Free Essay

Sea Trial Report for a Ship

In:

Submitted By winfieldzheng
Words 3812
Pages 16
[pic]

| | | |
|[pic] | |
|Sea Trial Report |
|VESSEL NAME: RAWABI 11 |
|Hull No. : H 1074 |
| | | | |
|Builder: |PT ASL SHIPYARD INDONESIA | | |
| | | | |
|Owner: |SWIBER ENGINEERING LIMITED | | |
| | | | |
|Class: |AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING | | |

Contents

Contents 2

Basic Preamble 4

1. General Conditions 4

2. Vessel Particulars 4

3. Sea Trial Conditions Checklist/Form 5

Navigation Part 8

4. Magnetic Compass 8

5. Gyro-Compass Trial 9 6. Wheelhouse Equipment 10

Hull Part 11

7. Bow Tunnel Thruster Trial 11

8. Stern Tunnel Thruster Trial 12

9. Steering Trial 13

10. Turning Trial 14

11. Man Overboard Recovery Trial – MOB 15

12. Emergency Stop Trial 17

13. Stopping Inertia Trial 18

14. Speed Trial 19

15. Anchoring Trial 21

16. Fast Rescue Craft Embarkation, Launching and Recovery Trial 23

17. Noise Measurements under 100% MCR 24

Code for Noise Levels on board a Vessel – Measurement 24 Noise Measurement Report 24 18. Vibration Measurements 26

Vibrations Measurement Report 26
Machinery Part 27

19. Emergency Fire Pump Trial 27

20. Endurance Trial 28

Conditions 28 21. Main Engines Fuel Consumption Trial 29

Electrical 30

22. Main Electrical Power Plant and Blackout Test 30

23. Lighting Test – Main/Emergency/Temporary 31

Lighting Illumination Measurement 31 24. Dynamic Positioning Trial 32

1. Purpose 32 2. Conditions 32 3. Method 32 25. FI-FI System Trial 33

Sea Trial Report
59.85m Multi Purpose Offshore Support Vessel

Basic Preamble

General Conditions

All measurements and readings are to be in the unit system that the design is based upon and should follow the general advice given in the applicable Classification Rules.

All trials listed here are in addition to those already mentioned in any Shipyard Dock Trial Procedures.

Vessel Particulars

Name of Ship : RAWABI 11

Yard Number : H 1074

Port of Registry : FUNAFUTI

Builder : PT ASL SHIPYARD (INDONESIA)

Owner : SWIBER ENGINEERING LIMITED

Length (Overall) : 59.85 M

Breadth Moulded : 14.95 M

Depth : 6.10 M

Design Draft : 5.10 M

IMO Number : 9661508

Official Number :

MMSI No. :

Classification Society : AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING

Main Propulsion : CAT. 3516C HD DITA DIESEL ENGINE

Speed : 12.5 KNOTS

Sea Trial Conditions Checklist/Form

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Sea Trial Conditions |Basic | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|Full Particulars of all Deadweight Items, Draughts, Wind and Weather Conditions. |
|The following list of equipment is to be onboard prior to departure. |
|Draught/Trim/List Conditions: – Departure Shipyard/Arrival Shipyard: |
| |Departure: P/S |Arrival: P/S |
|Draft Forward: Port/Starboard |[m] | | | | |
|Draft Midship: Port/Starboard |[m] | | | | |
|Draft Aft: Port/Starboard |[m] | | | | |
|Trim [m] | |List [deg] | |
|Weather Conditions | |
|Wind | |
|Sea State | |
|Lightship Displacement [t] | |
|TANK |CONTENT |BEFORE SEA TRIAL |AFTER SEA TRIAL |
| | |SOUNDING |VOLUME |SOUNDING |VOLUME |
| | |(MM) |(MT) |(MM) |(MT) |
|Drill Water / Water Ballast Tanks |
|DW/WB AP TK C |S.W. | | | | |
|DW/WB AP TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|DW/WB AP TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|DW/WB FP TK C |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.1 DW/WB DB TK C |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.2 DW/WB DB TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.2 DW/WB DB TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.3 DW/WB DB TK C |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.4 DW/WB DB TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.4 DW/WB DB TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.5 DW/WB DB TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.5 DW/WB DB TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.6 DW/WB DB TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.6 DW/WB DB TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.7 DW/WB DB TK P |S.W. | | | | |
|NO.7 DW/WB DB TK S |S.W. | | | | |
|Fuel Oil Tanks |
|FO DAY TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|FO DAY TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.1 FO TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.1 FO TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.2 FO DB TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.2 FO DB TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.3 FO TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.3 FO TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.4 FO DB TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.4 FO DB TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.5 FO TK C |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.6 FO TK P |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.6 FO TK S |M.D.O | | | | |
|NO.7 FO TK C |M.D.O | | | | |
|Fresh Water Tanks |
|NO.1 FW TK P |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.1 FW TK S |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.2 FW DB TK P |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.2 FW DB TK S |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.3 FW TK P |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.3 FW TK S |F.W. | | | | |
|NO.4 FW DB TK C |F.W. | | | | |
|Mud Tanks |
|NO.1 MUD TK P |LIQ. MUD | | | | |
|NO.1 MUD TK S |LIQ. MUD | | | | |
|NO.2 MUD TK P |LIQ. MUD | | | | |
|NO.2 MUD TK S |LIQ. MUD | | | | |
|Misc. Tanks |
|FOAM TK P |FOAM | | | | |
|DETERGENT TK S |DETERGENT | | | | |
|HYD. OIL TK P |HYD. OIL | | | | |
|LUB OIL TK S |LUB. OIL | | | | |
|BILGE HOLDING TK P |BILGE | | | | |
|DIRTY OIL TK S |DIRTY OIL | | | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Navigation Part

