...OF PORTER’S COST LEADERSHIP AND DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES Y. Datta Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo Professor Emeritus College of Business Northern Kentucky University Highland Heights, KY 41099 (USA) 7539, Tiki Av. Cincinnati, OH 45243 USA Tel: (513) 984-1032 [Home] Fax: (513) 984-1032 E-Mail: datta@nku.edu A paper accepted for presentation at the 9th Oxford Business & Economics Conference to be held in Oxford, England, June 22-24. Table of Contents A Critique of Porter’s Cost Leadership and Differentiation Strategies 4 ABSTRACT 4 Key Words 4 INTRODUCTION 5 COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY 5 Major Reliance on Modern Capital Equipment 7 Relying on the Experience Curve to Underprice Competition Risky 7 A Cost Leader Cannot Ignore Differentiation 8 No Such Thing as a "Commodity": Everything Can Be Differentiated 9 High Market Share a Prior Condition for Cost Leadership? 10 Porter Identifies High Market Share with Cost Leadership Strategy 10 Differentiation--Not Cost Leadership Alone--Behind GM’s and Whirlpool’s Success 11 “Low-Cost” or “Low-Price” Strategy? 12 Thompson and Strickland’s Low-cost Provider Strategy 14 Internal Orientation of Cost Leadership Strategy 14 DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY 15 Superiority of Differentiation over Cost Leadership Strategy 16 Porter: Differentiation and High Market Share Incompatible 17 Differentiation Compatible with High Market Share--and Low Cost 18 Even higher...
Words: 10109 - Pages: 41
...would a differentiation strategy be a better option than a low cost option for Aspire when entering China? (16marks) A differentiation strategy is something businesses use to gain an edge over their competitors. In industries where multiple competitors produce similar products, managers will try to make their product unique in some way so that it stands out from the pack. A low cost option focuses on providing similar benefits to competitors, but at a lower price. For Aspire to differentiate, they need to provide more benefits than their competitors for example strong levels of customer service, which therefore should enable them to charge higher prices. If Aspire pursued a differentiation strategy the distribution of the coffee should be exclusive, keeping a tight control over distribution to maintain an exclusive image. This being used to emphasise the difference between their products (the coffee) to their rivals. In order to compete in the Chinese market Aspire needs to make sure its product is different from competitors. If consumers value this difference it will benefit the firm in two ways, firstly by an increased sales volume and a greater scope for charging a higher price. Differentiation can be based on a number of different characteristics for example different distribution methods, clever promotional and advertising campaigns to boost brand image and sales and the design of the products itself for example the coffee cups etc. Differentiation can add...
Words: 574 - Pages: 3
...PORTER’S COST LEADERSHIP AND DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES Y. Datta Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo Professor Emeritus College of Business Northern Kentucky University Highland Heights, KY 41099 (USA) 7539, Tiki Av. Cincinnati, OH 45243 USA Tel: (513) 984-1032 [Home] Fax: (513) 984-1032 E-Mail: datta@nku.edu A paper accepted for presentation at the 9th Oxford Business & Economics Conference to be held in Oxford, England, June 22-24. Table of Contents A Critique of Porter’s Cost Leadership and Differentiation Strategies 4 ABSTRACT 4 Key Words 4 INTRODUCTION 5 COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY 5 Major Reliance on Modern Capital Equipment 7 Relying on the Experience Curve to Underprice Competition Risky 7 A Cost Leader Cannot Ignore Differentiation 8 No Such Thing as a "Commodity": Everything Can Be Differentiated 9 High Market Share a Prior Condition for Cost Leadership? 10 Porter Identifies High Market Share with Cost Leadership Strategy 10 Differentiation--Not Cost Leadership Alone--Behind GM’s and Whirlpool’s Success 11 “Low-Cost” or “Low-Price” Strategy? 12 Thompson and Strickland’s Low-cost Provider Strategy 14 Internal Orientation of Cost Leadership Strategy 14 DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY 15 Superiority of Differentiation over Cost Leadership Strategy 16 Porter: Differentiation and High Market Share Incompatible 17 Differentiation Compatible with High Market Share--and Low Cost 18 Even higher...
