Premium Essay

South Korea Should Be a Nuclear Weapon State

In:

Submitted By badsoden
Words 1027
Pages 5
The rising concern of North Korea and its threat to the world with nuclear tests is apparently in need to meet a new and practical solution. Six countries just sitting down trying to negotitate but ending up nowhere is not the measure the world wants. Over years, United States and South Korea has tried to soothe the temper of North Korea but it never seemed to work. In fact, it only allowed the rogue state to be a bad tempered infant, throwing temper whenever things do not go the way they want. Such provovative acts resulted in actual victims and death of South korean people. For example, the cheon-An crisis took away over 40 soldiers, who were someone's father, son or beloved sibling. Now, North Korea dropped off from the NPT and is trying to throw its temper again, but this time harder. The rising tension between the two Koreas is making citizens feel frustrated, especially those living near the northern end of South Korea. Something must be done, but this time something practical. In this sense, a new meausre to suppress North Korea, not to soothe, is in need. In other words, South Korea must become a nuclear weapon state for the following three reasones: the impossibility of the world changing into a world without nuclear weapons, the need to safeguard against North Korea and lastly the contribution to peace through nuclear paradox. Firstly, the contemporary society cannot be fully disarmed with nuclear weapons and thus a more practical alternative should be seeked for. Although the world currently shouts for an idealistic world of harmony and peace without nuclear power, that is not the reality. In truth, the current society cannot completely eliminate nuclear weapons due to two factors: the existence of Rogue States with nuclear power and the hesitation of nuclear weapon states or the P-5 to eliminate nuclear weapons. To start with, the so called rogue

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Assembly Line

...Should "South Korea" be allowed to develop a NUCLEAR weapon? YES Self protection is no crime. They should be able to protect themselves from threatening North Korea. All countries should have the right to possess some nuclear weapons for their own safety, as long as they agree to a treaty. It would not be possible to get rid of all nuclear weapons in the world, and they should not be controlled by only like 8 countries. Moreover South Korea is very vulnerable to North Korea, since this country's leader seems determined to have nuclear capabilities. South Korea having nuclear weapons might deter (prevent) North Korea somewhat if they were considering using nuclear force against another country. I think, for their own protection, the South Korean military could possess short range nuclear weapons to help neutralize or equalize things with the North Korean regime. Why not Russia, USA, and China allowed South Korea to develop their own nuclear weapon? Considering that they have their own? AGAINST If we talk about Russia and China the first reason is North Korea is against South Korea and as we know that Russia and China support North Korea so it can’t be denied that the enemy of my friend is also my enemy. The Second reason is that a country that owns nuclear weapons is feared and respected in the international circuit. That’s why they don’t let another country possess its own nukes. If we talk about USA, it’s obvious that USA supports South Korea by providing with US army...

Words: 471 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

North Korea Research Paper

...North Korea has been a thorn in the side of America’s Foreign affairs. North Korea is one of the few countries in the global community that openly displays very strong Anti-american rhetoric. Now with the capabilities of possessing a nuclear missile that can strike the Continental United States it has become quite apparent that North Korea is major threat. I believe there is a way to help solve this “North Korea” problem that will both stabilize the korean peninsula and maintain the power balance in the asia-pacific region. The whole “North Korea” problem started back in 1945 when after the unconditional surrender of Japan. The Soviet Union and the United States occupied the north and south of korea divided at the 38th parallel respectively. In 1948 after failed unification talks, two new governments were formed. South Korea having a Federal Presidential Republic (Democracy) and North Korea having an Unitary one-party Juche state (Communist). At this point the tension between the two koreas grew to the point of war. On June 25, 1950 North Korea invaded South Korea sparking what would be a war lasting more than three years. During this time period the Americans and the UN were the allies of South Korea and the Soviet and China were allies of North Korea. After three...

