...origins and the history of how Obama Care got started and its difficulties. Then, I am going to talk about the pros and cons dealing with Obama Care and the ways it will affect our economy. Next, I will discuss how Obama Care is funded and how there are still missing pieces that the administration needs to clear up. Lastly, I will argue how some of the American population thinks Obama Care is a scam. Then, to wrap up my paper I will be giving my opinion on this complex matter. Steps in the process of Obama Care The history of Obama Care is very complex but the name is the unofficial name for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care act, which was singed into law on March 23, 2010. The major requirements went into effect in January 1, 2014 even though significant modifications had happened before this date. Many Americans were opposed to Obama Care before it was even passed because they didn’t like the idea of the government taking over the healthcare polices. Now, I am going to describe the obstacles of Obama Care over the years in a timeline form. President Obama promised in 2009 that the act would lower costs for families but in reality, health insurance premiums rose 9% in 2011 and by a margin of 8 to 1, employers expected continued increases due to the result of Obama Care. On January 28, 2010, former speaker Nancy Pelosi justifies that the House of Democrats...
Words: 2414 - Pages: 10
...‘We’re not doing enough’ Advocates want more from gun control plan Summary This article is about the gun control in America. It elaborates on President Obama’s plan to lessen crimes from guns in America. The main focus of this article is the awareness of Mental Health. Obama has set out a plan that involves identifying mental illnesses in young children so that it can be treated at an early stage. Along with this comes a background check; however, I believe that the Congress has rejected it in recent months. The plan is great, but it will be hard to pass because of the amount of money that the federal government will have to invest in. Another factor that will be considered is whether or not the majority is republican or democrat (which is a lot of the reasons the house can’t agree on anything). Politics play a huge role with the decision-making. Improving Things/ Inventing or Redefining a Concept The whole issue with gun control shouldn’t be that complicated. Obama has a great plan for it, which includes Mental Illness Awareness. Some people may view this as big government when the feds are trying to set out more strict laws about owning. This makes perfect sense because there is much improvement when it comes to owners of a gun. Too many people are allowed to use a gun, and too many times other people have been hurt in the process. The article expresses that there have been 82 people who were killed in large-scale shootings since 2007 (and this was an article written on...
Words: 680 - Pages: 3
...argument that has continued for years is whether the American federal government should increase the minimum? The two opposing sides on this argument are the Republicans and the Democrats. The Democrats are for minimum wage to increase, unlike the Republicans, who are against it and think of it as a job killer. There are many reasons why the Democrats are for the increase of minimum wage. Currently, there are approximately 3.8 million people who are working at minimum wage or below it. Fewer than one in four minimum wage workers are teenagers and more than half are 25 or older. (Dickinson) If minimum wage were raised to $10.10 it would trim payrolls by less than one-third of one percent, which would help approximately one million Americans out of poverty. It has been proven by the Congressional Budget Office that the raise will not affect the number of jobs as much as people think, and the increase will accomplish more than just harmful situations. There should have been a consistent raise in minimum wage from 1968 to now, but there has not been. The federal government minimum wage should be close to $20 an hour. Tax money could potentially fund less food stamps, welfare, and other financial support for this to occur. A family of four trying to be successful and build their family is living on the earnings of being a minimum wage worker. If that is the case that family is making $15,080 a year, which falls more than $8,000 below the poverty line. For minimum wage workers it is expensive...
Words: 1107 - Pages: 5
...Another Pro is high-capacity magazines should be banned because they too often turn murder into a mass murder, the next Con is gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety. The last Pro that will add is more gun control laws are needed to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers, and the last Con I will add is gun control laws, especially those that try to ban “assault weapons” infringe upon the right to own guns for hunting and or sports. Did you know that at least five women a day are killed by guns in America, and women are at risk of being murdered increase by 500% if there is a gun in a domestic dispute. I think that if they take away our guns from us then it left us variable and it will let other people come over and invade us and if they take our guns and the military fail we have no way to defend us. Another thing if they take our guns then if we get broken into we have no way from stopping people from killing us or they, will find a way illegal to get the guns and end up killing...
