...Argumentative essay: Save animals. Say no to animal testing! Nowadays, it is a well-known fact that many companies test their products like cosmetics and medicines with animals before production to check their products ’safety and quality. A huge amount of animals are used in research purpose every year. Is it right for human beings to sacrifice millions of animals for testing purpose? Should animal testing be banned? Animal testing is a controversial issue and there is a heated debated about pros and cons of animal testing in society. People hold different points of view. Supporters of animal testing think that animal testing are critical to medical and scientific development. Opponents of animal testing think that animal testing is inhumane and cruel. It is generally believed that animal testing should be banned because it is unethical, unreliable and unnecessary. First and foremost, it would be interesting to see that supporters of animal testing argue that animals do not have feelings and rights. They are convinced that it is right to take animals ‘lives and make them suffer because they think human beings are more superior to other animals. They also think that only small amount of animals are being harm and kill each year. Actually, animals also do have feelings and rights, they are not deserve to suffer for research purpose. One should however, not forget that large amount of animals are killed because of us, there are actually 19.5 million animals are killed every year...
Words: 1376 - Pages: 6
...different from a human being to a wild animal. We think, we feel, and we see, we all have a life. An animal poked, prodded, and abused is no different from a person being mishandled. Happiness and sadness are two major emotions both animal and human both experience, weather we were born in a jungle or a hospital. The Department of Agriculture has approved the importation of 37 marmosets for experiments in laboratories. We don't know precisely what's in store for these creatures but you can be sure it's likely to be something that turns your stomach. Sydney University in recent years used marmosets in experiments in which their eyes were removed for testing and the animals were put down. About 92% of experimental...
Words: 1599 - Pages: 7
...INTRODUCTION The use of animals in scientific experimentation should continue to be fought against because it is morally wrong, there are alternatives to animal experimentation, and the unnecessary research it involves. The use of animals in experimentation has been a debate and a controversy for quite some time now. Many have strong opinions and views on this sensitive issue. That leads us to one question: Is it right? There are alternatives to animal experimentation, and they are addressed by some government websites. The number of animals used for experimentation tens of millions. Scientists defend animal research saying that this testing has contributed greatly to the advancement of cures for human diseases. However, in our generation, there should be a continued resolve in the fight against animal experimentation because it is morally wrong, there are now promising alternatives, and it involves a lot of unnecessary research. " The practice of animal experimentation and testing continues not because it is the most accurate or reliable means of research, but rather because of tradition, peer-pressure, and enormous promotion from those with strong vested interests." S.O.S at the University of Georgia (2012) BODY In my opinion animal testing is wrong, mainly for the moral debate of inflicting unnecessary pain to a living species, but it is also wrong for the environment. Scientists claim that testing on animals is the key to find cures for human diseases, and try to justify...
Words: 1420 - Pages: 6
...its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated,” (qtd. in Mendoza). Today, some of the world’s most advanced countries exploit animals for cosmetic testing. Cosmetic animal testing should be illegal due to it being inhumane, having inaccurate test results, and alternative testing methods are available. First, animal testing is inhumane because it causes animals a lot of pain and permanently damages their bodies. A common way to test chemicals is the Draize test. During this procedure chemicals such as toluene are dropped into rabbits’ eyes and causes severe pain and blindness (Moran and Locke). Testing chemicals on animals’ skin is also common. Exposure to large...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...Cruelty Involved in Animal Testing Hobbes, the cat, has been under experimentation for most of his life. This is probably the last time that he will ever have to be experimented on again. Why? Because he is probably not going to make it through this time. The makers of Herbal Essences are about to force shampoo down his throat to see what happens to its organs. Even if the cat lives through the process, they are going to have to kill it to see which organs it could have damaged. If this was an actual human going through this deadly experiment, people would be in shock. Instead, scientists are testing whether or not swallowing shampoo would affect a cat. Testing on animals is a very disagreeable process that should not be allowed. Animal testing started a numerous years ago to help provide humans with information. The process of animal testing is one of the most disturbing experiments ever done. Many cosmetics and personal care products are made every year and are put into the market after being tested on animals. Almost every product has been animal tested at some stage in its development. The website titled "Animals in Product Testing" stated, "...these products have gone through a long and complex testing process that leaves millions of animals mutilated, burned, poisoned and gassed in outmoded and unnecessary tests." From these different experiments, animals are often left with different diseases like Syphilis, herpes, or AIDS ("Animal Rights: Animal Testing"). Manufacturers...
