...Some issues that the HRC deals with are gay rights, transgender equality and hate crimes. The HRC are very dynamic and cater to a lot of needs. The HRC is a human rights right group which deals with many different and controversial issues. The people who join this group aren’t just gay and lesbian Americans. The HRC isn’t just exclusive to gays and lesbians it’s a group open to everyone. Some people typically think that the HRC is just a gay and lesbian group but they deal with equal rights for everyone. Also it’s not just a liberal group some conservatives are on board with the campaign. In 2007 a poll was taken on whether or not they should strengthen the laws on hate crimes and 56 percent of republicans and 63 percent of evangelical Christians expressed support. Also many people have shown support for the group through social media such as facebook and twitter. The group also appeals to people between the ages of 13-17 through their program growing up LGBT in America. Also a lot of celebrities have supported the HRC such as Sarah Jessica Parker, Cyndi Lauper, Christopher Meloni, Kevin Bacon, Anne Hathaway and many more. Most people join this group because they believe that all basic rights should be given to everybody. For example most people who join this group feel that gay marriage should be legal because who are they to say what’s a true and pure marriage. Also people join to receive some sort of justice of the many gay, lesbian and transgender people who are...
Words: 2099 - Pages: 9
...Conflicting viewpoints Name Institution Should Gay Marriage be Legal? Introduction The family is an important institution in the society. This is because it enables people to maintain the moral fabric of the society, hence keeping the nation moving. According to biblical teachings, a family comes up through marriage between a man and a woman. Once the two get married, they are to honor God’s commandment of fulfilling the earth through procreation. This aspect makes children an important, but not a must aspect of a family. This is because there are some people who cannot bear children naturally. When it comes it same sex marriages, the concept of a family loses meaning. This is because people in these marriages cannot have kids of their own. At the same time, their sexual acts are unnatural if not extremely weird to heterosexuals (Greenberg, 1993). Based on these factors, legalizing same sex marriages will definitely be destroying the moral marriage institution. Kids who are growing up will not know the importance of having a family, something that is likely to have a serious impact on the continuity of the nation’s traditions. As a result of these scenarios, I am against the idea of legalizing these marriages as they are likely to compromise the wellbeing of the society. Body Points that oppose my viewpoint Today, there are people who strongly believe that same sex marriages should be legalized. These people give various reasons to support their position. These reasons...
Words: 1000 - Pages: 4
...the legalization of same sex marriage and the other for doing away with the idea as a whole. If the illegality of the current topic continues then it can only damage us all in negative ways as a whole being that the United States people are all that stand in its way or atleast had been for the past years. Each day millions of Gay citizens of this country contribute to the growth of our nation and everyones wallets whether it be spiritually, politically, vocationally, socially, or culturally. The citizens of our country that make up these groups (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transsexual) are a detremental piece to the puzzle that builds our economy and country as a whole. If these groups were to withdrawl their many contributions to this country, then it would affect the system as a whole in only negative ways. By legalizing same sex marriage then it will show these groups that they are equal to every other citizen as well as capable of having the same exact benefits. After all this country has been known to be quite the advocate for equal rights through out time based on all sorts of issues in the past such as racial discrimination, womens rights, immigration etc Affirming these minor groups in society will reduce prejudice in groups by supporting cultural diversity, thus promoting a better environment for anyone to thrive in a more accepting society. This will also boost the psychological, physical, and social well Scott 2 being amongst the gay population. Not only is it...
Words: 726 - Pages: 3
...Affirmative action with regards to marriage. Name: Institution: Date: A lot of people today have used affirmative action as a way of obtaining special privileges by calling them “rights” – particularly, “equal rights”. Affirmative quotas have notably been seen in local political campaigns through demands that the scope of marriage should be adjusted to suit different conditions in marriage including same sex marriage, interracial marriages and single parenting. When goals in affirmative action are not met, the burden of showing evidence that there was no discrimination against women and minorities lies with the employers in a job recruiting exercise for example. The people who advocate for these “rights” don’t have the burden of proof to elaborately show there was no discrimination in the exercise whatsoever. In many countries, minorities have always outperformed the majority even when there was no way of discriminating against them. Marriage has ever been recognized as the binding of a man and woman since. A vast range of laws have, however, come up in regard to marriage. All arising from disparities resultant from the union of man and woman. These disparities, however, arise naturally and affirmative policies should be developed for people who engage in behaviors that occur naturally and are inevitable. Research reveals that it is normal for differences between people of the same sex to occur, thus, everyone need laws that protect them whatsoever the case. Families led...
