...Roger Kidder Euthanasia Work Document 1. What is active euthanasia? * The process of causing a person’s painless death usually as a consequence of suffering from an incurable disease or terminal illness. * Administration of potentially life-ending drugs or lethal doses for the purpose of causing death. * Requires active participation by health care providers. 2. What is the difference between killing and allowing to die? * Killing is an act of commission, the performing of an action to cause death. * Allowing to die is an act of omission, withholding potential life sustaining treatments to bring about death. 3. What is passive euthanasia? * The act of allowing a patient to die primarily by not administering life saving treatments or procedures. * Does not require active participation by health care providers. 4. What is voluntary euthanasia? * The rational decision of a terminally ill person to end their life. * Requires a comprehension of the consequences of their decision. * A person must be able to make competent decisions about their own health care. 5. What is non-voluntary euthanasia? * The decision of someone other than the patient to end that patient’s life. * Usually as a result of the patient’s inability to speak for themselves. * May not be competent to make the decision, (i.e.) Alzheimer’s disease. 6. What is the difference between ordinary treatment and extraordinary treatment...
Words: 3177 - Pages: 13
...Will, Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders (Fremgen, 2009). This paper will discuss one type of advance directives, the DNR order. The DNR order alerts medical professionals not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), per the patient’s request. This means that health care professionals will not attempt emergency CPR if the patient’s breathing or heartbeat stops (Smith.). Advance directives and DNR orders are important to have drawn up by the patient because in the event they are unable to speak for themselves, an order is put in place stating their wishes. This helps in assisting family members and health care professionals in making decisions when the end of life is inevitable. Advantages and Disadvantages of a DNR Order When it comes to making this difficult decision, there are many advantages and disadvantages of a DNR order. The advantages as stated in the report called, “Recording “Do Not Resuscitate” and other Life-Sustaining Orders in the Out-of-Hospital Setting” are: * Available to all patients * No personal discomfort * Deals with a range of treatment * Easy to maintain * No loss of privacy (Pace, 2002). For example, when a person is entering their last stages of life, they want to be assured that their wishes are met. This document is a legal document where health care providers must carry out the order regardless of the wishes of others. It is easy to create, but once created...
Words: 1232 - Pages: 5
...Ethics Paper HCC/335 La’Verne A Love Professor Holly Martinez de Andino June 16, 2014 We are hearing all too frequently about End of life issues and decisions that family members are having to deal with because of not being prepared for when the time comes for a loved one. I will discuss more in depth the issues, problems and solutions to making this seemingly painful and undiscussed topic something that will help make it less painful and more important to do before the time comes. Death is something that is inevitable, it will eventually come to us all, some sooner than later and we should do all that we can to make it less stressful and painful to the loved ones we leave behind. Making these End of Life choices beforehand has always been considered a “taboo” of sorts because it’s just an issue that is never discussed. There is no said population that this matter should be discussed with because no one knows when they are going to die unless they are contemplating suicide and that’s an entirely different situation. End of life choices is a role that many of us may have to step into whether for ourselves or assisting our loved ones with them. “Only about one in four people have signed advanced directives that spell out their wishes if they’re unable to make medical decisions on their own, according to a 2006 report published by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press”. An advance directive includes two types of documents, a living will describes...
Words: 1138 - Pages: 5
...Should doctors be able to refuse demands for "futile" treatment? "Futile" treatment is when there is no medical benefit from the treatment they are receiving, and that there will be no improvement if they are in a permanent vegetative state. Although the concept of medical futility dates back in the Ancient Greek days with physician Hippocrates, it has only recently (in the past 40 years) become a controversial topic. The issue of medical futility is important because it deals with many issues such as patient-physician relationship, financial resources, and most importantly it deals with lives of people. The issues are controversial because it has alarmed many people that physicians may be taking it a step too far being able to pull the plug on a person with an incapacitating condition. The debate is over who has the right to make this decision - the patient's family or physician. There are two sides to this debate; the "Yes" side says that the physician is more qualified and is following what the patient's want to receive while the "No" side says that it should not be up to the physician to decide if the life is worth keeping or not. Steven Miles supports the idea that doctors should be able to refuse futile medical treatment. He maintains that physicians should be able to refuse futile medical treatment because it takes up too many resources, violates community standards, and it follows patient's wishes when what they expect is not what the treatment can achieve. The example...
Words: 968 - Pages: 4
...Living Wills and Euthanasia Penny Hockensmith Social Ethics PHI 320 Professor Haussmann May 30th, 2012 A) It is good to be in control of my medical. B. An informed living will prescribes my medical decisions when I am unconscious. C. A living will is good. Should living wills over ride doctors and caretakers? THE STORY Imagine someone you love or better yet, imagine yourself lying in a hospital bed oblivious to the world around you, unable to move or show any signs of life, your own existence controlled by an I.V., a respiratory machine, and a feeding tube. In essence you are dead. Your body is no longer able to sustain life, its entire purpose is now replaced by a machine - you are being kept alive by artificial means. At this point the question arises - should you be kept alive by these means or should you be allowed to die a natural death? Unfortunately you are unable to answer this question because your voice is limited to a "beep" on a heart monitor machine. Who then is going to decide if you live artificially or die naturally? Who gets to play God? Well, if your family doesn't have your written consent in the form of a living will, to cease life support, then the doctor will make the ultimate decision for both you and your family. Most often this is the case. Even though writing a living will is just as easy if not easier than writing a death will, many people don't take the time to do so. Therefore, doctors have to debate the question of euthanasia – a question...