Magnetic Compass

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Magnetic Compass Setting |Navigation | |
|Description |Completed Y/N |Verified |
|Magnetic Compass to be swung and adjusted by licensed Compass Adjuster |Yes / No | |
|Magnetic Compass Viewing Periscope and Emergency Lighting to be proven effective for Emergency |Yes / No | |
|Steering at night. | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Gyro-Compass Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard | |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. | |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Gyro-Compass Setting |Navigation | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
| |
|Conditions |Weather/Sea Conditions |
|Service Speed Draught |[M] |Wind - Direction | |
|Trial Speed Draught |[M] |Wind - Speed | |
|Water Depth |[M] |General Weather Conditions | |
| | |Sea State – [Max 2] | |
| | |Ocean Current -- Speed | |
| | |Ocean Current -- Direction | |
|Description |Completed Y/N |Verified |
|Main Gyro to be checked and confirmed operational |Yes / No | |
|All repeaters to be checked for alignment with main unit |Yes / No | |
|Bridge Repeater to be checked for alignment with main unit |Yes / No | |
|Gyro output to slave equipment to be checked and verified |Yes / No | |
|Gyro off course alarm to be checked and verified |Yes / No | |

Wheelhouse Equipment

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Wheelhouse Equipment Testing |Navigation | |
|Description |Completed Y/N |Verified |
|Radar |Yes / No | |
|Echo Sounder |Yes / No | |
|Speed Log |Yes / No | |
|GMDSS |Yes / No | |
|NAVTEX |Yes / No | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Hull Part

Bow Tunnel Thruster Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Bow Thrusters Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine the vessel’s steering characteristics and her handling in the open sea. |
|Operations |Completed (Y/N) |Verified |
| |Time Elapsed | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Port direction with 1st B/T |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Stbd direction with 1st B/Ts |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Port direction with 2nd B/Ts |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Stbd direction with 2nd B/Ts |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Port direction with both B/Ts |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. (Port) | | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. (Stbd) | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Stbd direction with both B/Ts |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. (Port) | | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. (Stbd) | | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Stern Tunnel Thruster Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Stern Thrusters Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine the vessel’s steering characteristics and her handling in the open sea. |
|Operations |Completed (Y/N) |Verified |
| |Time Elapsed | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Port direction with S/T |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Ascribe 360° circle in Stbd direction with S/T |Y / N | | |
|Current A, Oil pressure bar. | | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Steering Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Steering Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine the vessel’s steering characteristics and her handling in the open sea. |
|Operations on Wheelhouse |Completed (Y/N) |Verified |
|Steering Angle |Time Taken in sec |Verified |
|Midship to STBD 35° | | |
|STBD 35° to PORT 30° | | |
|PORT 30° to STBD 35° | | |
|STBD 35° to Midship | | |
|Switch over to manual emergency mode by operation |Emergency Steering | |
|solenoid valve. (Speed : 6.3 kn) | | |
|Steering Angle |Time Taken in sec |Verified |
|Midship to Port 15° (Port) | | |
|Port 15° to Starboard 15° (Port) | | |
|Starboard 15° to Port 15° (Port) | | |
|Port 15° to Midship (Port) | | |
|Midship to Port 15° (Stbd) | | |
|Port 15° to Starboard 15° (Stbd) | | |
|Starboard 15° to Port 15° (Stbd) | | |
|Port 15° to Midship (Stbd) | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:_________________ |Class:_________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Turning Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Turning Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine the vessel’s steering characteristics of the Bow/Stern Thrusters |
|Operations |Speed (Knots) |Completed (Y/N) |Verified |
| | |Time Elapsed | |
|35°Port Turn | | | | |
|35° Starboard Turn | | | | |
| | |
|Note: | |
|Port Turn |Stbd Turn |
|HDG: |HDG: |
|Speed : |Speed : |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Man Overboard Recovery Trial – MOB

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Man Overboard Recovery (MOB) Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine the Maneuvering Characteristics of the vessel under “Man Overboard” (MOB) conditions and record the results obtained. |
|Operations: |Requirements: |Verified: |
|3.1 – Trial to be initiated with a call/order of |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|Man Overboard. Log starting time. | | |
|3.2 – Vessel to drop a suitable marker and hold |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|present course to clear MOB. | | |
|3.3 - Steering to be set Hard to Port and vessel |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|to complete a 90 0 turn. | | |
|3.4 - On completion of 90 0 turn, steering to be |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|set to Hard to Starboard and vessel to complete a | | |
|270 0 turn to bring vessel back over original | | |
|course. | | |
|3.5 - On approaching MOB lifebuoy and line to be |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|deployed as near as MOB marker as practical from | | |
|vessel’s Starboard side. | | |
|3.6 - After clearing MOB vessel’s steering to be |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|set Hard to Port and vessel to complete a full 270| | |
|0 turn around MOB. | | |
|3.7 - With engines stopped, vessel to recover |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|lifebuoy/ (MOB). | | |
| |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |
|[pic] |
|Figure 1: Mark Position on above pictorial reference at every point of turn. |

