Malaysian University is said to produce quality students and human capital to the country. University now offers a variety of courses to help students get jobs. Malaysian University expect more to the students but the University gives less to the students. In my opinion, I agree with the statement. For example, bias lecturers, obsolete equipments, poor learning environment.
The problem with bias lecturers. For example, the lecturers have been assigned to teach certain classes group but only give opportunity to the class he/she likes. One class group have about 30 to 40 students but only a quarter of the class passed the subject. Lecturers cannot easily choose their favourite students and ignore the rest. Lecturers cannot expect that students can follow his/her style of teaching.
Next, the Universities have many obsolete equipments for the students no matter what courses. Many students had complained that they cannot use these obsolete equipments because they do not support students’ work. The equipments need to be update in order to use it for work. For example, PCs needs to use latest Operating System. The monitors need to use the clearer screen than CRTs. Trackball mouse need to replace with laser mouse.
Next, the problem is poor learning environment. The library has air-conditioner but the room not cool enough. Students study with sweats in the library. The classrooms have trash inside them. The smokes of cigarettes all over the university.Toilets are very smelly that toilets can smell from the classroom. They do not take any action for fixingthe facilities such as broken chairs and tables.
Conclusion, Malaysian Universities produce quality students and human capital. Malaysian University expect more to the students but gives less to the students. They will produce less human capital. and quality students than they