Words: 10083 - Pages: 41
...2 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH (2 ICBER 2011) PROCEEDING nd nd THE APPLICATION OF COST, DIFFERENTIATION AND HYBRID STRATEGY IN BUSINESS OPERATIONS: WILL HYBRID STRATEGY BECOME THE NEW COMPETITIVE STRATEGY? Mas Bambang Baroto, 2Muhammad Madi Bin Abdullah International Business School (IBS), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia International Campus, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia E-mail: 1mbbaroto@ic.utm.my (Corresponding Author), 2muhdmadi@ic.utm.my 1 ABSTRACT Both strategic management researchers and practitioners have realized the importance of the cost, differentiation and combination strategies for effective organizational performance and excellence. Recently, many large business companies in different part of the world have been applying both strategies (hybrid strategy) at the same time, rather than applying a single strategy at one period of time. The implementations of those three strategies are commonly used by the big giant companies where their business operations level is ranging from domestic, regional, international and global. Thus, the principal aim of this paper is to explore the application of these three strategies (cost strategy, differentiation strategy, and hybrid strategy) in various business companies. Keywords: Cost leadership strategy, differentiation strategy, single strategy, hybrid strategy INTRODUCTION In the competitive market, certain industries are having very heavy competitive rivalry among the company players. The...
Words: 4324 - Pages: 18
...advantage and sustainability 3 generic strategies that a firm can use to overcome the five forces and achieve competitive advantage. 1. Overall cost leadership, is based on creating a low-cost-position. 2. Differentiation requires a firm to create products and/ or services that are unique and valued. 3. Focus strategy directs attention toward narrow product lines, buyer segments, or targeted geographic markets and they must attain advantages either through differentiation or cost leadership. Overall cost leadership Overall cost leadership: a firm’s generic strategy based on appeal to the industrywide market using a competitive advantage based on low cost. This strategy requires a tight set of interrelated tactics that include: * Aggressive construction of efficient-scale facilities * Vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from experience * Tight cost and overhead control * Avoidance of marginal customer accounts * Cost minimization in all activities in the firm’s value chain, such as R&D, service, sales force, and advertising. Experience curve: the decline in unit costs of production as cumulative output increase. Competitive parity: a firm’s achievement of similarity, or being “on par”, with competitors with respect to low cost, differentiation, or other strategic product characteristic. Overall cost leadership: improving competitive position vis-à-vis the five forces * An overall low-cost position enables a firm to achieve above-average...
Words: 677 - Pages: 3
...generic strategies with particular reference to Apple Inc) Table of contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………. Porter’s three Generic Competitive Strategies…………………………………………………………. Cost Leadership…………………………………………………………………………………………… Differentiation………………………………………………………………………………………………. Focus or Niche strategy…………………………………………………………………………………... Apple Inc……………………………………………………………………………………………………. Identification and Critical Evaluation of the Company’s Existing Strategies………………………… Apple Inc Cost leadership Strategy……………………………………………………………………… Apple Inc Differentiation Strategy………………………………………………………………………... Apple Inc Focus or Niche Strategy………………………………………………………………………. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………….. References…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1.0 Introduction A firm's relative position within its industry determines whether a firm's profitability is above or below the industry average. The fundamental basis of above average profitability in the long run is sustainable competitive advantage. There are two basic types of competitive advantage a firm can possess: low cost or differentiation. The two basic types of competitive advantage combined with the scope of activities for which a firm seeks to achieve them, lead to three generic strategies for achieving above average performance in an industry: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. The focus strategy has two...
Words: 2894 - Pages: 12
...Business-Level Strategy TRUE/FALSE 1. A business-level strategy is a “big picture,” highly-generalized action plan that will move an organization toward achievement of its general vision. ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: Page 98 OBJ: Learning Objective 1 KEY: Knowledge MSC: AACSB: Analytic | Management: Strategy | Dierdorff & Rubin: Strategic & Systems Skills 2. A generic business strategy is one that can be used in all industries and by all types of firms. ANS: T PTS: 1 REF: Page 99 OBJ: Learning Objective 1 KEY: Knowledge MSC: AACSB: Analytic | Management: Strategy | Dierdorff & Rubin: Strategic & Systems Skills 3. Wal-Mart has not adjusted its business model since the mid 1990s. ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: Page 99 OBJ: Learning Objective 1 KEY: Knowledge MSC: AACSB: Reflective Thinking | Management: Strategy | Dierdorff & Rubin: Strategic & Systems Skills 4. Competitive scope describes the breadth of the target market the organization wishes to serve. ANS: T PTS: 1 REF: Page 99-100 OBJ: Learning Objective 2 KEY: Knowledge MSC: AACSB: Analytic | Management: Strategy | Dierdorff & Rubin: Strategic & Systems Skills 5. In general, firms with a standardized product should narrowly segment their market. ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: Page 100 OBJ: Learning Objective 2 KEY: Comprehension MSC: AACSB: Analytic | Management: Strategy | Dierdorff & Rubin: Strategic & Systems Skills 6. Typically, the customers of organizations using the cost-leadership strategy are not...