Words: 1175 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Nuclear Fallacy of North Korea

...The Nuclear Fallacy of North Korea Bill Gonzalez April 22 2013 Since its inception, North Korea has never ceased to stir up trouble with the international community. Officially know as the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK), North Korea split from the neighbouring South Korea at the end of the Second World War in 1945. The young nation was initially adopted by the Soviet Union, which implemented their Communist ideals into the countries government and society. The tension between the communist government of the north and the republican government of the south would eventually lead to the Korean War, a three-year conflict which saw the US and other members of the UN supporting South Korea and North Korea being supported by the Soviet Union and later China. The Korean War, which never ended in a piece treaty (it’s still technically going on today), would lead to the strained relations that exist between North Korea and the UN today. North Korea’s economy initially recovered from the aftermath of the Korean War, however increasing debt, inflation, the mismanagement of funds, numerous droughts, and the lack of western trade partners lead to an eventual economic decline in the late 1970’s. North Korea has since been one of the world’s poorest countries, with roughly 20-27% of the population living below the poverty line. The social economic issues in North Korea haven’t stopped the government from developing nuclear weapons however, a process which has lead to...

Words: 3699 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Korean War and Limited Warfare

...mind would dare attack the United States (or any of its satellite states), following its emergence as a super power after its victory in WWII and the U.S’s willingness to use nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are regarded as absolute weapons and having them was a deterrence to other countries of going to war with the United States out of fear of total annihilation. The Korean War challenged the assumption that having nuclear weapons meant total deterrence of war or guaranteed total victory in war for the United States. Between 1945 and 1949 America was the only nation to have nuclear weapons. This changed in 1949 when the Soviet Union announced that they now had nuclear weapon capabilities. This gave pause to America because now another Superpower and their enemy had the same ultimate weapon. The U.S. thought that if it gave up South Korea so easily the perception would be that America was soft on Communism and give way to the enemy (China and the Soviet Union) to expand its influence. This would upset the balance of power between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Now wars had to be fought strictly for political reasons. War always has been fought for political and military goals but now wars had to be fought only with political ends in mind and the acceptance of no military gains. Due to nuclear weapons even political objectives were limited and the best each side could hope for was to maintain the status quo. When the United States intervened in the war on the Korean...

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

North Korea Research Paper

...North Korea was formed in September 9, 1948 as a result of South Korea separating from the communist party, North Korea (“History”). The border between North and South Korea, known as the de-militarization zone (DMZ), is startling. The zone is 150 miles long running from coast to coast on the 38th parallel, and is one of the world's most guarded borders in the world (“Demilitarized”). However, there are several lingering questions pertaining to the protection and secrecy of this border. North Korea is one of the most isolated countries on the planet. North Korea is in possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that the country is run by a ruthless supreme leader. These qualities contribute to the overall negative facet of the North...

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

North Korea Research Paper

...inform you about our relations with the communist regime of North Korea. Their nuclear weapons have been in production and tested since 2008 ( Fitzpatrick 5-6 ). It has been nine years since the start of the test and there are no signs in reducing its production and use. These weapons of mass destruction can destroy a single country and it could be the spark of a new world war. Ever since the victory of the allies after World War 2, Korea was divided into two countries. The North side became a communist country as for the south, it became democratic. The regime up in the north have been living in isolation from the world and is known as the “ hermit kingdom “ ( Fitzpatrick 7 ). The United States at the time was very anti-communism. They wanted to stop the spread of communism by helping east Asian countries. They had successfully stop communism from spreading into South Korea but failed with Vietnam. Because we successfully stopped communism from spreading into South Korea, we were able to become allies with them causing the North to show signs of animosity....

