Free Essay

Team Cohesion

In:

Submitted By JordanCurtis
Words 2135
Pages 9
Team Cohesion in the Public Services.
Question 1:

Meredith Belbin came up with 9 Team Roles.

Implementer: This means that this character is well organised. This is a good thing because it means that they are able to keep track of what’s been done, what needs doing etc. They take very basic ideas, and they convert them into tasks. This is good because if there wasn’t someone like this, then the team would not have a high productivity because they wouldn’t know how to change ideas into actions. Sometimes they can be slower than others, this would be a problem in a fast paced activity.
Shaper: This means that they have a lot of energy when doing a task. This is a good thing because it makes other people in the team want to move forward and to do well. This means that the task will be done quicker as more people will be getting involved with the task. They can sometimes be insensitive. This means that they show or feel no concern for other people’s feelings. This is a bad thing because people in the team could get offended by a comment and it could cause friction in the group.
Completer/Finisher: This means that they always see things through to the end of the task. They make sure that everything is working well and making sure that everything’s right. This is a good thing because it means that if anything is going wrong, then they can identify it and make it right. A bad thing about this role, is that they can worry too much about the task and they may not trust other people in the team. This is bad because trust level will be low, and communication will not be high.
Plant: This means that they take original and creative ideas, and they tackle difficult problems with these ideas. This is good because it means that if there is someone who is struggling with a problem, then they can help them. A bad thing about these is that they can sometimes ignore some of the essential details and can be poor communicators. This is bad because ideas could not be transferred between the members of the team as they do not communicate.
Monitor/Evaluator: This means that they think about things accurately and carefully. They also look at the big picture instead of the little ones. This is good because they will go through things instead of jumping straight to a conclusion. These roles sometimes lack inspiration for the other team members. Also they may lack energy. These are bad things because it means that they may find you a boring person and no one will be motivated.
Specialist: These roles are for people who have expert knowledge/skills in a particular area and will solve problems in this area. This is good because they only have to concentrate on a specific area instead of possibly getting confused because they have too much to think about. A bad thing is that they can be disinterested in other areas. This is bad because it means that if there is no one that is strong in that area, then it won’t be done to a good standard.
Coordinator: This team role is someone who is respected by everyone because they always try and keep everyone concentrated on the task. This is good because if someone loses focus, then they can bring them back and help them regain focus. A bad thing with these is that they can sometimes seen as controlling. This is bad because people may get annoyed with this person and there could be friction.
Team Worker: This team role is someone who cares for every individual and the team itself. This person aims to help with social problems through the team and they are great listeners. This is good because they can make other people in the team feel wanted and needed in the team. Also they act as the peacemaker in the team. A bad thing about these is that they can have problems in making difficult decisions. This is bad because they could take a while on deciding things.
Resource/Investigator: This team role is for someone who explores new ideas. This is good because it means that the team can have different ideas to work with instead of only a few. A bad thing with these is that they can be too optimistic. A bad thing with this is that they can sometimes be too confident in the future out coming.

Honey came up with 5 team roles.

Leader: This is someone who ensures that every individual remains focused on the task. This is similar to the Coordinator from Belbin’s roles. They give clear aims for the team and ensure that they will reach or even exceed that aim.
Challenger: This is someone who will always push for improvements to make sure that they get the best results. This is good because it means that they will never stop working and they won’t stop until they get the best result.
Worker: This is someone who isn’t afraid of getting stuck in and taking control of the team. They work hard for the sake of other members in the team. This is good because it means that they will get a lot of respect in the team and that will make them want to keep doing what they’re doing.
Thinking: This is someone who thinks about every situation carefully and will always analyse the situation in order to know how to improve it and make it better. This is good because while other people are working, they can take a step back to look at it and improve it.
Helper: This is someone in the team who will always try and kill all tension through the team and they will aim to have everyone in the team to be happy and to be satisfactory. This is good because it means that even if there is a bit of tension in the team, then they will be able to sort that out.