Note: Time taken for Williamson turns are ____ min ____ sec

Time taken for Man overboard recovery turns are ____ min ____ sec

Emergency Stop Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Emergency Stop Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To prove vessel’s Emergency Stopping capabilities and to record the time and distance between the order for Stop Engines and vessel’s complete stop in |
|the water. Requirement: Dead in the water within 40 seconds. |
|Operations: |Requirements: |Verified: |
|3.1 – With the vessel initially underway at Full Service Speed (Ahead) give the |Completed and | |
|order for “STOP ENGINES”. Start time count. |Satisfactory. | |
|3.2 – Direction of both propellers to be reversed as quickly as possible under |Completed and | |
|control of the Engine Control System and Power Management System where fitted, |Satisfactory. | |
|and without undue loading on propulsion motors and gearboxes. | | |
|3.3 - When the vessel’s speed has been reduced to a complete Stop condition stop|Completed and | |
|time clock. Record elapsed time. |Satisfactory. | |
| |Engine RPM |Time of “Stop Engines” |
| | | |
|Vessel Speed ____ knots | | |

Stopping Inertia Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Stopping Inertia Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To prove vessel’s Emergency Stopping capabilities and to record the time and distance between the order for Stop Engines and vessel’s complete stop in the |
|water. |
|Operations: |Requirements: |Verified: |
|3.1 – With the vessel initially underway at Full |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|Service Speed (Ahead) give the order for “STOP | | |
|ENGINES”. Start time count. | | |
|3.2 – When vessel’s speed comes to less than two (2) |Completed and Satisfactory. | |
|knots. Stop time count. | | |
|Engine RPM |Initial Heading |Final Heading |

Speed Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Speed Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To determine and record the vessel’s speed (knots) for various conditions of draft and power. |
|Service and Trial Speed Runs |
|Trip No: |Course |Eng Shaft RPM [P/S] |Engine Load [Total] |Total Time |Speed for Each|Speed |Average Speed |
| | | | |[Min/Sec] |Run | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 1 |070 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 2 |250 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 3 |250 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 4 |070 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 5 |070 | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |100% MCR | | | | |
|100% - 6 |250 | | | | | | |

|Trial Speed |HDG | |90% MCR | | | | |
|90% - 1 |250 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |90% MCR | | | | |
|90% - 2 |70 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |

|Trial Speed |HDG | |90% MCR | | | | |
|75% - 1 |70 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|Trial Speed |HDG | |90% MCR | | | | |
|75% - 2 |250 | | | | | | |

Trial Speed – 100% Record (each record 15 sec)

| |
|Run No.1 |
|Run No.1 | | |

Anchoring Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Anchoring Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To confirm and record the performance of the Windlass and Associated Equipment under operating conditions. |
|Conditions/Preparations: –Arrival Anchorage Position |
| |Requirements: |Verified: |
|2.1 Draught |3.8[M] | |
|2.2 Depth of water (min. 40 metres.) |40 [M] | |
|2.3 Marking of Cables |Completed at yard |Yes / No |
|2.4 Anchoring Ground Conditions |Acceptable to all parties |Yes / No |
|2.5 Position of Anchoring Grounds. |Acceptable to all parties |Yes / No |
|2.6 Windlass/Winch Dock Trials Completed. |Completed at yard |Yes / No |
|2.7 Vessel in Stopped Condition. |: Yes / No |Yes / No |
|3.1 Lubrication of Windlass Machinery. |Completed at yard |Yes / No |
|3.2 Power available to Windlass Machinery. |: Yes / No |Yes / No |
|3.3 Water available for Cable Washing. |: Yes / No |Yes / No |
| |Completed |Verified |
|Operations: Port Anchor | | |
|4.1 With Gypsy engaged lower the Port Anchor to water level and apply brake. | | |
|4.2 Release Gypsy Clutch and Let Go/Free Fall five (5) shackles of Port anchor chain. | | |
|4.3 With Anchor cast and five (5) shackles clear of the Hawse Pipe secure the chain with the | | |
|Chain Stopper and run vessel astern slowly to tension the chain and test the reliability of | | |
|Chain Stopper. | | |
|4.4 With propulsion motors stopped, engage Gypsy Clutch and retrieve chain with operating | | |
|lever at maximum and note times between each chain Kenter Shackle at Chain Stopper. | | |
|4.5 Fully house Port Anchor and secure using Chain Stopper and Lashing Screw. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|Operations: Starboard Anchor |Completed: (Yes/No) |Verified: |
|4.1 With Gypsy engaged lower the Starboard Anchor to water level and apply brake. | | |
|4.2 Release Gypsy Clutch and Let Go/Free Fall three (3) shackles of Starboard anchor chain. | | |
|4.3 With Anchor cast and three (3) shackles clear of the Hawse Pipe secure the chain with the | | |
|Chain Stopper and run vessel astern slowly to tension the chain and test the reliability of | | |
|Chain Stopper. | | |
|4.4 With propulsion motors stopped, engage Gypsy Clutch and retrieve chain with operating | | |
|lever at maximum and note times between each chain Kenter Shackle at Chain Stopper. | | |
|4.5 Fully house Starboard Anchor and secure using Chain Stopper and Lashing Screw. | | |
|Observations: |Completed: |Verified: |
|5.1 Note any excessive cable movement, jumping of cable etc. during free fall and retrieval | | |
|operations. | | |
|5.2 Verify correct alignment of Windlass Gypsy/Chain Stopper/Hawse Pipe and note any | | |
|distortion | | |
|5.3 Record all conditions and times of each shackle retrieved to verify recovery speeds of | | |
|each cable. | | |
|Port Stbd | | |
|1st: min sec 1st: min sec | | |
|2nd: min sec 2nd: min sec | | |
|3rd: min sec 3rd: min sec | | |
| | | |
|Avg: min sec Avg: min sec | | |
| | | |
|Hydraulic pressure Bar Hydraulic pressure Bar | | |
| | | |
|Chain lifting speed (Min 9m/min) | | |
| | | |
|Port m/min Stbd m/min | | |
|5.4 Check all running equipment for any signs of overheating and vibration. | | |
|5.5 Observe operation of Cable Washers to ensure correct alignment of nozzles. | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Fast Rescue Craft Embarkation, Launching and Recovery Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Fast Rescue Craft Embarkation, Launching & Recovery Trial |Hull | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To confirm the operation of the fast rescue craft and davit launching arrangement under SOLAS approved conditions |
|Operations |Completed (Y/N) |Verified |
| |Time Elapsed | |
|Fast rescue craft to be prepped for launch | | |
|Swing davit out for crew embarkation | | |
|Test brakes 3x while lowering | | |
|Crew to lower boat by remote wire handgrip, start engine when| | |
|boat is in water | | |
|Recover boat under Class requirements. | | |
|Stow and house boat properly | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Noise Measurements under 100% MCR