Words: 1261 - Pages: 6
...Obamacare Kayla Entingh American National Government Instructor Sloan December 4th, 2012 Being a democrat myself, the last four years have been a battleground between friends and family who don't agree with my side. I have stood my ground on what I believe and back my arguments with facts. One of the largest issues being scrutinized by our country right now is Obamacare. The goals for the way our healthcare system will be laid out are either loved by people or they absolutely hate it. There have been questionable issues about violating parts of our amendments and how or why people who can't afford healthcare actually deserve it. The biggest issue with the Obamacare Plan is whether it is or isn't Constitutional and what that means for the people of the United States. The Patient Protection and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, it represents the most significant regulatory overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 (Wikipedia 2012). The main focus of Obamacare is to leave no person without health coverage. The majority of US Citizens struggle or can simply not afford health care thus not having proper treatment for illness for themselves or their children. The Obamacare policy is a reform of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that...
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...residents of the U.S. This paper will analyze the Obamacare Healthcare Policy-highlighting its core elements, health care problem solution, and the policies history. Also it will evaluate the pros and cons using different perspectives in debate. Let’s begin with the elements of Obamacare. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), also called Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010 (ObamaCare Summary: A Summary of Obama's Health Care Reform, 2013). Since the establishment of Medicaid and Medicare of 1965, Obamacare is one of the most significant expansions from the government and administrative overhaul of the U.S healthcare system. The purpose of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is to raise the rate of health coverage of Americans, to modernize the delivery of health care services, and to reduce the overall costs of health care. This is to be done by restricting certain insurance company practices and providing tax credits and subsidies for individuals and businesses. Prior to the approval of the Obamacare Policy, the American health care industry was in deep calamity. Around 50 million people had no health insurance. Many people with pre-existing conditions were being disallowed from getting health insurance because there was a chance that certain companies would not profit from them. Along with that, companies were enabled to cancel their contract with...
Words: 1743 - Pages: 7
...cell policy.” 1) The benefits of this research can lead to new, more effective treatments for human ailments. Stem cell therapy has alleviated the suffering of thousands of people. Unused stem cells are being discarded instead of being used for research. (“Frequently asked questions.” 3) Stem cells are quite resourceful. They can easily be taken from our own bodies and stored just like blood. During radiation or chemotherapy, white and red blood cells can get damaged. These affected cells can easily be replaced with healthy stem cells that adapt. (Pros and cons of stem cell research, 1)The biggest debate about this topic isn’t about whether stem cells work, but who’s going to pay for the research. It’s not a matter of pro-life or pro-choice, it’s pro-science. If my family had the finances for stem cell therapy, we would have made sure that my grandmother was in as little as pain as possible when she was diagnosed with myeloma. No matter what type of injury or disease, cells can easily be replaced with healthy stem cells. (Pros and cons of stem cell research, 1) Stem cells are their own navigators in the body. When an area is affected by any type of disease or injury, they know exactly what to do. Stem cells have capability of growing into almost any type of cell. (Pros and cons of stem cell research, 1)Stem cells can be used in aiding those with Parkinson’s disease for the pain, they can be used in face lifts to...
Words: 1194 - Pages: 5
...Cons of Gun Outlaw in the United States Sarah Chadwick, Maria Escalante, Aubrey Ballard, Jonathan Mcwilliams, Royal Delahoussaye, Andrew Urey, Stacon Boisse BCOM/275 February 12, 2013 Joseph Scott University of Phoenix Cons of Gun Outlaw in the United States I hate guns. Should an argument be made over a hate statement or should the right to bear arms hold to be as valuable as gold. The introduction of gun control laws can be an effective way to make the streets of America safe again but on the other hand this can also make law-abiding citizens become vulnerable for those whom have illegal possession of fire arms. Firearms, for the most part, are big business in the United States. Manufacturing firearms and ammunition have helped drive the economy for decades. The threat of banning some firearms has created the price of the AR15 assault riffle to sky rocket; so even the thought of not having a gun is big business. Fire arm sells increase with a bad economy because people feel they need protection from people becoming desperate (Thurman,R., 2009). Gun control is a sensitive subject in any country, in any neighborhood, or any civilized establishment. In America alone, about 80 million people representing half of the U.S. homes, own more than 223 million guns. And politically, 60% of Democrats and 30% of Republicans favor stronger gun owner laws (White, 2013). Gun rights are granted by the Second Amendment, which reads: “A well regulated Militia...
