Free Essay

“We Fight for Democracy and Justice”

In:

Submitted By porploiiy
Words 1432
Pages 6
“WE FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY AND JUSTICE”

After a historic election in 2001, Thaksin was the first democratically elected prime minister of Thailand to complete a full term in office and his rule is generally agreed to have been one of the most distinctive in the country's modern history. At the time, some academics called it the most open, corruption-free election in Thai history. Thai Rak Thai won 248 parliamentary seats. Not only that, he got re-elected and back in position again in 2005, winning 374 out of 500 seats in the Parliament. The election had been recorded as the highest voter turnout in Thai history. That means that the people of Thailand approved him democratically. And it’s the will of the people who decides that Thaksin is suitable for running the country. People are the voice and the absolute power of democracy. For those who observed the soldiers cold-blood murdered people on the streets of Bangkok, it may be tempting to assume the chaos is merely about different colored shirts and supporters of different political parties. But that is not the case. What we have been seeing in Thailand since late 2005 is a growing class war between the poor majority and the old elites. The military troops firing bullets and snipers on pro-democracy demonstrators in Bangkok aiming to protect the interests of the conservative elites who have run Thailand for the past 80 years. If you ask me why I’m red, if you ask me why I support Thaksin. It’s because I support democracy and looking for a true democratic rules and justice in this country. What had happened in 2006 was a military coup d’état in which the military has cancelled the thenupcoming elections, abrogated the Constitution, dissolved Parliament and Constitutional Court, banned protests and all political activities, declared martial law nationwide, arrested Cabinet members, and suppressed and censored the media. It’s the worst censorship ever in Thailand, censoring the Internet and the media in all shape and form. They even attack on the public social network such as Facebook. These practices drifted Thailand far away from democracy, liberty, justice and human rights. These practices were not democracy. These were unmistakably an act of tyranny, dictatorship, and fascism and of course these are the process to impede the democracy. According to Jatuporn Prompan, Thai politician and activist of Red Shirts said that from the coup d’état, more people from all levels of society have become Red Shirt supporters because they see the injustice occurred and the importance of fighting for true democratic rules and justice. All the corruption cases that against Thaksin, such as the seizing of Thaksin’s assets that worth 46 billion Thai baht, were imputed because of the coup d’état. The accusations against him were not democratic at all. They were done by the military in charge and therefore I don’t believe that Thaksin is guilty of those accusations. If someone wants to find him guilty of something, file him against the guilty based on democratic code of law not a code that was written by soldiers or military with guns standing behind. In the late 2007, when the first general election was held since the military coup in previous year, the People’s Power Party has won the election overwhelmingly, receiving 310 votes against 163 of the Democrat Party. Samak, the then party's leader, was elected as a prime minister. But not long after, in July 2008, Samak Sundaravej's 5-month-old government was in great trouble and was forced to resign from the premiership only because of Samak is running two cooking shows on television, which are Chim Pai Bon Pai and Yok Khayong Hok Mong Chao. Also, the People’s Power Party was accused of vote buying. Looking through the surface, this case maybe done democratically, but actually, there’s a general who stand behind the scene with their guns and tanks telling the court to pass the decision against the party. The military that want to overthrew a democratically elected leader away. And this is definitely non-democracy. There was a time during that period that Mr. Abhisit and Democrats Party came to power by the ballot of people in the House of Representatives. On the surface, this maybe sounds democratic when the Members of Parliament vote for the prime minister but really this’s abusing democracy. Those Members of Parliament and those smaller parties were scared by the military. The situation forced them to take the Democrats side. It’s all about tyranny with the soldiers behind the scene. We want the government that is democratically elected by the people not the military appointed. We want the government that comes from real people and that will do things for the people. That’s why we marched. That’s why we raise a protest to fight for the freedom and equality of ordinary citizens. In 2010, when the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), also known as Red Shirts, marched from the village in Korat down to Ayutthaya and to Bangkok, we marched for democracy and justice. We marched down to call for dissolution of the government and a new general election to reset Thailand’s troubled democracy. We marched peacefully. We exercised for our democratic rights to protect democracy, which had been overthrown by a military-backed coup d’état in 2006. But instead, the government brings armed soldiers and tanks onto the streets. They try to disperse our peaceful demonstration using armed tanks, guns, and so on. Live ammunition was fired at unarmed protesters and journalists. We even have people hiding in the religious ground, Wat Pathum Wanaram temple, and the soldiers were shooting at the civilians in the temple. At least 98 people died and almost 2,000 were injured. The soldiers murdered us. Abhisit ordered the soldiers to shoot us, to kill us. He’s the murderer. We are just innocent unarmed demonstrators exercising for our democratic rights, dignity, and social justice. So, demanding for proper democratic elections is perfectly legitimate.
But what the government did was injustice. Our democratic rights have been robbed and that this is part of the system that allows such inequality in Thailand. The government needs to be condemned. They must responsible for their fierce attack on our rights to freedom of speech. It has always been evil in the kingdom of Thailand. The rich take everything and the poor get nothing. But when Thaksin came into power in 2001, he brought prosperity and development to the country. Surachai Sae-Dan, former Communist Party of Thailand leader of Daeng Siam (Red Siam Group), who is currently imprisoned under lese majeste allegations, noted that Thaksin brought prosperity and development to the country. As he says, Thaksin worked in good faith for the masses, creating opportunities for people on an equal basis, and wanted to see social improvement through his populism scheme. Thaksin introduced a range of policies to alleviate rural poverty. He launched a village-managed microcredit development funds, low-interest agricultural loans, and the One Tambon One Product (OTOP) rural small and medium enterprise development program that promotes equal chances for all people. It creates job opportunities for us that give us a sense of self-worth and better life standard. These schemes help Thailand recover from the 1997 Asian financial crisis and substantially reduce poverty. Nationwide poverty fell from 21.3% to 11.3%. Moreover, the GDP has grown from 4.9 trillion baht in 2001 to 7.1 trillion baht in 2006. Thailand also able to repaid its debts to the International Monetary Fund two years ahead of schedule. Beside that he also introduced a 30-baht/visit national healthcare program in which I can go to the doctor with just 30 baht in the pocket. The program has been proved by the National Health Security Office (NHSO) to have help increase access to healthcare from 76% of the population to 96% From all the great schemes that Thaksin had initiated, we are able to support our family and ourselves. Thaksin gave us prosperity that no one else or no other government in the kingdom of Thailand has ever been able to do. The government that come from the real people and do things for the people is the deal we make in a democracy. The government that gives us prosperity and the right to simply be free and enjoy life. Call it populism or call it whatever you like but for me, I’m able to live a life better than ever before. And that is why I wear the red shirt and support their ideology.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Accounting

