Free Essay

Stem Cell Research Debate

In:

Submitted By cheerfun
Words 2970
Pages 12
Stem Cell research is a very controversial topic in today’s society. This topic brings up many ethical questions about it is right to do the research or not. Stem cells come from embryos that are only a few days old. The ethical issues that arise are many. If one believes that an embryo is a baby upon fertilization, then one would feel that this was unethical to do the research no matter what the benefits would be. On the other hand, some feel the benefits of what can be learned from stem cell research outweighs the ethical and moral dilemmas that are argued. This long debate brings about many questions about the ethical approaches, that there have been restrictions placed on the research in the lines of what type of embryos can be used for the research. Ethical or not there are always two sides to debate, stem cell research is no different. Throughout this paper I will discuss the ethical issues that stem cell research brings into light and the benefits that stem cell research brings into light that may just outweigh the ethical issues, then determine it these benefits and ethical issues really make stem cell research the most beneficial way to help cure diseases such as juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s disease or even spinal cord or neck injuries.
Argument for Research Stem Cell research can help scientist discover more about human cells and how they grow, change, and replace damaged cells within the body. The information that can be learned is priceless. Using this research has made many breakthroughs in medical help for many disease states. Stem cells come from three different sources: adult cells, cord cells, and embryonic cells. There are draw backs from using an adult cell because it is a very painful procedure to pull the from an adult’s bone marrow. Embryonic cells are very controversial because there are from fertilized eggs that are only a few days old. Many couples that use in vitro-fertilization can donate the unused eggs to research. Since this research will ultimately kill the egg many people feel that this is not ethically right. According to Lawrence Soler, “Most scientists believe that research on stem cells from embryos could be the difference between life and death for millions of people. This research may be the best-and, in some cases, the only chance to find a cure for diseases that now kill thousands daily” (Soler, 2001, pg. 32). Researchers want to use stem cells because they have a potential to develop into different types of cells. Studying how these cells form together to create a human being has taught scientist many important facts about the human body. These cells can be used to repair other cells or in tissues they have a repair mechanism that can help repair the tissue, which is why scientists want to research to help with spinal cord and neck injuries. When stem cells divide they have a chance to become other stem cells or other types of cells, which is how an embryo begins to form into a human being. The cells keep dividing until they create a baby. Scientist has learned much about the different cells of our bodies and have discovered that they can be used to help damaged and worn out tissue. The research has also showed scientists the properties of the cells and that cells have unique regenerating properties and these properties is what enables the potential to treat diseases like diabetes. With all these findings there are still more questions that need to be answered. This is why stem cell research is so important. An embryonic stem cell can regenerate itself many times without differentiating itself, but most non-embryonic stem cells cannot (Stem Cell Basics, 2009). Studying these cells will help scientists discover ways to use these cells to help others and can help with testing different drugs that are being developed. Many people do not like testing of drugs on actual human beings, so this can be a way to help with debate, by allowing the stem cells to react to different drugs for research purpose. They can then determine if the drug is safe and able to help people. Knowing how the drug will react with the cells will help determine the drug safety. Stem cells can also be taken from bone marrow in adults. This is a very painful procedure that many people are not willing to endure unless they do not have a choice in the matter. There is another way to do this research by using human skin cells that are genetically modified. This was discovered in hopes that the ethical issues for using embryonic cells could be bypassed, but this has not been the case. This type of research raises other ethical issues, but the possibilities that one day patient-and disease-specific pluripotent could one day yield clinical benefits (Hyun, 2008, pg. 20). This type of research with adult skin cells will still need to have embryotic stem cell research because the ongoing research can give scientists a better understanding of all human cells. This understanding and analyses of human cells will bring more information and discoveries to help scientist develop ways to help humans cure diseases. This type of research can have its own set of problems with causing infections or other major disease if the cells are not withdrawn from the adult carefully. The other reason both should be done is the embryotic stem cells are needed to be the control cell in the experiments with the skin cells, so they can see how things are changed and manipulated. Throughout this research there are positives for humanity that will help humans live longer and healthier from the potential information researchers will learn by studying the stem cells.
