Free Essay

Higgs Boson

In:

Submitted By madelynmina
Words 4416
Pages 18
Submitted by:
Mina, Madelyn Ann C.
IV- St. Cecilia
Submitted to:
Mr. Noel A. Hermano
Submitted by:
Mina, Madelyn Ann C.
IV- St. Cecilia
Submitted to:
Mr. Noel A. Hermano
Higgs Boson
Higgs Boson

What is Higgs Boson?

What is Higgs Boson?

Higgs Boson, the “God Particle” as coined by Leon Lederman back in 1993, is the particle that made up the Higgs Field. The Higgs Field is the energy field that permeated the entire universe, according to Dr. Peter Higgs. For example, our entire universe is covered with snowfield and we know that what makes up a snowfield is a snowflake. The same way it goes with the Higgs field; it is made up of Higgs Boson (Ellis, 2013). The Higgs Boson or the Higgs Particle is the very first elementary particle that does not spin at all; it has no electric charge, nor color charge. It was officially announced to the public last year (2012), 4th of the month of July at the European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland. Their discovery was confirmed as the Higgs boson on March 14 this year, bringing to an end to a 50-year search. The discovery of the Higgs Boson is very important because it is said to be the missing link in our understanding of the universe, known as the Standard Model. It has also led to Professor Higgs becoming the only person ever to have a fundamental particle named after him. (Wilson, 2013).It was regarded as the “God Particle” before but many physicists did not like the way it was called.
Results to
Results to
More Interaction to the Higgs Field More mass
More Interaction to the Higgs Field More mass Every time a particle interacts more with the Higgs Field, we can predict that it has more mass than any other particle that has less interaction to the Higgs Field. Therefore,

But why? Why does it result to more mass when it t interacts more to the Higgs Field? Because Higgs Boson is a particle that gives mass to other particles. Higgs Boson is said to have a mass that ranges from 125 GeV/c2 to 127 GeV/c2 (GeV means Giga-Electron-Volt = One thousand million electron volts).
Who is the Person behind Higgs Boson?
Who is the Person behind Higgs Boson?

The discovery of the Higgs Boson last 2012 had a great impact in the world of science particularly in the field of Physics. The apparent discovery of the subatomic particle has been hailed as a major breakthrough by physicists. Physicist were greatly overwhelmed about this new particle and they had been studying about the properties of this Higgs Boson through the most expensive, most technologically advanced and the biggest facility ever built by humankind – the Large Hadron Collider. While scientist are greatly disturbed by this discovery, it’s time to unfold and introduce the person behind this “Higgs Boson.”
As mentioned earlier, it was named after Dr. Peter Higgs and this statement gives as an idea that it was perhaps Dr. Peter Higgs’ discovery. Yes, it was his discovery; the genius man behind the Higgs Boson. François Englert of the Free University of Brussels, Belgium and his late colleague Robert Brout were the first to describe how this field [Higgs Field] might operate, but it was Peter Higgs who first predicted the particle that bears his name. (Aron, 2013).
Even before, scientists were greatly into this ‘particle’ but they could not just simply point it out. In 1964, Robert Brout and François Englert, Peter Higgs, and Gerald Guralnik, C. Richard Hagen, and Tom Kibble wrote scientific papers which proposed related but different approaches to explain how mass could arise in local gauge theories. They are credited with the theory of the Higgs mechanism and the prediction of the Higgs field and Higgs boson. All of the six physicists were awarded the 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics for this work, and in 2013 Englert and Higgs received the Nobel Prize in Physics.
Physicist Involved in the Search for the Higgs Boson
Physicist Involved in the Search for the Higgs Boson