Code for Noise Levels on board a Vessel – Measurement

On completion of the construction of the ship, or as soon as practicable thereafter, measurement of noise levels in spaces as specified below should take place under the operating conditions should be suitably recorded as per attached report “Format of Noise Measurement Report”.

Noise upper limit as per requirement

|Space |Upper Limit of Noise Levels (dB) |
|Wheelhouse |65 |
|Cabins |60 |
|Mess Room |65 |
|Sick Bay |60 |
|Galley |75 |
|Offices |65 |
|Engine Room |110 |
|Engine Control Room |75 |

Noise Measurement Report

|Cabins & Compartments Noise Level under 100% MCR |
|Space |Measured Sound Levels (dB) |
|Wheelhouse (Fwd) | |
|Wheelhouse (Aft) | |
| | |
|Upper forecastle deck corridor | |
|Chief engineer room (301) | |
|Captain room (302) | |
|2 Crew Cabin (303) | |
|4 SP Cabin (304) | |
|2 Crew Cabin (305) | |
|Office (306) | |
|Bosun store | |
| | |
|Forecastle deck corridor | |
|2 Crew Cabin (201) | |
|2 Crew Cabin (202) | |
|4 SP Cabin (203) | |
|4 SP Cabin (204) | |
|4 SP Cabin (205) | |
|Laundry (206) | |
|4 SP Cabin (207) | |
|Meeting room (208) | |
|2 Crew Cabin (209) | |
|Forecastle store | |
|Forecastle linen store | |
| | |
|Main deck corridor | |
|Recreation room (101) | |
|Mess room (102) | |
|4 SP Cabin (103) | |
|Galley (104) | |
|4 SP Cabin (105) | |
|Provision store (106) | |
|Hospital (109) | |
|Deck store | |
| | |
|ECR | |
|Engine room | |
|Fwd cement compartment | |
|Aft cement compartment | |
|Bow thrusters compartment | |
|Steering gear compartment | |
| | |
|Wheelhouse (exposed deck) | |
|Upper forecastle (exposed deck) | |
|Forecastle deck (exposed deck) | |
|Main deck (exposed deck) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|Measuring Instrumentation |Make |Type |Serial No. |
|Sound Level Meter | | | |
| |
|Calibration of Sound Meter |Date of Calibration: |Expiry Date: |
|- At survey by competent Authority | | |
| |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Vibration Measurements

Vibrations Measurement Report

|Space |Measured Levels in mm/s |
|Wheelhouse (Fwd) | |
|Wheelhouse (Aft) | |
|Upper forecastle deck corridor | |
|Forecastle deck corridor | |
|Main deck corridor | |
|Main deck cargo area | |
|Deck store | |
|Bosun store | |
|ECR | |
|Engine room | |
|Fwd cement compartment | |
|Aft cement compartment | |
|Bow thrusters compartment | |
|Steering gear compartment | |
| | |
|Measuring Instrumentation |Make |Type |Serial No. |
|Noise Meter | | | |
| |
|Calibration of Meter |Date of Calibration: |Date of Expiry: |
|- At survey by competent Authority | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Machinery Part

Emergency Fire Pump Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: |Room |
|Emergency Fire Pump Trial |Machinery | |
| |Pressure Measurement |Verified |
|Fire Fighting System | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Endurance Trial