...being a ladies man to a good samaritan, to being a killer on the cricket pitch. But he wears all these labels with ease and élan.” 00441698395067 dg11812 "Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that, but the really great make you feel that you, too, can become great." -- Mark Twain "Indiscriminate killing and looting could only serve the cause of the enemies of Pakistan. In the harshness, we lost the support of the silent majority of the people of East Pakistan." -- Hamood-ur-Rehman Commission Report on 1971 "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the grey twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -- Theodore Roosevelt "You have asked me to give you a message. What message can I give you? We have got the great message in the Quran for our guidance and enlightenment." -- Jinnah's message to Frontier MSF April 4, 1943 "Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found, against the wrong" -- Theodore Roosevelt "This above all, to thine own self be true." -- Shakespeare "Without courage, wisdom bears no fruit" -- Baltasar Gracian "In a country where half a million die every year only for drinking polluted water, it is more necessary for us to do something for them." -- Imran Khan "Ask yourself...

Words: 6102 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of Jfk Speech

...Our 35th president, John F. Kennedy, delivered a speech on June 26, 1963 in West Berlin commending the people of Berlin on their relentless dedication to democracy. His speech was titled, “Ich bin ein Berliner” which translates to English as, I am a Berliner. Mr. Kennedy gives praise to the people for fighting communism for almost two decades. President Kennedy persuades the audience to not give up their fight for freedom. He does a successful job of using an emotional appeal to help his persuasion by saying that the people of the United States are also fighting for them to achieve freedom. The president did this by saying, ”I know of no town, no city, that has been besieged for 18 years that still lives with the vitality and the force, and...

