...How would you feel if you were locked in a cage, with people coming and going, experimenting on you? Would you feel good? This is what actually happens to animals. I believe that animal testing is horrible and should not be continued. Why this is important is because of my reasons, that are: first it is expensive; second that it is inaccurate; and my third and most important reason is because animal testing abuses an animal rights. My first reason why I think animal testing is bad is because it is really expensive. According to Vittana “... the total cost of caring for a dog could be over $9000 per year.”. That is only a possibility, and only that, but the cost could still be well over $500, which is the least amount required, and even though...
Words: 1388 - Pages: 6
...no different from a human being to a wild animal. We think, we feel, and we see, we all have a life. An animal poked, prodded, and abused is no different from a person being mishandled. Happiness and sadness are two major emotions both animal and human both experience, weather we were born in a jungle or a hospital. The Department of Agriculture has approved the importation of 37 marmosets for experiments in laboratories. We don't know precisely what's in store for these creatures but you can be sure it's likely to be something that turns your stomach. Sydney University in recent years used marmosets in experiments in which their eyes were removed for testing and the animals were put down. About 92% of experimental...
Words: 1599 - Pages: 7
...for animals to die for our benefit, but its really not. Animals deserve rights and should not be taken advantage of. They don’t deserve what the scientists do to them. Not all experiments actually help everyone. Many experiments effect animals very differently than they effect humans, good or bad. In a Nature Reviews Drug Discovery article, it explains how the top leukemia drug, Gleevec, was almost thrown away because it caused severe liver toxivity in dogs. Misleading animal experiments may cause us to throw away possible cures in humans. Vice versa, Vioxx, was shown to protect the hearts of mice, monkeys, dogs, and other lab animals. Though, it was linked to heart attacks and strokes in over 400,000 humans. Therefore, experiments on animals can actually harm humans too....
Words: 477 - Pages: 2
...Testing Hurts What would you do if you heard that people’s dog’s have been taken from them for testing purposes.What type of testing do they do on them? They test medical products and drugs.The issue is people are using many animals for testing.My opinion is that animals are to be loved not tested on and why make animals suffer.Animals are living things and your just taking there life from them. How many animals do you think die a year?Each year more than 100 million animals die from testing on them.Don’t those number scare you what if they go extinct I mean like there are already hunter killing animals making them extinct why make it worse.What also harms animals is the things what humans are doing.Pollution causing climate change and humans cutting trees down.Everything we do harms the animals or have an...
Words: 550 - Pages: 3
...Have you ever wondered the benefits of animal tests? Well, there aren’t many. they delay the releases of cures for many diseases, they yield defective results, and they kill/injure 1,000s of humans and animals each year. This is why I argue that they should be banned from the world. I see how an innocent bystander like yourselves would be fooled by the shroud of lies surrounding animal tests and I hope this can make you see the truth. My first reason is that these tests actually delay cures from being released, not hurry them up like they're supposed to. For instance, blood transfusions were delayed a whole 200 years by animal studies! In addition, The polio vaccine was delayed by another 40 years because of … ( big surprise) monkey tests! My last piece of evidence is...
Words: 569 - Pages: 3
...Humans have used animals for different uses. They have been used for food, clothing farm work and a variety of other uses. So using them to test new medical advances is different. Animal testing for medical purpose help saves lives and future generations. Animal testing should be continued for the use within the medical field. The ancient Greeks believed that animals were created by the gods to be used however people wish. The Bible says God gave man dominions “over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping things that creeps on the earth” (Genesis 9:1-3). The ancient Greeks and Romans influenced the laws of western civilization. The western civilization had no laws saying what you could not do to an animal no matter how cruel or unnecessary the act was (Thorburn). To some people animals have no rights at all while to others animals have rights and should not fell unnecessary pain and suffering. The people who believe animals have no rights; and use them just for their benefits but there is a line that should not be crossed animals do have feelings and some rights. The new movement of animal right groups has some good points like human like primates should not be used in testing like chimpanzees. The first law put in place by western civilizations was in the Massachusetts Bay colony. The law states that it is illegal to exercise any tyranny or cruelty towards any animal which are kept for use by humans...
Words: 1491 - Pages: 6
...good science and also result in medical breakthroughs for humans. Depending on whether the progress may have achieved by any means. Millions of animals each year in the United States are experimented on for testing to help find cures and medicine for sick people/patients. Toxicity of medicine is put into animals and take the risk of whether or not are tests are successful or not so we can research further more. Research is led into saving lives, but what about the ones that are tested for hours on end and spend days in cages without...
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
...Animal Testing More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities (Testing 101). Many people may ask what exactly is animal testing? Animal testing refers to any procedure performed on living animals for purposes of research, yet there are alternative ways to do that research. Why aren’t we using those? Why do people continue to use animal testing? Some of the most beneficial things that have come from medical testing on animals are Penicillin, various asthma treatments, and insulin (Wpadmin). The majority of the animals used in these types of tests are mammals with a DNA structure...
