...1967 Referendum On May 27th 1967, a historical moment in Australia’s history occurred. The Referendum of 1967 approved two Australian constitutions concerning about Aboriginals and Torres Straight Islanders. The change of sections 51 and 127 in the Australian constitution allowed Aboriginals to be counted in the national census and the Commonwealth’s right to legislate for Aboriginal Peoples. This was an overwhelming vote with over 90% of Australians voting in the ‘yes’ campaign. The Referendum was an important change for Aboriginals because they would be then accepted as people in their own country, they would then have special laws to protect them from being discriminated, there would be funding towards Aboriginal communities and the Australian community as a whole and they needed the scars to heal from the past. For many decades Aboriginal organisations worked diligently to remove discriminatory references towards Aboriginal peoples. They campaigned all over the country for a constitutional referendum to be held. Finally in 1967 an Australian referendum was held. The referendum did not allow Aboriginal people to vote as this right was already given in 1962. The referendum was not about citizenship nor equal rights. There were several factors that impacted the final outcome of the 1967 Referendum these included: growing families that had accessed to media therefor they were more aware of the arising issue, both political parties approved of the 1967 Referendum, a huge non-Aboriginal...
Words: 638 - Pages: 3
...1. The referendum in 1967 was a significant event in Australian history that allowed the Government to change the Constitution so it could make specific laws that applied to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples that could assist in addressing inequalities. 2. There were several key individuals and groups involved in bringing about the Referendum. For instance, significant and powerful groups included the Aboriginal–Australian Fellowship and the Federal Council for the Advancement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (FCAATSI), which was formed in 1957. 3. During this period, one of the prominent leaders was Faith Bandler. Bandler led the campaign and helped to organize several massive petitions and hundreds of public meetings. She was a key figure leading up to the...
Words: 448 - Pages: 2
...* Stolen generation –with kay getting taken away by the government. * 1967 referendum- counted in the census so there should be equality but theres not still as seen in the bar at the talent show. Them not winning, people leaving when there singing. Taxi. Maybe the tappware party * Vietnam- the aboriginals and the black solider in the helicoopperter. Sapphires essay Rights were a massive issue in the 1968. There were major event all around the world to do with rights but many people over look Australia. In Australia people were still furious over the stolen generation and the effects, and even though the 1967 referendum allowed aboriginals to be counted in the national census, there was still great disprove of aboriginals. The sapphires does accurately reflect the social and political issues of the time. Through the stolen generation, 1967 referendum and the war in Vietnam you see that laws are one thing but acceptance is another. The sapphires shows that there was many social and political issues at that time. One major political and social issue is the treatment of the aboriginals by the white people. Even with the 1967 referendum which allowed aboriginals be counted in the national census, you would think that aboriginals would be treated better. But they didn’t and you see this when the three girls go to the talent show. When they first enter everyone stares at them, looking at them like there from another planet. Then again when they start singing and...
Words: 723 - Pages: 3
...http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200608/r101740_311009.jpg http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200608/r101740_311009.jpg Vincent Lingiari, Leader and Elder of Gurindji people head stockman ay Wave Hill cattle Station. Lingiari was described as a quietly spoken, dignified, non-violet, but very strong willed and determined man. He could not read or write, but he was a natural leader (Guile. 2010. P.8). He felt the injustice of the Europeans taking traditional Gurindiji land and was determined to get it back. Lingiari was fearless in standing up to cattle station bosses and was very clever at gaining support for his land rights. (Albert. T. 2009. p.16) “We want that Vesty mob to go away from here. To go away from here and never come back. Go where they came from. This been Gurindiji country. All this is Gurindji country” (Vincent Lingiari 1966). At Wave Hill cattle station, managed by the Vesty Pastoral company, many of the workers were Indigenous Australians who had been treated unfairly for years and their living and working conditions were appalling. The Company made huge profits by paying indigenous workers flour and beef instead of money (Guile. 2010. P.8). Indigenous families at Wave Hill liven in iron huts with dirt floors and no lights, running water or toilets. There were no schools or health clinics (Thompson. L. 1990 p.103) Billy Bunter Jampijinpa was 16 at the time of the walk out. About living conditions at Wave hill cattle station he said “ We were treated just like dogs…we...
Words: 1311 - Pages: 6
...Race Power to only Legislate for the Benefit Contrarily, Justice Murphy was in favour of the second interpretation and held in Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1 that Section 51 (xxvi) should be interpreted to only allow for legislation which maintains and protects the rights of the Aboriginal people taking into consideration the 1967 Referendum as ‘to hold otherwise would be to make a mockery of the decision by the people’. This view was upheld by Brennan J and it was held that the 1967 Referendum was ‘an affirmation of the will of the Australian people … that the primary object of the power is beneficial’. Gaudron J in Kartinyeri contemplated that although the scope of Section 51 (xxvi) is wide enough to authorise laws to the advantage...