Dr. Peter Ware Higgs
Dr. Peter Ware Higgs

Dr. Peter Higgs was born on the 29th of May in 1929. He is a British theoretical Physicist, Nobel Prize laureate and a professor at the University of Edinburgh - the sixth-oldest university in the English-speaking world. The original basis of Higgs' work came from the Japanese-born theorist and Nobel Prize laureate Yoichiro Nambu from the University of Chicago. Professor Nambu had proposed a theory known as spontaneous symmetry breaking based on what was known to happen in superconductivity in condensed matter; however, the theory predicted massless particles (the Goldstone's theorem), a clearly incorrect prediction. At Edinburgh Higgs first became interested in mass, developing the idea that particles – massless when the universe began – acquired mass a fraction of a second later as a result of interacting with a theoretical field (which became known as the Higgs field). Higgs postulated that this field permeates space, giving mass to all elementary subatomic particles that interact with it. The Higgs mechanism postulates the existence of the Higgs field which confers mass on quarks and leptons. However this causes only a tiny portion of the masses of other subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons. In these, gluons that bind quarks together confer most of the particle mass. On 4 July 2012, CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) announced the ATLAS and CMS experiments had seen strong indications for the presence of a new particle, which could be the Higgs boson. Speaking at the seminar in Geneva, Higgs commented "It's really an incredible thing that it's happened in my lifetime."

François, Baron Englert
François, Baron Englert

François, Baron Englert was born on 6th of November in 1932. He is a Holocaust survivor and was born in a Belgian Jewish Family. He is a Belgian theoretical physicist and he is also a Nobel Prize laureate just like Peter Higgs. He is Professor emeritus at the Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB) where he is member of the Service de Physique Théorique. He is also a Sackler Professor by Special Appointment in the School of Physics and Astronomy at Tel Aviv University and a member of the Institute for Quantum Studies at Chapman University in California.
Brout and Englert, Higgs, and Gerald Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and Tom Kibble introduced as agent of the vacuum structure a scalar field (most often called the Higgs field) which many physicists view as the agent responsible for all masses in the universe. Brout and Englert also showed that the mechanism may remain valid if the scalar field is replaced by a more structured agent such as a fermion condensate. Their approach led them to conjecture that the theory is renormalizable. The eventual proof of renormalizability, a major achievement of twentieth century physics, is due to Gerardus 't Hooft and Martinus Veltman who were awarded the 1999 Nobel Prize for this work. The Brout–Englert–Higgs–Guralnik–Hagen–Kibble mechanism is the building stone of the electroweak theory of elementary particles and laid the foundation of a unified view of the basic laws of nature.

Robert Brout
Robert Brout

Robert Brout is born on the 14th of June in 1928. He died at the age of 82 last 2011 in the 3rd of May. Brout is an American-Belgian theoretical physicist of jewish origin and a Professor of Physics at Université Libre de Bruxelles where he had created, together with François Englert, the Service de Physique Théorique.
In 1964, Brout, in collaboration with Englert, discovered how mass can be generated for gauge particles in the presence of a local abelian and non-abelian gauge symmetry. This was demonstrated by them, both classically and quantum mechanically, successfully avoiding theorems initiated by J. Goldstone while indicating that the theory would be renormalizable. Similar ideas have been developed in condensed matter physics.Peter Higgs and Gerald Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and Tom Kibble came to the same conclusion as Brout and Englert.
While each of these famous papers took similar approaches, the contributions and differences between the 1964 PRL symmetry breaking papers is noteworthy. This work showed that the particles that carry the weak force acquire their mass through interactions with an all-pervasive field that is now known as the Higgs field, and that the interactions occur via particles that are widely known as Higgs bosons. As yet, these Higgs bosons had not been observed experimentally; however, most physicists believed that they exist.

Gerald Guralnik
Gerald Guralnik

Gerald Guralnik was born on 17th of September in 1936. He is the Chancellor’s Professor of Physics at Brown and he was one of the six international physicists who originated the Higgs theory in 1964.
Professor Guralnik received his PH.D in Physics from Harvard University. He has carried out research at many institutions in Europe and the United States. His primary interest is in elementary particle theory. He went to Imperial College London as a postdoctoral fellow supported by the National Science Foundation and then became a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Rochester. In the fall of 1967 went to Brown University and frequently visited Imperial College and Los Alamos National Laboratory where he was a staff member from 1985 to 1987. While at Los Alamos, he did extensive work on the development and application of computational methods for Lattice QCD. He is most famous for his co-discovery of the Higgs mechanism and Higgs boson with C. R. Hagen and Tom Kibble..

