...In Langston Hughes’ poem, “Democracy, and Leonard Cohen’s poem, “Democracy”, both authors share the common theory that there should be democracy. However, the two stories have completely different perspectives. Langston Hughes wants democracy for African Americans and Leonard Cohen wants democracy for the world. Despite these differences, the two authors use their rhyme scheme, their stanza structure, and their point of view to express their demands. In Leonard Cohen’s poem, “Democracy” Leonard Cohen’s rhyme scheme in the fourth stanza shows that change could happen, but people don’t want it. For example, in the fourth stanza of “Democracy” by Leonard Cohen, “It's coming to America first/The cradle of the best and of the worst/It’s here they got the range/And the machinery for change/And it's here they got the spiritual thirst/It’s here the family's broken/And it's here the lonely say/That the heart has got to open/In a fundamental way/Democracy is coming to the U.S.A.” In this stanza the rhyme scheme is A/A/B/B/C/D/E/D/E/F. Leonard Cohen uses this rhyme scheme so people could understand where he’s coming from better and two, it helps him emphasize on places that don’t have democracy. In his stanza structure, he uses 10 lines (Or at least in this copy) in one stanza. This not only shows that he emphasized on this stanza but it also shows that its related to one another. In the line, “ It’s here they got the range/And the machinery for change.” Leonard Cohen puts this line so...
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
...Governing methods vary around the world. While some governments have good relationships with their people, others do not. Governing methods, such as democracy, typically have better relationships because they have equal control. Totalitarian governments normally have worse relationships with their people because they are controlling every aspect of their lives, while self-governing can have either good or bad relationships. Governing methods with equal control between people and government generally fosters better relationships because they are able to communicate more, while other governments may be oppressive and deter relationships. Although they may not directly interact with them, democratic governing usually creates a better relationship...
Words: 1997 - Pages: 8
...institutions. This subordination is often called civilian control and a country lacking in this may face serious obstacles to developing or consolidating democracy as well as allow the military to make national security subservient to other meaningful tasks of a country. However, according to Kohn, there is an ideal civil-military relationship for a democracy and this can be maintained through a laying out a clear chain of command, putting the decision of warfare into civilian hands, and paying attention to military policy. The Filipino people, having suffered under a personalistic dictatorship for almost twenty years enforced by the military, instead maintain a precarious relationship with military forces that has protected the interests military elites while still allowing civilians to survive in the political arena. While the recently elected Minister of Defense Voltaire Gazmin has a highly decorated military background and history of stopping military coup d’états as well as a policy of military transparency and peace, recent news articles suggest this may not be enough as a military coup seems imminent with war ravaging southern Philippines as well as the refusal of President Aquino III to step down after his alleged embezzlement of public funds. Kohn suggests that there is an ideal civil-military relationship in a democracy and this is best preserved through a clear chain of command, placing decisions of war into the hands of civilians, as well as giving attention the military...
Words: 1464 - Pages: 6
...Athenian Democracy Greeks are known to be the creators of democracy. In our readings we find two perspectives on Athenian democracy. The two people in the readings are the Old Oligarch, an anonymous author who in the late 5th century B.C. wrote a short essay that explained Athenian democracy according to his view, and Pericles, a 5th century B.C. statesman who made a speech in honor of those who had fallen in the Peloponnesian war. These two readings show us how two men of seemingly opposite views arrived at the same opinion of democracy in Athens. The Old Oligarch was a critique of Athenian democracy. He was more liberal in saying that the structure of the Athenian government favored the rich aristocrats and suppressed the poor. When in his opinion he thought it was fairer that the common and poor classes should have been given more consideration than the rich and men of birth. He argued that it was the common people that made Athens great because it was the People that gave the city more power than the aristocratic class (Sourcebook, p153). Another thing that differentiated the Old Oligarch from Pericles is the fact that the Old Oligarch recognized slaves in Greek society praising Athens for treating them with some equality. For example, in the city where there would be slaves and aristocrats, a slave is not entitled to bow and step aside to let the aristocrat pass. He also states that it is not legal to beat a slave or alien resident. This is not because Athens believes...
