Free Essay

Taguchi

In:

Submitted By jws9542
Words 3524
Pages 15
Genichi Taguchi and Taguchi Methods - Practical, Rapid Quality Cohort 2, Wooshik Jung Taguchi methodology is concerned with the routine optimisation of product and process prior to manufacture, rather than emphasizing the achievement of quality through inspection. Instead concepts of quality and reliability are pushed back to the design stage where they really belong. The method provides an efficient technique to design product tests prior to entering the manufacturing phase. However, it can also be used as a trouble-shooting methodology to sort out pressing manufacturing problems. Here are some of the major contributions that Taguchi has made to the quality improvement world: 1. The Loss Function - Taguchi devised an equation to quantify the decline of a customer's perceived value of a product as its quality declines. Essentially, it tells managers how much revenue they are losing because of variability in their production process. It is a powerful tool for projecting the benefits of a quality improvement program. Taguchi was the first person to equate quality with cost. 2. Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs - When evaluating a production process analysis will undoubtedly identify outside factors or noise which cause deviations from the mean. Isolating these factors to determine their individual effects can be a very costly and time consuming process. Taguchi devised a way to use orthogonal arrays to isolate these noise factors from all others in a cost effective manner. 3. Robustness - Some noise factors can be identified, isolated and even eliminated but others cannot. For instance it is too difficult to predict and prepare for any possible weather condition. Taguchi therefore referred to the ability of a process or product to work as intended regardless of uncontrollable outside influences as robustness. He was pivotal in many companies' development of products and processes which perform uniformly regardless of uncontrollable forces; an obviously beneficial service.

Continuing our series on the leaders that have made a significant impact to the quality movement, lean manufacturing, and six sigma, we’ve featured Sakichi Toyoda, Walter Shewhart, and Armand Feigenbaum, and today we feature Genichi Taguchi.
Perhaps Taguchi is best known for his influence on modern day website optimization, better known as A/B Testing or Multivariate Testing, which we’ll discuss shortly. Overall, his application of statistics for business specific problems is his greatest contribution with broad influence.
Genichi Taguchi History
Genichi Taguchi stressed quality right from the design stage and not just as an inspection. In short, he believed quality was related to process design. Dr Genichi Taguchi was born in 1924 in Japan. Initially, he served the Astronomical Department of the Navigation Institute of the Imperial Japanese Navy during the Second World War. Later, he joined the Ministry of Public Health and Welfare and the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. It was here that he worked with the eminent Japanese statistician Matosaburo Masuyama and gained vital insights into statistical analysis.
His expertise in statistics garnered him an opportunity to work with reputed pharmaceutical company Morinaga Seika and its sister company, Morinaga Pharmaceuticals. Taguchi then joined the Nippon Telegraph Electrical Communications Laboratory. Here, he was entrusted with the task of enhancing the productivity of the Research and Development (R & D) department. To achieve this objective, Taguchi trained the engineers to improve productivity through effective and simple techniques. Initially, Taguchi visited many Japanese companies to study different operating procedures. He would later educate the engineers on what he had learned. Eventually, he developed his own techniques, and his visits to companies helped him propagate his techniques. He stayed at the Nippon Telegraph Electrical Communications Laboratory for over 12 years
Soon, Japanese companies like Toyota adopted Taguchi’s techniques because they foresaw its great advantages. In 1951, he published a book that introduced the concept of orthogonal arrays. In his quest for a methodology for high quality, he met two legendary statisticians at the Indian Statistical Institute – R. A. Fisher and Walter A. Shewhart. After his interactions with them, he published a book on Design of Experiments in 1957.
Genichi Taguchi Contributions
Taguchi’s contributions have made its way into almost every facet of business. Unfortunately, few know about them while actively practicing what he either invented or had a large influence on. Here are a few of Taguchi’s contributions.
Taguchi Quality Loss Function
In 1970, Taguchi devised a new concept in quality called the Quality Loss Function. He published two more books this year, along with the third edition of Design of Experiments.
Unlike the western definition of quality, Taguchi defined quality loss, as “loss imparted by the product to society from the time the product is shipped.” The loss factor encompasses two losses: 1. Loss at the company end due to financial set-up, time, man-hours, productivity, rework, scrap, warranty cost, equipment downtime cost and loss of customer trust. 2. Loss at the customer end due to substandard product delivery, financial setbacks, distrust of customers, shared value deprecation, wasted time and project delays.
Taguchi Loss Function was developed on the premise that the greater the variation of a value from the standard, the greater the costs incurred. Taguchi Loss Function suggests that organizations must settle for options that cost the least. Organizations should thus make decisions after conducting a cost analysis and understanding all implications. It also suggests that the lowest cost decision is not always the best one for the organization. This decision depends on organizational priorities
In its most basic form, Taguchi Loss Functions shows us the cost to the firm when we deviate from the standard. Below is an image of the Taguchi Loss Function:

Take a simple example of a tire manufacturer. This firm produces tires and a key component of high quality tires is the thickness of the rubber, for it induces safety and comfort and stability. The firm has statistically arrived at a “standard” tire thickness.
To apply the Taguchi Loss Function, suppose the firm produces tires whose thickness are less than standard or tires whose thickness is more than standard. In either case, there is a cost as indicated by the function above.
Design of Experiments (DOE)
Taguchi is also known for his contribution to multivariate testing, otherwise known as Design of Experiments or DOE. In a Design of Experiment, the central question is this:
How many different conditions do you need to experience to be able to reliably ascertain whether “A” is better than “B” or not?
As such, a Design of Experiment is centered around Factors, Responses, and Runs. We are interested in how a Factor affects a Response and we do in several Levels or Runs.
Here are 2 examples where Design of Experiments can be applied:
Taguchi Experiment: Microwave Popcorn
What is the best method to prepare microwave popcorn? The Response you want is this: the best outcome is the bag with the most popped corn kernels.
Below are the Factors: * How long to cook the popcorn (between 3 and 5 minutes) * What level of power to use on the microwave oven (between settings 5 and 10) * Which brand of popcorn to use (Top Secret or Orville Redenbacher)
A/B Testing (Multivariate Testing)
Another application of Taguchi’s Design of Experiments is for testing elements of a website landing page that lead to the desired outcome, whether the outcome or conversion is defined as a sale, email sign-up, click through to the next page, etc.
In general, the steps to test the elements of a landing page are similar to the steps above: 1. Select elements on the landing page that we believe will influence sign-up 2. Create alternatives for each element 3. Create test “recipes” that combine these elements according to the Taguchi Methodology 4. Set up and run a concurrent multi variable test.
Here’s an example experiment: * Headline Graphic on left, right, top of page Font selections in Body text, and varying sizes Color schemes in the footer and header Validation logos like Truste, BBB, Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover Card, etc.
The elements on a landing page are Factors. The number of times and variations you run a Taguchi Test are the Runs. And, the outcome or Response is Conversion.
Conclusion
We owe much to Genichi Taguchi. Without knowing it, much of what we do today in terms of our statistical approach to “what is better a or b or c or d” can be credited to Genichi Taguchi.

Born 1924
Genichi Taguchi is a Japanese quality expert, known for the Quality Loss Function and for methodologies to optimise quality at the design stage – “robust design”. Taguchi received formal recognition for his work including Deming Prizes and Awards.
Genichi Taguchi considers quality loss all the way through to the customer, including cost of scrap, rework, downtime, warranty claims and ultimately reduced market share.
Genichi Taguchi's Quality Loss Function
The Quality Loss Function gives a financial value for customers' increasing dissatisfaction as the product performance goes below the desired target performance.

Equally, it gives a financial value for increasing costs as product performance goes above the desired target performance. Determining the target performance is an educated guess, often based on customer surveys and feedback.
The quality loss function allows financial decisions to be made at the design stage regarding the cost of achieving the target performance.
Quality through Robust Design Methodology
Taguchi methods emphasised quality through robust design, not quality through inspection. Taguchi breaks the design process into three stages: 1. System design - involves creating a working prototype 2. Parameter design - involves experimenting to find which factors influence product performance most 3. Tolerance design - involves setting tight tolerance limits for the critical factors and looser tolerance limits for less important factors.
Taguchi’s Robust Design methodologies allow the designer through experiments to determine which factors most affect product performance and which factors are unimportant.

The designer can focus on reducing variation on the important or critical factors. Unimportant or uncontrollable “noise” factors have negligible impact on the product performance and can be ignored.

Robust Design of Cookies
This is easier explained by example. If your business makes cookies from raw ingredients, there are many possible factors that could influence the quality of the cookie - amount of flour, number of eggs, temperature of butter, heat of oven, cooking time, baking tray material etc.
With Genichi Taguchi’s Robust Design methodologies you would set up experiments that would test a range of combinations of factors - for example, high and low oven temperature, with long and short cooking time, 1 or 2 eggs, etc. The cookies resulting from each of these trials would be assessed for quality.
A statistical analysis of results would tell you which are the most important factors, for example oven temperature affects cookie quality more than the number of eggs.