Words: 1787 - Pages: 8
...through this deadly experiment, people would be in shock. Instead, scientists are testing whether or not swallowing shampoo would affect a cat. Testing on animals is a very disagreeable process that should not be allowed. Animal testing started a number of years ago to help provide humans with information. The process of animal testing is one of the most disturbing experiments ever done. Many cosmetics and personal care products are made every year and are put into the market after being tested on animals. Almost every product has been animal tested at some stage in its development. The website titled "Animals in Product Testing" stated, "...these products have gone through a long and complex testing process that leaves millions of animals mutilated, burned, poisoned and gassed in outmoded and unnecessary tests." From these different experiments, animals are often left with different diseases like Syphilis, herpes, or AIDS. Manufacturers of these different products say that they are performing these tests to assure our safety for these products. They want to make sure that humans are not in any amount of danger. Why do companies even agree with animal experimentation? Some companies, like Clairol, demand that they do not use animal testing on their shampoo product. Even though they have cut down on animal testing, they have not eliminated the complete line of cosmetics and other products of animal...
Words: 1904 - Pages: 8
...Animal Testing and the Harmful Processes Animal testing has been around for a number of years, yet the medical field can’t seem to catch up to the cosmetic field in testing technologies. Humans should put an end to animal testing. Animals’ perception of time makes the pain they are put through inhuman at best. Animal testing is often just previously done tests that already haven’t worked, making testing redundant and a waste of time. Animal testing is unnecessary with computer programs and human cell donations and growing technology outdoing any previous results from animal testing. Animal testing is important since living cells are the best way to see how medicines and diseases work. Without live cells to properly process and show the results...
Words: 1301 - Pages: 6
...Animal testing has been a hot topic of debate for centuries, dating experimentation all the way back to ancient Greece with Aristotle. Two polar opposite sides clash on the daily; those who want animal testing banned, and those who want it regularly applied. While researching on the internet, the first impression you receive is from animal rights organizations loudly protesting the laboratory critters--vocalizing opinions about how “animal testing should be banned from laboratories”; but is what they say the full story? Animal testing has been the source of countless human achievements including a better understanding of life and valuable cures for diseases, and several laws demand the use of animal testing before human trials. Animal experimentation...
Words: 1577 - Pages: 7
..."When I look into the eyes of an animal, I do not see an animal. I see a living being. I see a friend. I feel a soul.” This quote was written by Anthony Douglas Williams. Millions of animals are poisoned and killed every year because of experiments they are forced to participate in. Although on the other side of the debate people argue that animal testing is the best option to find cures for diseases. However, it is important for people to know that products should absolutely not be tested on animals because they suffer from the experiments, species of animals are becoming endangered, and there are many alternatives that scientists could use instead. My first reason why it is absolutely critical that products are not tested on animals is because...
Words: 1150 - Pages: 5
...monoxide! Animal testing must be banned for unnecessary tests. Animals should not be guinea pigs. Animals still feel the pain when they are injected with medicine just like humans. Humans can defend themselves and stop the pain, but the animals get strapped down and cannot move. It is better to have tests run on animals because animals will help find cures faster. Animal testing must be banned for unnecessary tests because a lot of animals are dying for no reason. Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products (Animal Testing 1). That only leaves six percent for medical research (1). Ninety percent of all animals used in research are rats and mine (Animals Used in Experiments 4). Cosmetic testing is banned in Belgium, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom (1). The United States has many companies that continue to legally perform horrible tests on animals (1). The United States Food and Drug Administration and the Consumer Product Safety Commission do not require animal testing for cosmetics or household products (1). The Animal Welfare Act is the only federal law to require basic standards of care, housing and treatment to the animals that are kept in the labs for testing (4). The LD50 test is one of the worst tests that was developed back in 1927 and is still used today (1). Groups of animals are dosed with different amounts of a test substance in order to determine the does which kills half of the animals (1)! Animals are...
Words: 1249 - Pages: 5
...Animal Bill of Rights People consider animals no more than property that do not have nor deserve any legitimate legal rights. This restricts the legal protection accessible to animals; without any legal protection, they are defenseless against human cruelty. An Animal Bill of Rights can provide the protection and rights animals deserve. “Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in American laboratories from medical experimentation and cosmetics testing” (Animal Experiments). Yet, there are still no existing laws that limit or regulate the practice of testing on animals. Animal testing does not contribute to improving human health because results gained from animal testing can be incorrect and misleading; these test are wasteful and unreliable. The anatomy of animals and humans do not contain a lot of similarities. So, why are we still conducting these experiments if there is no real benefit to humans? In fact, drugs prescribed to patients would be a lot safer if it wasn’t tested on animals. Human volunteers is an alternative to animal testing and is more reliable way of testing....