Argument against Research The most controversial is the embryonic cells because the embryo is destroyed when abstracting the cells. The best way to say why many are against stem cell research is that the primary rule of medicine has always been, “First, do no harm” (Soler, 2001, pg. 32). Use of embryonic cells does do harm to a living cell. There have been many laws that do not allow scientists to conduct research on humans wither their consent. An embryonic cell is unable to give their consent at the timer of formation, so ethically it should not be used for research. This is a very the wishes of someone that is unwilling, so they should not be allowed to avoid this development stage of life to do research. The killing of the embryonic cells is harming a human and therefore is breaking the primary rule of research. When we begin to talk about ethical issues, often time’s religious beliefs are also brought into the discussion. There are only ethical issues, but religious issues with killing the embryonic cell to do the research. In the Jewish religion, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein states that:
….what if the life that would need to be sacrificed was that of a fetus? May we permit abortion to save life an already born person? The Mishna clearly states that is the life of a woman in labor is threatened by her fetus, the fetus should be aborted. But once a portion of the baby has emerged, we may not abort the fetus, because “one may not set aside one person’s life for the sake of another.” The principle behind this ruling is that one may not kill someone who is unjustly pursuing a third party to kill him. Since the fetus, who is not yet considered a “complete” person is “pursuing” the mother in a way that will inevitably result in her death, we may kill it first. But, once it has even partially emerged, it is considered a full-fledge person. Now we are faced with a dilemma…(Eisenberg, D. MD, 2001). The ethical and religious issues are numerous. The ethical reasons questions how scientist can feel it is okay to research on an embryonic cell when as soon as the cell begins to form it is considered by many to be a human being already. The religious issues come into play with this same argument. When discussing ethical issues, or moral philosophy, we are investigating how we can evaluate this behavior in terms of right and wrong, good and bad (Mosser, 2010, pg.37). With that in mind how can killing an embryo be morally right? It would depend on what you consider a baby. The point being when fertilization actually takes place or once the embryo divides and becomes a fetus after a few days. This is where the debate starts for the ethical reason and the religious reasons. The stem cell, once it starts to divide can be considered an abortion and this is why it is a controversial issue. Each individual has a right to be treated with human worthiness no matter what their stage of life is at the time. Abortion is looked at being wrong because it is killing another human being, and they should be treated with human dignity. We should not treat others as a means to an end which is how destroying an embryo can be seen (Outka, 2002, pg. 178). Not only does stem cell research cause many people to get upset and strongly argue their side of their belief, it is a very highly political issue. Political parties make this a very high profile political debate, which is why they have placed regulations on stem cell research. The embryo must be donated from extra eggs that were used for in vitro-fertilization. The eggs are destroyed after research begins and there is no way not to destroy the fertilized egg. Each country looks at this issue many different ways. The United States has been torn on the issue and many religious beliefs get involved in the argument. Most of the Governments seem not to allow the cloning that can take place from this research, but will allow the eggs to be researched on as long as they have complete consent from the donors.
My Stand Before stating this paper, I did not know which side of the debate I actually would agree with. I am still unsure, but I have learned much more about the issue and I am able to determine that I have mixed feelings over the debate. One ethical theory that can be looked at for this argument can be deontology ethics. This would ignore the fact that the consequence of the act could be right or wrong, but takes into account that all acts have a consequence and that consequence should not play a role in evaluating the morality of something. This focuses on the will of the person carrying out the act (Mosser, 2010, pg. 42). Basically, saying the will of the researcher and his attention in carrying out the act and the duties and obligations one has in carrying out this task. Kant makes a good point about all people being treated with respect and not objects (Mosser, 2010, pg. 43). If you look at this rule for categorical imperative, then an embryo, that is considered a person, should be given respect and not just created as a means to an end to do research. Researchers that are only allowed to work on the extra embryos those parents donate after in vitro-fertilization, what’s to say they do not make “extra” on purpose just so they can experiment on them. They are already planning for the end goal and are only creating these eggs to be able to experiment on them. This shows no respect for what that embryo could become. Being that there are alternatives like using adult skin cells, I would think we need