With this knowledge you would design a process that ensures the oven maintains the optimal temperature and you would be able to consistently produce good cookies.

Rise to fame
Dr Genichi Taguchi was born in 1924. After service in the Astronomical Department of the Navigation Institute of the Imperial Japanese Navy in 1942-45, he worked in the Ministry of Public Health and Welfare and the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Ministry of Education. He learned much of experimental design techniques and the use of orthogonal arrays from the prize-winning Japanese statistician Matosaburo Masuyama whom he met whilst working at the Ministry of Public Health and Welfare. This also led to his early involvement as a consultant to Morinaga Pharmaceuticals and its parent company Morinaga Seika.
In 1950 he joined the newly founded Electrical Communications Laboratory of the Nippon Telephone and Telegraph Company with the purpose of increasing the productivity of its R and D activities by training engineers in effective techniques. He stayed for more than 12 years, during which period he began to develop his methods.
Whilst working at the Electrical Communications Laboratory, he consulted widely amongst Japanese industry. Accordingly, Japanese companies began applying Taguchi methods extensively from the early 1950s, including Toyota and its subsidiaries. His first book, which introduced orthogonal arrays, was published in 1951.
In 1954-5 Taguchi was visiting Professor at the Indian Statistical Institute. During this visit he met the famous statisticians R A Fisher and Walter A Shewhart.
In 1957-8 he published the first version of his two-volume book on Design of Experiments. His first visit to the United States was in 1962 as Visiting Research Associate at Princeton University, during which time he visited the AT & T Bell Laboratories. At Princeton, Taguchi was hosted by the eminent statistician John Tukey who arranged for him to work with the industrial statisticians at Bell Laboratories. In 1962 he was awarded his PhD by Kyushu University.
In 1964 Taguchi became a Professor at Aoyama Gakuin University in Tokyo, a position he held until 1982. In 1966 Taguchi and several co-authors wrote Management by Total Results which was translated into Chinese by Yuin Wu. At this stage, Taguchi's methods were still essentially unknown in the West, although applications were taking place in Taiwan and India. In this period and throughout the 1970s most applications of his methods were on production processes, the shift to product design being in the last decade.
In the early 1970s Taguchi developed the concept of the Quality Loss Function. He published two other books in the 1970s and the third (current) edition of Design of Experiments. By the late 1970s Taguchi had an impressive record in Japan having won the Deming application prize in 1960 and Deming awards for literature on quality in 1951 and 1953.
In 1980 Taguchi was invited by Yuin Wu, who had emigrated to the United States, to give a presentation at his company. By this time Taguchi was director of the Japanese Academy of Quality. During his visit he arranged to revisit AT & T Bell Laboratories at his own cost where he was hosted by Madhav Phadke. Despite communication problems, successful experiments were run that established Taguchi methods within Bell Laboratories.
Following his 1980 visit to the United States, more and more American manufacturers implemented Taguchi's methodology. Despite an adverse reaction among American statisticians at the methods, and possibly at the way they were being marketed, major US companies became involved in the methods including Xerox, Ford and ITT.
In 1982 Taguchi became an advisor at the Japanese Standards Association. In 1984 he again won the Deming award for literature on quality. In 1986 he was awarded the Willard F Rockwell Medal by the International Technology Institute. With one or two notable exceptions, such as Lucas, his methods had made little impact on Europe until the Institute of Statisticians organised the first conference on the methods in 1987 in London. The UK Taguchi Club (now the Quality Methods Association) was formed later that year.
Taguchi's message
Taguchi methodology is concerned with the routine optimisation of product and process prior to manufacture, rather than emphasizing the achievement of quality through inspection. Instead concepts of quality and reliability are pushed back to the design stage where they really belong. The method provides an efficient technique to design product tests prior to entering the manufacturing phase. However, it can also be used as a trouble-shooting methodology to sort out pressing manufacturing problems.
In contrast to Western definitions, Taguchi works in terms of quality loss rather than quality. This is defined as 'loss imparted by the product to society from the time the product is shipped'. This loss includes not only the loss to the company through costs of reworking or scrapping, maintenance costs, downtime due to equipment failure and warranty claims, but also costs to the customer through poor product performance and reliability, leading to further losses to the manufacturer as his market share falls. Taking a target value for the quality characteristic under consideration as the best possible value of this characteristic, Taguchi associates a simple quadratic loss function with deviations from this target.
This loss function shows that a reduction in variability about the target leads to a decrease in loss and a subsequent increase in quality.