Carl Richard Hagen
Carl Richard Hagen

Carl Richard Hagen was born on the 2nd of February in 1937. He is a professor of particle physics at the University of Rochester. He is most noted for his contributions to the Standard Model and Symmetry breaking as well as the co-discovery of the Higgs mechanism and Higgs boson. Professor Hagen's research interests are in the field of Theoretical High Energy Physics, primarily in the area of quantum field theory. This includes the formulation and quantization of higher spin field theories within the context of Galilean relativity as well as that of Special relativity.
Hagen received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At MIT, his doctoral thesis topic was in quantum electrodynamics. He has been a professor of physics at the University of Rochester since 1963. Professor Hagen won the Award for Excellence in Teaching, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester twice (in 1996 and 1999). Hagen is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and was named Outstanding Referee by APS in 2008. Valparaiso University awarded Hagen the degree Honorary Doctor of Science in 2012 for his significant contributions to particle physics and the theory of mass generation.

Thomas Walter Bannerman Kibble
Thomas Walter Bannerman Kibble

Thomas W. B. Kibble was born on the 23rd of December in 1932. He is a British theoretical physicist and senior research investigator at The Blackett Laboratory, at Imperial College London, UK. Kibble is an avid cyclist. He was born in Madras, India and is the grandson of author Helen Bannerman and William Bannerman who was an officer in the Indian Medical Service.
He has worked on mechanisms of symmetry breaking, phase transitions and the topological defects that can be formed. Kibble is noted for his co-discovery of the Higgs mechanism and Higgs boson with Gerald Guralnik and C. R. Hagen. For this discovery Prof. Kibble was awarded The American Physical Society's 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics. Prof. Kibble is also a Fellow of the Royal Society, of the Institute of Physics, and of Imperial College London, a member of the American Physical Society, the European Physical Society and the Academia Europaea, and a CBE. He has been awarded the Hughes Medal of the Royal Society and the Rutherford and Guthrie Medals of the Institute of Physics.

So, how did they come to confirm it?

So, how did they come to confirm it?

This idea of the existence of the Higgs boson were rejected several times. They consider it as a ‘junk’ but after many revisions of Dr. Peter Higgs’ proposal to this ‘another particle,’ the Physical Review Letters finally published his work and the works of the other five scientists who patiently worked on this research.
In order to confirm the existence of the Higgs Boson, the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) built the Large Hadron Collider or the LHC from 1998 to 2008. The Large Hadron Collider is the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator. It is one hundred meters (or about 328 feet) underground, beneath the border between France and Switzerland. It’s the world's largest machine and it will examine the universe's tiniest particles. The LHC consists of a 27-kilometre ring of superconducting magnets with a number of accelerating structures to boost the energy of the particles along the way. They had built this despite the fact that it will cost them a lot because they aim of allowing physicists to test the predictions of different theories of particle physics and high-energy physics, and particularly prove or disprove the existence of the theorized Higgs particle. Physicists hope that the LHC will help answer some of the fundamental open questions in physics, concerning the basic laws governing the interactions and forces among the elementary objects, and many more.
How Does the LHC Works?
How Does the LHC Works?

The particles the LHC will accelerate and collide are protons or lead nuclei, both have positive charges and this means that they can be steered by use of appropriate magnetic fields.
Various types of superconducting magnets (9,300 in total) are used to steer and focus beams of particles as they race around the 27km loop of the LHC collider. The LHC carries two beams, travelling in opposite directions, in two, adjacent beam pipes. At the collision points the beams briefly share the same pipe as the magnets direct them to collide head-on. The beam pipes are enclosed in a sheath of superconducting magnets and all of this is bathed in supercold liquid helium (1.8oK).
The magnets, which make up the bulk of the collider, are only one part of the story. The other task of the collider is to accelerate the particles as they travel around it. This is done at 4 locations where the particles pass through superconducting radio frequency (RF) cavities. Just like pushing a child’s swing, these RF cavities give the particles a push each time they pass, steadily increasing the energy of the particles prior to collision.
The LHC is the last in a ‘ladder’ of accelerators that are used in sequence to accelerate low energy particles up to the LHC’s maximum energy.
The LHC has detectors as well. the ALICE observes the Primordial Cosmic Plasma, the ATLAS and the CMS seeks for the Higgs Boson and the Dark Matter, and the LHCb seeks the Matter-antimatter difference.

