Justice is a topic that even philosophers struggle to define. At times philosophers even conclude that right and wrong is an idea that does not exist. In this essay, I will acknowledge that right and wrong is an idea that exists, but is inadequately defined by the majority of people. The dictionary definition of “right” is something that is “morally or socially correct or acceptable,” but there is a conflict that arises between the two factors of the word. General morality may derive from a universal set of principles, while social mores are laws and standards that are relative to groups of people. This conflicting definition enables the meaning of “right” to be ambiguous. Thus, an act can be morally wrong, but socially right, or vice versa. The ambiguity of justice has influenced philosophers such as Sophocles to explore the true definition of justice by writing tragedies such as Antigone, where a clash between the morally correct and the socially correct is purposefully staged to spark questions on the true meaning of justice, morality, and ethics. Sophocles’ writing can also be analyzed through the ideas of other philosophers such as Confucius and Nagel in order to see how the overarching ideas of philosophers from different cultures and eras converge to challenge the same ideas. Ultimately, through Antigone, I want to try to show that the definition of right and wrong can be more focused if one eliminates or challenges law and takes the human natural intuition to act morally into more