to look at this aspect a little further. I know that abstracting the cells can be very painful for a person, but if we have volunteers that do this to see if they are a match for someone, can they not use those cells to experiment with. They can pull a little extra and use those, this way we have a consenting adult and we are respecting them because they are consenting to the cells being abstracted. This would keep from killing another human being. The benefit of using your own adult cells for treatment can be there is less tissue rejection and everyone is does agree with this concept (Outka, 2002, pg. 180). There is no evidence that the embryonic cells can only have clinical advantages that the adult cells do not. This is one reason we cannot morally allow embryonic stem cells from being experimented on. We are using something that does not have a major advantage over other options for the experiments and research. Liberal Catholics feel that researchers can use the embryo for research as long as it is within a certain timeframe because they feel the embryo is not a fetus until the cell begins to individualize. Once the cells individualize then it is morally wrong to kill the cell. This is normally within the first 14 days of the cells development. The donors must have safeguards in place where they cannot specify who the therapeutic treatment will be used for and that they cannot be used for reproductive cloning. Many people work with fertility doctors and they have their extra frozen in case they need them later in life. Researchers know that many of these are just left to be forgotten about or just discarded. They feel instead of them going to waste they should be able to use these cells to be experiment with. I see the point they are making, but it still does not make it right for the cells to be experimented because that egg has the potential of being human and we should keep in mind that every human being deserves respect. A doctor should not create something, just so that it can be destroyed even if they feel it is for the greater good. It seems that most of the controversy is around using stem cells to clone another human being. Many countries have put in place laws that stop this kind of experimentation from taking place. Ever since scientists cloned the first animal there has been a fear that they will clone a human being. This is such a unknown territory and is not considered the correct way for a child to be born, not just only as a religious belief, but as an actual human existence. Cloning messes with the natural conception of a human being and should not be messed with. I believe that if you are going to mess with the natural steps of creation then you are messing with God and this should not be allowed. God places us on this earth for specific reasons and it is not one to destroy what he has created. I have a strong belief in God and feel that we should respect his creations and we do not need to try making our own creations.
Conclusion
Having many people believe that killing another human is wrong brings in moral and ethical issues. I have brought up both sides of the ethical issues showing why we should do the research and why we should not do the research. Even though stem cell research has taught us about how cells are formed and have given us ways to experiment with drugs without being on a human. It still brings up many questions about the treatment and respect of that potential human life. There are other alternatives that can be used in the experiments to learn about cell splitting and how they can repair dead tissue. Using the alternatives seems to be a better choice than taking a life of a fetus. Even though there is much debate on when the cells actually are considered to be an individual human. There are some scientists that feel that the adult stem cells have a better chance of being tolerated than embryonic stem cells and should be used instead. Studying and researching this topic has opened up my eyes to many different arguments over this topic. I still feel that it is wrong to create a fertilized egg just so it can be destroyed even if couples donate their extra eggs. Doctors can and will take advantage of this and will create more than what they need. Dealing with this argument does bring other issues into light, but the ethical and moral issues of experimenting with stem cells to help create better advances to help cure diabetes and disease like Parkinson’s or spinal or neck injuries may be better suited using adult cells for the possibility of less chance of rejecting the treatment.
References
Eisenberg, D. MD. (2001). Is the destruction of preexisting pre-embryos permitted for stem research? Retrieved on June 18, 2010 from http://www.aish.com/ci/sam/48969936.html
Hyun, I. (2008).Stem Cells from Skin Cells: The Ethical Questions. Hastings Center Report, 38(1), 20- 22. Retrieved on June 18, 2012 from EBSCOhost.
Mosser, Kurt. (2010). A concise introduction to philosophy. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.: San Diego, CA
Outka, G. (2002). The Ethics of Human Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 12(2), 175-213. Retrieved on June 28, 2012 from Project Muse DOI: 10.1353/Ken.2002.0012.
Stem Cell Basics:What are the unique properties of all stem cells?In Stem Cell Information. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. Retrieved July 1, 2012 from http://www.stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics/1.
Soler, L. & Haas. J. (2001). Is stem-cell research ethical? New York times Upfront. 134(3), 32. Retrieved on June 18, 2012 from ProQuest document ID: 82437246

