"I believe the government has the right to fully monitor internet content. I feel this way because monitoring prevents bad acts from happening in our country. It also gives people a sense of feeling safe and secure everyday. Monitoring keeps people's emotions in check. Lastly, with this monitoring taking place, the world will be a safer place. Less people would be killed/harmed, and the world be a lot less chaotic. First, I believe the government has the right to monitor internet content because
Words: 508 - Pages: 3
The technologies described are an unethical violation of the privacy rights of the individuals subjected to them. Many customers are protesting the data collection as an invasion of privacy. In the age of smartphones, it’s become easier for stores to monitor the customers who give them business. Unless some form of regulation is established, this type of monitoring will continue to become a part of reality. Many customers don’t trust stores with their personal information after the Target credit
Words: 311 - Pages: 2
Privacy today is rare commodity—social media sites track what you like and dislike in order to target ads, major online websites which retain sensitive information are prone hacks, and the government monitors virtually everything you do on the internet. If you find any of that to be a bit unsettlingly, like me, then the proposition of tracking college students by means of bio surveillance should raise major red flags. Bio surveillance is nothing new, for the most part we’ve used this type of technology
Words: 365 - Pages: 2
strategy is in place to provide a better user experience. Although this may be true to a certain extent, it is undeniable that surveillance is being used as a vehicle to obtain capital gains, spy on users private activity, and to destroy any sense of privacy. Surveillance and data tracking has become a venture for many media companies that has been more advantageous to their pockets than it has been for the
Words: 732 - Pages: 3
This argument perfectly displays a red herring fallacy; diverting the argument away from it’s original point. If the argument attempting to be made is that “photo radar is lazy policing” it doesn’t add to your point to talk about bad drivers who aren’t speeders. If Blizzard’s point is to enforce the idea that photo radar’s aren’t a good form of policing, talking about other types of drivers that photo radar wasn’t designed to catch doesn’t add to the argument at hand, it only distracts from it. Photo
Words: 635 - Pages: 3
Children and adults alike are always craving privacy from one person or another, but can never seem to find the exact feeling of privacy that they desire. In the United States of America, the problem of surveillance dates back to the times of World War I, yet during these times it was a benefit for the people of the United States. As time progresses, the government continues to form new organizations to keep a “helpful” eye on the people that are housed within our nation. Many American people have
Words: 1167 - Pages: 5
When it comes to personal privacy, many feel their privacy is invaded due to the fact that private companies can scan and sell their license plates without their consent. In the article, “Private License Plate Scanners Amassing Vast Databases Open to Highest Bidders” infers that license plate scanners are a very negative technological device for the community. Next, the publication In These Times, a progressive activism journal out of Chicago, persuades in their article, “Who Has the Right to Track
Words: 687 - Pages: 3
into their daily lives, a question as to how much privacy they can truly maintain away from the government is hotly debated. The government has the abilities in this modern age to watch, listen, and read whatever is out in the open, but it should be fair because these privileges allow the government to keep America safe and stay vigilant over potential threats. The National Security Agency (NSA) should be able to invade American citizens’ privacy to a certain extent for the sake of protection. To
Words: 867 - Pages: 4
being watched? “How Private Is Your Life” is written by Andrea Rock, in which she tells about her day at several different times, and how she’s giving up her privacy by doing everyday activities. The other article, “The Privacy Debate” is written by Arthur M. Ahalt. This article tells about the benefits of having an open life. Yes my privacy is at risk because when I purchase something with a discount card, retailers can track what I have purchased and when standing on the street you are being filmed
Words: 335 - Pages: 2
of this drone flying near the airport (Sussex). This accident was just this year as well, therefore there needs to be a better system of how these drones are monitored since the fact that they only seem to be spotted by direct vision of a human or employee of a said installation for the public or government. Drones are not completely bad to have around given the fact that their cameras can be
Words: 1202 - Pages: 5