Words: 574 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Security Competition Between the Us and North Korea

...Conclusion This concluding chapter evaluates the implications of this research project through five sections. First, a postscript briefly recalls the process of US-North Korean interaction from the transition to the Administration of George W. Bush in 2001 to Pyongyang’s June 2008 demolition of the cooling tower at the Yongbyon nuclear facility. Secondly, and based on the findings of my empirical case study in Chapters Four and Five, I comparatively examine the strength of offensive realism, defensive realism and constructivism in explaining the extent to which US-North Korean security competition was mitigated from 1993 to 2000. The third section considers the implications of this research project’s findings for the ability of policymakers to exercise security dilemma sensibility. The fourth section concludes this PhD thesis by laying out a proposed research agenda that builds on the findings of this research project. 1. Postscript: Transition to George W. Bush George W. Bush succeeded to the US presidency in early 2001 on a political platform that pointed to elements of ideological fundamentalism and assumptions of inherent bad faith in Pyongyang. Robert Woodward argued that the Bush Administration’s outlook was based on moral absolutism that cast the US as a crusader against the ‘evil’ North Korean leadership. Similarly, Charles L. Pritchard, who served as National Security Council Director for Asian Affairs under the Clinton Administration, and the US Representative...

Words: 9664 - Pages: 39

Premium Essay

Defense Strategy Essay 1

...perspective of United States policy options for North Korean nuclear and strategic missile capabilities 16 February 2014 Benjamin J. McClellan CPT, USAR North Korea’s nuclear and strategic missile capabilities present grave challenges to regional security. Pyongyang’s propensity to export its weapons also threatens the global non-proliferation regime. Despite economic impoverishment and an inability to feed its people, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea remains heavily armed and ready to fire first. Its recent and continued military provocations demonstrate the potential for resumed conflict on the Korean Peninsula. Policymakers must determine the appropriate manner to address these threats. Current considerations for policy options include containment of North Korean capabilities, destruction of North Korean capabilities without regime change, and compelling regime change in North Korea. This paper will offer analysis on each of these policy courses of action. The merits and drawbacks of each will be weighed against the ends, ways, means framework of strategy formulation, as well as the suitability, feasibility, acceptability risk model. For the purposes of this analysis, the stipulated end is elimination of North Korea’s nuclear and missile capability. North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Capabilities As recently as July 2013, North Korea is believed to possess between four and eight nuclear weapons. Pyongyang claims that this and further nuclear capability is necessary...

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Political Science

...Canadian International Council Strengthening the Non-Proliferation Regime: The Role of Coercive Sanctions Author(s): T. V. Paul Source: International Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, Nuclear Politics (Summer, 1996), pp. 440-465 Published by: Canadian International Council Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40203123 Accessed: 30/11/2010 19:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cic. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Canadian International Councilis collaborating...

Words: 9239 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

2003 Apush Dbq Analysis

...(Background Essay). The Soviet Union and the United States had many differences, however, one of their greatest differences were over a political and economic system called communism. In it’s purest form, communism is a belief that private property should be replaced by community ownership. Due to the major loss of 27 million Soviet soldiers, the Soviet Union wanted to prevent any further casualties. Therefore, the Soviet’s policy was the expansion of not only the country itself but also communism. With major disapproval of communism, the US made a policy of containment which prevented the Soviet Union and Soviet communism from spreading. Thus marking the beginning of the Cold War, which will last from 1947-1991....

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

North Korea Human Rights Violations

...North Korea. One of the most seclusive —yet one of the most controversial— countries in the world. Controlled by dictators from the Kim family since the end of the Korean War in 1953, the country is led today by Kim Jong-un with ruthless expectations. Notorious for its labor camps, draconian punishments, public executions, and a myriad of other human rights violations, the international community has called for increased sanctions and restrictive trade in efforts to curtail these crimes and stifle the regime. However, North Korea has easily bypassed this by deploying a tactic of their own: sending forced laborers abroad to harvest cold currency for the dictatorship. Furthermore, in the past five years, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s...