Words: 862 - Pages: 4
...Affirmative action with regards to marriage. Name: Institution: Date: A lot of people today have used affirmative action as a way of obtaining special privileges by calling them “rights” – particularly, “equal rights”. Affirmative quotas have notably been seen in local political campaigns through demands that the scope of marriage should be adjusted to suit different conditions in marriage including same sex marriage, interracial marriages and single parenting. When goals in affirmative action are not met, the burden of showing evidence that there was no discrimination against women and minorities lies with the employers in a job recruiting exercise for example. The people who advocate for these “rights” don’t have the burden of proof to elaborately show there was no discrimination in the exercise whatsoever. In many countries, minorities have always outperformed the majority even when there was no way of discriminating against them. Marriage has ever been recognized as the binding of a man and woman since. A vast range of laws have, however, come up in regard to marriage. All arising from disparities resultant from the union of man and woman. These disparities, however, arise naturally and affirmative policies should be developed for people who engage in behaviors that occur naturally and are inevitable. Research reveals that it is normal for differences between people of the same sex to occur, thus, everyone need laws that protect them whatsoever the...
Words: 860 - Pages: 4
...legalization of gay marriage, the strength of that side is based on the ballot box. According to the Constitution, it has no specific right to marriage as people have viewed. That's where the ballot box comes in for people to vote and decide if gay marriage should be legal or not. If the majority of people believe that is the right thing to do then the public will be won over. The only weakness about this view would have to be that the majority rule does not work in the favor of gay couples. Viewing the State-by-State statements, people want to figure out if determining the legality of gay marriage should be continued to be argued and if it is appropriate. The weakness about this view is that the power is left for the states to decide because the Constitution is not authorized by the federal government of gay marriage. Meaning that each state has the power to decide on whether what their own policy will be as a state. Based on the Defense of Marriage Act, it gives each state the legal authority to approve or reject same-sex marriages. The strength about this resolves to federalism taking over to operate and letting the subsets of states get their way by their own people locally. Reading the civil rights issue conveys only a positive side to all of it. The issue conveys to be considered as a civil right problem because of what America went through with the laws being outlawed to interracial marriage. The strength that helps this is considering this issue to be discriminatory towards...
Words: 744 - Pages: 3
...Within this essay, the main focus will be to develop a thorough analysis and discussion in relation to the topic of gay marriage. In order to construct this, this essay will discuss positions in favor of and against gay marriage. In reference to the position supporting gay marriage, the discussion will focus on; discrimination and equality and respect on individual’s rights. The points that will be discussed contraty to gay marriage will be building upon ideas that we rose in the debate as well as incorporating some new material. Throughout this essay, the ‘for and against’ positions will distinguish between both sides of the argument. Inclusion of scholarly articles will become evident throughout this essay to support the main points that will be made within this argument on gay marriage as well incorporating case studies that support both ‘for and against’ gay marriage. Overall, this essay will display a thorough representation and discussion on how gay marriage can be positioned in society with valid points made both ‘for and against’. Gay marriage has slowly become a significant factor amongst individuals of today’s society. Similarly, this leads to the discussion of homosexuals having the right to marry in society. Ultimately, conflict from the opposing position of ‘against’ gay marriage may arise that gay marriage can destroy the concept of marriage and mock the importance of procreation. In reference to this; everyone in society has the right to marry regardless of gender...
