Our Bigot in Chief by Sasha Abramsky. The Nation. Abramsky thinks the way Trump responded to the Charlottesville incident was not done well. He proposes several theories explaining why, Trump is morally corrupt, riding emotion to power again, it was to sure up his base of white Americans, or he is simply a white supremacist. Overall, Abramsky believes Trump should not be in power over anything and that if his behavior continues he will get the U.S. into another war. I would not pick Trump as president, but to say he should not oversee anything is extreme. He has become a very successful business man so he must be able to be trusted with somethings.
Dual Freeze on Korea? By Tim Shorrock. The Nation. North Korea is slowly backing away from threating …show more content…
The Nation. Scott Pruitt: head of the EPA, however he does not actually believe in saving the environment and has alliances with climate-change denialists. Stephen Miller: helped Trump write his controversial inaugural speech and continues to have a negative influence on Trump’s decisions, according to Nichols. Miller is also known as a prominent white supremacist. Mick Mulvaney: director of the office of Management and budget with plans to cut domestic programs so military spending can be increased, provide more tax cuts for the rich, and send less help for people in need which is why he is dangerous to America. Kris Kobach: Kansas secretary of state, Nichols does not like him because he is anti-immigration and is working to find out voter information so he can try and enact some voter suppression. Sebastian Gorka: Trumps radical Islam advisor, Nichols believes Gorka knows nothing about Islam and is concerned about some secret relationships he may or may not have with Hungary. Betsy DeVos: education secretary, she is in favor of privatizing schools which further implements “right-wing social engineering” Nichols says this is not good for small towns, but can be combated by Democrats staying vigilant and proper