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Stem Cell Research Debate

...Stem Cell Research Essay Stem Cell research is a highly controversial topic in the world of science. Many people disagree with and oppose the research because of their belief that the research is unethical. The laws regarding the research of Stem cells vary from country to country. Many countries have very strict laws on the research and some have completely banned it. There are many organizations and scientists that are pushing for the research and study of the stem cells. These viewpoints establish that Stem cells can be very beneficial for human use. There are three main types of stem cells: embryonic, tissue and induced pluripotent (Euro Stem Cell, 2012). Embryonic stem cells are used because they do not have a designated function...

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Debate

...Embryonic stem cell research has been a topic of controversy since the 1980’s when the practice started. Originally this type of research was banned by the federal government, but in 2009 Obama lifted the federal ban and allowed some funding. This type of research has not been accepted by American law or as a common convention. Stem cells have the ability to develop into many different types of cells such as nerve cells, cardiac cells, and liver cells and have regenerate to replace damaged cells. Stem cell research can be so beneficiary to lives and be an extraordinary scientific achievement. The problem is not many people agree. In this type of situation there is no in between the two arguments. Stem cell research should be permitted because...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Debate

...“Embryonic stem cell research has the potential to alleviate so much suffering. Surely, by working together we can harness its life-giving potential.” These words from the renowned former actress, Nancy Reagan, demonstrate the vast functions and significant impacts of stem cells in life. Stem cell research has come a long way since the nineteenth century as a cure for diseases and a savior of life. Most people view it as a method that aids researchers in advancing the use of embryos, however, stem cell research seems to have negative aspects as well. While using stem cells for treatments, it can involve the destruction of embryos, can lead to lethal side effects, and crosses ethical boundaries. Stem cell research has been an ethical dilemma...

Words: 1508 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Claim Paper Stem Cell Research

...CLAIM: President Bush’s veto of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act in July of 2006 was a proportional reaction to the expanding influence of conservative political ideology and religious fundamentalism throughout America. VARIABLES: My independent variables are conservative political ideology and religious fundamentalism. My dependant variable is President Bush’s 2006 veto of the Stem Cell Enhancement Act, also known as the H.R. 810 Bill. EXPECTATIONS: I expect to find overwhelming and convincing evidence to corroborate my assertion that the expanding influence of conservative political ideology and religious fundamentalism in America are the two most profound independent variables to affect President Bush’s 2006 veto of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act. I also expect to obtain convincing evidence that political conservatism and religiosity have an interactive effect on the public attitude towards stem cell research which directly influences federal policy concerning this controversial issue. It is my contention that the preponderance of evidence will confirm my theory that as the level of conservatism and religious zeal rises; the public support and enthusiasm for stem cell research will wane proportionally, resulting in federal policies that continue to be restrictive and obtuse. EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS THE CLAIM: With the advent of technology and subsequent advances in human stem cell research, the scientific and medical communities were inspired...

Words: 1939 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Arent We There Yet?