When did the search started?
When did the search started?

1964
Peter Higgs is the first to explicitly predict the particle that would eventually acquire his name in October, but other physicists can also lay claim to the idea of a mass-generating boson. In August, Robert Brout and François Englert independently detail how the mass-generation mechanism could work. Another group – Dick Hagen, Gerald Guralnik and Tom Kibble – also produce similar ideas independently, publishing shortly after Higgs in November.
Identifying exactly who came up with the Higgs could be problematic for the Nobel committee, as the prize can only be shared between a maximum of three people.
1995
Even without the discovery of the Higgs boson we still have evidence for the Higgs mechanism, as it allowed the Standard Model to make a number of successful predictions, including the discovery of the heaviest known particle, the top quark. In 1995, CERN's Chicago rival, Fermilab, finds the top quark using its Tevatron particle accelerator at around 176 gigaelectronvolts (GeV) – just as predicted.
2001
Before the Large Hadron Collider, CERN had the Large Electron-Positron (LEP) Collider, which spent five years looking for a Higgs with a mass of around 80 GeV before closing in 2000. Conclusive analysis the following year rules out a Higgs with a mass below 115 GeV.
2004
During a gap between the closure of the LEP and the switch-on of the LHC, Chicago was the most likely place to find the Higgs. Data from the Tevatron places the Higgs above 117 GeV, just above LEP's reach, with an upper limit of 251 GeV.
2007
The LHC is capable of colliding particles at higher energies than any previous accelerator, so experiments pointing to a lighter Higgs increased the Tevatron's chances of discovery. With pressure from CERN mounting, Fermilab reduces the upper limit to 153 GeV.
2008
One billion people watch as proton beams circulate the Large Hadron Collider for the first time, amid unfounded fears that it could produce a world-destroying black hole. The Higgs hunt is back on at CERN, but only briefly, as a gas leak shuts the accelerator down until the following year.
2009
With the LHC out of action until November, Tevatron researchers say – somewhat hopefully – that they have a 50 per cent chance of finding the Higgs by end of 2010.
2010
Physics blogs buzz with rumours of a Higgs signal at the Tevatron that ultimately prove false.
2011
April sees another round of rumours flourish after an unreviewed LHC study is leaked online, while in September the Tevatron shuts down, having failed to find the Higgs. As the year draws to a close, the LHC's ATLAS and CMS experiments both show hints of the Higgs at around 125 GeV, the first signal at nearly the same mass.
2012
In February, the LHC boosts collision energy from 7 to 8 teraelectronvolts (TeV), improving its Higgs sensitivity by 30 to 40 per cent.
4 July
The existence of the Higgs Boson was officially announced to the public.
14 March 2013
The existence of the Higgs Boson was confirmed.

This timeline is from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22008-a-brief-history-of-a-boson-timeline-of-higgs.html#.Un8nNuI-dkM but this has few revisions.

Is there any Physics in it?
Is there any Physics in it?

We have been mentioning about this newly discovered ‘particle.’ While we strive to know more about this Higgs Boson, we are engaging in the branch of Physics known as Particle Physics.
Particle Physics is the branch of Physics that studies the nature of particles that are the constituents of what is usually referred to as matter and radiation. Theoretical particle physics attempts to develop the models, theoretical framework, and mathematical tools to understand current experiments and make predictions for future experiments. The LHC also uses magnets and energies to make the particles move like of that speed of light in order to collide the particles.

Is there any news about this Higgs Boson?
Is there any news about this Higgs Boson?

