Free Essay

What Happens During the Trial

In:

Submitted By Geanger
Words 793
Pages 4
What Happens During the Trial Events in a trial usually happen in a particular order, though the order may be changed by the judge. The usual order of events is set out below. Step 1: Selection of the Jury. Step 2: Opening Statements. The lawyers for each side will discuss their views of the case that you are to hear and will also present a general picture of what they intend to prove about the case. What the lawyers say in their opening statements is not evidence and, therefore, does not help prove their cases. Step 3: Presentation of Evidence. All parties are entitled to present evidence. The testimony of witnesses who testify at trial is evidence. Evidence may also take the form of physical exhibits, such as a gun or a photograph. On occasion, the written testimony of people not able to attend the trial may also be evidence in the cases you will hear. Many things you will see and hear during the trial are not evidence. For example, what the lawyers say in their opening and closing statements is not evidence. Physical exhibits offered by the lawyers, but not admitted by the judge, are also to be disregarded, as is testimony that the judge orders stricken off the record. Many times during the trial the lawyers may make OBJECTIONS to evidence presented by the other side or to questions asked by the other lawyer. Lawyers are allowed to object to these things when they consider them improper under the laws of evidence. It is up to the judge to decide whether each objection was valid or invalid, and whether, therefore, the evidence can be admitted or the question allowed. If the objection was valid, the judge will SUSTAIN THE OBJECTION. If the objection was not valid, the judge will OVERRULE THE OBJECTION. These rulings do not reflect the judge's opinion of the case or whether the judge favours or does not favour the evidence or the question to which there has been an objection. It is your duty as a juror to decide the weight or importance of evidence or testimony allowed by the judge. You are also the sole judge of the CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES, that is, of whether their testimony is believable. In considering credibility, you may take into account the witnesses' opportunity and ability to observe the events about which they are testifying, their memory and manner while testifying, the reasonableness of their testimony when considered in the light of all the other evidence in the case, their possible bias or prejudice, and any other factors that bear on the believability of the testimony or on the importance to be given that testimony. Step 4: The Instructions. Following presentation of all the evidence, the judge instructs the jury on the laws that are to guide the jury in their deliberations on a verdict. A copy of the instructions will be sent to the jury room for the use of jurors during their deliberations. All documents or physical objects that have been received into evidence will also be sent to the jury room. Step 5: Closing Arguments. The lawyers in the closing arguments summarize the case from their point of view. They may discuss the evidence that has been presented or comment on the credibility of witnesses. The lawyers may also discuss any of the judge's instructions that they feel are of special importance to their case. These arguments are not evidence. Step 6: Jury Deliberation. The jury retires to the jury room to conduct the deliberations on the verdict in the case they have just heard. The jury first elects a foreman who will see to it that discussion is conducted in a sensible and orderly fashion, that all issues are fully and fairly discussed, and that every juror is given a fair chance to participate. When a verdict has been reached, the foreman signs it and informs the bailiff. The jury returns to the courtroom, where the foreman presents the verdict. The judge then discharges the jury from the case.

TASK 1. Paraphrase the following words and expressions and explain their meanings.

- lawyers for each side; - intend to prove; - to testify; - improper objections; - if sup to the judge; - valid or invalid; - to sustain the objection; - to favour one of the sides; - to summarize the case; - the jury retires; - sensible and orderly fashion.

TASK 2. Answer the questions.
1. What are the steps of a trial?
2. How is jury selected?
3. Define the word EVIDENCE. What cannot be considered evidence?
4. Can you give examples of physical exhibits?
5. What can you tell about OBJECTIONS?
6. What can you tell about INSTRUCTIONS?
7. Who presents CLOSING ARGUMENTS?
8. What have you learned about JURY DELIBERATIONS?

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Salem Witch Trials Research Paper

...Salem witch trials were once known as “the devil’s magic” because of the witchcraft being used. Mary easty a victim of prosecution during the witch trials said “I never complied, but prayed against [Satan] all my days… I will say it, if it was my last time, I’m clear of all this sin”. These accusations led to consequences therefore, result as vicious prosecutions. During that time, the Salem witch trials were very prejudiced toward anyone. The circumstances that induced to the Salem witch trials were irrational. It all started “during the spring of 1692, after a group of young girls in Salem Village, Massachusetts, claimed to be possessed by the devil and accused several local women of witchcraft.”...