...world in science and technology. American technology has produced advances in many areas of medicine. As this medical research continues, there has controversy between advancing medicine through testing and preserving life. In the United States and around the world, there have been debates and laws created which demonstrate the controversy in stem cell research. One of the main debates is that stem research can be used to discover cures for illness. Many experts believe stem cell research can be used to help against diabetes, Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer (Lacayo, 2001). However, many people worry that stem cell research will be used for unethical purposes such as human cloning. They also argue that money from the government should not be used to destroy a human embryo. In the United States and around the world there have been many laws regarding stem cell research. President Bush was the first President that made funds available for stem cell research. (Bush, 2007). According to the National Institute of Health, a government biomedical research organization, President George W Bush announced in August, 2001 a policy which advances stem cell research. Federal funds may be used for research on human embryonic stem cells if the following three requirements are met: 1) the destruction of the embryo must be prior to August 9, 2001, 2) stem cells were removed from embryo for the purpose of reproduction, which “was no longer needed.” 3) the donor had informed consent...

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stem Cells

...Experimentation Critique Stem Cells Abstract According to human guidelines, human stem cell research is questionable. The main ethical dilemma revolves around whether or not an embryo is a human being of a cluster of cells. Stem cell research has the ability to provide treatment for many of today’s incurable diseases and disorders, and it is apparent this type of research produces many ethical issues in which one can consider both positive and negative for such research. Experimentation Critique Introduction Stem cell research is a modern method of discovering new medical break throughs. Research is involoved, using human embryos, causing heated moral debates. Human –nature and goal-based ethics theories apply to this controversial debate. The debate lies in the determionation of the embryos with moral status is owed. There has been extensive research in the underlying law and religious ethics surrounding the use of embryos for medical reasons. Discussed, is the debate, controversy, and opinion of government officials, in relation to the ethics involving stem cell research. Issues/Conflict Stem cell research proposes many ethical issues. The basis of this issue is that embryonic stem cells research holds such vast promise for so many people but obtaining the cell means destroying embryos. The ethical conflict brought on by stem cells means destroying embryos. The ethical conflict brought on by stem cell research is whether or not it is acceptable by social standards...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Stem Cell

...Name: Jeanette Khoury Title: Stem Cells Save Lives 1. Excite a. Good afternoon everyone b. I am honored to have been given the opportunity to speak with you all today. c. What if you or someone you know was told they would not be able to walk within the next 10 years but there is a cure out there that you are unable to have? 2. Launch d. I am here today to speak with you about the potential uses of stem cells, the funding for stem cell research and the ethical debates of stem cell research. e. If you knew that there might be a potential cure for a disease, would you want the government to follow the lead and explore the possibilities? The answer for me is yes. 3. Relate f. Four years ago, my aunt was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and told that she may not be able to walk in 10 years. g. While there currently is not a cure for MS, the use of stem cells will have a huge impact on treatments and possibly a future cure for this awful disease. 4. Persuade h. Stem cell research can have a significant impact in many areas of medicine. i. There are a variety of diseases and injuries in which a patient’s cells or tissues are destroyed and require organ or tissue transplants. 1. Stem cells are able to potentially create brand new tissue 2. Stem cells may be able to cure diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, type 1 Diabetes, spinal cord injuries, stroke...

Words: 1222 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Stem Cells

...Recent advances in human stem cell research have not only generated enormous enthusiasm on the part of researchers and optimistic predictions of revolutionary advances in biomedicine, but have also sparked considerable ethical and emotional public debate. There has been much controversy in the press about pros and cons of stem cell research . The important question to think about is Why the prospect of stem cell therapy has been greeted not as an innovation to be welcomed but as a threat to be resisted? The enormous capabilities of stem cells announce the beginning of an extraordinary advanced field of medicine that can help to cure deadly diseases . The present method , however, destroys human blastocyst that gives rise to intense controversy. (Monroe, Miller, & Tobis , 2008, p. 1) Stem cell controversy is the ethical debate centered on research involving the creation, usage and destruction of human embryonic stem cells. Around the world, many people believe that human embryo research , including the deliberate creation of embryos for valid research or clinical purposes , is wrong . Due to the controversy , some people argues that we should allow stem cell research but some of them are not in favour of stem cell research . According to S Holm , the author of Going to the Roots of Stem Cell Controversy, “A stem cell is a non – differentiated cell that can divide and multiply in its undifferentiated state, but which can also give rise to more specialized...