Words: 3275 - Pages: 14
...scheme consisting of three general types of strategies that are commonly used by businesses to achieve and maintain competitive advantage. These three generic strategies are defined along two dimensions: strategic scope and strategic strength. Strategic scope is a demand-side dimension (Michael E. Porter was originally an engineer, then an economist before he specialized in strategy) and looks at the size and composition of the market you intend to target. Strategic strength is a supply-side dimension and looks at the strength or core competency of the firm. In particular he identified two competencies that he felt were most important: product differentiation and product cost (efficiency). He originally ranked each of the three dimensions (level of differentiation, relative product cost, and scope of target market) as either low, medium, or high, and juxtaposed them in a three dimensional matrix. That is, the category scheme was displayed as a 3 by 3 by 3 cube. But most of the 27 combinations were not viable. In his 1980 classic Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, Porter simplifies the scheme by reducing it down to the three best strategies. They are cost leadership, differentiation, and market segmentation (or focus). Market segmentation is narrow in scope while both cost leadership and differentiation are relatively broad in market scope. Empirical research on the profit impact of marketing strategy indicated that firms with a high market...
Words: 2130 - Pages: 9
...A competitive advantage is a position that a firm occupies in its competitive landscape. Cost advantage Cost advantage A firm possesses a sustainable competitive advantage when it has value-creating processes and positions that cannot be duplicated or imitated by others, that lead to the production of above normal rents, in that it provides a long-term advantage that is not easily replicated. Sources of competitive advantage: Competitive advantage Competitive advantage Similar products at lower price Differentiation advantage Differentiation advantage Price premium from unique products Competitors’ gained by offering consumers greater value, either by means of lower prices or by providing greater benefits and service that justifies higher prices. Porter suggested four "generic" business strategies that could be adopted in order to gain competitive advantage. The strategies relate to the extent to which the scope of a business' activities are narrow versus broad and the extent to which a business seeks to differentiate its products. Question 3: The differentiation and cost leadership strategies seek competitive advantage in a broad range of market or industry segments. By contrast, the differentiation focus and cost focus strategies are adopted in a narrow market or industry. Cost leadership With this strategy, the objective is to become the lowest-cost producer in the industry. The traditional method to achieve this objective is to produce on...
Words: 1626 - Pages: 7
...Michael Porter’s “Generic Strategies” • Porter’s five-forces model describes strategy as taking actions that create defendable positions in an industry. • In general, the strategy can be offensive or defensive with respect to competitive forces. • Defensive strategies take the structure of the industry as given, and position the company to match its strengths and weaknesses to it. • In contrast, offensive strategies are designed to do more than simply cope with each of the competitive forces; they are meant to alter the underlying cause of such forces, thereby altering the competitive environment itself. There are, of course, many specific strategies of each type (offensive or defensive), and identifying which is best depends on the circumstances. But Porter suggests 3 broad or generic strategies for creating a defendable position in the long-run and outperforming competitors. 1) Cost Leadership • Cost leadership means having the lowest per-unit (i.e., average) cost in the industry – that is, lowest cost relative to your rivals. • This could mean having the lowest per-unit cost among rivals in highly competitive industries, in which case returns or profits will be low but nonetheless higher than competitors • Or, this could mean having lowest cost among a few rivals where each firm enjoys pricing power and high profits. • Notice that cost leadership is defined independently of market structure. Cost leadership is a defendable strategy because: I. It defends...
Words: 966 - Pages: 4
...management. It is the systematic analysis of the factors associated with customers and competitors (the external environment) and the organization itself (the internal environment) to provide the basis for maintaining optimum management practices. The objective of strategic management is to achieve better alignment of corporate policies and strategic priorities. Porter’s generic strategies. These are three general types of strategies developed by Michael Porter that are commonly used by businesses to achieve and maintain competitive advantage. Company. It is a voluntary association formed and organized to carry on a business. Types of companies include sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability, corporation, and public limited company. INTRODUCTION The concept of competitive advantage is central to the study of strategic management, since a company or an organization must follow an aligned strategy to outperform their rivals in the industry. Michael Porter introduces three generic strategies that a firm may apply in order to do so they include; overall cost leadership, Differentiation and Focus. In order to create and sustain competitive advantage, companies should analyse the value chains of their customers and suppliers to see where they can add value. Competitive advantage Competitive advantage occurs when an organization acquires or develops an attribute or combination of attributes that allows it to outperform its competitors. These attributes can include...
