...Farah English 3 Part 2: Why gun ownership should be held more strictly: I, Omar Farah, certify that I have personally completed this assignment based on my own personal efforts. I understand if I use outside sources, I must properly give my source(s) credit using the APA format and my paper should not include more than 20% of direct quotes from other sources. I understand if I do not provide proper credit to outside sources, I will be documented for plagiarism and be required to resubmit a new assignment. I will not divulge the content of this assignment or any of my work, generally or specifically, to any current or future James Madison High School students. 1/4/2015 I chose the topic “Why gun ownership should be held more strictly” because most of our daily news flashes say at least someone was shot and killed or shot and injured. I don’t like this; it is senseless and very sad. We are losing people every day, because someone is using their gun recklessly or leaving it where someone else has access or easily found. I don’t get why people kill people it is just inhumane and against our morals. Guns have very high danger to our country as well as other countries. That is why I pick or chose to write about this topic for my persuasive essay because that is what I see in guns and want people to see it too. I have one question to my reader; do you think guns should be under a stricter law? Honestly, I believe that we should have more stringent gun laws that tell people; that...
Words: 894 - Pages: 4
...crime. This has sparked the debate of whether gun control is necessary to diminish crime and many pro gun advocates, look at Switzerland as proof that it is false. To get into this heated debate, it is important to understand the term gun control. Gun control is defined as laws that control the selling, owning, and use of guns (Webster's Dictionary). Like in any debate there are always two very different stance on this topic. PRO Pro gun control advocates argue that having strict gun laws will decrease the nation's crime rate. They also point out that having tougher gun laws will save lives by avoiding any more public massacres. To the eyes of a gun control advocate, it seems like a no brainer. After all, the less guns on the street will result in less gun related deaths. In the United States, 33,636 people have died due to a firearm in 2013 (Alpers, Philip).That number accounts for murders, homicides and suicides across the country. Thousands of people that year lost their life due to a firearm incident and the number keeps growing each year. Many gun control advocates wonder why it is so difficult to implement stricter gun laws in the world's greatest democracy. The misinterpretation of the second amendment is what's holding back the U.S. Many people that are against gun control throw around the Second Amendment a whole lot. What many have failed to realize is that the Second Amendment protects the right of militias to own guns, not the individual. Let's take a look at what...
Words: 1584 - Pages: 7
...Although people some people don't want to make gun laws stricter, it needs to be strict. Anyone that owns a gun can easily walk outside and go to to a school or just decide to shoot someone. Someone that want to hurt someone or make it on the news about something can easily go to a person that is gun running(1). People that are mentally ill can still go out there a buy guns from any store because they don't know that they are mentally ill. Over thousands of people die from gunshot wounds in the U.S. There has been more than one school shooting(2). Every day in the U.S, 14 children die from a gunshot wound or killed instalinty(3). In 1987-1888 Highland Hospital had more the 700 patiens com in with gunshot wounds, Which the cost...
Words: 1870 - Pages: 8
...make the argument that stricter gun control laws will make society safer. That a decrease in crime, injury and death will make society safer. Now let us assume that hostile individuals seeking to commit crimes or harm others often use a gun to carry out their destructive objectives. One could argue that gun control laws would prevent hostile individuals from acquiring guns, and if we assume that these individuals would be less of a threat if they did not have a gun, then stricter gun control laws would make society safer. Now, let us assume that less strict gun control laws would result in more people carrying guns. It would then result in more criminals carrying guns because they feel that this is a necessary measure in order to adequately defend themselves from vigilante justice. If we say that more people and criminals carrying guns would result in more frequent gun-related deaths and injuries, then stricter gun control laws would again result in a safer society. Guns can be mishandled by their owners, which may result in the injury or death of the gun :owner or an unsuspecting, innocent individual. Statistics show that there is a correlation between the laxity of a country's gun laws and its suicide rate. Let’s say that individuals would be less successful in committing suicide if they did not have access to a gun, and that stricter gun control laws will make guns more difficult for individuals to obtain, and then stricter gun control laws would make society safer. So, by...