With this conception a loss will occur even when the product is within the specification allowed, but is minimal when the product is on target. (If the quality characteristic or response is required to be maximised, eg strength, or minimised, eg shrinkage, then the loss function becomes a half-parabola.) The loss function may be used to evaluate design decisions on a financial basis to decide whether additional costs in production will actually prove to be worthwhile in the market place.
Taguchi methodology can be applied off-line in design or on-line in production.
Taguchi breaks down off-line quality control into three stages:
1. System design.
2. Parameter design.
3. Tolerance design.
System design is the genius of creating a design concept or 'up and limping' prototype. In the past we have been good at this in the West.
Parameter design is the crucial step - this is where the Japanese excel at achieving high quality levels without an increase in cost. The nominal design features or process factor levels selected are tested and the combination of product parameter levels or process operating levels least sensitive to changes in environmental conditions and other uncontrollable (noise) factors is determined.
Finally, tolerance design is employed to reduce variation further if required, by tightening the tolerance on those factors shown to have a large impact on variation. This is the stage at which, by utilising the loss function, more money is spent if necessary buying better materials or equipment, emphasising the Japanese philosophy of invest last not invest first.
The potential for these methods within UK and world industry is large. Typically, designs and line calibrations are in reality far from optimal. Much manufacturing folklore is based on the need to 'twiddle' important parameters or settings. Typically we do not understand the correct settings although we do have our prejudices.
Taguchi methodology is fundamentally a prototyping method that enables the engineer or designer to identify the optimal settings to produce a robust product which can survive manufacturing time after time, piece after piece, in order to provide the functionality required by the customer.
There are perhaps two major features of the advantage of Taguchi methodology. Firstly, it was developed by, and is largely used by engineers rather than statisticians. This removes most of the communication gap and the problems of language traditionally associated with many statistical methodologies. In addition, it means that it is tailored directly to the engineering context. The consequence of this is that the importance of noise variables which disrupt production must be considered in addition to the control variables introduced. Optimising a product corresponds not only to getting its quality characteristics on target but also to minimising variability away from that target on a piece-to-piece or time-to-time basis. This is the connection with Statistical Process Control (SPC).
Taguchi may be used to narrow the spread of the quality characteristics distribution and to identify variables to build control on. SPC may then be used to keep quality characteristics on target by making use of the known spread about the target value. Essentially this is the other novel feature of Taguchi methodology: the use of the so-called Signal-To-Noise ratio to choose the control setting that minimises the sensitivity to noise. In addition to this the methods are fundamentally evolutionary.
One major feature, however, is the codifying by Taguchi of the so-called Orthogonal Arrays. These are designs for experiments which were largely previously identified by others but are codified by Taguchi in such a way that an engineer automatically has a route to the minimum number of prototypes necessary for experimentation. The numbers are kept deliberately small by sacrificing all the interaction information that may be present in the design (or almost all of it) since information about interactions can subsequently be found in typical industrial applications by evaluating one more prototype - that corresponding to the predicted optimum setting (the confirmatory trial). This is the difference between industrial application and the agricultural context on which most of the Western statistical methods which foreran Taguchi were based. In agriculture, responses are slow so that leaving out prototype combinations and sacrificing interactions would necessitate an extra year in the agricultural cycle in order to be able to verify that the predicted prototype combination really was best. In the industrial setting responses are usually fast, so that it is possible to go back immediately and try out one additional prototype. Interactions can, however, be incorporated into Taguchi methodology and he presents a simple graphical codification of these (the linear graphs) to enable the analyst to introduce them systematically and easily. However, only limited numbers can be conveniently introduced without leading to great increase in prototype or experimental sizes.
Further readings:
Bendell, A (ed) - Taguchi Methods, London, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1989.
Bendell, Tony et al (ed) - Taguchi Methods: Applications in World Industry, Bedford, IFS Publications, 1989.
Bendell, Tony et al - Taguchi Methodology Within Total Quality Bedford, IFS Publications, 1990.
Taguchi, G - Introduction to Quality Engineering, Tokyo, Asian Productivity Organization, 1986.
Taguchi, G - Systems of Experimental Design, Unipub/Kraus International Publications and American Supplier Institute, 1978.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Taguchi

