Poverty debate outline I. Introduction a. On balance- we’re beating poverty i. On paper, the sheer amount of capital expended on social programs since their inception is a testament to their success – we wouldn’t be spending if they weren’t working I. Once these programs are taken into account, the data show a significant decline in poverty, and a much larger decline in extreme poverty II. Explanation of relevance b. The battle for economic equality
Words: 253 - Pages: 2
climate-change theory is facing a sudden collapse, because of two recent arguments: The first argument being the observations that Monnett and fellow researcher Jeffrey Gleason made in 2004 - of four polar bears drowning after being forced to swim long distances in the open sea, because of the climate changes - are now being questioned and investigated. Monnett has now been put on “leave” due to integrity issues. The other argument being a paper published in the peer-reviewed journal ‘Remote Sensing’ by Drs
Words: 762 - Pages: 4
Outcome 3 is creating a complex argument that creates a claim for you paper. That claim needs to have stakes. Stakes are basically risks you paper takes in arguing your point. The argument should persuade the reader your way. The claim is essentially what gives your paper direction. It is the main point you are trying to make. The claim is like the heart in the body, without it you can’t survive. It pumps blood through the whole body just like the claim gives direction to every paragraph. This
Words: 1028 - Pages: 5
writing of the four page minimum paper is not captured by the five hour online aspect of the online portion. Each debate review and discussion is broken down into four phases: watching/reading the media, small group discussion, large group discussion board and your individual work through the four page paper. The Focus for the business-related debate The focus for the second debate assignment is to continue to pay attention to any definite arguments – the V and T argument structures (identify at least
Words: 680 - Pages: 3
role in writing. They’re the “key ingredients” in a paper in order to capture readers’ attention and achieve writers’ purposes. When I was in Human Resource Organization Behaviors 101 class, professor Thomas Shirley assigned an ethics case for each group. I joined a group of five people and we got together for several group meetings. Finally, I was assigned to compose the “Ethical Analysis” section. Toward to the paper deadline, we produced the paper called “Starbucks: Friend or Foe.” The purpose of
Words: 1410 - Pages: 6
Paper 1: Argument Paper There are too many lawyers William E. Foster wrote this article entitled “There are Not Too Many lawyers.” It is an interesting piece, sharing a lot of information. The author pointed to all the benefits that can arise from being an attorney, while underlying several other important factors. He also tried to bring up few points to reinforce his statement. He argued that attorneys have deep working knowledge of the legal system, are skilled specialists and bring a noble
Words: 1004 - Pages: 5
to build a convincing argument to prove why plastic shopping bags should not be banned. The assertive, logical, yet empathetic tone grabs the reader's attention and persuades them to agree with Summers’ point. The numerous facts throughout the paper effectively back up Summers’ argument. After he makes a claim, he provides examples and facts to further explain his point. For example, he first claims that the “claims that plastic bags are [worse] for the environment than paper bags… are dubious at
Words: 540 - Pages: 3
Kartik Hosanagar. Within the evidence section of this paper the author established his authority to be speaking on this paper by his reference to research studies that he participated in regarding this algorithmically personalized content. By referencing these research studies Mr. Hosanagar is attempting to appeal to his audience’s ethos by proving he is a credible source to be speaking on this topic. Once he begins discussing the topic of the paper he makes a point to distinguish the difference between
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper Author: Jim Pryor, Princeton University [pic] Philosophical writing is different from the writing you'll be asked to do in other courses. Most of the strategies described below will also serve you well when writing for other courses, but don't automatically assume that they all will. Nor should you assume that every writing guideline you've been given by other teachers is important when you're writing a philosophy paper. Some of those guidelines are routinely
Words: 6966 - Pages: 28
Unit 5 Exercise 1: Guided Reading Chapter 10 1) The typical organization of an argument essay is an argument is to explore two or more sides of a controversial topic and then to argue fairly and reasonably for one side over the others. 2) The points of contention is something argued or stated. They can be identified by looking at the title, look for contention indicators, and location. 3) It’s important to know the stance of your opposition because by knowing your opposition, you can
Words: 264 - Pages: 2