Finding the Higgs Leads to More Puzzles
By DENNIS OVERBYE
Published: November 4, 2011
Near the end of “The Tempest,” in what has been taken as Shakespeare’s farewell speech, the sorcerer Prospero breaks his staff and declares, “Our revels now are ended.” And he goes on: “These our actors, as I foretold you, were all spirits and are melted into air, into thin air: and ...leave not a rack behind.”
The latest word from physics is that something like that ending may be in store for the universe. In this case, the role of Prospero is played by the Higgs field, an invisible ocean of energy that permeates space, confers mass on elementary particles and gives elementary forces their distinct features and strengths.
The field, theoretical for 50 years, took on real life last year when physicists at CERN in Europe discovered the Higgs boson, a sort of droplet of Higgs energy. The world rejoiced, and two of the chief theorists, Peter Higgs and François Englert, will share a Nobel Prize. But studies of the new boson suggest it could have a fatal disease.
As Joseph Lykken, a theorist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, and Maria Spiropulu, of the California Institute of Technology, put it in a new paper reviewing the history and future of the Higgs boson:
“Taken at face value, the result implies that eventually (in 10^100 years or so) an unlucky quantum fluctuation will produce a bubble of a different vacuum, which will then expand at the speed of light, destroying everything.”
The idea is that the Higgs field could someday twitch and drop to a lower energy state, like water freezing into ice, thereby obliterating the workings of reality as we know it. Naturally, we would have no warning. Just blink and it’s over.
End times are part of a science reporter’s stock in trade, of course. The death of the sun, dark energy sucking galaxies, greenhouse gas catastrophes, comets and asteroids boiling the oceans, apocalyptic earthquakes and plagues are regularly paraded through these pages.
Maybe I’m just getting old and I’ve lost whatever Zen detachment I might have pretended to have, but to me this is the most depressing end-of-days vision I’ve encountered. It would be as if we’d never existed at all. Talk about a particle with Godlike properties.
But cheer up. That is only one of many scenarios that are emerging as physicists try to reconcile the CERN discovery with what they thought they knew. You might think that finding the Higgs boson, after 50 years and $10 billion or so, would bring clarity to physics and to the cosmos. But just the opposite is true: they may have found the Higgs boson, but they don’t understand it.
In particular, they don’t understand why it weighs what it does — it is about 125 times as massive as the protons that were collided to make it, not gazillions of times as heavy, as standard quantum mechanical calculations would suggest.
That is because when they do the math, physicists have to include the effects of the Higgs’s interactions with all other particles, even the ones that aren’t there, so-called virtual particles that wink in and out of existence on borrowed energy. This zooms the mass all the way up to the top of the scale, like one of those carnival games where you hit a scale with a sledgehammer: 10 quadrillion trillion electron volts, otherwise known as the Planck energy, where gravity and the other particle forces are theoretically equal.
For years the preferred solution to this conundrum has been a theory called supersymmetry, which, among other things, predicted the existence of a whole new spectrum of particles, superpartners of the ones we already know, that would cancel out the quantum calculations and keep the Higgs light. One of these particles might also be the dark matter that makes up a quarter of the universe by weight.
It’s such a beautiful theory that if Einstein were alive today he might say, as he did of his theory of general relativity, that “I would have been sorry for the dear Lord” if it were disproved.
Alas for the Lord, experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider have already eliminated the simplest versions of supersymmetry. That doesn’t mean anything yet. Two years ago, many physicists were about to give up on the standard version of the Higgs boson, because it hadn’t shown up. Then it did.
Likewise, some advocates of supersymmetry are now suggesting that it could take an even more powerful collider — say, tunneling under Lake Geneva — to smoke out a supersymmetric particle.
The most talked-about alternative to supersymmetry is the idea of the multiverse, an almost infinite ensemble of universes in which the value of the Higgs — as well as many other crucial parameters — is random. We just happen to live in the one in which the conditions and parameters are fit for us. This is a notion that flows naturally from string theory and modern theories of the Big Bang, but accepting multiple universes means giving up the Einsteinian dream of a single explanation for the cosmos, a painful concession.
Steven Weinberg, of the University of Texas at Austin, who won his Nobel in 1979 for using the Higgs theory to unify two of the forces of nature, declared mournfully in The New York Review of Books: “Physical science has historically progressed not only by finding precise explanations of natural phenomena, but also by discovering what sorts of things can be precisely explained. These may be fewer than we had thought.”
But there is still hope, at least for Einstein.
In a talk this spring in Germany, Dr. Lykken called the choice between supersymmetry and multiple universes “a false dichotomy.”
There is a third way, he says, to keep the Higgs mass in bounds. That is by saying that its mass comes entirely from the virtual particles winking in and out of life around the particle. To make this scheme work, however, physicists have to abandon popular speculations of how the forces of nature are unified at “superhigh energies,” Dr. Lykken admitted in an email.
The bonus, he said, is that the same idea can generate the mass for dark matter particles, the invisible swarm in vast clouds that form the gravitational cradles for galaxies. In that case, dark matter could interact with the visible matter by means of a “dark” Higgs boson, something that will be testable in underground dark matter experiments like LUX, in South Dakota, which just announced it had come up empty so far.
It’s an exotic but hardly irrelevant subject. “The details of how dark matter works will end up determining whether the vacuum is unstable and, if so, how long it will last,” Dr. Lykken wrote.
It may all depend on the exact mass of another particle, the top quark. Gian Giudice of CERN, who did some of the first calculations of the new Higgs and found the universe teetering on Shakespearean dissolution, said, “The near criticality of the universe is the most important thing we have learned from the discovery of the Higgs boson so far.”
It might be, as Prospero put it, that we really are such stuff as dreams are made on. But we may have to wait longer than the age of the universe to find out.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Djklsa

