CBI v. M/s Blue-Sky Tie-up Ltd and Ors ,Crl. Appeal No(s). 950 of 2004 11. Kartick Chandra v.Harsha M. Dasi, AIR 1943 Calcutta 35 at 354; Contents Introduction 6 Corporate Criminal Liability under the Companies Act 1956 &2013 6 Doctrine of identification theory 9 Position prior to the Standard Chartered Bank Case Law 11 Standard Chartered Bank and Ors. v. Directorate of Enforcement (2005) 4 SCC 530 12 Post Standard Chartered Bank case law: 13 Conclusion 13 Bibliography
Words: 4662 - Pages: 19
has changed the way in which we conduct business, however, what remains a constant regardless of the size of a company be it small, medium, or large, is that they are all mandated to comply with employment laws regardless if it is within the US and our in another country. In an effort to compare employment laws in three different companies varying in size, location and expansion strategies, we have comprised an analysis of laws that will impact each business individually and will evaluate these laws
Words: 751 - Pages: 4
Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar which was not a client of Coleman’s. Coleman decided to show John a cool trick that at the end it killed Jimmy and the bar sustained a lot of damage. Because of what occurred at the Bar Software Inc. terminated Coleman’s employment. Coleman decided after a week of his job being terminated that he would make amends with John. He took John out to dinner and got into an argument and punched John in the eye. Issues The issues that were presented in this scenario were: 1
Words: 670 - Pages: 3
and their theological employment because the religious language expresses an transcendent reality which is God and the relationship between God and human. And the problem is how to understand the meaning of words which are used in the secular context when they are applied to God and the relationship between God and human. In this essay, I want to discuss about the peculiarity of religious language through two doctrine: the doctrine of analogy of Thomas Aquinas and the doctrine of the "symbolic" nature
Words: 1614 - Pages: 7
Three Briefs Helen Mayes Kaplan University PA205: Introduction to Legal Analysis and Writing June 26, 2012 Citation- Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976) Facts- 1. Plaintiff (Mrs. Mitchell) was terminated from her job at Lovington good Samaritan Center, Inc., due to alleged misconduct. Plaintiff then filed for unemployment compensation benefits. Due to the finding from the deputy of the Unemployment Security Commission Mrs. Mitchell was denied
Words: 1976 - Pages: 8
lives. If a person is fired without reason or unfairly, they are likely to seek compensation. If a person hasn't signed a contract or is fired, with exception to a few points in the employment at will doctrine, there is not much they can do about it. The law is on the side of the businesses in most cases of at-will employment. In the case of Elaine, she was fired without notice or reason for termination. Elaine had been promised career opportunities and given a salary, but no contract was signed. Elaine's
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
The “Hosanna-Tabor” Case in the US Supreme Court Introduction “Evangelical Lutheran Church and School Hosanna-Tabor v. Commission for Equal Employment Opportunities-CIOE” is a famous case decided in January 2012 by the United States Supreme Court. It addressed the right to religious freedom and the establishment clause, the "ministerial exception" and the limits of state intervention in the internal affairs of a church. Arguably, "Hosanna-Tabor" is the most important case on religious
Words: 2788 - Pages: 12
Running head: EMPLOYMENT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUE(S) Employment Conflict Management Technique(s) Ayada Ingram University of Phoenix Employment Conflict Management FastServe Inc is a 25 million dollar business of well-known sports attire just opened two online advertising sites which mainly focus on kids that love sports. It has 350 workers; FastServe operated 10% of its personnel to the online allocation development. There were certain mannequins that were used which involved the
Words: 2490 - Pages: 10
was not doing what her employment required her to do. Brown’s job does not require her to be walking in the road and her job did not require her to be in the road in the first place. The conditions of her injury do not satisfy the requirement of arising out of employment that is needed. Her job did not have an increased risk or positional risk. Brown also was not injured while performing any of her employment duties so it did not happen during the course of her employment. 3) Rawlinson should assert
Words: 657 - Pages: 3
employers are held liable under a theory of respondent superior for the actions of employees within the scope of their employment (The Restatement (2nd) of Torts). In the case of Wong-Leong v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc., it state that in determining scope of employment for purposes of respondeat superior doctrine, applicable test is whether employee's conduct was related to employment enterprise or whether enterprise derived any benefit from employee's activity. The
Words: 783 - Pages: 4