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Essay On The Salem Witch Trials

...The movie focused on the Salem Witch trials. They showed the trials and how they prosecuted people who were believed in being apart of witchcraft in the countries of Essex, Suffolk, and Middlesex in colonial Massachusetts. The event in the movie took place in the mid 17th century. It showed during that time how any person accused of witchcraft was believed to be consorting with the devil. The movie focuses on a kids who were in fear of being associated with any part of witchcraft. The kids being so scared were the causes of accusation of innocent people who were condemned without fair trial. In their deception, they Salem witch trial system sent a group of falsely accused people to their death. In the movie they made a solid point and used many accurate facts from the history of the Salem Trials. In the movie, Samuel Parris played the minister who demanded that the outbreak of witchcraft be stopped with. It was fear and paranoia that caused people to be beheaded or sent to jail which is well shown in the movie. The movie does take a more subtle way of showing the tortures that happen to people being accused. During those times people suffered both physically and mentally. The torture methods are worse than what is being shown in the movie. In conclusion, I think the movie fully explained what happen during the Salem Witch trials. I think it depicted everything in its reality that happen to...

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...Jury Trial Analysis Jaynice Harden March 16, 2015 CJA/364 Criminal Procedure Shane Krauser Jury Trial Analysis In today’s society, there are many people who know what a jury trial is and what is expected in the process of a jury trial. They may also know why the process is important and very necessary as it protects the citizens of the United States. The part that some people may not know about is the process that is taken during the pre-trial phase. Any and every individual that has been accused of wrong doing have the right to a fair trial. In addition, everyone has the right to an attorney to help then fight and understand the legal side of the defense. A jury trial can consists of 12 adjudicators which as selected at random that will take all information into consideration and decide upon the facts of the civil or criminal case. Criminal cases are more serious than civil cases. “In this case, serious offense refers to offense carrying a punishment of over six months (Gaines & Miller,2011). A jury trial consists of six steps that must be followed in order to ensure a fair trial. The prosecution as well as the defense is very needing of these steps in the criminal justice system. If it should happen to be a violent crime then a fair and impartial jury would have to be the ones to give the prosecution the verdict. However, if it turns out that the accused is not guilty then the accused have the right to due process and a fair trial. A jury trial is very important...

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Analysis Of The Trial Of God By Elie Wiesel

...In the book The Trial of God written by Elie Wiesel, an Innkeeper by the name of Berish and his daughter Hanna are the last 2 surviving Jewish people in Shamgorod Ukraine after a pogrom occurred. Three Jewish minstrels unintentionally end up in Shamgorod during Purim, offending Berish greatly, but after coming to an agreement Berish allows the three minstrels to stay free of charge in an exchange for performances from the three men for himself and Maria, a Christian waitress at his inn. After much conversation while trying to find a topic for the minstrels to perform they decide to put God on trial. The three minstrels were to be judges, Berish requested to be the prosecutor, and Maria the audience or the people. The minstrels have asked Berish several times about what happened...

Words: 433 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Jadm 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Final Exam Answers

...enforcement official is responsible for serving court papers, maintaining security within courtrooms, and running the county jail? (TCOs 3&4) The legalistic style of policing: (TCOs 3&4) Unreasonable searches and seizures are prohibited by the: (TCOs 3&4) Historically, officers were allowed to use deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspected felon even when the person represented no immediate threat to the officer or the public. This was known as the: (TCOs 3&4) The most widely used system of indigent defense is: (TCOs 5&6) During a trial, the ________ happens before the closing statement, but after the jury selection. (TCOs 5&6) Bail serves two purposes. One is to help ensure the reappearance of the accused at trial. The other is: (TCOs 5&6) Which of the following is one of the more rational sentencing goals? (TCOs 7&8) Historically, ________ was the most widely used type of physical punishment. (TCOs 7&8) What word describes aggressive men who assume the masculine role in homosexual relations in male prisons? (TCOs 7&8) This group...