Question 2

Recruitment: Bringing in the right people into the team is essential because if you bring the wrong people into the team, then some tasks could not be done. For example, if you’re looking for someone with a specific set of skills, and you recruit someone with a different set of skills, team building will be bad as tasks my not be done. Also if you recruit someone with the wrong attitude, then there could be friction in the team.
Induction: When someone new is in the team, there will need to be an induction. This means that they will be notified what the expectations of the team are. This is important because if they do not know the expectations, then they may be doing it wrong and the team may have a bad cohesion.
Motivation: This is a good thing in a team because if everyone is motivated to complete a task, then they will try their hardest to complete it. If there was no motivation in a team, then possibly some tasks couldn’t be done.
Training/Coaching: This is a good thing because it allows people to see how and where to improve on. If this wasn’t present in the team, then people would keep making the same mistakes and would never know on how to improve.
Mentoring: This is good because if someone is struggling then that individual can get tips to help them. If no one in the team done this, then people would start to get frustrated because they’re constantly confused and not knowing what to do.
Team Knowledge: This is good because it allows people to give alternate ways of how to do a task. If this wasn’t in the team, then there would only be a few ideas being chucked around the group. The more ideas, the better.
Awareness of Team Members Strengths: This is good because it means that if someone has a specific strength, then they can give that individual a certain role which requires their skill. This makes the person feel more comfortable than being in a role they don’t know.

Question 3.

Forming: Forming is where the team will meet for the first time. When they meet the team cohesion will be low because they don’t know each other. The members of the team will rely on the leader most of the time because as they are new to the team, their understanding of what they need to do will be very low. This is where all expectations will be given to the members so they will know exactly what’s expected of them.

Storming: This is the stage where people will be finding power within the group. The team cohesion will have increased slightly because the team would’ve spent more time together. This is where skills, strengths, qualities, and weaknesses will be shown through the team. This will give the leader the ability to work out what roles he/she can give to each individual. This is where some conflict could occur because they’re all trying to gain power in the team.
Norming: This is the calmer stage of the other ones. This is because they will all know what the routine is and what’s expected of them. This is also where members will not challenge each other for things they know they won’t be able to. This helps the team to rely more on themselves rather than the leader. There is an improvement with team cohesion because there is an increase in trust and confidence through the group. This will create good relationships through the team.
Performing: This is where team development is at its highest. This is the stage where the team will start to know each other well, they will have high levels of trust. This makes the team work really well. Some of the roles and responsibilities have changed over time because someone people would’ve adapted to different ways of doing things. All the team members will be able to support each other because everyone is aware of what people struggle with. The loyalty and Morale will be high will be high at this stage in the team.
Adjourning: This is where the team starts to break up and find different teams to join. This is a bad thing because some people may’ve had brilliant relationships and strong bonds with each other and they may feel after the team has been disbanded, that bond will disappear. In some cases this will happen, but sometimes people will keep in contact with each other.

Question 4.

Knowing a team members weakness is very important and good to notice. This is because you can notify them on what they need to improve on and how they can improve. This helps to develop a team because allows the team to work well instead of there being confusion and struggle.
Question 5.

Team building is conducted by making sure that everyone in the team is comfortable in the roles they’ve been given. This is important because if they don’t, then they may not want to work as well as they can. Also building relationships in the team is good because there will be a significant increase in trust and confidence in the team, which makes everyone feel comfortable if they do something wrong. Finding the right routine and finding who is a bad person to work with is very good because it allows you to adapt to different people within the team and it makes you understand who to make friends with and who not too.

Question 6.

Targets are set, monitored, and reviewed constantly. This is because if a target is set and they don’t review it, then people will not know on how they can improve to achieve better goals. It allows everyone to get an idea of what they need to do next time and so they don’t get it wrong again.

Question 7.

In a team, it’s important to identify and define team goals so that people know what they need to achieve within the team. This is good for developing a team because it helps people understand what they have to do and how to do it.

Question 8.

Poor team cohesion can often cause conflict and a high turnover. This is because people won’t feel comfortable in the team as there will be no trust, there will be constant arguments, and also there will be a low morale in the team. If there is a high turnover within a team, there will be low productivity because people will keep leaving and joining. This means that there will be trust issues, and people with have to keep making new friendships.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Team Cohesion Leads to Teamwork

...Team cohesion leads to teamwork The better the team cohesion the better the members of the team will work and perform together in a task. In a team people that work together the best are people that get on with each other and likes one another. Team members that do not know each other tends to change the dynamics of a team because people will change their behaviour by being shy and being reserved and the atmosphere will be tense and awkward as no one knows what to say and how to act around one another. The team should bond by doing team building exercise which will help them to get to know each other so that they know each other’s strengths and weaknesses. Team members should also socialise outside of working hours by meeting doing activities such as bowling or cinema or even going to a pub or restaurant. This will help them to get to know each other personally such as their likes and dislikes, hobbies and interests. By doing this the members of a team are more relaxed around each other and they feel really close like a working family. This is good in work situations because the group will feel safer knowing that nothing bad is going to happen to someone as the rest of the team will be there to help and support. Each person in the team will feel that they can contribute to the task both physically and mentally therefore trying to get the job done more effectively and efficiently. This also means that everyone in the team has to take equal responsibility of the task and the...