Words: 1116 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Did Martin Luther King Revolutionized American Society

...Throughout the history of the world, democracy and essential human rights have been achieved because of the brave men and women who have stood up to tyranny and oppression. Without the efforts of people like Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau, and Mahatma Gandhi, the United States would still be living in a time vastly consisting of white supremacy, glass ceilings and injustice toward people of other races and backgrounds. Today, some of these dreadful characteristics of American society endure but they have been severely weakened by protests and outcries from citizens demanding justice. Peaceful resistance paves the way for change and equality because it leads other people to become informed about different viewpoints. The...

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter To A Birmingham Jail

...clergymen wrote an article condemning Dr. King for hypocrisy and breaking the law. In response to the article, Dr. King wrote the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” in which he clarified the difference between a just and unjust law, stating we, as human beings, have “not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust...

Words: 965 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The American Dream: Social Injustice In The United States

...Social justice is a simple concept that unfortunately is not fulfilled within our society. Obtaining my Bachelor’s of Science in Criminal Justice last spring has given me the opportunity to take various courses such as juveniles and the criminal justice system, social psychology, and ethics. I believed the basic concept of social justice is that every human being has equal rights and opportunities regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, beliefs, etc. America has sold this idea that we can all have what is known as the “American Dream”. The American Dream refers to a big house with a white picket fence along with a nice car and so forth, but what they do not emphasize is how unrealistic that idea is for many American, which is a social injustice. It is very unfortunate that slavery ended 151 years ago, but yet African Americans still face oppression. They are fighting odds not put forth on themselves but the odds society has created for them. A prime example, the current amount of police brutality cases against African American is a tremendous societal...

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly

...United Nations Millennium Declaration I. Values and principles 1. We, heads of State and Government, have gathered at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 6 to 8 September 2000, at the dawn of a new millennium, to reaffirm our faith in the Organization and its Charter as indispensable foundations of a more peaceful, prosperous and just world. 2. We recognize that, in addition to our separate responsibilities to our individual societies, we have a collective responsibility to uphold the principles of human dignity, equality and equity at the global level. As leaders we have a duty therefore to all the world’s people, especially the most vulnerable and, in particular, the children of the world, to whom the future belongs. 3. We reaffirm our commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, which have proved timeless and universal. Indeed, their relevance and capacity to inspire have increased, as nations and peoples have become increasingly interconnected and interdependent. 4. We are determined to establish a just and lasting peace all over the world in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter. We rededicate ourselves to support all efforts to uphold the sovereign equality of all States, respect for their territorial integrity and political independence, resolution of disputes by peaceful means and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, the right to selfdetermination of peoples which...

Words: 3263 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Social & Economic Justice Issues with Racial Disparity

...Social & Economic Justice Issues with Racial Disparity LaToya Foster Shaw University A lot of historical injustices have happened towards the black community over the years. It is clear that they have suffered a lot as they were considered part of the society that was not worthy of certain privileges. The African American communities were brought from Africa to work as slaves to the white people. They were property to be owned rather than people with feelings and needs. They were bought and sold just like any other property. A person who had the most slaves was considered to be the richest (Marte, 2014). The slaves were treated in whichever way that the owner felt. However, over the years, improvements have been made as the African American community have fought for their rights and have been acknowledged by the white community. However, black people are still being discriminated against especially when trying to secure employment. They are considered to be inferior to the white people and the skills that they have.             Society can still be stuck in the cloud that most black people come from poor backgrounds and therefore do not have the same opportunities to study as their white counterparts. Therefore, they are not able to access the same job opportunities. Furthermore, the African American population is said to commit the most crimes and therefore making people afraid to hire them. Research...