Words: 6098 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

How Personal Injury Cases Work

...Understand the many types of motions and what they are designed for. Speak to the attorney to determine which best apply in the case and why they are being used. The more one know about the process, the more confident they will feel as the case moves forward. Settlements When considering a settlement, many factors need to be evaluated. The strength of the case is one variable to take into account, with the settlement amount being another. The fees to be paid to the attorney also need to be taken into consideration. An attorney with experience in personal injury cases can determine if a settlement offer is reasonable or if the client should take the case to trial. Going To Trial When a case is to go to trial, make sure the attorney explains exactly how this process works. Many individuals assume they know what to expect, as they have seen trials played out on TV shows. This is real life, however, and trials typically don't happen as they do on television. The attorney can tell his or her client what to expect at every stage. What Happens...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Criminal Trial

...The criminal trial process begins with the arresting of the individual or the filing for an arrest warrant. An arraignment usually occurs within 48 hours after an arrest. At this time if the defendant has not been mirandized, they will advise them of their rights and of the charges against one. Bail will be set as long as the charge is not murder (2011). A judge can determine if he wants to impose bail for someone charged with murder. They will be given a date for their next court appearance and will be able to post bail and leave or if bail is denied will be remanded into custody (2011). In a state case the preliminary hearing is the next step. Within 7 to 10 days of the initial arraignment the preliminary hearing will take place. During this hearing a district judge will decide if the charges should be upheld. The prosecutions job is to prove that the charges are valid via a prima facie case. Witnesses and evidence will be provided by the prosecutor. The defense attorney does not provide any at this point. If the charges are federal charges an individual goes before a grand jury instead of a preliminary hearing. Grand jury trials are private hearings comprised of 23 citizens. The only one allowed to present in this hearing is the jury, prosecutor, and any witnesses the prosecutors deems necessary. The witnesses can only enter one at a time and have to leave immediately after giving there testimony. A formal arraignment takes place within 30 days from the...

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Scottsborro Boys

...blackface. This particular show consisted of black people in blackface. However, minstrel shows portray black people as dim-witted, lazy, and careless. The nine Scottsboro boys were accused in Alabama for raping two white women on a train in the 1930s. The landmark of legal cases from this incident dealt with racism, the right to a fair trial, and miscarriage of justice. The cases included an angry murder crowd before the suspects were charged, an entrapment, a completely white jury, and rushed trials. Throughout these trials, the boys received very poor legal representation, and even though there was medical evidence to suggest that they had not committed the crime, eight of the boys were convicted. The youngest, Eugene was given a new trial because he was a juvenile. The other boys were held in Kirby Prison, having their case appealed twice to the United States Supreme Court. During the return of the case to the lower court, one of the girls, Ruby admitted to fabricating the rape accusations and explained that none of the Scottsboro boys touched her or her friend, Victoria. The jury still managed to find the defendants guilty. Another trial, with one black member within the jury, freed four more of the Scottsboro boys. Of those who remained in prison, one was shot by a prison guard, two escaped and later charged with something else and sent back to prison; one was sentenced to death, but “jumped parole” and went into hiding. The musical begins with a woman waiting for a bus...

Words: 2079 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Criminal Justice Process

...The Criminal Justice Process Edith Lewis Criminal Law & Procedure (BLJ1442A) Agustin Pena November 15, 2014 The Criminal Justice Process Even though the defendant can be found guilty at his trial he, has the right to to file an appeal to see if legal errors occurred which could possibly affect the outcome of the verdict or the trial. The first step in the criminal justice process is the investigation and plea negotiations begin after the defendant is charged and a trial is set when the plea negotiations fail. The defendant has an arraignment hearing where he is allowed to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. In this step probable cause is established with the evidence that is gathered so that an arrest can be made. Each state has their own way of processing felony criminal charges in a state court. They have their own procedures and rules that describe the criminal justice process for their states. The first step in the criminal justice process is the investigation. Before an arrest can be made in a crime, a crime must be committed and reported so that an investigation can be initiated. The Criminal Justice Process, 2014 noted that, “During the investigation the investigating officer seeks to obtain a search warrant if there is enough evidence in a particular location” (The Criminal Justice Process, 2014). When the investigators submit the information to the judge, the judge decides if there is “probable cause” to issue a search warrant for...