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Marketing

...Research & Ideas Strategy for Small Fish Published: | August 23, 2004 | Authors: | Marco Iansiti and Roy Levien | * E-Mail * Print * Executive Summary: Microsoft, Wal-Mart, and eBay provide ecosystems in which other companies thrive or fail. But what are effective strategies for a small fish in a big pond? An excerpt from The Keystone Advantage by HBS professor Marco Iansiti and Roy Levien. About Faculty in this Article: Marco Iansiti is the David Sarnoff Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. * More Working Knowledge from Marco Iansiti * Marco Iansiti - Faculty Research Editor's Note: The art of business today seems to be the ability to influence resources your company doesn't own—resources such as the production scheduling of manufacturing partners, the packaging requirements of distribution partners, and the development of technical standards your products must incorporate. Welcome to the age of business interdependence, say HBS professor Marco Iansiti and collaborator Roy Levien, authors of the new HBSP book The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Think of the business environment as a series of ecosystems, they urge, with "keystone" companies such as Microsoft and Wal-Mart providing for the health of all who do business with them. What are the best strategies for companies living in these ecosystems? This excerpt focuses on strategies...

Words: 2237 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

English

...Rg31 Prefixes A-Z Prefix A-Z A ab,abs- from, away from abduct lead away, kidnap, abjure renounce ad, ac, af, ag, an, ap, ar, as, at to, forward accord agreement, harmony, affliction cause by distress, aggregation collection, annexation addition, appease bring toward peace, arraignment indictment, assumption arrogance, taking for granted, attendance presence, the persons present ambi both ambiguous of double meaning, ambivalent having two conflicting emotions an, a without anarchy lack of government, amoral without morals ante before antecedent preceding event or word, antediluvian ancient anti against, opposite antipathy hatred, antithetical exactly opposite arch chief, first archetype original, archbishop chief bishop B be over, thoroughly bedaub smear over, befuddle confuse thoroughly bi two bicameral composed of two houses, biennial every two years C cata down catastrophe disaster, cataract waterfall, catapult hurl circum around circumnavigate sail around, circumspect cautious, circumscribe limit com, co, col, con, cor with, together combine merge with, coeditor joint editor, collateral subordinate, connected, conference meeting, corroborate confirm contra, contro against contravene conflict with, controversy dispute D de down, away debase lower in value, decadence deterioration demi partly, half demigod partly divine being di two dichotomy into two parts, dilemma choice between two bad alternatives dia across diagonal across a figure, diameter distance...

Words: 2092 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Radio Station Manager

...Community radio fosters good governance October 27, 2013 in Opinion While the technological advancement in this country is pointing to a new world order, where globalisation and simplification of life is happening fast, there remains a gap in our country which if harnessed and supported has the capacity to be the game changer. Sunday Opinion with Kudzai Kwangwari The cellphone came and with it text messages, WhatsApp facilities, as well as money-transfer mechanisms while the internet also brought with it major communication developments in Africa but more specifically in Zimbabwe. One area which remains unexploited and untapped is community broadcasting and we believe this is a critical sector. For many it may be just a communication issue, but it must be viewed from a development perspective because more than anything else that’s what it is. It is a development tool. Community radio has the capacity to positively affect the politics, social set up of a country, economy and even the culture of a people. In terms of politics of a country, community radio in this day and age where democracy has become the new political philosophy considered as ideal plays a very critical role in promoting debate and dialogue, which are critical components of a functioning democracy. Community radio promotes the enhancement of interaction between citizens and the state, which is a prerequisite for any functioning democracy again. This is particularly so, because it promotes good governance where...

