Ratifying the Constitution DBQ essay
The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America, one of the greatest documents ever to be written, and the rope that keeps this vast nation tied together. Although this great document may seem flawless, many components and ideas have been amended and argued as allowed by “Article Five” of the U.S. Constitution. When writing and discussing the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention, many of the authors and scholars disagreed on the ratification of the Constitution whilst others favored the ratification of the famous document. Some claimed that liberty will be jeopardized and a tyrannical government may result, as stated in document two. Whilst others claimed that the Constitution was the solution to the political and economic struggles of the current government as stated in document one. The anti-federalists, led by Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson favored a weaker central government; whilst the federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton favored a strong central government. Overall, the major arguments of the convention can be categorized into two groups, the ones who favored the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and those who didn’t.
To continue, the scholars who favored the ratification of …show more content…
The delegates had a dream; a dream to build a unified, equal, and strong country. They achieved this dream with the ratification of the Constitution; however, it did not come easy. Arguments arose about the ratification of the document, some people favored it whilst others opposed it. The major arguments can be categorized into two groups, the ones who favored the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and those who didn’t. However, after tirelessly reasoning, agreeing, and disagreeing on specifics, the terms were agreed upon on the date of September 17,