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...Animal testing is a world wide argument. Many people believe it is cruel and inhumane, others agree it is the best way to get fast results. This is a very controversial topic, especially in psychology. Psychologist do research to learn about behavior and how knowledge of behavior can be used to advance the welfare of people and animals. Overall, animal testing is right because it not only saves human lives, but animals as well, contributes to many life saving cures and lastly animals have shorter life cycles so it speeds up the result process. People think animal testing only benefits us, but it is widely used to save animals all around the world. Because when animals get sick we don't always know or understand why. So what could be better to learn about a rat or chimpanzee than testing on one? Animal researchers have reestablished populations of endangered and threatened species. They did this by...
Words: 682 - Pages: 3
...Imagine yourself strapped to a table while a person attaches two metal hooks to hold your eye open. Then he uses an eyedropper to put a substance in your eye to estimate the ability of a test substance to irritate or damage the eye. This kind of needless torture happens hundreds of times every day as scientists don’t even care if the animal is suffering. Animal testing should be banned because we don’t need the next eyeliner and we have a different body system than animals. Claim: My claim is that we should not do animal testing. First Argument: The first reason why is that they kill animals just to have the next medicine,soap, and food ingredient. My first piece of evidence: Right now there are millions of animals such as dogs, cats, rats, mice, and primates getting tortured just to get the next product of eyeliner. In a recent article by PETA they said that “More than 100 million animals every year suffer and die in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests”(PETA), just to see if the products work. There are some countries such as Europe are getting away from buying products that were animal tested. China is different, they are continuing to sell animal cosmetics. What are cosmetics? A product applied to the body, especially the face, to improve its appearance. In 2014 “China spent 26.3 billion dollars, just on cosmetics”(Jeanne Kim). This proves that people should not kill animals just to get the next resource. The second piece...
Words: 828 - Pages: 4
...Testing Products on Animals Today there are many ways to test products and find cures for diseases. Doctors can take tissue samples from people and grow them in test tubes to evaluate the specimen. They can also use computer modeling techniques to study diseases and products. With so many ways to test products and find cures, doctors do not need to rely on animals. Doctors should not use animals for testing because it is cruel and unreliable. Doctors should not use animals in experiments because it is unreliable. Animals are very different than humans, so what worked on an animal might not work on a person. 95% of drugs that worked in animal tests failed on humans. A recent study showed that only 19% of 93 dangerous drug side effects could have been predicted by animals. “Using mice and rats to test the safety of drugs is only accurate 43% of the time” (Dr. Nick Palmer Unreliable animal testing).That shows that using rodents to test products isn’t the best thing for doctors to rely on. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine concluded that there was no current need for chimpanzees in biomedical research. Chimpanzees share up to 98% of their genes with...
Words: 718 - Pages: 3
...Kleemeier Erica Jones ENG 105 11-22-15 Stop Animal Testing in the Medical Field Lions and tiger and bears oh my. More like, monkeys and dogs and mice oh no. How does being poked, probed, opened up, burned, shocked and tortured all for the advancement of the medical field sound? Now think about all those things being done, knowing there is another way, which causes no agony, distress or discomfort to any living creature. Animal testing is a process or “tradition” that has been around for many, many years. The problem with this tradition in particular is that although it causes much pain to innocent animals and can be avoided, many choose to still use this practice today. Animals have been used as tools in biomedical research as early on as the days when Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle, were experimenting for their next scientific breakthrough. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients (Hajar 2011). Many research associations claim that animal testing has been used in almost every single medical breakthrough within the last one hundred years. Laws have been passed in several countries to make this practice more “humane.” In reality, these laws are the bare minimum and do not truly make a difference for the animals that are being used for experimentations. Animal testing in the medical field needs to dissolve and ultimately...
Words: 3596 - Pages: 15
...People everywhere are debating whether animal testing should be allowed or not, and there are many reasons to prove that animal testing is insufficient and should not be allowed. The main reason as to why animal testing should be banned, is because it is cruel and inhumane. The Humane Society International has found out that the animals used in experiments are being subjected to force feeding, water and food deprivation, lengthy periods of physical restraints, the animals are being inflicted with burns and other wounds to study the healing process, they are forced to suffer a great amount of pain to study the effects and the remedies for it, and are killed by carbon dioxide gas, neck- breaking and decapitation. Before a company can release...
Words: 339 - Pages: 2
...experiments, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Because of animal testing, many cures and treatments to an array of diseases and illnesses have been discovered. But too many animals are sacrificed each year. There are many reasons why animal testing is not necessary to the development of the human population. First, animals are killed and injured. As humans, we think that we are so much better than other animals that live and breath on this earth and that we should have more...
Words: 1606 - Pages: 7
...For years, scientists have tried to use animals for experimentation and testing. Animals and humans are not the same things and animals should not have to go through the pain and suffering because we believe that it can benefit us. Humans can make their own decisions and decide if they want to try something or be used as a trial experiment, animals cannot. Animals should have their own rights and be kept away from all things that involve human testing. Strangers are someone who we have no relation to. Politically it is someone who does not share a national identity. If something was to happen is the stranger we wrong. An animal is that stranger. If we as humans work on animals forgetting the basic rights, we might not be able to coexist...
Words: 877 - Pages: 4