Conditions

1. Draught: Approximate 4.0m mean

2. Total Trial duration: 4 Hours under 100% MCR

Note: Refer to Separate Caterpillar Engine Report

| |Port Main Shafting Bearing |Stbd Main shafting Bearing |
|Location |Temp. o C |Vibration Velocity in mm/s |Temp. o C |Vibration Velocity in mm/s |
| | |(RMS) | |(RMS) |
|Shaft Tunnel | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Main Engines Fuel Consumption Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard |PT ASL Shipyard |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. |H 1074 |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|Fuel Oil Consumption Trial during |Machinery | |
|Endurance Trial (100% MCR) | | |
|Machinery |Measurement |Verified |
|Port Main Engine FO |Hrs |Reading |UOM |Ave in ltr/hr | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| |1 | |Ltr | | |
| | | | | | |
| |2 | |Ltr | | |
| |3 | |Ltr | | |
| |4 | |Ltr | | |
|Stbd Main Engine FO |Hrs |Reading |UOM |Ave in ltr/hr | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| |1 | |Ltr | | |
| | | | | | |
| |2 | |Ltr | | |
| |3 | |Ltr | | |
| |4 | |Ltr | | |
|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Electrical

Main Electrical Power Plant and Blackout Test

The emergency source of electrical power is a generator, which must be able to start automatically upon failure of the electrical supply from the main source of electrical power. E-generator to carry its full rated load as quickly as is safe and practicable, subject to a maximum of 45 s, which to sufficient to supply for E-lighting and other essential equipments such as emergency fire pump, navigation & communication system etc.

Note: E-gen starts up after ______ Sec of vessel black out.

|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Lighting Test – Main/Emergency/Temporary

Lighting Illumination Measurement

|Illumination Test |
|Space |Lux Level |Measured Level |Note |
|Wheelhouse |150 | | |
|Cabins |150 | | |
|Office |300 | | |
|E/Gen room |100 | | |
|Laundry room |200 | | |
|AHU room |150 | | |
|Meeting room |300 | | |
|Recreation Room |150 | | |
|Mess Room |150 | | |
|Galley |300 | | |
|Hospital |300 | | |
|Compressor room |150 | | |
|ECR |300 | | |
|Engine room |200 | | |
|Steering compt |200 | | |
|B/T compt |200 | | |
|Winch Area |100 | | |

|Accepted: |Accepted: |Accepted: |
| | | |
| | | |
|Yard:__________________ |Class:__________________ |Owner:__________________ |

Dynamic Positioning Trial

Purpose

To test complete Dynamic Positioning System during Sea Trial Period:

Conditions

1. Draught: Approximate 4.0m mean

2. Vessel operating conditions to suit DP requirements

Method

3. Manufacturer’s Test Procedure for DP System to be adopted completely.(See Separate Document)

FI-FI System Trial

|Inspection and Testing | |Shipyard | |
|Dock Trials | |Hull No. | |
|Sea Trials | |Date | |
| |
|Subject: |Category: | |
|FIFI Trial |Ship | |
|Instructions /Preparations for Testing/Trials: |
|To test the fire fighting system on board is to be tested for length and height of throw, in order to meet the class requirements for fire |
|fighting. |
|Conditions |Weather/Sea Conditions |
|Service Speed Draught |[M] |Wind - Direction | |
|Trial Speed Draught |[M] |Wind - Speed | |
|Water Depth |[M] |General Weather Conditions | |
| | |Sea State – [Max 2] | |
| | |Ocean Current -- Speed | |
| | |Ocean Current -- Direction | |
|Description |Result |Completed Y/N |Verified |
|M/E switch to FIFI mode and system made ready to |N.A |Yes / No | |
|FIFI System | | | |
|System activated and run to full power |N.A |Yes / No | |
|Port FIFI Monitor Throw Length | |Yes / No | |
|Port FIFI Monitor Throw Height | |Yes / No | |
|Stbd FIFI Monitor Throw Length | |Yes / No | |
|Stbd FIFI Monitor Throw Height | |Yes / No | |
|Water Curtain Coverage |N.A |Yes / No | |

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Enrice Lexie Accident: International Law Essay

...legal aspects of coastal state jurisdiction and the sovereign immunity available to the Italian marines under international law and the national law extensively. The views of the Supreme court on the coastal state jurisdiction with regard to Enrica Lexie incident appears to be final, despite the Court having allowed the Italian marines to re- agitate the jurisdiction issue in the Special Court, which will try the crimes committed by the Italian marines from Enrica Lexie . The investigation of the Enrica Lexie incident is now destined to go to the Special Court once the investigation is completed and charges are laid. The legal aspects of other post judgment developments such as Italy’s initial refusal to send back the Italian marines for trial in India and the consequential order of the Supreme Court restraining the movement of the Italian Ambassador outside India are also dealt with. Obviously, an enquiry of this nature involves sifting judicial decisions on coastal State jurisdiction over crimes committed from a foreign vessel in an area beyond national jurisdiction in the light of UNCLOS, SUA Act and other relevant international conventions and national legislations. Italy has...

Words: 8730 - Pages: 35

Free Essay

Tatanic

...mother of all ships was a massive palace with intentions to stay afloat for days even in a worst case scenario. She was almost 900 feet long and almost 11 stories high, but in less than four hours, years of investment came to an end. Clearly an investigation to mitigate future disaster unfolded and the results were mind blowing. ”In the construction of the Titanic no limit of cost circumscribed their endeavor, and when this vessel took its place at the head of the line every modern improvement in shipbuilding was supposed to have been realized; so confident were they that both owner and builder were eager to go upon the trial trip; no sufficient tests were made of boilers or bulkheads or gearing or equipment, and no life-saving or signal devices were reviewed; officers and crew were strangers to one another and passengers to both; neither was familiar with the vessel or its implements or tools; no drill or station practice or helpful discipline disturbed the tranquility of that voyage, and when the crisis came a state of absolute unpreparedness stupefied both passengers and crew, and in their despair the ship went down, carrying as needless a sacrifice of noble women and brave men as ever clustered about the Judgment Seat in any single moment of passing time”. (Smith. 1912). Recommendation from the investigation panel was suggested, with stringent declaration. According to Senator Raynor, from his findings he recommended sufficient amount of lifeboat and ships be equipped...