Words: 840 - Pages: 4
...Gun control. A big topic in politics. People put down guns all the time all others totally uplift it. Is it tremendously bad, is it totally good, does it need balance? The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” As the law says, we must have a well regulated militia to defend our freedoms. I believe a fair system of owning guns should be implemented, through fair regulations. Why are guns and the control of them such a big topic in today’s politics? One-third of Americans own or have someone in their home whom owns a gun. Many people love and care for their guns and their right to have them, which is the Second...
Words: 769 - Pages: 4
...Is gun control bad? “Countries with higher gun ownership have lower murder rates.”(Harvard 1) There are two sides to the debate, people against gun control and people for gun control. It is a big issue because there are so many people for and against guns. There are 318 million people in the United States and 270 million use guns. While there are reasons for higher gun control, there are just as many against it also. “In some early states people were required to own guns,”(Krull 80) so why are people trying to take away them now. The problem has been around for a long time but it started with racism against African americans. In 1837 Georgia passed a law banning guns but it was decided that it was unconstitutional really quickly. In 1968 a gun control act was passed to keep firearms out of the hands of people who were not...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...power. ” (Gun Rights FAQ). As citizens of this country it is important the rights that the people have and their real history and meaning behind the rights. Stricter gun laws is negative because fewer people will own guns, which means people will have a hard time protecting themselves and will have fewer privileges hunting. Stricter gun laws may be a good idea but only if we had a low rate of crime and criminals wouldn’t be able to get their hands on any firearms (Pratt Web). If criminals were not so smart and there was no way criminal could be able to get a gun then the stricter gun laws would and could possibly work. Connecticut...
Words: 1146 - Pages: 5
...Guns do not kill people. People kill people. The person is the one who pulls the trigger, killing someone. A gun cannot kill a person by itself. Some people disagree, and because of this, there is an issue on gun control, whether people should freely possess them or not. The debate is between making gun laws more or less strict, letting people wield them freely or not.Though the results of laws being less strict are far more acceptable than laws being more strict. Some reasons include that when guns are removed, crime increases, possessing a firearm can help with self defense, and when guns are taken out, gun violence still exists. Primarily, removing guns causes more crimes. Samuel Francis, contributor of Gun Control: Opposing Viewpoints,...
Words: 1066 - Pages: 5
...Gun control now!!! Seventeen people lost their life and another seventeen injured in a school shooting on February 14th. Many of us know this as the Parkland Florida school shooting. Seventeen people, were talking kids, that can't go home and see their families and parents and can't tell them they love them one last time. We need better Gun control!!! Laws need to be more strict and specific. The Parkland Florida shooter was also a kid of nineteen years of age legally able to own a firearm. Why at such a young age, not even old enough to sit down and have a beer legally, can you own a weapon that can shoot 800 yards (8!!! Football fields!!!) and have 30 rounds and can shoot 90-120 rounds per minute, oh and don't forget its light weight also....
Words: 783 - Pages: 4
...According to the Gun Violence Archive, there has been over 50,000 gun related incidents in the USA in 2015.America has been immersed in the gun debate during recent years. It is a hot topic within the 2016 election race. Many believe that since the 2nd Amendment gives americans the right to own guns, gun owners should not be restricted in anyway. Gun control laws are necessary to curb mass shootings and decrease gun violence ( Infobase Learning,“Should the US adopt stronger gun control laws”) I advocate for stricter gun control laws considering that lax regulations within states such as Louisiana, gun deaths/injuries are a threat to American public health, and that more restrictive laws directly correlate to less gun-related injuries/deaths...
Words: 1186 - Pages: 5
...Gun Control Essay 1 Gun Control Essay 06/14/2015 The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. Many politicians are looking to amend the constitution any way they can to ban handguns or at least Gun Control Essay 2 restrict sales. The argument between pro and anti gun control has been debated for years, both with valid points. Many studies and factual data shows that strict gun control only removes guns from law-abiding citizens, but does not actually help reduce crime. Studies have shown that gun control cannot stop people from committing the crime because if a handgun ban were issued, there is evidence that citizens would not comply with the law, strict gun control does not reduce homicide rates, and studies have found that high crime rates have stimulated purchasing of guns rather than high gun ownership stimulating crime. While the Founding Fathers of this country were developing the system of government, as set forth in the Constitution, many feared that a standing army controlled by a strong central government would leave them helpless. The Federal Constitution contained no provisions to prohibit a standing army or allow states to create their own militias. The Constitution was signed by thirty-nine men from the twelve states represented at the Constitutional Convention on September 17 1787; three delegates refused to sign because of the absence of a bill of rights. Two years later, the First Congress agreed on...