Words: 876 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Housing Market

...Kong. We, the Liberal Party, strongly believe that freedom is the core value that we should safeguard and preserve to make Hong Kong a more prosperous and thriving international metropolitan. Without freedom, Hong Kong would not be the freest economy in the global arena for many years. Without freedom, Hong Kong citizens and other mass media would not have a channel to convey their ideas and opinions openly. Without freedom, there would not be Liberal Party. Pursuit of freedom has never been an easy task, therefore since our establishment, we have been endeavored to pursue freedom wholeheartedly. We believe that only by preserving this value ceaselessly can Hong Kong maintain her prosperity and stability. Pursuit of freedom is by no means our exclusive mission. In order to make Hong Kong a better place to live in, we also place great emphasis in upholding some irreplaceable values such as equality in opportunity, cultural diversity, justice, love and care. The Liberal Party is committed to attain all these goals by an unshakable spirit, which is to serve the Hong Kong citizens at all cost. The Liberal Party will inherit the proud history and continue to serve Hong Kong with our sincere attitude. We will actively listen to different opinions and voices, and grasp every opportunity to improve ourselves to a higher level. We believe that through the collective effort by our citizens, Hong Kong will continue to prosper in years ahead. 2. Our values Democracy We firmly...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Responsibility Of The Government In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." As we say in the pledge of allegiance “with liberty and justice for all." This means that every citizen has the right to freedom and justice. Freedom as in, those citizens can't be compelled to work for free, and justice as in the state has the responsibility to bring those who trespass against you to trial by a jury of peers. Basically it means you are a free person, and no one has the right to harm you. In the Book Anthem by Ayn Rand, no one has individual rights. They do not even know what I means, they are all one. I would hate to have this government, and I wouldn't even be able to have an opinion about it. The government should NOT have the right to control the individual. People should have the right to be an individual. People deserve to choose how their life functions. They deserve to have the right to choose if they want a family, friends experiences, etc. Even little things like what they read, write, say, even how they look....

Words: 490 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Martin Luther King

...The power of the human race settles on the imagination of one’s full potential and ambition. Life is deteriorating, hope for none; a world in which is becoming a chore than expressing humanity. Among society, the people Dr. Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau expresses stresses the idea of activism and revolution, a life for one where one becomes a human more than a machine for a capitalist world. In a controlled system of government, Thoreau and King both show differences of acting against the government for sake and will. Within their differentiations in strategies for seeking justice and individuality, Thoreau and King both come across the same purpose: the power is within the American citizen. Thoreau was a philosophical transcendentalist...

Words: 1189 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Dance

...moment to upset the peace of the world. It is this happy fact, now clear to the view of every public man whose thoughts do not still linger in an age that is dead and gone, which makes it possible for every nation whose purposes are consistent with justice and the peace of the world to avow nor or at any other time the objects it has in view. We entered this war because violations of right had occurred which touched us to the quick and made the life of our own people impossible unless they were corrected and the world secure once for all against their recurrence. What we demand in this war, therefore, is nothing peculiar to ourselves. It is that the world be made fit and safe to live in; and particularly that it be made safe for every peace-loving nation which, like our own, wishes to live its own life, determine its own institutions, be assured of justice and fair dealing by the other peoples of the world as against force and selfish aggression. All the peoples of the world are in effect partners in this interest, and for our own part we see very clearly that unless justice be done to others it will not be done to us. The programme of the world's peace, therefore, is our programme; and that programme, the only possible programme, as we see it, is this: I. Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy...

Words: 1513 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Some Truths Are Not Self-Evident

...United States Of America’s Constitution plays in citizens actions is to write down laws, However The Constitution is a document that has just a little of importance at the time of talking about justice, liberty, and democracy among citizens in The United States of America. Howard Zinn focused on five main issues of justice and liberty that lead to his conclusion.Those five issues are the matter of racial equality, free speech, economic justice, sexual equality, and when war approaches. When he mentioned racial equality he focused on black people. This issue was a huge problem in the United states back in time and it has decreased as of now but, not only among black people but colored people as well. Zinn mentions different movements that were taken by people; citizens from the country to abolish slavery. Thanks to those social movements laws were created, like the fourteenth and fifteenth Amendments. The actions taken by the citizens in the United States were outside the Sanchez 2 Constitution. My Father-in law mentioned that two of his recent friends went to Louisiana on a trip. They decided to stop by a bar and the owner told the Caucasian man to come back without his Black friend and he will be allowed to come in. My Father-in law agrees that blacks still have to fight to get their rights including colored people in general. Zinn is right the constitution...