Words: 2707 - Pages: 11
...Within this essay, the main focus will be to develop a thorough analysis and discussion in relation to the topic of gay marriage. In order to construct this, this essay will discuss positions in favor of and against gay marriage. In reference to the position supporting gay marriage, the discussion will focus on; discrimination and equality and respect on individual’s rights. The points that will be discussed contraty to gay marriage will be building upon ideas that we rose in the debate as well as incorporating some new material. Throughout this essay, the ‘for and against’ positions will distinguish between both sides of the argument. Inclusion of scholarly articles will become evident throughout this essay to support the main points that will be made within this argument on gay marriage as well incorporating case studies that support both ‘for and against’ gay marriage. Overall, this essay will display a thorough representation and discussion on how gay marriage can be positioned in society with valid points made both ‘for and against’. Gay marriage has slowly become a significant factor amongst individuals of today’s society. Similarly, this leads to the discussion of homosexuals having the right to marry in society. Ultimately, conflict from the opposing position of ‘against’ gay marriage may arise that gay marriage can destroy the concept of marriage and mock the importance of procreation. In reference to this; everyone in society has the right to marry regardless of...
Words: 2707 - Pages: 11
...Name Professor English1301 22, October 2013 Gay Marriage Gay marriage has slowly become a significant factor amongst individuals of today's society. Similarly, this leads to the discussion of homosexuals having the right to marry in society. Ultimately, conflict from the opposing position of ‘against’ gay marriage may arise that gay marriage can destroy the concept of marriage and mock the importance of procreation as presented in Charles Colson's "Gay Marriage: Societal Suicide". In Katha Pollitt's "What's Wrong with Gay Marriage?", she appeals to the readers logic to convince them that gay couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples when it comes to marriage, while Charles Colson also uses logic to emphasize his argument, though it is not as strong as Pollitt's. Marriage has been justified as a religious and legal commitment between man and woman, through the expression of love. Specifically, in relation to origins of marriage as it is the traditional building block of human society, further steps should not be taken to define the term marriage as it is already set in framework that it is known to be kept as man and woman. This concept of man and woman reiterates through the concept of how gay marriage could affect families and children that are involved within homosexual relationships. Firstly, in relation to the idea of forming a family with homosexual parents becomes unnatural as homosexual parenting represents an attempt to disrupt that ‘natural’...
Words: 992 - Pages: 4
...Same-sex Marriage The world is constantly changing and evolving. It isn’t possible to stop this from happening, but it is possible to stand up for what is morally right and for what isn’t. And now, we are faced with what many people feel is the “inevitable evolution” of marriage: legalizing homosexual marriages. Not allowing homosexual marriages to be recognized by the government and to be legal would prevent changing a fundamental institution, would prohibit breaching the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and would prevent unthinkable consequences. Marriage has been around for as long as anyone can remember. And after all this time, it has changed very little in the eyes of the law. Every major religion and culture has embraced marriage as a unique relationship between a man and a woman. One of the only times marriage was altered, was when no-fault divorce was legalized. No-fault divorce was introduced, and it has proven to be a complete disaster for children and often for the adults involved. Statistics now show that 53% of marriages end in divorce. And now, we find ourselves gambling yet again with an institution that is foundational to the well-being of our children. Many Mormons oppose gay marriage because they believe offends everything religion stands for. Also, making love to another man betrays everything that is masculine and that people fear that gay people might recruit straight people to the gay lifestyle. Many people are in favor of equal rights for homosexuals...
Words: 624 - Pages: 3
...Within this essay, the main focus will be to develop a thorough analysis and discussion in relation to the topic of gay marriage. In order to construct this, this essay will discuss positions in favor of and against gay marriage. In reference to the position supporting gay marriage, the discussion will focus on; discrimination and equality and respect on individual’s rights. The points that will be discussed contraty to gay marriage will be building upon ideas that we rose in the debate as well as incorporating some new material. Throughout this essay, the ‘for and against’ positions will distinguish between both sides of the argument. Inclusion of scholarly articles will become evident throughout this essay to support the main points that will be made within this argument on gay marriage as well incorporating case studies that support both ‘for and against’ gay marriage. Overall, this essay will display a thorough representation and discussion on how gay marriage can be positioned in society with valid points made both ‘for and against’. Gay marriage has slowly become a significant factor amongst individuals of today’s society. Similarly, this leads to the discussion of homosexuals having the right to marry in society. Ultimately, conflict from the opposing position of ‘against’ gay marriage may arise that gay marriage can destroy the concept of marriage and mock the importance of procreation. In reference to this; everyone in society has the right to marry regardless of...