Words: 2285 - Pages: 10
...I. Introduction There is always a time for everything, “1For everything there is a season, a time for every activity under heaven. 2A time to be born and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to harvest. 3A time to kill and a time to heal; A time to tear down and a time to build up.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1-3) Throughout the ages and for the next generation to come, there is only one thing constant in our lives and that binds mankind together, and that is facing the great inevitable, which is death. Death is something we all must face -- no escaping techniques, no meditation rituals, and no amount of money can avoid it. Death is not a right, it is the end of all rights and a fate that none of us can escape. It is the great equalizer. The finality of death and not knowing the inevitable would ultimately give a person a scare for their life. But what happens when death can no longer be a natural occurrence? What happens when we are given the choice to manipulate and control the death of a person? What happens when a person interferes with the laws of nature and decides for himself/herself what time a person may die, but saying he/she had the best interest of the person? What happens to these situations then? Is it justifiable to end the life of a person? i. Background The ultimate right we have as human beings is the right-to-life, an inalienable right that can never be taken away, not even by the person who possesses it. It is similar to the fact that our right to liberty...
Words: 939 - Pages: 4
...about it in the front yard the sheriff and a guy named Frank shows up. They are collecting 2 horses, which walked up on the narrator and his wife’s property. When the sheriff and Frank leave, they take the narrators wife with them and leave the narrator alone. 2. The narrator doesn’t believe that the letter he receives is from his wife – why not? Why does the narrator spend so much energy and so many words on trying to convince the reader that the letter is not written by his wife? I think he is in denial. The fact that he doesn’t recognize his wife’s handwriting indicates he doesn’t know his wife anymore. He spend so much energy on trying to deny that the letter is from his wife, because he, in my opinion, knows it’s coming – it inevitable (in-evitable). 3. What does this letter indicate about the couple’s relationship? The letter indicates that there is a lack of communication between man and wife. During the years of marriage the man have become withdrawn – he has withdrawn himself from his marriage. He spends his time in his “room” (an office, maybe?). 4. Do you think the narrator can be trusted that he for instance says that he may have accidently thrown his wife’s letter away? In my opinion the narrator can’t really be trusted. He only remembers the things he wants to. The fact that he may have accidently thrown his wife’s letter away indicates, that he is avoiding the conflict that is...
Words: 1027 - Pages: 5
... we start to enter into the area of what is ethically right and wrong and wonder how much is too much? There are many different forms of medical treatment that can save someone’s life. This will vary from medicine to surgery and many things in between. Not everyone will agree on some of the techniques used, but most people understand why someone would want to save their life. Since people will try to save their own lives if they are dying, many scientists believe that there is no difference in trying to extend a life through medicine, or trying to create a life from another person through a cloning system. This is where the tables turn from helping mankind, to hurting what God has created for us. There are many conflicts between prolonging life and Christianity. Some people say that the world is entering into an area we do not belong, while others say we have already crossed that line. How Religion Is Impacted By Science Extending the Lifespan of a Human Introduction Currently, physicians have the know-how and advanced technology which...
Words: 3538 - Pages: 15
...Running head: EUTHANASIA Euthanasia: A Silent Plea for Mercy Shannon Curry University of Southern New Hampshire Professor Henson Tuesday December 23, 2014 Euthanasia: A Silent Plea for Mercy All over the world there are amazing technological advances in medicine happening every day, despite that there are neonatal patients suffering from painful life limiting medical conditions that have no treatment or cure. “Advances in medical technology make it possible to extend life, at times, the focus on ‘cure at all costs’ overshadows the obligation to provide dignified, humane, and compassionate care” (Rushton, 2005). In an effort to provide legal, humane and compassionate end-of-life care to infants, the Dutch developed the Groningen Protocol in 2003. Developed in collaboration with the prosecutor’s office, the Groningen Protocol was designed to guide a transparent medical and legal decision making process for parents and their doctors considering neonatal euthanasia (Catlin, 2008; Petrou, 2005). Neonatal euthanasia is the practice of hastening the death of a terminal ill newborn in an effort to relive their suffering. Most countries current laws make it illegal for the neonatal population to benefit from euthanasia. Research is suggestive that albeit in secret neonatal euthanasia maybe disguised and illegally practiced around the world. Legalizing neonatal euthanasia would not only allow transparency...
