Is Evolution Possible? Evolution is highly improbable because by definition evolution is the naturalistic explanation of the origin of life that includes an account for the origin of elements, missing links, and laws of nature.
Our bodies need 25 elements to live. (Schirber). Ninety six percent of the body is made up of four chemical elements; oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen. (Schirber). Without hydrogen a person may live three to five days. If no oxygen is present within four minutes permanent brain damage will occur and death in four to six minutes (CPR). Both plants and animals need basic elements to live. (Plant). Even bacteria need water and oxygen to survive. With all this said, elements are essential for living organisms. Where …show more content…
Evolutionists say, evolution happens too slowly for humans to see the process happening today. If that were to be true we would see intermediary animals. Consider dogs and cats as an example; one may see variations of these two animals but no one has ever observed a ‘“dat” or “cog.”’(The Scientific). On the other hand microevolution can explain the variations between the dog kingdom and the cat kingdom. Microevolution infact is present and can be observed while macroevolution has never been observed. For example, “evolutionary geneticist experimented with fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes in hopes of creating new species or better kinds.” (The Scientific). With no such luck, Jeffrey Schwartz, a professor of anthropology in Pittsburgh and the leading evolutionist has said, “It was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.” (The Scientific). Meaning, no one has seen a fruit fly become a new specie it has never been observed or replicated by anyone besides Dobzhansky therefore Dobzhansky’s experiment cannot be held valid. A hypothesis can be validated if it can be repeated multiple times. Dobzhansky's experiment cannot even be held as a theory because by definition a theory is “understanding that develops from …show more content…
Different environments have their own basic survival mechanisms; for example, cows breath above water whilst whales breath underwater. First of all, there are many changes that need to happen before a cow can become a whale: breathing, eating, skin, etc. must go through change. lf one changes the vision, likewise, part of the nervous system needs to change. Therefore these changes are not singular but interweaved. This suggests scientists should see thousands of fossils records of intermediary animals. (Statistical Probability). The truth is scientist should be able to find abundantly more intermediate fossils then that which is already found.
In the existing world we have laws that govern the universe. Laws of combustion, Newton's law of gravity, laws of aerodynamics, Hooke's law for elasticity, Bernoulli's law of fluid dynamics, Dalton's law of partial pressures, Fourier's law of heat conduction, etc.. Big bang does not explain how these laws came to govern the