...Taguchi methods Taguchi methods are statistical methods developed by Genichi Taguchi to improve the quality of manufactured goods and, more recently, to biotechnology [1], marketing and advertising. Taguchi methods are considered controversial among some traditional Western statisticians but others accept many of his concepts as being useful additions to the body of knowledge. Taguchi's principal contributions to statistics are: 1. Taguchi loss-function; 2. The philosophy of off-line quality control; and 3. Innovations in the design of experiments. [pic]Loss functions Taguchi's reaction to the classical design of experiments methodology of R. A. Fisher was that it was perfectly adapted in seeking to improve the mean outcome of a process. As Fisher's work had been largely motivated by programmes to increase agricultural production, this was hardly surprising. However, Taguchi realised that in much industrial production, there is a need to produce an outcome on target, for example, to machine a hole to a specified diameter or to manufacture a cell to produce a given voltage. He also realised, as had Walter A. Shewhart and others before him, that excessive variation lay at the root of poor manufactured quality and that reacting to individual items inside and outside specification was counter-productive. He therefore, argued that quality engineering should start with an understanding of the cost of poor quality in various situations. In much conventional industrial...

Words: 3798 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Taguchi Method

...of Experiments Research TAGUCHI METHOD Fernando de Castro Palomino Siller – A01191233 Thursday, September 17th, 2015 Professor: Héctor Rincón CONTENT Introduction ……………………………….………………………………… 3 Why to use Taguchi Method ……………………………….……………. 3-4 Taguchi Method Strategy ……………………………….………………… 4 P-diagram ……………………………….………………………………….. 5 Quality Measurement ……………………………….……………………. 5-6 Signal To Noise (S/N) Ratios ……………………………….…………… 6-7 Static Versus Dynamic S/N Ratios……………………………….………. 7 Steps in Robust Parameter Design ……………………………….……. 7-8 Conclusions ……………………………….……………………………….. 8 Bibliography ……………………………….……………………………….. 9 Introduction Taguchi methods are statistical methods developed by Dr. Genichi Taguchi to improve the quality of manufactured goods and greatly improve engineering productivity. Dr. Genichi Taguchi developed a method (also known as Robust Design) after the end of the Second World War and it has evolved over the last five decades. Many companies around the world have saved hundreds of millions of dollars by using this method in diverse industries like automobiles, xerography, telecommunications, electronics, software, etc. This method results in a much-reduced variance for the experiment with optimum settings of control parameters. Because Design of Experiments works extremely close with optimization of control parameters, you can achieve the best results with the Taguchi Method. Taguchi's uses functions...

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Taguchi Method

...IE 466: Concurrent Engineering T. W. Simpson 32.3 Taguchi’ Robust Design Method s Since 1960, Taguchi methods have been used for improving the quality of Japanese products with great success. During the 1980’ many companies finally realized that the old s, methods for ensuring quality were not competitive with the Japanese methods. The old methods for quality assurance relied heavily upon inspecting products as they rolled off the production line and rejecting those products that did not fall within a certain acceptance range. However, Taguchi was quick to point out that no amount of inspection can improve a product; quality must be designed into a product from the start. It is only recently that companies in the United States and Europe began adopting Taguchi’ robust design approaches in an effort to improve product s quality and design robustness. What is robust design? Robust design is an “engineering methodology for improving productivity during research and development so that high-quality products can be produced quickly and at low cost” (Phadke, 1989). The idea behind robust design is to improve the quality of a product by minimizing the effects of variation without eliminating the causes (since they are too difficult or too expensive to conrol). His method is an off-line quality control method that is instituted at both the product and process design stage to improve product manufacturability and reliability by making products insensitive to environmental conditions...

Words: 4545 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Doe Taguchi Design

...9/25/2015 9/25/2015 Priyanka Palamuru SCSU Priyanka Palamuru SCSU Design of Experiment on a Catapult Taguchi Design Design of Experiment on a Catapult Taguchi Design Objective The objective of this project is to analyze the effect of various factors controlling the catapult model using Design of experiments (DOE). Design : Taguchi Software : Minitab17 Introduction Design of experiments (DOE) is a method of finding the important and less important factors involved in an experiment through a number of steps such as information gathering and mathematical calculations either manually or using a software. It is considered as one of the accurate techniques and widely used in various fields such as engineering, healthcare, education, etc. It is also known for its quality improvement, efficiency, cost and effectiveness. Catapult experiment is generally used to demonstrate DOE as it has the simplest setup and meets the requirements for this method. Taguchi Design 1. Define the process objective i.e. whether we need the output to be maximum or nominal or smaller. In this experiment, it is given as nominal the best. 2. Determine the factors which affect the outcome and number of levels the factors can vary for performing the experiment. Here, the factors are Start angle, Stop position, Cup Position and Peg position and has three levels each. 3. Select the suitable orthogonal array based on number of factors and levels, prepare...