Words: 1489 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Odysseus: The Hero In Homer's The Odyssey

...Odyssey. Odysseus’s selfless actions demonstrate that he is a hero, for he chooses to offer service to those in need and firmly withstands burdensome trials. On the difficult journey back home, Odysseus’s men are trapped under the captivating spell of the Lotus-Eaters. Odysseus promptly responds to this crisis: “Whoever ate that sweet fruit/ lost the will to report back, preferring instead/ to stay there, munching on lotus, oblivious to home./ I hauled them back wailing to the ships,/bound them under the bunches, then ordered / all hands to board their ships on the...

Words: 575 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Study on Use of Chlorinated Rubber Paints for Machinery Bilges

...challenge to the maintainer due to poor accessibility and unavoidable effects of running machinery such as spillage of cooling sea water, spillage of fuel, spillage of lub oil, high ambient temperature and drainage of hot water below feed quality (in case of steam driven machinery). Coal tar epoxy paint (CTE) has been in use in these bilges. However the expected life of CTE could not be achieved, in many cases, as stringent surface preparation standards (Grit blasting to Sa 2.5) specified for the paint system could not be achieved prior to application of CTE. Creating sufficient accessibility to undertake grit blasting in machinery bilges has also been found to be extremely demanding in terms of time and effort, even during an MR when the engine bearers are thoroughly surveyed. Hence it can be seen that the ideal paint scheme, for machinery bilges, would be one which can accept the standard of surface preparation achievable by means of manual methods, in poor accessibility conditions, typical of a machinery compartment, often with the vessel afloat. Paucity of time required for boxing up of refitted machinery, critical for undocking, often restricts the possibility of undertaking painting in machinery bilges during the docked time. Chlorinated rubber based paint applied by brush has been tried out as an alternative paint system. This paper is a report on a case study of the application of chlorinated rubber paint in the bilges of INS Fiction. 2. Paint Specifications: - The...

Words: 871 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Fast Cargo Vessel

...transit at high speed? COI 5: Is the vessel capable of a rapid turnaround? 2. Describe how these Critical Validation Issues are to be tested. This is pitched at the Test and Evaluation Master Plan level, but may show aspects of lower level documentation to justify certain decisions. a. What major activities are required and when could they be carried out? b. Are there validation issues that should be carried out as (or before) the system is under development to minimize or mitigate risk? c. Describe the resources that would be required for these test programs, including assessing when they might be realistically available? Shonky Enterprises have identified a shortfall in the market between slow sea freight and expensive air freight. Market research and analysis of historical data conducted as part of the Needs Analysis has identified what the end-user (the customer) requires and how Shonky will meet the needs of this niche market. Information on how the vessel will be used and any risks that the project may or may not be financially viable for the company have be identified as a number of Critical Operational Issues (COIs). The COIs are the absolutes required for the project as they detail what is operationally expected of the system. Failure to meet any of the COIs can not be tolerated. Validation of the vessels suitability and effectiveness will occur during OT&E; however, there is a critical requirement for validation of...

Words: 5542 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Corrosion and Biofouling Resistance Evaluation of 90-10 Copper-Nickel

...condenser tubes and seawater piping. They still enjoy widespread use today not only for many navies but also in commercial shipping, floating production, storage and offloading vessels (FPSOs), and in multistage flash desalination. The two popular alloys contain 90% or 70% copper and differ in strength and maximum sea water velocity levels they can handle but it is the 90-10 coppernickel (CuNi10Fe1Mn) which is the more economic and extensively used. An additional benefit of this alloy is its high resistance to biofouling: in recent years this has led to sheathing developments particularly for structures and boat hulls. This paper provides a review of the corrosion and biofouling resistance of 90-10 coppernickel based on laboratory test data and documented experience of the alloy in marine environments. Particular attention is given to exposure trials over 8 years in Langstone Harbour, UK, which have recently been completed by Portsmouth University on behalf of the Nickel Institute. These examined four sheathing products; plate and foil as well as two composite products with rubber backing. The latter involved copper-nickel granules and slit sheet. The trial results are consistent with the behaviour of the alloy in the overall review. There is an inherent high resistance to marine biofouling when freely exposed. Prolonged exposure to quiet conditions can result in some growth of marine organisms but this is loosely...

Words: 4337 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Omalia State Failure, Piracy

...Citation: 50 Va. J. Int'l L. 553 2009-2010 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Nov 6 03:36:58 2013 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0042-6571 50TH ANNIVERSARY COMMEMORATIVE ESSAY Somalia: State Failure, Piracy, and the Challenge to International Law MARIO SILVA* Introduction .......................................................................................... I. T he Failed State ......................................................................... A . In General ........................................................................ B. Case Study: Somalia ........................................................ 1. Political Instability in Somalia ............................. 2. Economic Instability in Somalia .......................... 3. Humanitarian Challenges and Societal Instability in Somalia ............................................ II. P iracy ......................................................................................... A . In General ..................................................

