When presenting an ad claim, it is important to have proper documentation. Having the proper documentation enables the plaintiff to claim damage from the defendant. If a company’s business is harmed by improper campaign from another company, then the company has a right to claim damage from the other company. For proper documentation of a claim the plaintiff should include all the evidence that they have to prove that the other company’s ad campaign is harmful to them and misleading. If possible have proof of the damage that has been done. It is fair from the competitor’s point of view to object to an ad content that is harmful to their business. If it is proved to be true, the competitors can recover a share of the damages from the defendant company’s profit, and there are times where the attorney fees can be included. …show more content…
Thrower, a beautician. The instructions was read and followed by the beautician before applying the product. Ms. Payne complained about a burning sensation to her back during the application process. She was diagnosed and treated in the emergency room with a second degree burn to her back. Since there was no warning signs on the permanent wave product the beautician is not liable for the burn to Ms. Payne’s back. However, the manufacturer is liable because they did not provide any statutory warnings. In the case of Sanders v. City of Fresno, this is the language of an express warranty. An express warranty is a seller’s promise on which a buyer relies when they purchase an item from a company. The police cannot be safe in saying that they would not cause any injuries. Therefore, express warranty of Tasers that it is safe and could not because injury cannot save police from liability.
In the case of Borland v Sanders Lead Co., the landowners has the right to recover cost for damages caused by the air pollution from the lead