Words: 1296 - Pages: 6
...The Freedom Rides in 1965 helped change people's views and opinions on people of colour in Australia Since the Britain colonisation of Australia in 1788 the indigenous Australians have been treated as lesser humans and sometimes not even the same species. For instance the Freedom Rides in 1965 and the 1967 referendum helped change people's views and opinions on people of colour. The rides were significant for bring attention to the poor conditions in which most aborigines were being treated. The 1967 referendum was an important event in helping to better lives of the aboriginals and how these actions started a bigger movement and changed people's views. In February 1965 a group of university students from the University of Sydney decided to...
Words: 377 - Pages: 2
...Changing rights and freedoms and human wellbeing By Yasmin Hayward On Australia Day’s 150th anniversary, in 1938, William Cooper, a member of the Aboriginal Progressive Association, declared the day a “Day of Mourning”, alluding to the annual re-enactment of Phillip’s landing. Aboriginal people call it ‘Invasion Day’, ‘Day of Mourning’, ‘Survival Day’ or, since 2006, ‘Aboriginal Sovereignty Day’. The latter name reflects that all Aboriginal nations are sovereign and should be united in the continuous fight for their rights. Aboriginal people refused to participate in the re-enactment because it included chasing away a party of Aboriginal people. “I refuse to celebrate, and every Australia Day my heart is broken as I am reminded that in the eyes of many, I am not welcome on my own land.” —Nakkiah Lui, Aboriginal woman “We won't stop, we won't go away / We won't celebrate Invasion Day!”—Chant during protests on Australia Day 2012 “January 26th marked the beginning of the murders, the rapes and the dispossession. It is no date to celebrate”—Michael Mansell, National Aboriginal The Day of Mourning Speech. The Aboriginal perspective of Australia day was that is was not a celebration Aboriginal people but in fact a commemoration of a deep loss. The issues outlined in the Day of Mourning speeches in 1937 led by three Aboriginal men were for the Aboriginal people to be able to access the same citizenship rights as those of white-Australians. This included their land being returned...
Words: 1467 - Pages: 6
...World War II. Elected to Parliament as a Labour member in 1948, he served in several major posts in Harold Wilson's First Government. As Home Secretary from 1965–1967, he sought to build what he described as "a civilised society", with measures such as the effective abolition in Britain of capital punishment and theatre censorship, the decriminalisation of homosexuality, relaxing of divorce law, suspension of birching and the legalisation of abortion. As Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1967–1970, he pursued a tight fiscal policy. On 8 July 1970, he was elected Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, but resigned in 1972 because he supported entry to the Common Market, while the party opposed it. He was elected to the House of Commons in a 1948 by-election as the Member of Parliament for Southwark Central. His constituency was abolished in boundary changes for the 1950 general election, when he stood instead in the new Birmingham Stechford constituency. He won the seat and represented the constituency until 1977. Once Jenkins took office as Home Sectary – the youngest Home Secretary since Churchill – he immediately set about reforming the operation and organisation of the Home Office. From 1967 to 1970 Jenkins served as Chancellor of the Exchequer, replacing James Callaghan following the devaluation crisis of November 1967. He quickly gained a reputation as a particularly tough Chancellor with his 1968 budget increasing taxes by £923 million, more than twice the increase of any previous...
Words: 1197 - Pages: 5
...UNDERSTANDING SELF AND SOCIETY: CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES Module 1: Why is Human Dignity important ? What is Human dignity ? "dignity: the quality of being worthy or honourable; worthiness, worth, nobleness, excellence. Latin dignitāt-em merit, worth" Oxford English Dictionary The focus of UNCC100 is on the theme of the common good: how we think about what is needed in order for all people to flourish in society. UNCC300 shifts this focus from the social to the individual, although of course, we can never think about the individual without reference to the broader context of society. In this unit, we are going to consider what it means to be a human being, and more particularly, how we can understand the notion of human worth, or value. This is what we are referring to when we talk about human dignity. Activity 1 Complete some research on Rosa Parks . 1. Who was she? 2. What impact did Rosa Parks have on the US Civil Rights movement? 3. What impact do you think Rosa Parks has had on our understanding of human dignity today? 4. There have been numerous songs written about Rosa Parks. The Neville Brothers recorded “Sister Rosa” in 1989. Click the link to hear the song and follow the lyrics. http://pancocojams.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/two-songs-about-rosa-parks-lyrics.html Human dignity is probably a very familiar expression, because the concept is part of many conversations taking place in the contemporary world. At the same time, once we begin...
Words: 2673 - Pages: 11
...began as a result of the Report of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody in 1991. The issue of Reconciliation is of great importance to common good because it helps avoid feelings of revenge, anger and hatred and a commitment to social justice as well as a way to ensure lasting peace and stability and to improve the relationship for the common good. Reconciliation aims to address the inequity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians that was introduced with the colonisation of Australia in 1788. Some relevant points around Reconciliation for the Common Good are, the referendum laws for Aboriginal people on May 27 1967, the report of the Royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody in 1991, as well as the Formal apology for the members of the stolen generations in 2008. Reconciliation for the common good was the referendum laws for Aboriginal people on May 27, 1967. It enabled Indigenous people to be included in the census, and it enabled federal parliament the power to make laws in relation to Indigenous people. This meant that Indigenous people and non-Indigenous people were all required to follow the same laws set out by the government, and that Indigenous people would be recognised and counted (in elections and the census) in all states and territories of Australia. The decision of the Australian population was a milestone for Indigenous people as they were finally being recognised as part of the population and the social, economic and political...