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...of Animal Testing in Cosmetic Companies Preface The ethical treatment of animal testing is a controversial topic in the field of zoology. Different aspects on animal testing range from positivity to negativity. Animals such as dogs and rats are used for experimental trials because they have been found to have psychological and genetic correlations that relate to humans. Although the benefits and improvements to modern medicine made it possible to ban animal experimentation completely, animals are still the main subjects in cosmetic industries. Something important to keep in mind when it comes to animal experimentation is that, “Most experimentation has nothing to do with disease research… it is cosmetic product testing” (Medical News Online). According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) over one hundred million animals suffer from experiments to test cosmetics. Many people stand against animal experimentation claiming that animals are not ours to experiment on, and even though that’s an important point, there are many other issues that should be discussed. For example, ninety two percent of all animal trials in cosmetics that are effective on animals are ineffective on humans (ASPCA). Meaning that the reasoning behind it is the lower cost of animal testing provided to those companies. Unfortunately, theses experiments are the cheapest options and some companies are required by the FDA to test all new cosmetic ingredients on animals. Animal testing can...
Words: 1299 - Pages: 6
...making is harm free to animals. Many tests are far from cruelty free. There are thirteen standardized tests for makeup testing, most of them being on animals (Siegel-Maier). The most common are the Draize and LD50 (Siegel-Maier). If testing on animals is more expensive and less accurate why choose that over other alternatives. Testing makeup on animals is immoral, ineffective, and unnecessary. Testing makeup on animals is immoral, it is cruel. There are many tests for makeup products that are done on innocent animals. The tests are taken on guinea pigs, rabbits, rats, mice, and sometimes hamsters to ensure safety if product is swallowed, inhaled, or has made contact with skin or eyes, etc.. Diarrhea, convulsions, bleeding from mouth, seizures, paralysis, or death may occur in all of these tests (“Cosmetics”).The test used for substances being swallowed is acute oral toxicity. Seven rats are to swallow an amount of substance and determine which amount cause half of them to die, which is a lot like LD50 (“Cosmetics”). The rat's throat is...
Words: 1557 - Pages: 7
...Why animal testing is good Intro: Have you ever heard of animal testing? Most people have and while it may seem like an unnecessary evil, I’m going to persuade you on why animal testing is good. Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, there is no alternative, it’s highly regulated and relatively few animals are used. 1. Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments * Every medical breakthrough in the past century has been the result of animal testing * The life-saving insulin was discovered with dog testing * Polio vaccine, tested on animals lowered the occurrence from 350k in 1988 to 223 in 2012. * Other breakthroughs would be: cancers, MS, tuberculosis, and leukemia –instrumental in pacemaker development. * Chris Abee, Director of the University of Texas’ Cancer research center stated “"we wouldn't have a vaccine for hepatitis B without chimpanzees" (why do scientists) 2. There is no alternative * Humans are complex * Petri dishes, while valuable, aren’t enough for finding and making medical breakthroughs * Studying side effects needs a circulatory system and researching blindness and high blood pressure can’t be done just using tissue samples * Even powerful supercomputers can accurate simulate the complex workings of body systems (animal testing) 3. It is highly regulated * Scientists and researches can’t do whatever they want, there are limits * Regulated...
Words: 428 - Pages: 2
...face of a helpless animal can break your heart. Many animals go through torturous testing on a day to day basis that they cannot help, nor can they defend themselves. Since Ancient Greek times, animals have been undergoing cruel and inhumane medical testing that should not be done for the benefits of the human race. Animal testing is wrong because it is cruel, costly, harmful to animals, unreliable, and outdated. Animal testing has been around since the times of the Ancient Greeks. Between seventeen million and twenty-two million animals are used for biomedical research each year (Leepson). Many believe that animals do have rights, and there are many organizations out there to trying to ensure their safety and help them get out of the horrible treatments they endure. For example, the ASPCA, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, has been around since 1866 trying to curb the gruesome treatment of humans to animals. The ASPCA tries to prevent the abuse and neglecting of animals around the nation. They set up shelters for animals and they give vaccines and anything else they may need. The different types of animals being tested are endless; from mice to sheep, they all serve their own purpose in the medical field. Even though these animals have helped scientist break through some medical mysteries, it is still inhumane how they have to suffer in confined quarters. The CAFO, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, raise animals in small living spaces...
Words: 1391 - Pages: 6