Words: 847 - Pages: 4
...Joshua Harris THEA 4200 Professor Marla Carlson September 26, 2010 Socrates is a danger to the state of Athens and something must be done. So much of what he says is against democracy. He does have a clever way of talking, but that just means that he is able to make all of the foolishness that comes out of his mouth sound like it makes sense. If you think about it, it makes no sense. We do not want to be ruled by philosopher kings. Under a democratic system, we can all come together to make decisions for ourselves like we have for so long. We know what is best for us and Socrates, by corrupting the youth of Athens with his nonsense, threatens to take our voice and liberty away from us. The oligarchs will say that Socrates should not be silenced because they are anti-democratic just as he is. They will say that Athens was a democracy when it was overtaken by Sparta which they will further argue is an oligarchy. I say that Sparta is made up of a bunch of meatheads who were not able to overtake us because they were an oligarchy. They were able to because they are so focused on fighting and little else. Democracy presents the opportunity to focus on fighting if it is the will of the citizens. Democracy also is a system of government that allows for innovations and rewards those who improve on things. While Spartans are busy doing things like head butting each other, we can be doing things like improving the navy, giving Athens a good defense. I also want to...
Words: 897 - Pages: 4
...Rummel v. Mann R. J. Rummel and Michael Mann have to different viewpoints on how genocide is connected to democracy. Rummel says that democracies are much less likely to commit genocide. Mann argues that even democracies can commit genocide. I believe that Rummel’s point of view is the correct one. There are many more differences in these articles than similarities. Mann does not think Rummel explains the more important cases that could be considered genocide. Rummel’s view focuses more on this centuries democracy while Mann focuses on the history of these democracies and the acts they committed to grow. Mann gives an example of the Europeans colonization the Americas, which in the end many of the Native Americans were killed. He says this...
Words: 278 - Pages: 2
...The reasons why Andrew Jackson was a very popular man of his day he was considered a man of the people is Because he was a very noble man he is even on the cover of the 20 dollar bill and he was know for many things like the industrial revolution and much more the various amounts of reasons are endless and he was a very good man to the united states of america. But there was also many bad things he did to america Andrew Jackson resigned from senate just so that he can run for presidency and he really wanted to win. He is also known as the man who led the war and he really is a war hero because of the battle of new orleans. Now there were some reasons that he did wrong like he violated the constitution by over using his power and he started...
Words: 252 - Pages: 2
...‘to start again’ (Arendt 1958: 69) Parrhêsia is essential to this new beginning – the exploring and questioning of history and nature that suggest that the world is open to choices that can be investigated by speech. This means that democracy in Athens was a regime always capable of change and recreation. Athenian democracy was a system of governance that aimed not to look back in time, but forward and allowed nothing from the past to mould it. The democratic breakdown of the...
Words: 1694 - Pages: 7
...another bomb hits the ground. Your leg has a near collision with another bullet. Your life flashes like the machine gun near your side. Is it time to sacrifice your life for freedom or save you and the rest of your loved ones. Are you as an American soldier going to fall or rise and continue to save your country. Even though illness is a stronger opponent than the British, you’ll push past it all for America’s freedom. For she in later years will rise as one of the best. Democracy, hope and fighting for the deceased it’s what urges you to continue. Illness has brought horror to your men and unknown tragedies. Regardless you fight for freedom. Document A provides an accurate description of illness. You are healthy and alive, so fighting can fill the absence of men. Honoring the dead and ill is the only way to proclaim America. Fighting can ensure a better future for the colonists. As our deaths for...
Words: 534 - Pages: 3
...Science, Consciousness, ETs, you name it. It’s a smorgasbord of fascinating subjects to learn about. If you find a dead link please let us know and we will find another to replace it. Enjoy! 1. Home (2009) 2. Thrive (2011) 3. Paradise or Oblivion (2012) 4. Love, Reality and the Time of Transition (2011) 5. Earthlings (2005) 6. Everything You Know Is Wrong (2000) 7. Zeitgeist: Addendum (2008) 8. Zeitgeist: Moving Forward (2011) 9. The Money Fix (2009) 10. The Wikileaks Documentary (2010) 11. Owned & Operated (2012) 12. Overdose: The Next Financial Crisis (2010) 13. Apologies of an Economic Hitman (2010) 14. The Beautiful Truth (2008) 15. The Awakening (2011) 16. What Would It Look Like? (2009) 17. The World According to Monsanto (2008) 18. Esoteric Agenda (2008) 19. Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging (2008) 20. College Conspiracy Scam in USA (2011) 21. The Indigo Evolution (2005) 22. Edible City: Grow the Revolution (2012) 23. Collapse (2009) 24. The Global Brain (1983) 25. The White Hole in Time (1993) 26. The Primacy of Consciousness (2011) 27. Fuel (2008) 28. Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil Crisis (2006) 29. What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire (2007) 30. Resonance: Beings of Frequency (2012) 31. War by Other Means (1992) 32. Endgame (2007) 33. War Made Easy (2007) 34. The War on Democracy (2007) 35. Rise Like Lions: The Occupy Wall Street Documentary (2011) 36. Propaganda (2012) 37. The Secret of...
