trade-off between risk and return, and list the four primary factors that influence capital structure decisions. Distinguish between a firm’s business risk and its financial risk. Explain how operating leverage contributes to a firm’s business risk and conduct a breakeven analysis, complete with a breakeven chart. Define financial leverage and explain its effect expected EPS, and the risk borne by stockholders. on expected ROE, • • • • • Briefly explain what is meant by a firm’s optimal capital structure
Words: 8936 - Pages: 36
Traditional views on capital structure point to the existence of an optimal capital structure. Critique the analysis of the traditional views on capital structure in light of the competing views offered by Modigliani and Miller along with their assumptions. Capital structure refers to the way a corporation finances its assets through some combination of equity, debt, or hybrid securities. Stewart C. Myers argues that there is “no magic” in leverage and there is nothing supporting a presumption
Words: 1668 - Pages: 7
2.5 Calculate the weighted average cost of capital for Coleman Systems 10 3. THE WACC AND PROJECT VALUES FOR DIFFERENT DEBT – EQUITY RATIOS AND THE OPTIMAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE FOR THE PROJECT 11 3.1 Case 1: No bankruptcy risk without tax 11 3.2 Case 2: No bankruptcy risk with tax 13 3.3 Case 3: With bankruptcy risk with tax 15 4. DISCUSSION ON AGENCY AND SIGNALLING EFFECT 18 5. REPLACEMENT PFOJECT 21 5.1 Replacing Machine A with Machine B 21 5.2
Words: 5094 - Pages: 21
1. Tutorial #1 2. Describe the difference between a financial asset and a tangible asset. A financial asset is an intangible asset whose value is derived from a contractual claim, such as bank deposits, bonds, and stocks. Financial assets are usually more liquid than other tangible assets, such as commodities or real estate, and may be traded on financial markets. In contrast, a tangible asset is an asset that has a physical form. Tangible assets include both fixed assets, such as machinery
Words: 3412 - Pages: 14
Systemic Risk and Regulation∗ Franklin Allen Department of Finance Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104 allenf@wharton.upenn.edu Douglas Gale Department of Economics New York University 269 Mercer Street New York, NY 10003 douglas.gale@nyu.edu January 4, 2006 Abstract Historically, much of the banking regulation that was put in place was designed to reduce systemic risk. In many countries capital regulation in the form of the Basel agreements is currently
Words: 12166 - Pages: 49
Portfolio Modeling and Evaluation: Beating the Market ABSTRACT During the period of 2005 to 2010, the market portfolio (P1) and one suggested portfolio (P3) post a positive absolute return of 0.80% and 0.82% respectively which underperformed the active fund portfolio (P2) 0.91%. This report follows
Words: 5765 - Pages: 24
return of a stock of any company belonging to a class is a linear function of the firm's leverage. “The expected yield of a share of stock is equal to the appropriate capitalization rate for a pure equity stream in the same risk class, plus a premium related to financial risk equal to the debt-equity ratio times the spread between the capitalization rate and the cost of debt. " Proposition explains that the firm's assets will generate stream of cash flows or profits, and the assessment of the
Words: 7319 - Pages: 30
| Financial Structure is the framework of various types of financing employed by a Oil company to acquire and support resources necessary for its operations, commonly, it comprises of stockholders’ investments, long- term loans, short-term loans and short-term liabilities as reflected on the right hand side of the Oil company balance sheet. Financial Structure is different from capital structure in the sense that it also includes current liabilities. Therefore, financial structure is the
Words: 10980 - Pages: 44
koziol@uni-hohenheim.de §juliane.proelss@gmx.de ¶denis.schweizer@whu.edu Received 21 October 2009 Accepted 27 October 2010 In this paper, we analyze whether model risk/asset-specific ambiguity is an issue for institutional investors. For this purpose, we first show how model risk (which turns out to be equivalent to special cases of ambiguity) affects optimal portfolio allocation. Using average portfolio holdings for traditional and alternative asset classes of 119 institutional investors, we then calibrate
Words: 9356 - Pages: 38
An additional debt has an effect on WACC and FCF: On WACC: -debt increase the cost of stock rs as the stockholders require a higher return due to the risk associated with additional debt -debt reduce the tax paid by the company as the interest is tax deductible -debt increase the risk of bankruptcy so debtholders will require a higher promised return rd ***low taxes Vs high cost of equity,high cost of debt => uncertain effect on WACC
Words: 1008 - Pages: 5