Words: 2074 - Pages: 9
...Level 4A Gun ownership should be tightly controlled Guns are currently being used in this society for murders, celebration, hunting and gang activity. Moreover, guns are used for war and by the police force. There is no doubt about that guns take lives. Guns should not be use in such ways where others could be harmed or killed. Therefore, the laws should tightly control gun ownership. Some people believe that guns save more live and prevent more injuries. However, the usage of guns for self-defense raises the risk of a homicide or suicide. Guns are clearly dangerous, no matter how they are used. In addition, a household may have a gun; a household may not be trained in using a gun, and may cause an accidental shooting. Some people say that crimes will not decrease with strict gun control laws. However, crimes will decrease with strict gun control law. For example, thirty percent of crimes were decreased in 1996 when guns were controlled. Guns are very unsafe because it takes away many lives of young people. There were 1409 teen suicides using gun and 1671 teen murders. Those numbers should make parents aware of how dangerous it is to have a gun. Some people say that gun control is not a solution of crime. It can be argued that in order to reduce violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence. Gun control is the effort to restrict or limit the possession...
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
...Gun Control Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora and most recently Newtown; these places will forever be known as sites of enormous tragedy. The flames of adults and children were put out, and innocent lives were taken. All some could do was hold back their tears and ask why! Rage began to consume some while they watched the families of the victims break down and become overcome by sorrow. They began to look for someone or something to enact justice upon. The blame quickly went to weapons, guns to be specific. According to many lawmakers, senators and associations, gun debate rages on to this very day. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said, “Until we have such reason to believe that we’d have a different outcome I think the issue is resolved by the Senate”. While some may have some strong feelings otherwise, I believe that completely abolishing guns will not solve our problems. Taking away guns from law abiding citizens will only endanger them more. I believe it is nearly impossible to eliminate guns. Although I am against eliminating our right to bear arms, I do believe that there should be more strict guidelines and procedures for us to be able to own weapons; more comprehensive background checks, mental evaluations and less availability. Imagine this, you are a law abiding citizen and the government just ruled that you may no longer own a weapon. You turn in your gun and two days later, a criminal breaks into your home, armed, and begins to assault you and your family. If only...
Words: 804 - Pages: 4
...Content and Purpose- The purpose of this white paper is to inform the reader on why the state of Nebraska should outlaw and prohibit domestic violence offenders from purchasing firearms or deadly weapons. Jennifer states that Nebraska should mirror federal law and prevent domestic violence offenders from purchasing firearms and ammunition. The audience is the citizens of Nebraska and the entire United States. Jennifer’s topic is very interesting, and she states concrete evidence to support her position. Jennifer demonstrates a vast knowledge of the subject. She conveys precise information to the audience. Author’s Position- Jennifer proactively wants domestic violence offenders not to have the right to purchase firearms to protect citizens of Nebraska from being killed. A study conducted...
Words: 588 - Pages: 3
...Gun Control: American Gun Laws Need Reform Roderick D. Harris Capella University Gun Control: American Gun Laws Need Reform At the national level, the issue of gun control has been in the spotlight for the last 50 years. The conversation seems to pick up or lose steam depending upon current events. In more recent years, the barrage of mass murders carried out with the use of assault-style weapons have fueled the fire and reopened the public debate. In 2012, President Obama and his administration made a strong push toward reform of current laws on gun control but were met with hard opposition and their efforts failed. Many states have developed their own gun controls in the absence of federal statues, but these new reforms do not go far enough in most cases and the variances between state laws add to the confusion around developing comprehensive reform at the federal level. Strict gun control should at the least consist of full background checks, a ban on assault-style weapons and large-capacity magazines for ammunition. Congressional leaders should take the first step toward reform with a bi-partisan approach to a sweeping legislation. Strict gun control with a ban on assault-style weapons will reduce violence and shootings of mass murder in the United States (U.S.). The fewer the assault weapons and large-capacity magazines in our society will provide a greater opportunity for survival and reduced by-stander casualties during random acts of violence and mass shootings...
Words: 1577 - Pages: 7