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Taguchi Method

...ROBUST DESIGN Seminar Report Submitted towards partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Aerospace Engineering) By SHYAM MOHAN. N (Roll No. 02401701) Under the guidance of Prof. K. Sudhakar Prof. P. M. Mujumdar Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay–400 076 November, 2002 ABSTRACT The underlying principles, techniques & methodology of robust design are discussed in detail in this report with a case study presented to appreciate the effectiveness of robust design. The importance of Parameter design & Tolerance design as the major elements in Quality engineering are described. The Quadratic loss functions for different quality characteristics are narrated, highlighting the fraction defective fallacy. The aim of the robust design technique is to minimize the variance of the response and orthogonal arrays are an effective simulation aid to evaluate the relative effects of variation in different parameters on the response with the minimum number of experiments. Statistical techniques like ANOM (analysis of means) and ANOVA (analysis of variance) are the tools for analyzing the data obtained from the orthogonal array based experiments. Using this technique of robust design the quality of a product or process can be improved through minimizing the effect of the causes of variation without eliminating the causes. Fundamental ways of improving the reliability of a product are discussed...

Words: 12307 - Pages: 50

Free Essay

Genechi Taguchi Total Quality Management Guru

...Genichi Taguchi: Total Quality Management Guru Name: Institution: Course Code: Introduction Every person has had an experience with quality and every person can give his own reflection on what he perceived to be of poor or high quality. Not until the early 1950’s did total quality management emerge at the top of firms’ schemata hence making quality improvement as the highest priority in any institution, firm or business. Based on the fact that quality comes from integrated efforts of teams, employees and each level in an organization, total quality management was introduced and applied in all businesses as a means to enhance total quality by working on each level and stage in the service delivery or production. TQM in History It is vitally crucial before one dwells into the work offered by Taguchi to observe the timeline in which prominent gurus of quality management placed to build a scaffold on which TQM, Total Quality Management, was evolved. Figure 1: Table displaying the differences between new and concepts of quality Looking at Figure 1 above, it is illustrative that a major shift happened in the 1970’s in the concepts of quality. The old concept of quality meant solely inspection after production, where the new concept of quality involves a corrective and preventive approach...

Words: 1071 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gscm 588 Final Exam

...1. (TCO B) Identify four categories of measures that might constitute a Balanced Scorecard of performance measures and provide an example of each. Also explain how a Balanced Scorecard could assist your organization. This answer must be in your own words—significant cut and paste from the text or other sources is not acceptable. (Points : 30) Some categories of measures of balance scorecard are: 1.-Measures Financial Performance Financial performance measures includes: Profitability such as ROI (return on investment), gross profit margin, asset turnover, etc Liquidity such as current ratio, quick ratio Financial performance measures, such as operating income and return on investment, indicate whether the company’s strategy and its implementation are increasing shareholder value. However, financial measures tend to be lagging indicators of the strategy. Firms monitor nonfinancial measures to understand whether they are building or destroying their capabilities—with customers, processes, employees, and systems—for future growth and profitability. Key nonfinancial measures are leading indicators of financial performance, in the sense that improvements in these indicators should lead to better financial performance in the future, while decreases in the nonfinancial indicators (such as customer satisfaction and loyalty, process quality, and employee motivation) generally predict decreased future financial performance 2.-Internal Operational Efficiency Time spent...

Words: 1963 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Pandora Case

...4) Explain any four (4) major factors that affect location decisions. COSTS We can divide location costs into two categories, tangible and intangible. Tangible costs are those costs that are already identifiable and precisely measured. For example, utilities, labor, material, taxes, depreciation, and other costs that the accounting department and management can identify, transportation of raw materials, transportation of finished goods and site construction. Intangible costs are less easily quantified. For example, quality of education, public transportation facilities, community attitudes toward the industry and the company, and quality and attitude of prospective employees and quality-of-life variables. PROXIMITY TO MARKETS For many firms, locating near customers is extremely important. Particularly, service organization find that proximity to market is the primary location factor. For example, drugstores, restaurants, post offices and barbers. Manufacturing firms find it useful to be close to customers when transporting finished goods is expensive or difficult, perhaps because they are bulky, heavy or fragile. For example, Mercedes, Honda, Toyota and Hyundai are building millions of cars each year in the U.S. With just-in-time production, suppliers want to locate near users. For example, Coca-Cola, whose product’s primary ingredient is water, it makes sense to have bottling plants in many cities rather than shipping heavy containers, which sometimes fragile glasses cross country...