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Social Issues

...What is diaspora? -    To scatter -    Bringing together old ideas – about diaspora - with new notions of ‘transnationalism’, ‘hybridity’ and ‘integration’ -    And language. -    What are the ‘traditional types’ of diaspora – victim, labour and imperial, trade and business, deterritorialised diasporas -    what other (newer) forms are there?  Economic, political (EU border issues). More modern notions that might not ‘fit’ traditional ideas of ‘diaspora’.  Even the word seems rather outdated now? -   Diaspora/transnational communities – relationships in the ‘hostland’, relationships with the ‘homeland’ – transnationalism and integration in the homeland TYPES Victim  Labour  Imperial  Trade  Deterritorialised New ideas   Characteristics of diaspora:  key features they have in common -     Dispersal: -      Or – Expansion -      Memory of homeland – idealisation of home. -      Idealisation of the ancestral homeland – -      Development of a return movement to the homeland – transnationalism. -      A strong ethnic group consciousness – based on distinctiveness, common history, common cultural and religious heritage -      ‘troubled’ relationship with host societies – integration – suggesting a lack of acceptance: Mazzucato research below. -      empathy with co-ethnic members in other countries of settlement. Aided by electronic communication, Skype, email, facebook, cheap phone calls, cheap flights. -      possibility of a distinctive...

Words: 3234 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Theoretical Perspectives Essay

...function properly. Because each contribution works with the others’ for the church to function properly, I believe the church can be analyzed in the perspective of a functional analysis; where society is viewed as an organism, in which all parts must work together in order for the organism to run smoothly (Henslin 2009). Everyone who is a part of a church organization has a part to uphold. This coincides with the perspective of a functionalist, which suggests everyone has a purpose or place in society. Social unity is expected to form either a mechanical solidarity or an organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity is described as a form of society cohesion that arises when people in a society share similar beliefs and values and also engages in similar types of work. Organic solidarity is a form of social cohesion that arises when people in a society are interdependent, but uphold varying values and beliefs as well as engage in varying types of work (Henslin 2009). In a church, everyone has a part for which they are responsible to uphold. Durkheim viewed society as having many parts with their own function. Just as our bodies, when society is functioning together it is in a normal state and when it is not, it is abnormal or in a pathological state (Henslin 2009). In order for society to function properly, its various parts must work together. Functional analysis helps us understand how society functions and...

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Psychological Impact of Endangerment

...The Psychological Impact of Endangerment in Institutions The feeling of insecurity due to perceptions of endangerment in establishments like the Citadel has a range of effects on social cohesion. In the Citadel, an all boys military college, a social hierarchy exists that places the students into a particular rank. During the late twentieth century, feminists, or those who advocate equal rights and opportunities for women, started to gain recognition; One of these activists is Susan Faludi, who wrote for prestigious newspapers such as The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, became a national spokesperson for women’s right after appearing on the cover of Time magazine alongside Gloria Steinem (Faludi 72). Faludi, author of “The Naked Citadel”, sought to change the old-fashioned, man dominated society through her writing on pressing issues of gender and equality by going straight into the action with a first-person account on the the culture of the Citadel. In her report, it can be seen that the fight is not simply between those who are for admitting women and those who are against it, it is also an internal battle between the boys. Perceptions of being endangered may have a positive effect on unity in such institutions by creating common goals for them to achieve, to keep girls out and to fight against the disturbance of well-established and cherished traditions, but some customs, such as hazing may make students uncomfortable and anxious, may create a barrier against...

Words: 1402 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Team Dynamics Summary

...Group Behaviors and Team Dynamics (Group 2) Group of 2+ people who interact and influence one another , mutually accountable for achieving common goals associated with organizational objectives, and perceive themselves as a social entity within organization. Typically , a team was formed because of a goal to be met. Can also team formed because of the need to collaborate with each other to achieve a common goal . These types of teams are divided into three divisions , namely : Duration teams, differences in abilities , and differences authority. Making the team is usually seen from how long the team will be there . Division teams usually according to the ability of each individual , usually refers to the ability and knowledge to the team . Differences authority is the third case in the formation of a team , referring to the difference in decision-making in a team . Informal groups A group consists of people who shared in an interdependent or an organization that is focused on a goal. Friends that you've encountered while lunch is usually called informal groups (groups not officially), but they can not be called a team because they do not depend on each other and do not have a specific purpose. This Informal group arises because man is a social creature. This is proven because everyone will use their time and effort to create a group and preserve their social life on this informal group. 2nd reason why people participate in the group's...