Words: 2707 - Pages: 11
...Same Sex Marriage December 3, 2013 A significant political policy issue that has been gaining more attention is same sex marriage. Currently same sex marriage has been legalized in 16 states. Some argue that same-sex couples should be able to get married, have access to the same marriage benefits and public acknowledgement enjoyed by heterosexual couples, they argue that prohibiting gay marriage is unconstitutional and discriminatory. While the other side argues that allowing same sex marriage would be altering the traditional definition of marriage, they argue that by allowing same sex marriage it will further weaken our institution and that it may lead to polygamous and interspecies marriages. The Republican National Committee have passed resolutions reaffirming its commitment to defining marriage as between a man and a women, and calling on the Supreme Court to “uphold the sanctity of marriage” as it weighed rulings on cases involving gay marriage. Their 2012 platform called for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and woman. The Republican Party has held this stance of opposing same sex marriage because it believes that the sanctity and value of traditional American morals need to be upheld and marriages can only be held between a man and a woman. In the recent years there has been a shift in views as more people support same sex marriage. As the country is “evolving” on the issue of same sex marriage, Republicans have been taking a closer look...
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...Lam Ka Kiu(54390709) Should same sex marriage be legalized in Hong Kong Legalizing same sex marriage(also known as gay marriage,a kind of marriage between people of the same sex) has long been a controversial issue.It is said that gay people should enjoy the same right as ordinary people while the others think that marriage should be between a man and a woman.I aim to explore whether same sex marriage should be legalized in Hong Kong.It is my belief that same sex marriage should be legalized. Everyone should have the right to love others and be loved,even for the same sex couples.All of us are equal and it applies to marriage as well.1,138 benefits, rights and protections are provided for married couples in Federal law"(Members of The...
Words: 992 - Pages: 4
...Chick-Fil-A as An Anti-Gay/Lesbian Business Robert LaSerre BCOM/275 July 19, 2012 Eveyln Hollis Chick-Fil-A as an Anti-Gay/Lesbian Business I recently read an article that has apparently caused a huge ruckus in the continuing debate about inclusion of gay and lesbians in the modern United States business world. The President and Chief Operating Officer of Chick-Fil-A, Dan Cathy, who is also the founder’s son, in a recent interview the Baptist Press stated that his company supported the traditional family versus the new same gender family. The part of the article that I disagree with concerns whether or not Mr. Cathy’s statements amount to “hate mongering”.1 CNN was not the first to post this article but their article was the first one that I saw. The article starts off mentioning that the company’s president responded “guilty as charged” when he was asked about his company’s stance regarding traditional family units. The article goes on to talk about how the social media networks are on fire with the news. The article implies that Mr. Cathy, and by proxy, Chick-Fil-A have been hiding their Christian values and hate for years and that it is a relief that they have finally come out in the open showing their discriminatory practices. The statement that Chick-Fil-A has hidden their beliefs until now is a false statement, they have been closed on Sundays for their employees to worship and spend time with their families since 1967, the founding of the first...
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...The author’s 5 year old daughter of this article was curious as to why Tango had two daddies. A simple reply of “there are all kinds of ways to be a family”. There are a lot of children all across America that are in Tango’s situation. Pooley, Julie Ann. “Resilience in Same –Sex Parented Families: The Lived Experience of Adults with Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual Parents.” Journal of GLBT Family Studies. 2014, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p329-353. 25p. 1 Chart The author examines the results of research done on children who had at least one parent who was identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual. Children raised by same-sex parents were psychologically healthy, and as socially and academically well-adjusted as their peers who were raised in traditional heterosexual-parented families. These children have the ability to flourish even though they face challenges. The participants did indicate fear and/or experience of homophobic reactions, parental modelling and social support. The participants also indicated that their nontraditional family structure gave them unique advantages and emphasized the importance of secure, loving relationships within their family. "Gay Parenting." Opposing...
Words: 771 - Pages: 4