Words: 775 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Taguchi Method

...MTBF and Power Supply Reliability Abstract: A general misconception is that Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) is the same as the operational life of a product. In fact MTBF represents the statistical approximation of the percentage of units that will pass (or fail) during a products useful life period. MTBF should be considered as a measure of a product’s reliability, not product life. There are many factors that go into the determination of product reliability, such as grounding methods, electrical stresses, and temperature. Oftentimes there are even differences in the way the calculations are derived due to a manufacturer’s methodology and approach to reliability engineering. Product reliability speaks to the strength of the design and the commitment of the manufacturer. Therefore special care should be given to understanding all the key concepts of MTBF. In this way, one can accurately determine the best product and manufacturer for a given application. John Benatti Technical Support Engineer Astrodyne Corporation 508-964-6300 x 6330 jbenatti@astrodyne.com www.astrodyne.com 1 Introduction MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) may be one of the more familiar terms seen in datasheets, yet there is still a widespread misunderstanding of the term and its application. Consequently, some designers place too much emphasis on this parameter, others very little, and some have trudged through too many disparate data sheets to deem it any use at all. The truth...

Words: 2003 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Acc291 Week 8

...E13-8 E13-8 Here are comparative balance sheets for Taguchi Company. TAGUCHI COMPANY Comparative Balance Sheets December 31 TAGUCHI COMPANY Comparative Balance Sheets December 31 Assets Cash Accounts Reveibable Inventories Land Equipment Accumulated depreciation Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2011 73,000.00 85,000.00 170,000.00 75,000.00 260,000.00 (66,000.00) 597,000.00 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Accounts payable $ 39,000.00 Bonds payable $ 150,000.00 Common Stock ($1 par) $ 21,600.00 Retained Earnings $ 192,000.00 Total $ 597,000.00 Additional information: 1. Net income for 2011 was $103,000. 2. Cash dividends of $45,000 were declared and paid. 3. Bonds payable amounting to $50,000 were redeemed for cash $50,000. 4. Common stock was issued for $42,000 cash. 5. No equipment was sold during 2011, but land was sold at cost. InstructionsPrepare a statement of cash flows for 2011 using the indirect method Answers Taguchi Company Cash flows from operating activities Net income Depreciation expense Decrease in inventory Decrease in accounts payable Increase in accounts receivable Net cash provided by operating Activity Cash flows: investing Sale of land Purchase of equipment Net cash used by investing activity Cash flows: financing Issuance of common stock Payment of cash dividends Redemption of bonds Net cash used by financing activity Net increase in cash Cash at beginning of period Cash at end of period E13-8 HI COMPANY e Balance Sheets ember 31 $ $ $ $...

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Super Crunchers Assignment 2

...the JoAnn.com discount of 10% on two sewing machines, and the Offermatica graphic example? The author wants to illustrate the application of randomized test in company. Offermatica shows the way that Super Crunching often exploits technology to shorten the time between data collection, analysis and implementation and conduct multiple tests at once. It also emphasizes the power of testing multiple combinations that it lets companies be bolder. As a conclusion, the power of randomization is about marketing. The author mentions a method known as Taguchi. Google this term to get more insight on this and write a synopsis of this technique. Taguchi methods are statistical methods developed by Genichi Taguchi to improve the quality of manufactured goods, and more recently also applied to engineering, biotechnology, marketing and advertising. Professional statisticians have welcomed the goals and improvements brought about by Taguchi methods, particularly by Taguchi's development of designs for studying variation, but have criticized the inefficiency of some of Taguchi's proposals. Give your thoughts about the number of tests run by Captial One in 2006. Is it possible for one company to do this much testing? I think it’s possible. In fact ,Captial One has been running randomized tests for a long time. Way back in 1995, it ran an even larger experiment by generating a mailing list of 600,000...

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

China and Japan

...China and Japan are in somewhat of a battle politically and economically. There are several issues that continue to fuel the fires between the two countries and government behavior on both sides is not helping matters. The documentary suggests economic rivalry, territorial disputes, and the Japanese bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council are behind the tensions. However, a seemingly larger issue is how World War II is remembered; there are two versions of history and each wants their version to be known as truth. (Taguchi) The documentary explains that accounts of World War II have always been conflicting and a Japanese textbook downplaying their involvement has ignited the Chinese youth. The Chinese remember World War II as “a war against Japanese aggression” and by their accounts Japan is the perpetrator, not the victim. (Taguchi) The Rape of Nanjing, by Chinese accounts, was six weeks of Japanese brutality. The Japanese murdered hundreds of thousands of Chinese and villages of women were raped. According to Oi, some Japanese deny the Rape of Nanjing, while others downplay it and say “it was a battlefield and people were killed”. (Oi) The saying “the winner gets to write history” is certainly relevant in this situation. Japan, playing the innocent, chooses to whitewash their actions and attempt to write history as they see fit. Although the rest of the world is taught about the Rape of Nanjing and other horrific acts perpetrated by Japanese, it...