Words: 1779 - Pages: 8
...citizenry. The people determine their future and shape accurately their society. There is no vacuum or distinction between the government and the people. For example this clear link can be seen in the case of the Scottish referendum on independence in 2014. However, the above may be more a reflection of an ideal and an aspiration than a functional practical possibility. In a large scale society direct democracy is not achievable, with voting population of almost 45 million. This means there is too many varying opinions for the public to come up with clear concise decisions. Representative Democracy requires the voter to vote for some candidate or party with whom they are very unlikely to agree on everything - the 'take it or leave it' option. Direct Democracy allows voters to vote on the issues separately. The problems with representative democracy can be seen in the case of the Liberal democrats as once they got into office very few of their policies came to fruition. However in general when representative democracy is used the majority of the policies of the parties are followed when the party comes into office. For example in 1997 it was said in Blair’s manifesto he wanted to push democracy to the people. This was followed through by two referendums in 1997. With Direct Democracy people become engaged within the political process, and hence to be...
Words: 781 - Pages: 4
...Historians do not rank him as the greatest prime minister although he was in power for sixteen years. Some of his controversial decisions were the Omnibus bill and the Official Languages Act. Young Trudeau introduced the Omnibus bill in the House of Commons when he was Justice Minister; that led to massive changes in the Criminal Code of Canada. “There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation” Trudeau made these comments on the CBC television in 1967. He also added “What’s done in private between adults doesn’t concern the Criminal Code”. These lines caused a tsunami over the issues of abortion, homosexuality and divorce law. These issues became headlines for the first time and forever changed the political and social scenario in Canada. The other part of this controversial bill concerned abortion laws. It made abortion legal if a woman got permission from a committee of three doctors. The Omnibus bill also allowed police to perform breathalyzer tests on suspected drunk drivers. The Official Languages Act of 1969 was another example of his controversy. Trudeau proved himself as a federalist, but on the other hand he was promoting French in Ottawa. This resulted an anti-bilingualism in...
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
...August 1966. The Aboriginal pastoral workers first conveyed their misery with the poor working conditions and the disrespectful treatment. The next year the group moved to a significance place to the Gurindji people, Wattie Creek. Vincent Lingiari and Mick Rangiari asked Frank Hardy to make a sign which had the word “Gurindji” across it. This showed that their animosity was much deeper than the wages and working conditions. Despite that these people could not read, they understood the significance and power of the sign. 1967 – Referendum On the 27th of May 1967, the Holt Government approved two modifications to the Australian constitution associating to the Indigenous Australians. Australians voted to change the constitution to permit the commonwealth to construct respectful laws for the Indigenous people anywhere they lived in Australia. It also allowed them to include Aboriginal people and incorporate them in the national census. The results for the referendum vote was 94 per cent of Australians voted a strong yes, with an outstanding majority of votes in all 6...
Words: 1226 - Pages: 5
...In 100 counties within Virginia, 71 of them were in favor of prohibition with only 29 of them voting against it. Even more surprising, 16 out of the states 20 cities voted going dry. The cities that remained largely wet during the referendum included, Norfolk, Richmond, Arlington, and Norfolk. Consequently, the law was labeled as the Mapp Law and was enacted on the 1st of November 1916[footnoteRef:27]. As a result of the new law, various distillers closed shop including six distillers and over 100 saloons. The major distillers were allowed to produce alcoholic beverages, as long as sales are restricted to other counties and states. Consequently, even Malt Company?s switched to the manufacture of soft drinks and bottled water. [27: Clifford, Experiment in Municipal Reform: The Prohibition Party in Norfolk Politics 1892-1896,...
Words: 4687 - Pages: 19
...Is the Australian government effectively making alterations within the Australian Legal System for the benefit of Indigenous Australians? Introduction The Indigenous Australian population consists of people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent. Prior to European settlement in 1788, Australia was occupied by over 750, 000 Indigenous Australians who spoke 700 languages between them. However, the number of Indigenous people in Australia has transformed since the devastating impact the European settlers had on Australia’s indigenous Australians. They were exposed to new diseases and violent conflicts resulting in a significant number of deaths. Consequently, today Indigenous Australians make up only 2% of the entire Australian population. In 1788, the European colonists settled into Australia as James Cook enforced the doctrine of terra nullius because he believed that it was, ‘no one’s land’ during his journey around Australia in 1770. The cultures of the Indigenous Australians have changed over the past 227 years, as the European colonists of Australia caused very prompt changes to the Aboriginal society and the ways in which they lived. Whilst a number of alterations have been made to the Australian Legal System for the benefit of the Indigenous Australians, they continue to fight to have their rights documented and acknowledged by the Government and the people of Australia. This paper will evaluate the arguments...
Words: 1814 - Pages: 8