Words: 11276 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Odysseus: A Tragic Hero

...I signaled the crew with frowns to set me free- they flung themselves at the oars and rowed on harder, Perimedes and Eurylochus springing up at once to bind me faster with rope on chafing rope But once we’d left the Sirens fading in our wake, once we could hear their song no more, their urgent call- my steadfast crew was quick to remove the wax I’d used to seal their ears and loosed the bonds that lashed me.” (12.508-517) Even though Odysseus was able to get him and his crew through the trial of the Island of Sirens, he appears to have more fails as a leader than success. Odysseus refuses to leave the cave of the cyclops Polyphemus. Despite his men’s urging to the contrary. “‘Let's make away with the cheeses, then come back- hurry, drive the lambs and kids from the pens to our swift ship, put out to sea at once!’ But I would not give way-” (9.253-259) Odysseus's stubborn spirits led to the death of many of his crew members. If Odysseus would have listened to the rest of his crew, he could have saved lives. But instead, he was too confident that he could handle whatever crossed his path. Not only does he not listen to crew, he also fails to communicate with crew about contents of bag he receives from Aeolus. After over-confident Odysseus sailed for 9 days by himself with no rest, he predictably fell asleep. He was exhausted. His men became curious and preceded to open the bag, not...

Words: 1221 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Current Status and Future of Shipbuilding Industry in Bangladesh

...nation with 1,66,000 sq. km area of sea, abundance with living and non-living resources. There are more than 200 rivers all around the country, with a total length of about 22,155 km, which occupy about 11% of total area of the country. Here rivers and water transports play a vital role for economical and commercial activities in Bangladesh. Major export and import of Bangladesh (about 85%) is also traveled by sea. At present more than 5,000 inland/coastal ships have been plying all over the country, which carry more than 90% of total oil product, 70% of cargo and 35% of passengers. More than 1,00,000 skilled workers and 150,000 semi-skilled workers are employed in this labor-intensive industry. All inland ships are constructed and repaired in local shipyards. Bangladesh harbours the second largest ship breaking industries in the world. They are the prime source of raw material including plate, frame, stiffener, longitudinal, pipe, old engine/generator, and even auxiliary machinery, for most of the local private shipbuilding yards. Those are used as raw material in manufacturing and repairing inland shipping fleet. Recently Bangladesh has successfully exported her first ocean going ship to Denmark, which was costing US$ 7 million. Ananda Shipyard and Slipway Ltd, the leading private owned shipyard, got orders from Germany, Denmark and Mozambique to build more than a dozen ships with the value costing of US$300 million. Few more quality ship builders like Western Marine...

Words: 4854 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

En$U

...of Pi Hui-Fen Hsu Applied English Department National Taichung University of Science and Technology Lecturer Abstract This paper examines the universal structure of a mythological hero’s adventure in Life of Pi. The theory is based on Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces, which illustrated and distilled heroic patterns from various cultures. The hero’s journey has three stages: separation, initiation, and return. Answering a call to adventure, the hero departs from his familiar world and ventures into a region of supernatural wonder. Miraculous forces are encountered there and a decisive victory is won. He then returns from this mysterious land, bringing an elixir to bene¿t his fellow men. Through this journey of trials, the hero transforms his former self and achieves spiritual growth. Such heroes range from monster slayers to spiritual leaders such as the Buddha and Christ. Life of Pi is a fantasy adventure novel about an Indian boy who survives a shipwreck by drifting on a lifeboat with a tiger. His adventure ¿ts Joseph Campbell’s hero archetype. Similar to the mythological hero, Pi departs from his familiar land of India, answering the call for adventure to a new country. Protected by the supernatural powers of Hinduism, Catholicism, and Islam, he penetrates the dangerous and mysterious realm of the Pacific Ocean. After experiencing harsh ordeals, he returns to the human world with a life-enhancing boon to share. In this study, Campbell’s insights...

Words: 9172 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Summary of Merchant of Venice

...The Merchant of Venice opens on a street in Venice, where Antonio, a Venetian merchant, complains of a sadness he can't quite explain. His friends suggest they'd be sad too if they had as much merchandise to worry about as Antonio. Apparently all of his money is tied up in various sea ventures to exotic locales. But Antonio is certain it's not money that's bothering him. Antonio's friend Bassanio enters the scene, and we learn that Bassanio has been at the forefront of Antonio's mind. Apparently Bassanio just got back from a secret trip to see an heiress named Portia in Belmont. Bassanio financed his trip (and in fact, his entire lifestyle) by borrowing tons of money from Antonio. Portia is beautiful, intelligent, and, most important, rich. If Bassanio could only get together the appearance of some wealth, he would be in a good position to compete with all the other guys vying for Portia's attention. If they marry, he's all set financially. Antonio would be happy to lend Bassanio the money he needs to woo Portia, except, as we know, all of Antonio's money is at sea. The two friends part ways, agreeing that they'll try to raise the funds on Antonio's credit around town. Meanwhile, even rich heiresses have their troubles. Portia is plagued by suitors from the four corners of the earth but isn't allowed to choose the one she wants. Instead, her father, before his death, devised an unusual test. Three caskets – one gold, one silver, and one lead – are laid out before each suitor...