...working at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are more than 99 percent certain they've discovered the Higgs boson, aka the God particle—or at the least a brand-new particle exactly where they expected the Higgs to be. The long-sought particle may complete the standard model of physics by explaining why objects in our universe have mass—and in so doing, why galaxies, planets, and even humans have any right to exist. "We have a discovery," Heuer said at the seminar. "We have observed a new particle consistent with a Higgs boson." History in the Making At the meeting were four theorists who helped develop the Higgs theory in the 1960s, including Peter Higgs himself, who could be seen wiping away tears as the announcement was made. Although preliminary, the results show a so-called five-sigma of significance, which means that there is only a one in a million chance that the Higgs-like signal the teams observed is a statistical fluke. "It's a tremendous and exciting time," said physicist Michael Tuts, who works with the ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC Apparatus) Experiment, one of the two Higgs-seeking LHC projects. The Columbia University physicist had organized a wee-hours gathering of physicists and students in the U.S. to watch the announcement, which took place at 9 a.m., Geneva time. "This is the payoff. This is what you do it for." The two LHC teams searching for the Higgs—the other being the CMS (Compact Muon, an elementary particle with a mass about 200 times that of an...

Words: 1764 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Cern Term Paper

...Particle Accelerator Since the evolution of advancement and science mankind always wondered about the existence of this universe and how it came into being. To answer these queries great scientists put forward many theories. Two most famous of them are “The Bing Bang Theory” and “The String Theory”. Nevertheless these are just theories. Therefore in order to prove them scientists at present using modern technology such as “The Large Hadron Collider” trying to stimulate what really happened at the beginning of time and space. This technology is also the Particle Accelerator as it accelerates particles such as Atoms at close to the speed of light. A Brief History of Time and Space “Is not He who created the heavens and the earth Able to create the likes of them?  Yes; and He is the Knowing Creator. His command is only when He intends a thing that He says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.” (Quran 36:81-82) The Big Bang theory states that around 12-15 billion years ago the universe came into existence from one single extremely hot and dense point, and that something triggered the explosion of this point that brought about the beginning of the universe. Matter was created along with its opposite antimatter. Time and space began at the moment of Big Bang. The Large Hadron Collider/ the Particle Accelerator The Large Hadron Collider is the largest and most powerful particle accelerator ever built. It was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) from 1998 to 2008, with...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Unit 3 College Writing

...The irony is that it’s everywhere, yet we can’t see ‘it’. We don’t know about its birth year or where ‘it’ exactly started. ‘It’ has had many definitions that have evolved from the ancient times to now. Aristotle defined ‘it’ as ‘the science of quantity’. But, as people dug deeper into ‘it’, they learnt new things and ‘it’ became more abstract. So people gave ‘it’ more logical and philosophical definitions. Bertrand Russell, a British mathematician, defined ‘it’ as ‘symbolic logic’. Walter Sawyer, another mathematician, defined ‘it’ as ‘the classification and study of all possible patterns’. Today, the encyclopedia defines ‘it’ as ‘the science of structure, order, and relation that has evolved from elemental practices of counting, measuring, and describing the shapes of objects’. This is the world of Mathematics. Where did it come from? Is it a human creation or is it a feature of the universe? Mathematics is undoubtedly one of the most important subjects known to man. It is artistic, exhaustive and sometimes even beautiful. But where did it come from? As we know, every science needs mathematics. Physics needs mathematics, chemistry needs mathematics, rocket science involves mathematics and so does the universal system of money. However, mathematics is the study of mathematics, which means that unlike the other sciences, it lacks an empirical component. One cannot see math happening. People might argue saying that if you had one person and if you cloned that person, you would...