Words: 935 - Pages: 4
...them on at one time, it would prove to be an administrative double-crossing task. Without a doubt, each element of the Clinton plan stimulated conflict (Joanathan Oberlander, 2007). The National Federation of Independent Business strongly was against the business obligation. The Health Insurance Association of America struggled against coverage guidelines and federally enforced price controls. Congressional Republicans criticized the whole design, including the health agreements, as being too much “big government.” The organization's hold on to the proficient opposition of health care system change separate well-insured, middle-class Americans (Joanathan Oberlander, 2007). The Clinton organization both overestimated the opposition and misjudged the support for reform. The organization did not organize any planned constituency to stand against the assaults, and individuals they had counted on as supporters, such as big corporations that let them down (Joanathan Oberlander, 2007). Congressional Democrats were separated and, rather than backing the Clinton plan, they came up with their own plan that they favored instead of the Clinton Plan. Furthermore, the plan's separation of guideline and struggle won...
Words: 1509 - Pages: 7
...parties are run by corporations. Some think that in order to break away from the special interests and influences, there should be a strong third party and that party with a different platform is the Libertarian Party. Historically the main two parties were not much different. In the beginning both parties believed that “men (not big government) was to rule them” (The Fundamental Differences Between Republican and Democrats). There was a mutual desire for individual freedom. Currently it seems that their fundamental beliefs have changed. The Democratic Party wants to increase government involvement in the lives of the American public, whereas the Republicans would like to see decreased national government and have each state govern themselves (The Fundamental Differences Between Republican and Democrats). The Libertarians seem to want to get back to what the founding fathers envisioned. Each party has very strong convictions on the topics that confront America today. The hottest topic facing the nation is Same Sex Marriage. Since the beginning the Democrats have defended Civil Rights and supported the expansion of opportunities for all. They fight to end all forms of discrimination, but this is an uphill battle. “We support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under the law for same-sex couples” (Democratic Party on Civil Rights). On the other hand the Republicans strive to strengthen, protect and preserve “Traditional Marriage” by believing...
Words: 2054 - Pages: 9
...cutter tax system that will be fair to all. With that being said, is a flat tax the way to go? There is no tax system that would be beneficial to all Americans. Just like any tax reform, a flat tax system has its own set of pros and cons. For example, a flat tax system would eliminate the current extensive tax code that is extremely difficult to interpret. It would result in an easier understanding of the tax code as well as reduce the chance for errors and tax fraud (Sonic, 2013, para. 7). Additionally, it would cause a reduction in the need for paid tax preparers, which is actually a pro and con. It would save taxpayers money by eliminating the need for paid tax preparers but at the same time would also cause a reduction in the workforce for that industry (Sonic, 2013, para. 7). As a result, this would cause a rise in the number of displaced workers’ as well as putting numerous tax software companies out of business. Moving on, a flat tax would eliminate the ability to create tax loopholes by the government, as previously done, for personal favors or campaign contributions (Sonic, 2013, para. 7). Furthermore, it could help businesses redirect their efforts from ways to reduce their tax liability to increasing their presence in the marketplace (Sonic, 2013, para. 7). Lastly, the flat tax has the potential to encourage investments because investment income would not be taxed (Sonic, 2013, para. 7). The list of cons of a flat tax system is...