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Bussiness

...obligations of DCI. All other departments extend support services to Operations Department in meeting the above responsibilities. Operations department is responsible for monitoring and control of various projects undertaken. Operations Department exercise control over all the Project Offices as well as all the Vessels. Project Offices are headed by Project-in-charge (PIC) and Vessels are headed by Masters. Masters of all DCI vessels, report to PICs who in turn report to HOD (Ops). Operations department strives for improvement of performance/ production, provides safe practices in dredging operations, complying with all Statutory Rules & Regulations of the Government, Ports and by establishing Procedures to safe guard against all identified risks and avoidance of damage to the property particularly while working and at sea. Operations Department looks after deployment of various dredgers at Dredging and Reclamation Projects as per the contracts concluded between the DCI and customers such as Major Ports, Minor Ports, Indian Navy, Ship building yards, Inland dredging organizations in India and major dredging and reclamation projects abroad. Operations department also looks after issues with respect to carrying out Hydrographic survey, soil explorations/ investigations and analysis apart from undertaking towage of dumb dredgers and crafts by the Tugs owned and hired. HOD (Ops) is assisted by Dy. General Managers, Managers, Dy. Managers, Asst. Managers, Surveyors and...

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Contracts Can Be Declared Void If the Conditions of the Contract Become Impossible (Aka the Doctrine of Frustration). However, the Doctrine Cannot Be Invoked Just Because One Side Is Going to Lose a Lot of Money on the

...Chapter 19 Performance and breach of Sales and Lease Contracts Case 19.1 352 N.Y.S.2d 784 76 Misc.2d 1080 MAPLE FARMS INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF ELMIRA, New York, Defendant. Supreme Court, Special Term, Chemung County. Feb. 1, 1974. CHARLES B. SWARTWOOD, Justice. This is a motion for summary judgment in an action for declaratory judgment whereby the plaintiff seeks, first, a determination that the contract wherein the plaintiff agreed to supply milk to the defendant school district at an agreed price be terminated without further liability on the grounds of legal "impossibility' or "impracticality' because of the occurrence of events not contemplated by the parties which makes performance impracticable and, second, a determination that the defendant school district has authority to unilaterally relieve the plaintiff of its contract without violating Article 8, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution. We commend counsel on the quality of their briefs. The background of this dispute is that the price of raw milk at the farm site is and has been controlled for many years in this area by the United States Department of Agriculture through the New York-New Jersey Market Administrator. The president of the plaintiff milk dealer has for at least ten years bid on contracts to supply milk for the defendant school district and is thoroughly conversant with prices and costs. Though the plaintiff avers that the defendant was aware of...

Words: 30297 - Pages: 122

Premium Essay

Merchent of Venice

...Merchent of venice The Merchant of Venice opens on a street in Venice, where Antonio, a Venetian merchant, complains of a sadness he can't quite explain. His friends suggest they'd be sad too if they had as much merchandise to worry about as Antonio. Apparently all of his money is tied up in various sea ventures to exotic locales. But Antonio is certain it's not money that's bothering him. Antonio's friend Bassanio enters the scene, and we learn that Bassanio has been at the forefront of Antonio's mind. Apparently Bassanio just got back from a secret trip to see an heiress named Portia in Belmont. Bassanio financed his trip by borrowing tons of money from Antonio. Portia is beautiful, intelligent, and, most important, rich. If Bassanio could only get together the appearance of some wealth, he would be in a good position to compete with all the other guys vying for Portia's attention. If they marry, he's all set financially. Antonio would be happy to lend Bassanio the money he needs to woo Portia, except, as we know, all of Antonio's money is at sea. The two friends part ways, agreeing that they'll try to raise the funds on Antonio's credit around town. Meanwhile, Portia is plagued by suitors from the four corners of the earth but isn't allowed to choose the one she wants. Instead, her father, before his death, devised an unusual test. Three caskets – one gold, one silver, and one lead – are laid out before each suitor, and whoever picks the right one gets the girl. Portia...

Words: 1487 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Costa Concordia Disaster

...Molly Howe Southern New Hampshire University Abstract This case study examines the Costa Concordia disaster in the context of organizational behavior. It will provide an analysis on the following issues: the breakdown of communication, to much group cohesion resulting in groupthink, lack of strong leadership, and the lack of good decision-making. These issues resulted in the accident and the unnecessary loss of life. This case study will also look at possible solutions for each of the issues. Keywords: communication, groupthink, leadership, and decision-making. The Costa Concordia Disaster On January 13, 2012, the Costa Concordia crashed off of Isola del Giglio, an island off the Tuscan coast. The Costa Concordia was a cruise ship part of Costa Crociere S.p.A, a subsidiary of Carnival Corp (Carnival Corp). The crash was a result of the deviation off the preplanned route (Del Valle, S. 2012). Captain Francesco Schettino is said to have traveled too close to the island hitting a granite reef that tore a hole in the side. What happened next was a disaster that resulted in 32 deaths (theguardian.com, 2013). Captain Schettino did not order an evacuation, or fully inform the authorities of the dire situation on board until an hour after the crash. The passengers aboard had not yet completed the safety drills on board and the crew on board seemed to lack the correct leadership in a disaster situation to properly assist passengers on board resulting greater loss of life (Del...

Words: 3754 - Pages: 16