Words: 1582 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

State of Matter

...Particle” What is the Higgs boson and the Higgs field? The Higgs field has been described as a kind of cosmic "treacle" spread through the universe. According to Prof Higgs's 1964 theory, the field interacts with the tiny particles that make up atoms, and weighs them down so that they do not simply whizz around space at the speed of light. But in the half-century following the theory, produced independently by the six scientists within a few months of each other, nobody has been able to prove that the Higgs Field really exists. Prof Higgs predicted that the field would have a signature particle, a massive boson. What would the world be like without the Higgs boson? According to the Standard Model theory, it would not be recognisable. Without something to give mass to the basic building blocks of matter, everything would behave as light does, floating freely and not combining with other particles. Ordinary matter, as we know it, would not exist. How long has the search gone on? Scientists have been looking for the Higgs since the 1960s, but the search began in earnest more than 20 years ago with early experiments at Cern in Europe and Fermilab in the US. Does finding the Higgs boson mark the end of the search? It's just the end of the beginning. Confirming the existence of the Higgs would only be the start of a new era of particle physics as scientists focus on understanding how it works and look for unexpected phenomena. How do you find a Higgs boson? To find the particle...

Words: 1561 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Types of Paragraph Development

...INFORMATICS INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE NORTHGATE CYBERZONE ALABANG, MUNTINLUPA CITY ASSIGNMENT IN TECHNICAL WRITING AND RESEARCH SUBMITTED BY: DATE: ELISEO, JOSEPH ALLAIN F. JULY 15, 2014 Types of Paragraph Narration * A narrative paragraph tells a story of one specific event. * The primary focus of the topic sentence is to identify the event or thought, including your stance on it. * A narration paragraph explains the significance of the event, purpose for writing the narrative and includes enough detail to engage the reader. * Normally chronological (though sometimes uses flashbacks) * A sequential presentation of the events that add up to a story. Example: Jesus and his disciples went to a farm nearby the Nazareth. Native people came to see him. Hearing the miraculous things that he has done, they believe He can also show things they never saw before. Jesus healed the people who was sick and tormented by the devil. He casted away the devil but it went to a pig near the farm. The people panic and got scared that they heave Jesus away. Description * Description is not what you saw, but what readers need to see in order to imagine the scene, person, object, etc. * This type of paragraph causes us to think in more detail about a person, place, event, or situation. * A definition paragraph works in both fiction and academic pieces. * When writing a definition paragraph, use specific examples and be thorough...

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Higgs Boson’s Conflict with Theology

...The Higgs Boson’s conflict with Theology Klynton Rhodes Georgia Southern University The Higgs Boson’s conflict with Theology A scientific discovery is also a religious discovery. There is no conflict between science and religion. Our knowledge of God is made larger with every discovery we make about the world. –Joseph H. Taylor Jr, God Evidence According to Steve Paulson (2010) “The debate over science and religion is like catnip for anyone wanting to spout off about the improbability of God or the arrogance of scientists”(p.1). Since I was young I remember being told that no matter what I learned in science class about evolution, or the big bang, that God was real. According to Dr. Agustin Fuentes of Psychology today “There are some factions of Christianity whose leaders (and thus their followers) express adamant opposition to “evolution” and this is often used as the key example in the science vs. religion conflict.” Examples of controversial scientific discoveries such as cloning, and genetic manipulation, are considered to be inhumane. In my opinion God created science for humans to better understand the world he created, and according to Steve Paulson (2010) Albert Einstein shared my belief demonstrated when he stated “ Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind” (p.3). It is well known that some people believe that the universe was started with the big bang as well as the subsequent reactions that followed. This brings into the discussion...