Words: 2668 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Article Rebuttal

...profits that will be gain in Los Angeles – large audience, large advertising would bring capital into the city, and he got that. Even with that he argues that he didn’t feel capital gain in the city would be enough, and it’s not a good idea to televise. As in any trial the defense attorney will disclosed many unknown things about Michael and he would be tried in this case. It is the attorney position to bring in as much evidence to put Michael immoral stat in defense of the action that Dr. Murray made that day. In the article the attorney feels it’s not fair to the kids and Michael’s mom. There will be things announce in the trial that will cause twinge to all of them. CONS Grant pain will be received by those family members, but I argue that broadcasting has very little bearing on those that are in sorrow with his death. It was reported that Michael’s kids and family members are schedule to testify and will be presence during the trial. I argue, would it be the right thing to have his kid’s presence throughout the trial. Now that would be anguish for the kids. Michael had thousands of fans nationally all over the universe and I’m sure broadcasting was warrant by each and every one of them. Broadcasting this trial will bring great revenue to the city, with gain of respect to those grateful adored Michael Jackson. Hearing and receiving second hand information is not always the best. Michael fans warrant hearing the facts...

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Water In The Collecting Jar

...Explain in your own words how the solar distiller works. (3 points) When salt water is set out into the sun the solar radiation causes the water evaporate into gas. When that happens the water and the...

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Dick Lee

...unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.  * Rights of people accused of crimes * No double jeopardy * Right to remain silent * Notice and opportunity to be heard Amendment 6 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have...

Words: 4129 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Comparing Atwood And Half-Hanged Mary

...Witch trials were a common thing back in the 1680’s-90, many people were killed. Anyone who was caught dealing with the devil was sentenced to death. Dealing with the devil was a very serious crime back then if you were accused of being a witch or talking to the devil or even being involved with witchcraft you were given death by being hanged. Being hanged was just one of the many punishments they gave. In both stories, the writer shows how the victims were treated and the difference between them both. The way both authors tell the story is very amusing. The writer tells the story as if someone is watching all of it happen. The watcher tells and shows the intensity of the witch trials. Atwood told her story where there could be an understanding of character’s thought, and gave us a better understanding on what really happens when it’s time to be hanged while Miller wrote his play in many different views. Miller gave the feeling of his trail through the people of the village (Miller pg. 464 Abigail” (in a temper)”) while in Atwood play Half-Hanged Mary, tells her feeling about and thoughts in her own words. Atwood line 5” I didn’t feel the aimed word hit”. The overall feeling of the text is different. Miller explained his character’s development by events that occurred in the play during the trails. He gives good details on what’s going on...

Words: 476 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Did Germany React To Ww2

...During the 20th century Europe was the eye of the hurricane of wars, and not just any typical war amongst one nation versus another nation, but several European states such as Germany, France, Great Britain, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, including the United States which is not a European country to mention a few. After the First World War, it was established that WWI would end all wars but to the contrary, WWI still left an amber behind and as the years went by that amber turned to a flame, that soon ended up bringing chaos. Before World War I, Germany and France had a bickering wars like the Franco Prussia did not settle down a menace between these two nations, Germany won that war and left France seeking victory, World War I happens, and this time France is in the winning side. Germany was humiliated, she was once seen as a powerful nation, and now she had to walk with her tail...

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examples Of Witch Hunt In The Crucible

...Historically, witch-hunts are known as an unfair judgement against innocent people derived from fear. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller talks about the Salem witch trials, writing an allegory that references the communists who were being persecuted during the red scare. In fact, witch-hunts can still be compared to events that occur in modern day’s American society. With this in mind it is important to point out racial profiling, which has been increasing lately. It is known as the inclusion of racial or ethnic characteristics in determining whether an individual is considered likely to commit an illegal act, leading to the unfair targeting of its victims. Arthur Miller profits from Salem’s history to address a higher concept, the McCarthyism,...

Words: 808 - Pages: 4