thus complicating the interests that MPs represent. The reduction of MPs from 650 to 600 is also controversial as it will statistically reduce representation in the Commons, as well as proportionally increasing the influence of government in a reduced legislature. There has though been a great deal of support, too, for FIXED TERM PARLIAMENTS since this takes away from the Prime Minister the right to call a General Election at his or her convenience. However, other reforms have been a great deal more controversial; the new ruling that a VOTE OF CONFIDENCE in the government can only be provoked by a vote of 55% in the House of Commons has been condemned...

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5