Words: 1398 - Pages: 6
...destroyed by natural disasters. The main problem, as most experts put it, is that “aid is substitutable and what the money is supposed to be used for is spent on something else” (Rieff 225). Warfare should be the last thing our government should be focusing on with disasters such as Haiti’s earthquake and with so many deaths from diseases caused by poverty. To help reduce poverty in the world, American Humanitarians and our government should focus more on countries with poverty problems and natural disasters and less on wars with other countries. Every morning our newspapers could report, “more than 20,000 people perished yesterday of extreme poverty” (New York Times). Up to 8,000 children dead of malaria, 5,000 mothers and fathers dead from tuberculosis, 7,500 young adults dead...
Words: 1514 - Pages: 7
...Monarchy vs. Democracy What would be your prefered society? One where you do not have to make many decisions, or one where you can help make all the decisions? One where you could speak out, for your community, or one where all the officials make all the decisions? Hard to decide, is it not? This debate has been talked about, and thrown around for a long time now. The two sides to this debate have been arguing for a long time now, with different points coming up all the time. Why do the people arguing for democracy, say that it is a better system, than a monarchy? First off, democracy makes sure that people retain some power, and know what is going on in their government. Secondly, democracy makes sure that not only one person, gets all the...
Words: 1124 - Pages: 5
...Nationalism and the appeal of Marxism: Bullet to ballet journey of Maoist Revolution in Nepal. Chapter-1 “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” ― Karl Marx 1. Introduction 1.1 Contextual Background The Communist Party of Nepal (CPN) – Maoist fired their first shots of the People's War on February 12, 1996. Their basic agenda was to establish people's republic. Misfortunately that resulted 13,000 people dead and 1,300 missing. The Maoists started their insurgence with just two old guns but succeed for armed conflict across the country and reformed Nepal’s political environment permanently. This revolution was ultimately ended when Maoist and some of the leading political party leaders signed the Comprehensive Peace...
Words: 1710 - Pages: 7
...Greek philosopher who developed his own ideas about government. He was extremely specific about democracy which he felt would lead to mob rule. He also felt that human reason is the most godlike part of human nature 3. In this document, Pericles is describing the complex government know as democracy. He had expectations for citizens in this type of government. For example, an expectation was that he wanted people, no matter what social class, to speak up for their political decisions no matter what the social scale. 4. Hippocrates was a Greek physician who studied the causes of illness as well as looked for cures. The Hippocratic oath states that he was promising to not give any harmful or deadly medicines to his patients. He also promises to not advise people to get any deadly nor harmful medicines. 5. Euclid was a highly-known famous Greek mathematician, he was also referred to as “The Father of Geometry”. He is best known for his work titled Elements, a thirteen-volume textbook on the principles of mathematics. They include treatises on plain geometry, proportion, and music. 6. According to the article, there are several values that are expressed in this Greek play. For example, Antigone claims that for him, Zeus has not made the order. He also feels that a mortal man could overrun the gods’ unwritten and greatly unfailing laws. Antigone would not allow his brother be dead and...
Words: 605 - Pages: 3
...Lies. Nothing but lies. My friends we were all lied too back in 2002 when George Brush and Tony Blair declared, falsely, that Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction” (WMDs) and that we had to prevent Saddam from unleashing his furry on the World or else we would all be doomed. So with no evidence to support these claims and against the United Nations orders, the United States and the Allied forces brought “freedom” and “democracy” to the people of Iraq. Now, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know just how this new found, wonderful freedom and democracy has benefited the people of Iraq. Just take a look at this fact; over four million Iraqis have emigrated from Iraq since 2003. What does this mean? This means that the invasion of Iraq was wrong. Bush and his so called “friends” invaded under false pretences; they were selective about where and when to promote this so-called democracy; and they did not make the world a safer place by eliminating Saddam Hussein. In the lead up to the war, Tony Blair and George Bush claimed that Saddam’s Iraq had developed weapons capable of creating mass destruction and that the only solution was too enter Iraq and exterminate these weapons. However, after seven years of endless searching not a single piece of evidence was found to support Bush and Blair’s claims. The collation forces ended up leaving Iraq WMDless. In any case, even if Iraq did have WMDs, so does other countries such as Israel, Russia and North Korea (which by the...
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