Words: 560 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Aasdhhjhjhihuihugyuhvhbbvgvghv

...Theory?  Inductive Reasoning v.s. Deductive Reasoning  Leading Contributors to Quality Theory  Dodge; Fisher; Shewhart; Deming; Crosby; Juran; Feigenbaum; Ishikawa; Taguchi; Conclusion  Quality Management Evolution  Lean Six-Sigma Evolution; Holistic Views of Quality Evolution Viewing Quality Theory from a Contingency Perspective  Quality Theory Implementation Depends on ambient Environment 2 Understanding Quality Concepts  3/1/2014 Quality Theory Defining Theory Inductive Reasoning v.s. Deductive Reasoning 3 Understanding Quality Concepts 3/1/2014 Defining Theory  A coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena.  An example for quality theory Quality Improvement Worker Morale Proposition Explain Phenomena 4 Understanding Quality Concepts 3/1/2014 Induction v.s Deduction  Induction  Collect data and then find out general phenomena (Chs. 2 and 10)  Deduction  State hypotheses and assume models, and then collect data to support the statements. (Chs. 11-12) 5 Understanding Quality Concepts 3/1/2014 Leading Contributors to Quality Theory Dodge: AS Fisher: DOE Shehwart: Control Chart Deming: Application Crosby Juran Feigenbaum Ishikawa Taguchi 6 Understanding Quality Concepts 3/1/2014 Harold F. Dodge (1893-1976)  Developed Acceptance Sampling (AS) methodologies in 1928  A form of inspection applied to lots...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gurus of Tqm

...Joseph Juran Joseph Moses Juran (December 24, 1904 – February 28, 2008) was a Romanian-born American management consultant and engineer. Dr. Joseph Juran is considered to have had the greatest impact on quality management after W. Edwards Deming. He is principally remembered as an evangelist for quality and quality management, having written several influential books on those subjects including the Quality Control Handbook and Managerial Breakthrough. In 1941, after discovering the Pareto principle by Vilfredo Pareto, he began to apply it to quality issues. In later years, Juran preferred "the vital few and the useful many" to signal the remaining 80% of the causes should not be totally ignored. Although his philosophy is similar to Deming’s, there are some differences. Whereas Deming stressed the need for an organizational “transformation,” Juran believes that implementing quality initiatives should not require such a dramatic change and that quality management should be embedded in the organization. One of his important contributions is his focus on the definition of quality and the cost of quality and poor quality. He extended his quality management to encompass nonmanufacturing processes, especially those that might be thought of as service related. Juran is credited with defining quality as fitness for use rather than simply conformance to specifications. Juran was one of the first to think about the cost of poor quality. This was illustrated by his "Juran trilogy"...

Words: 1858 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Wiley Weekly

...Question 2 | | Here are comparative balance sheets for Taguchi Company. | TAGUCHI COMPANY | Comparative Balance Sheets | ------------------------------------------------- December 31 | Assets | ------------------------------------------------- 2011 | | ------------------------------------------------- 2010 | Cash | $73,000 | | $22,000 | Accounts receivable | 85,000 | | 76,000 | Inventories | 170,000 | | 189,000 | Land | 75,000 | | 100,000 | Equipment | 260,000 | | 200,000 | Accumulated depreciation | ------------------------------------------------- (66,000) | | ------------------------------------------------- (32,000) | Total | ------------------------------------------------- $597,000 | | ------------------------------------------------- $555,000 | | | | | Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | Accounts payable | $39,000 | | $47,000 | Bonds payable | 150,000 | | 200,000 | Common stock ($1 par) | 216,000 | | 174,000 | Retained earnings | ------------------------------------------------- 192,000 | | ------------------------------------------------- 134,000 | Total | ------------------------------------------------- $597,000 | | ------------------------------------------------- $555,000 | Additional information: 1. Net income for 2011 was $103,000. 2. Cash dividends of $45,000 were declared and paid. 3. Bonds payable amounting to $50,000 were redeemed for cash $50,000. ...

Words: 996 - Pages: 4