Words: 2327 - Pages: 10
...Legalizing Euthanasia: A Practical Approach Theressa Thacker RN Excelsior College Abstract We are all in the process of dying from the day we are born. The prevalence of catastrophic diseases that once killed swiftly such as pneumonia, cholera, and massive heart attacks, have been replaced by chronic and, often, degenerative diseases such as advanced cancers, diabetes, lung disease, and Alzheimer’s, leading to a slow death for most (Gardner, 2012). This places a great financial burden on the Medicare system as well as patient’s families. Atul Gawande (2010) reports that twenty five percent of all Medicare spending is for the five percent of patients who are in their final year of life, and most of that money goes for care in their last couple of months, which is of little apparent benefit (p. 3). Even more concerning is the suffering that many patients are forced to endure due to the lack of other options. Patients must have the right to make autonomous decisions regarding the end of their lives. They need to be confident that those decisions will be upheld, even if they conflict with the wishes of their families or physicians. However, patient confidence in knowing that their final wishes will be met is complicated by a lack of education and empowerment for those who face these difficult decisions (Frank & Anselmi, 2011). The purpose of this essay is to discuss the benefits to patient autonomy and the Medicare budget, by the legalization of physician-assisted...
Words: 2318 - Pages: 10
...Jan Narveson, following the utilitarian reasoning she uses in Morality of Marilyn, believes the focus of moral action should be to cause the least amount of pain and greatest amount of pleasure for the most amount of people. When applied to Earle Birney's, David, we cannot directly compare a masses sentiment against that of an individual. Jan Narveson might approach this from a different angle, attempting to quantify the pain of David against one’s moral obligation to preserve life. When David falls from the peak of the mountain we can be almost certain of two things, that there is little time to save him and that if saved he will live as a paraplegic. The probable consequences to be expected result in David leading an unsatisfactory life by...
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...As the story progresses his choices become more dramatic, and a saboteur to his own army. This obviously reveals his very realistic personal promises; prolonging of life, and the demonstration that what matters if he dies or if he leaves. When Yossarian analyses the situation around him he knows there are countless countries fighting on their own terms with their own people, but it ties in to the moral ambiguity does his contribution really matter? He is conflicted, and he cannot choose one or the other, they are chosen for him, in demonstration with the bombing of Bologna he nearly loses his life. In the first run he manages to direct the plane back to base to save himself, an example of prolonging, yet when the other bombers return, but irony occurs when the place that was rumored to be so defended is just a ‘milk run’(Ch.13-14) so easy to get by without anyone getting hurt and completing what they set out for with no resistance. When Yossarian returns it shows that his action are cowardly yet it is relatable from a readers point of view because if the reader was in the same position and wanted to continue to live a full life and knew that this was a seriously...
Words: 1586 - Pages: 7
...fact, he threatened to kill all appropriationist chiefs that participated in the sale of land (Dowd, 216). For his dedication and exceptional leadership, though, Tecumseh’s divisiveness hurt the unity of different tribes and could not save them from being vastly outnumbered. He would fall at the Battle of Thames, and his movement quickly followed. Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa held great sway over the Amerindians during the War of 1812, but the movements they lead were ultimately unsuccessful. The way they took advantage of previous trends that were already beginning to decline showed that they were more opportunist than revolutionary leaders. Unfortunately, it seems that all that came of the two brothers’ valiant efforts was prolonging the United States’ inevitable march to the Pacific. ...
Words: 789 - Pages: 4
...Haiti has had a strong history of surviving the unsurvivable, first with the slave rebellion against the French colony of Saint-Domingue, followed by a countless amount of military coups and dictators instated by the American government and eventually deadly natural disasters like the 2010 7.0 earthquake. All these things have left Haiti vulnerable for powers other than the Haitian government to make decisions for the Haitian people, and out of desperate measures Haiti is constantly forced to succumb to foreign powers. In particular, the recovery from the Haitian earthquake being delayed even to this day because of countries coming into Haiti attempting to aid Haiti but in reality they are just prolonging the inevitable issues that need to be addressed. Haiti needs to create more laws and enforce the laws, so that things like the poor structural engineering in...
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
...of our text book gives us a few arguments in pro to passive euthanasia. First, the individual rights over bodies and lives, it means that all human being have the freedom to do whatever they want with their lives. Individuals have the right to do whatever they think if better for them. They can get tattoos; they can pierce parts of their body that even God would not believe; they can jump out of a roof when they are depressed, so why not ask for a doctor pull the cord? The second argument is shortening the period of suffering, is this case a terminal patient with no quality of life should not suffer any longer. The doctors and the family should let the patient go if they know that is no chance of recovery. They have to understand that prolonging this patient’s life will just bring them more pain and suffer. The health care professionals and the families should make decisions based on the patient’s best interest. Last but not least the patients’ right to die with dignity, it means that human being have the right of dying distinction. The doctors have to respect the patient’s decision of not to deteriorate on a bed waiting for death to take his life away. A terminal patient wishes not quality of life but quality of death. So, why not give it to him? I believe that they deserve to die with dignity and piece, since they will not be able to have this in life. The author also gives us arguments against passive euthanasia. First...
Words: 1393 - Pages: 6