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Stem Cell Research

...Stem Cell Research At the end of the twentieth century, the United States began to fade away from traditional medicine and slowly moved their focuses onto areas that had yet to be explored, such as stem cell research. With this change, the United States took a small step toward the beginning of a technological metamorphosis. As the nation began making paces toward the age of technology, new inventions as well as new types of equipment were developed to improve our well-being and way of life. During this time, many researchers in science and medical fields also began to benefit from these new inventions and cutting edge technological research; the most notably one being the recent approval of tax payers money to aid stem cell research. Stem cells are the basic building blocks from which the cells of every tissue in the body grow. Because of their unique ability to develop into different types of tissue, they could potentially be used to replace tissue damaged or destroyed by disease. They offer much hope for medical advancement because of their ability to grow into almost any kind of cell. For instance, the neural cells in the brain and spinal cord could never naturally repair itself, but it could be replaced by new healthy stem cells. In treatment of Cancer, whether it be part of the brain, heart, liver, lungs, or whatever, new healthy stem cells can adapt to the affected cell area that are destroyed by radiation or chemotherapy (Pro). Implementing this research requires...

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Thesis

...RESEARCH TOPIC: What Makes Most Christians fundamentalist opposed to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research? RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Scientists have the view that, the use of Human Embryonic Stem Cell will help to cure some diseases like Parkinson’s disease, diabetes and several medical disorders sickness. If this is true, then why are the Christian fundamentalist opposing a research that many people believe it is going to save many lives? Are the Christian fundamentalist using their religious belief or their educational (scientific) knowledge in supporting their argument? Have they conducted any research to find out any harmful effect that Embryonic Stem Cell will bring to people? THREE SOURCES FOR THE RESEARCH Richard M. Doer flinger, Old...

Words: 832 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Stem Cell Research and Therapy

...Stem cell research and therapy Stephanie Reeves Rasmussen College Author Note This paper is being submitted on August 3, 2014, for Ellen Doyles’ Human Biology course. Stem cell research and therapy Stem cell research has great significance for medical use. They have the ability to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. They can also serve as a repair system to many tissues, by dividing without limitation to replenish other cells as long as the person or animal is still alive. Stem cells are the body’s raw materials. Stem cell research has created quite the controversy and has been a topic of debate for over a decade. There are 3 types of stem cells that are currently being used in stem cell research and therapies; Embryotic, Adult, and induced pluripotent stem cells. There are a few characteristics that differ between these types of stem cells Embryotic stem cells can become all cell types of the body because they are pluripotent, and can be grown relatively easy in culture. Adult stem cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue origin, and are rare in mature tissues which makes it difficult to isolate these cells in adult tissue, and methods to expand their numbers in cell culture has not been worked out as of today. Induced pluripotent stem cells are adult cells that have been genetically altered to have properties of embryonic stem cells. ...

Words: 705 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stem Cell

...Stem Cell 2 The debate and controversy on stem cell research is so pervasive and passionate that we can get lost in the argument. Let us first explain what the definition of stem cell is: A stem cell is a “generic” cell that can make exact copies of itself indefinitely. In addition, a stem cell has the ability to produce specialized cells for various tissues in the body such as heart muscle, brain tissue, and liver tissue. Scientists are able to maintain stem cells forever, developing them into specialized cells as needed. There are two basic types of stem cell: Embryonic stem cells- these are obtained from either aborted fetuses or fertilized eggs that are left over from in vitro fertilization (IVF). They are useful for medical and research purposes because they can produce cells for almost every tissue in the body. Adult stem cells- these are not as versatile for research purposes because they are specific to certain cell types, such as blood, intestines, skin, and muscle. The term “adult stem cell” may be misleading because both children and adults have them (Healthline, online). The most controversial one is embryonic stem cells because it brings up a huge debate from research opponents who say it is wrong because it destroys human life and supporters say the embryos were going to be destroyed anyway, and that research from their cells holds the potential to cure debilitating diseases such as diabetes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Creating embryos intended only for research...