Words: 1339 - Pages: 6
...26th Amendment The 26th Amendment was proposed on March 23rd, 1971 and ratified on July 1st of the same year. The 26th Amendment would be the quickest to be ratified in United States history. So many people wanted this law to happen and it did. The saying was “Old enough to fight, then old enough to vote.” This new amendment had people across the nation pondering. This amendment was a remarkable new amendment. Young people could now vote and get involve in there new political leaders. Before this new amendment the law was that you couldn’t vote unless you were at least 21 so until that age, teenagers didn’t care about who was running their country at all until they were of that legal age. The 26th Amendment changed the whole idea of the adulthood of eighteen year olds in America’s eyes forever. Student activist during the Vietnam War, were outraged that young men and women could die in a war and fight for their country but weren’t able to vote. They felt like this was unfair and it took away their rights as citizens. Making the 26th Amendment as a law made them feel like they made a difference. "No taxation without representation” was also a big deal because taxes were still getting pulled out of young teenager’s paychecks. How is that fair if they couldn’t even vote on this but still had to get chunks of money taken out of their paychecks? In some states, including Texas, has changes the adult age to seventeen years old, declaring that if you disobey a law than you will...
Words: 1121 - Pages: 5
...The 26th Amendment 26th Amendment The 26th Amendment was proposed on March 23rd, 1971 and ratified on July 1st of the same year. The 26th Amendment would be the quickest to be ratified in United States history. So many people wanted this law to happen and it did. The saying was “Old enough to fight, then old enough to vote.” This new amendment had people across the nation pondering. This amendment was a remarkable new amendment. Young people could now vote and get involve in there new political leaders. Before this new amendment the law was that you couldn’t vote unless you were at least 21 so until that age, teenagers didn’t care about who was running their country at all until they were of that legal age. The 26th Amendment changed the whole idea of the adulthood of eighteen year olds in America’s eyes forever. Student activist during the Vietnam War, were outraged that young men and women could die in a war and fight for their country but weren’t able to vote. They felt like this was unfair and it took away their rights as citizens. Making the 26th Amendment as a law made them feel like they made a difference. "No taxation without representation” was also a big deal because taxes were still getting pulled out of young teenager’s paychecks. How is that fair if they couldn’t even vote on this but still had to get chunks of money taken out of their paychecks? In some states, including Texas, has changes the adult age to seventeen years old, declaring that if you disobey a...
Words: 1125 - Pages: 5
...Abstract Whether you are an economists or the average consumer, Health Care costs and spending seems to always be a hot topic. From my initial research I found that Health Care costs are steadily rising both in the private and public sectors. From what I have read I believe some sort of Health Care reform is required. There are vast numbers of people suffering and even dying because the cost of Health Care is too expensive. Unfortunately people skip doctor appointments and ignore ailments, just because they cannot afford it and it some cases people are paying the ultimate price. I’d like to look a little deeper into the Pros and Cons of Private and Public Healthcare and delve a little into some of the Health Care reform Bills that are in play or will be implemented in the near future. Specifically I want to look at Obamacare, as I hear it in the news, but do not know what impacts it has to the economy, good or bad. List of Figures Figure 1 6 Figure 2 6 Figure 3 7 Figure 4 7 Health Care Reform In recent years, a fair amount of attention has been geared towards Health Care. There has been a number of Economists that have voiced concern that rising health care spending could hurt the economy and lower employment. A December 2004 survey of CEOs found that employee health care costs are the greatest cost concern of America’s business leaders. (via aspe.hhs.gov). Due to the ever rising cost of healthcare, I found that approximately 53 Million...
Words: 1347 - Pages: 6
...get insurance through work or the government could shop for a health plan from a private insurer. The government offered subsidies for Americans with lower incomes to help pay their premiums and deductibles. What is most relevant to me are the pros and the cons of the ACA. The most important benefit of the ACA is that it slows the cost of rising healthcare cost. How so, you ask? It does so by providing preventive care for Americans who once couldn’t afford insurance. Preventative care is any medical...
Words: 627 - Pages: 3