Words: 1924 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Leadership

...beneficial to teams Synergy T.E. which is a benefit of unit /team cohesion Increases group productivity T.E. which factors help promote a good physical environment? Personal space L.i.O. what leaders can do to improve team performance Articulate an appealing vision T.E. individual commitment to a team Can’t be forced T.E. teams must first accomplish Set goals and supporting people / The first step to becoming a successful team is to have a clear understanding of the team’s goals and mission L.T.S. Team leader quality most desirable Honesty L.i.O. Facilitates Self-managed team to perform more effectively Smaller teams and defined objectives Cog Ladder: “polite stage” group approval strong-group identity _______ Low Cogs ladder: transition from 3 stage to 4 stage Attitude change L.T.L.G.B.t.S. sorted out in early stages of team development Membership, purpose, and leadership L.T.L.G.B.t.S. difficult to respond to radical change Reforming L.T.L.G.B.t.S. monitors interpersonal dynamics is process________ Process facilitator W.t.O.i.a.G behaviors helps positive working relationships Gate keeping L.T.S. advantage of working in a team Extends available expertise I.U.C Which is beneficial to teams? Synergy I.U.C unit cohesion is direct result of goals T.D.M.a.C.M group dysfunctional point leading to premature consensus groupthink T.D.M.a.C.M 2 types of conflict: Cognitive and __________ mixed motive L.T.S Disruptive to a team Word machine ...

Words: 2341 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Mrme

...Maintaining Team Cohesion * 2.1 Team Cohesion Defined * 2.2 The Question * 2.3 Team Composition * 2.3.1 How to promote team cohesion when selecting and identifying diversity within teams * 2.3.2 Surface-Level Diversity: * 2.3.3 Deep-Level Diversity: * 2.3.4 Summary * 2.4 Internal Environment Factors Needed in Team Cohesion * 2.4.1 Communication * 2.4.2 Unity of Purpose or a Common Goal * 2.4.3 Commitment * 2.5 Role of Management in Team Cohesion * 2.5.1 Establish the Team Vision/Goal * 2.5.2 Facilitate a Working Environment * 2.5.3 Set Clear Expectations and Responsibilities * 2.5.4 Training and Staffing * 2.5.5 Get Out of Their Way * 2.5.6 Summary * 2.6 Examples of Team Cohesion: The Good * 2.7 Examples of Team Cohesion: The Bad * 2.8 Conclusion * 2.8.1 Ways to Increase Team Cohesion * 2.8.2 Potential problems * 2.9 References  3 Communication * 3.1 Introduction * 3.2 Miscommunication * 3.3 Communication Breakdown * 3.4 Planning for Communication * 3.5 Communication Tools * 3.6 Personality Types * 3.7 Conclusion * 3.8 References  4 Conflict * 4.1 Conflict Defined * 4.1.1 Conflict in Groups and Teams * 4.2 Types of Conflict that a Team Can Face * 4.2.1 Positive conflict * 4.2.2 Negative conflict * 4.3 Why is Conflict Resolution Important in a Team Setting? ...

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Your Team Is Only as Good as Your Coach

...Abstract The connection between coaches and a team’s cohesion has long been researched. The factors that coaches use in their coaching method and the way that athletes perceive their coach can make or break a winning team. This study examines the connection between a coach’s ability to coach and a team’s cohesiveness. A Team is Only as Good as Their Coach Numerous researchers have studied the correlation between a coach’s method of coaching and team performance. One of the most notable theoretical models used to investigate coaching behavior is Chelladurai’s Multidemensional Model of Leadership. This model shows the coach’s behavior as viewed from three perspectives: the behavior that is preferred by the athlete, the behavior that is required by the situation and the actual behavior of the coach. It has long been assumed that a team’s performance and satisfaction are a direct result of the coach’s behavior (Carron, Hausenblas & Eys, 2005). Athletes look to coaches that foster friendship, mutual trust heightened respect and interpersonal warmth (Shields, Gardner, Bredemeier & Bostro, 1997). What is a Coach’s Perfect Behavior? The perfect behavior of a successful coach is a combination of different styles of training, democratic style, autocratic style, social support and positive feedback (Carron, et. Al., 2005). It takes many years to become a perfect coach, it is often wondered if coaches are taught or born into their profession. Just as...