Words: 1779 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Nuclearization of Japan

...without nuclear weapons. He added, “this goal will not be reached quickly.” As demonstrated by the Measheimer and Zakheim discussion, we cannot be certain if nuclear weapon realize the world a more secure place, but we should minimize the potential power-inbalance caused by disarmament . In order to reach Obama’s “utopian” vision, the United States has to choose as realist approach, like the one posed by Carr . This paper proposes a realistic approach to nuclear disarmament. Obama’s plan does not take into account the power-inbalance that his plan would create in East Asia. Nor does it fully appreciate how Japan would respond to this power inbalance. This paper analyzes Japanese nuclear history in order to explain the current attitude toward nuclear weapons and how this attitude need to be taken seriously by the United States. First it needs to be repeated that Japan is the only country in the world to have suffered through nuclear attacks. As a result, the population in Japan is strongly opposed to nuclearization. This sensitivity has increased since the Fukushima nuclear disaster. But there still remains to the possibility of nuclearization since some political leaders have even sought out nuclear bombs. This stance is the result of a lingering Cold War structure that still exists in East Asia. Since World War II, Japan has officially officially expresses opposition toward nuclear weapons. In the 1976, Japanese Parliament passed “Three Non-Nuclear Principles”...

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Is Preemptive War Wrong

...paper that preemptive war against North Korea is wrong. I am going to show that claims and conditions of Just War Theory disapprove of a preemptive war against North Korea, even with their concurrent development of nuclear warheads and ICBMs and threats by the North Korean head of state, Kim Jong Un, to the United States. I will show that the aspects of quantitative utilitarianism determine that the results of avoiding war are better than those of preemptive war. I will argue that Natural Law Theory rejects a preemptive war due to failure to defend natural inclinations and satisfy the principles of forfeiture and double effect. Then, I will consider the arguments...

Words: 1419 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Atomic Shield vs Iron Curtain

...capitalist and communist ideologies that ultimately led to the United States winning the Cold War. The Cold War was a post-World War II stalemate between the world’s two reigning superpowers, the Soviet Union and the United States. The world now saw opposition between the United States’ capitalist visions verses the Soviet Union’s communist visions. Various roots contributed to the start of the Cold War. Even before the end of World War II, suspicions of the Soviets were present. In October 1917, a revolution in Russia led by Lenin Bolshevik and the communists alarmed many Americans. The Communists had seized power and often used violence to achieve their goals. With a Marxist view, they rejected religion and the idea of private property. It was obvious that the Soviet Union wanted to spread communism throughout the world. After World War II, there loomed a danger of appeasement, because of the familiar events that occurred with Hitler and Germany. Hitler made demands that allowed the Nazis to expand further, and many believed that the Soviet Union was more fixed on world domination than the Nazis were. At the wars end, Stalin pushed to control areas along ports connected to the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. Soviet forces supported communist ambitions in Northern Iran, Greece, and China led by Mao Zedong. Russian troops controlled the Northern half of Korea. In Vietnam, leftist nationalists were fighting against the return of...

Words: 1316 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Xxxx

...North Korea: A Stand Down or a Stand Off? Christopher Caver Strayer University North Korea ENG 215 Research & Writing Professor J. Welch June 9, 2013 With North Korea´s recent threats on several occasions to launch a nuclear weapon at various countries to include South Korea, Guam, Japan, and even the United States, the United Nations and the United States cannot standby any longer. Additionally does North Korea’s recent withdraw from verbal threats to the United States and its allies indicate a stand down? Although nuclear talks and heated talks between the U.S. and North Korea are nothing new, it has become progressively more frequent and North Korea has been determined to be seen as a nuclear capable country. Although for now, North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong Un has receded from his talks of going to war with South Korea and other United States´ allies, can the U.S. trust the North Koreans knowing how they continually say one thing while secretly doing the opposite. Additionally can the U.S. and the U.N. continue to allow North Korea to possess nuclear capabilities while continuing to ignore other major issues within the country? [pic] As you can see in the photograph above, North Korea has gone as far as to strategically place several missles which could be possibly armed with nuclear warheads in various positions in the launch position for the world to see. The...

Words: 2675 - Pages: 11