Words: 1375 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Stem Cell

...Real Promise of Stem Cell Research Dr. David Prentice, HealthNewsDigest.com 2 Derivation of Human Stem-Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts, C. A. Cowan and others. March 25, 2004, New England Journal of Medicine, p.1355 with secondary reference to footnotes 13-17 p.1356. Stem Cell Research Pros The following article is a take on the ongoing debate related to stem cell research pros and cons. The stem cell research information covered in the article below will help you understand the potential of this new research for the benefit of humanity. [pic] Stem cell research, sounds like a plot from a best-selling novel by Robin Cook. However, it's not just a fictional thought, but a reality making waves in genetic research. There is a lot of controversy surrounding stem cell research. There are two groups formed, one supporting and the other against embryonic stem cell research. Both groups use the advantages and disadvantages of stem cell as the basis of arguments. We too shall discuss some of the stem cell research pros in the following paragraphs. This research is a major breakthrough in the scientific world. It is important to understand the positive points of this discovery before we push it over to the recycle bin. Let us have a look at the advantages stem cell research to shed some positive light on this debatable topic. What are Stem Cells? Let's first brush up on our basic, by beginning with some information related to what are stem cells. Stem cells are basically...

Words: 1377 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Stalemate

...Scientific research has come a long way since the first use of human embryos to treat and prevent diseases. The polio vaccine was invented in the 1950’s from the use of human fetal kidney cells, fetuses in uteri were used to develop techniques like amniocenteses and improving knowledge about congenital heart disease in the 1970’s, and in the 1980’s the transplantation of fetal tissue into adults to help with serious conditions like, diabetes or Parkinson’s (Gold, 2004). While there has always been concern and controversy over the use of human embryonic cells, today the debate is ethical. This ethical debate lies within the destruction of human embryos in order to use them for medical research. This paper will talk about how two different theories; utilitarianism and relativism view this ethical issue and the problem it presents, as well as my personal views on use of embryonic stem cell research. The theory of utilitarianism determines what is best by looking at the results of an act. According to Mosser (2010, section 1.7), “utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice.” When looking at the use of embryonic stem cells for research, utilitarianism looks at the end result. Embryonic stem cells have the potential to save lives by curing diseases and through the use of transplantation. While some utilitarianism’s may still view the destruction of these cells as the...

Words: 2265 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Stem Cell Research Paper

...Jean-Marie Lux Biology 121 Stem Cell Research Paper September 12, 2012 Stem cell research is a relatively new field and has made huge advances in the past fifty years. The idea of stem cells was first made public by a Russian-American Scientist named Alexander Maksimov in 1908. However it was not until 1963 that two Canadian Scientists were able to actually demonstrate the existence of self-renewing cells found in the bone marrow of mice. The Scientists were James E. Till and Ernest A. McCulloch. So although Maksimov was the first person who put the idea of stem cells out there, it is really Till and McCulloch who are credited with proving that stems cells actually existed. Since Till and McCulloch, many Scientist have contributed to the huge advances in stem cell research. In 1968, the first successful bone marrow transplant was conducted on two siblings suffering from Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID), a primary immune deficiency which typically results in the onset of one or more serious infections within the first few months of life. These infections are usually serious, and may even be life threatening. In 1978, the presence of Haematopoietic stem cells were discovered in human cord blood cells. Haematopoietic stem cells, are multipotent stem cells that give rise to all the blood cell types. In 1981, Scientist were able to derive embryonic stem cells from mice. One of the biggest advancements in all stem cell research came in 1997 when a link between...

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6