Words: 3350 - Pages: 14
...CHAPTER 5 THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES - Which One to Employ? Copyright ®2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1. Understand what distinguishes each of the five generic strategies and why some of these strategies work better in certain kinds of industry and competitive conditions than in others. 2. Gain command of the major avenues for achieving a competitive advantage based on lower costs. 3. Learn the major avenues to a competitive advantage based on differentiating a company’s product or service offering from the offerings of rivals. 4. Recognize the attributes of a best-cost provider strategy and the way in which some firms use a hybrid strategy to go about building a competitive advantage and delivering superior value to customers. 5–2 Why Do Strategies Differ? Is the firm’s market target broad or narrow? Key factors that distinguish one strategy from another Is the competitive advantage pursued linked to low costs or product differentiation? 5–3 THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES Low-Cost Provider Broad Differentiation Focused Low-Cost Focused Differentiation Best-Cost Provider Striving to achieve lower overall costs than rivals on products that attract a broad spectrum of buyers. Differentiating the firm’s product offering from rivals’ with attributes that appeal to a broad spectrum of buyers. Concentrating on a narrow price-sensitive buyer segment and on costs to offer a lower-priced product. Concentrating on a narrow buyer...
Words: 1506 - Pages: 7
...TOURISM MANAGEMENT: GMN269. JULY 4 2015. DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY VERSUS COST-LEADERSHIP STRATEGY A VIEW OF ASSOCIATED RISK. DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY VERSUS COST-LEADERSHIP STRATEGY A VIEW OF ASSOCIATED RISK. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Any accomplishment requires work and effort of many people. This project is no different. I am grateful to God without whom life would not be possible. And also the Delta State government for making this vision possible. OBJECTIVE OF PAPER The purpose of this paper is show the risks concerned with the differentiation strategy and compare them to those of the cost-leadership strategy. The amount of profit made by a firm is determined by the attractiveness of the industry in which it operates and the quality of its opposition within the industry. Even though an industry may have below average profitability, a firm that is optimally positioned can generate superior returns. Michael Porter argued that if a firm leverages its strengths in either a narrow or broad scope, three generic strategies result; cost-leadership, differentiation, and focus strategies. He said that these strategies are not firm or industry dependent. (Porter, 1999-2010). What is differentiation Strategy Differentiation strategy can be seen as a strategy employed by businesses or firms to increase the...
Words: 1113 - Pages: 5
...Introduction. The essence of business development and commercialisation can be said to be market and growth strategies. Porter’s Generic strategies can be used for this purpose. A well thought out market strategy can minimise risk and increase profits, which is of key importance especially for start up companies with little funding and resources. In order to grow, companies need to adopt strategic frameworks, which can if understood and used in the right way, help the company decide on their next step in the market place. I will first give a brief introduction to Porter’s Generic strategies theories and discuss advantages and disadvantages for using these framework in business development and commercialisation projects in this case Men’s clothing brand. Porter’s generic strategies. According to Michael Porters “Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors” from 1980, one can use Porter’s generic strategies theories to find the optimum position for a company within an industry. Often, a determinant of a company’s profitability can be said to be the attractiveness of an industry in which it operates. This mean that companies that manage to place them self correctly can generate more profits than companies who have not thought about their optimal position. The framework is called generic because it is not industry dependent. A company should reflect on its strengths and weaknesses in order to find its competitive advantage, and this unique strength...
Words: 1693 - Pages: 7
...Cost Leadership Strategy This strategy involves the firm winning market share by appealing to cost-conscious or price-sensitive customers. This is achieved by having the lowest prices in the target market segment, or at least the lowest price to value ratio (price compared to what customers receive). To succeed at offering the lowest price while still achieving profitability and a high return on investment, the firm must be able to operate at a lower cost than its rivals. There are three main ways to achieve this. The first approach is achieving a high asset turnover. In service industries, this may mean for example a restaurant that turns tables around very quickly, or an airline that turns around flights very fast. In manufacturing, it will involve production of high volumes of output. These approaches mean fixed costs are spread over a larger number of units of the product or service, resulting in a lower unit cost, i.e. the firm hopes to take advantage of economies of scale and experience curve effects. For industrial firms, mass production becomes both a strategy and an end in itself. Higher levels of output both require and result in high market share, and create an entry barrier to potential competitors, who may be unable to achieve the scale necessary to match the firms low costs and prices. The second dimension is achieving low direct and indirect operating costs. This is achieved by offering high volumes of standardized products, offering basic no-frills products...
Words: 2128 - Pages: 9