**In the scenario above did the social host have a duty of care to the injured guest? Duty of care is known as a legal obligation that one person owes another under a specific set of circumstances, associated with a particular relationship, and/or by virtue of performing or not performing certain actions vis a vis the other. Duty of care can be identified in the above scenario by using the Anns test. The modified Anns test determines if duty of care is evident by asking three questions: was the
Words: 319 - Pages: 2
What I feel that the innkeeper probably learns from his experience is to never sue anyone over scrambled eggs. I know this, because the text states when the innkeeper went to court, he was the one who had to pay money. The text also states how much the farmer owed the innkeeper which was four thousand kroner or four thousand dollars. The innkeeper said, “ You ate ten eggs. If those had hatched, i would have had ten chickens. They too would have laid eggs, and so on”. The innkeeper was wrong for what
Words: 287 - Pages: 2
Wagner v State is a case that centers around the question: Can a person who is mentally incompetent commit a battery? This case came about after Mrs. Wagner was attacked by Mr. Giese, a mentally incompetent person, who was a charge of the state while standing in Walmart. The intentional tort of battery consists of intent to contact, not intent to harm. This contact must be deliberate and it must also be harmful. However, the actor does not need to know that his action is harmful in order for the
Words: 394 - Pages: 2
Question #2 According to the Court the Duty of Care that a hotel owes a guest are as follows: “The law imposed upon innkeepers’ at least ordinary or reasonable care to protect their guests against injury by third persons, and some cases call for the exercise of a higher degree of care.” Allegedly the hotel was negligent in the following areas 1.) Permitting Criminals, sex deviates, and vagrants to wander discriminately about the hotel 2.) Failure
Words: 351 - Pages: 2
Factual Summary Coleman works for Software, Inc. Software, Inc. sells security equipment to businesses and bars, which requires Coleman to be traveling a lot to meet with clients and representatives within his sales division. During his trip to Colorado, Coleman stole a ring from a jewelry store because he couldn’t afford it and wanted to give his wife it as an anniversary gift. Coleman also met a client named John at Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar. During this meeting Coleman spilled his drink and then
Words: 1504 - Pages: 7
MATERIALS WEEK 1 The dotted line between ‘fault liability’ and ‘strict liability’: four ideal types of liability in tort law 1. Are the notions of fault and strict liability misleading? • two notions should be considered as they will be applied all along the four types of liability: - fault (as in fault liability) ( liability for one’s own faults. - risk (or strict liability) ( accountability, based on criteria other than individual fault, for the consequences resulting from
Words: 986 - Pages: 4
iii) Fitness for Propose s14(3) From the course of the business, there are condition that need to applies from the good sold. If the goods do not fit any purpose then the goods have the right to be return whether it is implied by the seller but if it is unreasonable to rely on the seller judgement, the goods can be return or cannot be return due to another purpose. b) Supply Goods and service Act 1982 With the reasonable time and for a reasonable charge of work completion, the price of goods
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
Ebony Law/531 November 2, 2015 Aaron Gershonowitz In the case of “You the Judge” The defendant was under the assumption that he was denied a promotion due to actions of his coworker the plaintiff because of an inappropriate screen saver that was sent to his computer. In the defense of the defendant this screensaver was completely inappropriate and the behavior from his coworker was not professional by any means and due to those actions alone she should have been reprimanded
Words: 852 - Pages: 4
The California Supreme Court addresses a complicated area of tort law concerning duty owed. The need to protect privileged communication between a therapist and his patient and the protections of the public was being addressed. With respect to the liability of the police that released Poddar, the court stated that a public employee is not liable for an injury resulting from his act or omission where the act of omission was the result of his exercised discretion. Discretionary policy decisions which
Words: 292 - Pages: 2
Taylor suffered a serious emotional distress, part of which was the fear for his and Mya’s life which led them to flee their home state of Massachusetts as a result of Murray’s continuous intimidations during four months. The issue in this case is whether Taylor has a claim against Murray for the intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. Under Massachusetts law, the court will likely conclude that Taylor has a claim against Murray for his conduct toward Taylor because (A) Murray intentionally
Words: 1725 - Pages: 7