Words: 1255 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Blank

...Understanding Team Development Teambuilding Recruitment Recruitment is a big part of the Uniform Public Services (UPS). It is important to get the right people with the right set of skills needed for that job. Having the right people helps with the development of the teams. All team members should support each other and avoid conflict to build a successful team. INDUCTION The induction is important when you start your first day because it gives you the opportunity to meet the new recruits get orientated and gain a good knowledge of the base. The induction is where all the information is given and explained about what will happen throughout the year. It’s a chance to meet new people and get comfortable with each other and become a good team. Most importantly it also gives you the chance to decide if you really want to be there. MOTIVATION Motivation is an important part of the UPS. Rewards are used such as recognition from your superiors, time off, promotions and medallions all motivate the team in order to get a job done. Being motivated helps you want to be part of and support your team, brings you all closer together. Negativity brings the moral down, so people recruiting try to avoid recruiting people that have a negative attitude. TRAINING/ COACHING All Public Services do it. It brings in knowledge and a key aspect to any role in the Public Services. Employees must be highly specialised and required extensive training and knowledge in order to perform well...

Words: 2033 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Paper B1

...Do committees and task forces work better when they are given short deadlines? I don’t know If they would work better if they were given short deadlines because they may have to rush with getting things done. 2. Are there some things that should be done only by face to face, not virtual teams. (it's really hard to make someone feel guilty on Fuze Meetings or such). I think if it something that is very important than it is best to have a face to face team but there are a lot of things that can get done with virtual teams. 3. Why do people in teams often tolerate social loafers? Why do students tolerate a student in a group who does nothing? I think it’s because they don’t want to cause problems in the group and they know that the work will get done with or without that person. 14.2 1. What happens if a team can't get past the storming stage? 2. What can a manager do to build positive performance norms on a work team? A manager can build positive performance norms on a work team by rewarding the team with praise to let them know that their hard work is greatly appreciated. 3. Why would a manager ever want to reduce the cohesion of a work group? A manager may want to reduce the cohesion of a work group when they have to add a new member or remove one or if the group is no longer needed. 14.3 1. How does consensus differ from unanimity in group decision making? The difference between the two are that with consensus group decision making all parties believe that they have...

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Nestle Retention Strategy

...Trust and Team Performance This paper will be analyzing and critiquing three main articles of trust and its direct and indirect effect on team performance. The selected articles are collected from the journal of occupational and organisational psychology, organization science and journal of business and industrial marketing, published no earlier than 2009 Contents RBUS2900 Article Review: “Trust and Team Performance” 2 I. Introduction 2 II. Research Design Characteristics 3 III. Summaries of the Three Articles 3 3.1. Article1: “The differential effect of team members’ trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion” (Mach, Dolan & Tzafrir, 2010) 3 3.2. Article 2: “Getting everyone one board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams” (Joshi, Lazarova & Liao, 2010) 5 3.3. Article 3: “Managerial trust and NPD performance: Team commitment and longevity as mediators” (Doyan, 2010) 6 IV. Critiques of the Three Articles 7 4.1. Article1: “The differential effect of team members’ trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion” (Mach, Dolan & Tzafrir, 2010) 7 4.2. Article 2: “Getting everyone one board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams” (Joshi, Lazarova & Liao, 2010) 8 4.3. Article 3: “Managerial trust and NPD performance: Team commitment and longevity as mediators” (Doyan, 2010) 9 V. Reference 12 VI. Appendix 13   RBUS2900 Article Review: “Trust and Team Performance” ...

Words: 5179 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

How to Best Improve My Professional Sports Team

...improve my professional sports team The offseason should be the most productive time of the year for any team, in any sport. It has proven to make or break teams, time and time again. As a coach of a very successful MLS soccer team, my focus will be centered on improving the following three points; team dynamics, group cohesion, and individual leadership. By optimizing all three of these characteristics I hope to build a much stronger team and win the league championship. My first point is focused on enhancing team dynamics. The first step in this is making my group of individuals feel as if they are a team of one, and not just a group of athletes who happen to be on the same team. As the text states, “Although all teams are groups, not all groups can be considered teams (Weinberg & Gould 2011).” In order to turn my group of athletes into a team I must first focus on creating a productive environment. This includes building social support amongst teammates. In order to accomplish this I might hold team meetings before and after every practice in which I encourage teammates to talk about on or off field pressures or experiences. In doing this I am strengthening the teams listening support as well as their emotional support. I might also try to improve my team’s distinctiveness in order to improve their unity. I might introduce a new nickname for this group of guys, or maybe design an emblem or logo, anything to set my team apart from any other team, past or present. Throughout...

Words: 771 - Pages: 4