Words: 363 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Odysseus Vs Malcolm X Analysis

...greatest aspects of their respective culture. When looking back on past societies, examining their heroes indicates what they valued. Even those from thousands of years ago, like the Ancients Greeks, used heros to share their values. The Greeks saw Homer’s Odysseus as an war hero because of his cunning and great battle skills. His legend still lives on today as people around the world learn about the myths of Odysseus. In more recent times, many people appreciate the work of Malcolm X for his heroic fight against injustice and his tremendous speaking ability. His monumental speeches impact the thoughts and shape the ideals of many activists that advance in the fight for social justice. In Homer’s The Odyssey and Malcolm X’s “The Ballot or the Bullet”, both heroes convey great strength in their battles through Odysseus’s surviving the hurricane sent from Poseidon, Malcolm X’s clear portrayal of the injustices in America, and both heroes willingness while staying persistent and achieve justice. Homer conveys Odysseus’s strength through his survival of the hurricane from Poseidon. For example, while Odysseus struggles to stay alive during the storm, “he’d not forget his craft-- he lunged after...

Words: 1033 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

What Is Democratic Socialism?

...more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be trasnsformed to through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the decisions that affect our lives. Democracy and socialism go hand in hand. All over the world, wherever the idea of democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well- everywhere but in the United States. Because of this, many false ideas about socialism have developed in the U.S. With this booklet, we hope to answer some of your questions about socialism. • Large corporations seem to be an almost permanent fixture in the US, so what is the point of working towards socialism? In the short term we can't eliminate large corporations, but we can bring them under democratic control. Government could use regulartions and tax incentives to encourage companies to act in the public interest and outlaw destructive activities such as exporting jobs to low-wage countries and polluting our environment. Public pressure and trade unions also have a critical role to play in the struggle to hold corporations accountable. Worker ownership of large corporations is another important possibility for democratizing our economy, and one that has recently seemed more and more attainable. Won't socialism be impractical because people will lose their incentive to work? We don't agree with the capitalist assumption that starvation or greed are the only reasons people work. People enjoy thier work...

Words: 1701 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

论文Aaa

...Thesis Statement: Henry David Thoreau is one of the pioneers of Transcendentalism, and his famous work, Civil Disobedience has great effect on Mahatma Gandhi’s ideology and movement which drives the India for independence. Outline 1. Introduction 1. Brief introduction of Henry David Thoreau 2. Brief introduction of Mahatma Gandhi 2. Writing background and cores of Civil Disobedience 2.1 Writing background 2.2 Cores of Civil Disobedience 2.2.1 Conscience of human 2.2.2 Effect of morality 2.2.3 Suspicion of American’s democracy 2.3.4 In-cooperation with government 3. Embodiment on Mahatma Gandhi 3.1 Effect on Gandhi’s ideology 3.1.1 Works of Gandhi 3.1.2 Speeches of Gandhi 3.2 Effect on Gandhi’s movement 3.2.1 Gandhi in South Africa 3.2.2 Gandhi in India 4. Conclusion 1. Introduction 1.1 Brief introduction of Henry David Thoreau Henry David Thoreau was one of the most famous writers, naturalist, philosophers, abolitionists, and the pioneers of Transcendentalism in America in 19 century. He was born in Concord, Massachusetts, 1817. Thoreau met Ralph Waldo Emerson when he studied in university. And he was deeply influenced by Emerson who advocated that man should be true to himself and close to nature. Emerson was not only a friend but also a teacher to Thoreau. They had edited the journal Sundial together. Thoreau graduated from Harvard College in 1837 and worked as...

Words: 5392 - Pages: 22