Words: 736 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Física de Partículas - Más Allá Del Átomo Cern Lhc John Ellis

...Física de partículas - Más allá del átomo CERN LHC John Ellis Bosón de Higgs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtBqyehjcNs Diego A. Correa Paredes 4020 Comienzan a mostrar unos átomos y nos cuestionan cuál será su futuro y que estos puede explicarnos mejor el universo, nos muestran a dos cientificos del CERN en Ginebra los cuáles dicen que el colisionador se abrirá y lo que intentará descubrir, posteriormente aparece el CERN y un hombre explicando lo que investiga el CERN y cual es su propósito, aparece el despacho de John Ellis, y el habla con un entrevistador, el cual le pregunta acerca de la materia y de lo que la gente se puede llegar a cuestionar con los descubrimientos de este mismo, John explica que es tienen un microscopio, el más grande del universo y que lo que hacen ahí es intentar comprender la materia y que con su microscopio pueden ver hasta el núcleo y que por eso dice que es el microscopio más grande, y explica como lo investigan y que propósitos se plantean antes de colisionar partículas, también quieren encontrar materia oscura y poder verla, posteriormente explica de donde proviene toda la materia ya que el entrevistador se lo pregunta, explica acerca de su “ADN cósmico” y que el gran enigma es que los cientificos dicen que la mayor parte de la materia del universo no puede verse ya que no emiten luz, y quieren saber por que la materia oscura no lo tiene, y...

Words: 1047 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Fraser

...How has the model of the structure of the atom changed over time? The idea of an atom was first conceived by the ancient philosophers of Greece. In the fifth century BC, Leucippus and his student Democritus suggested that there were small indivisible particles, which he called atoms – from the Greek atomos meaning ‘uncuttable’. This idea of atoms has been built on by many other scientists over hundreds of years. These scientists have drawn conclusions from a variety of different experiments. Some conclusions have been arrived at when scientists were researching other questions, and some ideas have been proven by designing a specific experiment. A model of the structure of the atom is still evolving today. Particle physicists are working at particle accelerators like CERN, on newly discovered quarks. In this task you will be researching one of the models to have been developed over the years to describe the structure of an atom. Task Your task is to produce a report into one of the different models of the atom that has been developed by scientists since 1890. Your research should be done online, using the web links provided below as well as any other credible sources you feel would be useful. Your report will be a written report and should include images and, where appropriate, diagrams of the experiments conducted. Your report should include: * Information about the key scientists who developed this model of the atom * A description of what they believed...

Words: 849 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Relativism

...presented in the lecture. Mainly knowledge is derived from facts and analysis people make. But facts themselves are relative as they are agreed on by a group of people, for example: water consists of H and O, but both hydrogen and oxygen are agreed to exist, and, probably, if some other scientists studied the contents of water, they would name these atoms differently, or maybe present the structure on a totally different way. The same relativity worked for an atom – some time ago people agreed and believed it to be the smallest indivisible particle. But later this agreement was understood to be wrong by the discovery of electrons and protons. The time passed and people found quarks. And now a new agreement is made by the acceptance of Higgs boson. In science the chain of accepted facts is endless, as the humankind is revealing more and more. On this point one could remember the definition of knowledge – “justified true belief”. Two words out of three show the relativity of knowledge. “Justified” – the knowledge should be justified by someone, and in the end is subjective, “belief” – not simply existing fact, but what a person or a society thinks. Even the word “true” has some uncertainty: although truth can be in only one form, it always depends on what people define as true and this understanding can change in time. Of course there are things that are defined as less or more relative (the things people agree on or things they are unsure of). But I do not think that some knowledge...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Dark Matter

...astro-ph/0301505 UMN–TH–2127/03 TPI–MINN–03/02 January 2003 arXiv:astro-ph/0301505v2 25 Jan 2003 TASI LECTURES ON DARK MATTER∗ KEITH A. OLIVE† William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA E-mail: olive@umn.edu Observational evidence and theoretical motivation for dark matter are presented and connections to the CMB and BBN are made. Problems for baryonic and neutrino dark matter are summarized. Emphasis is placed on the prospects for supersymmetric dark matter. 1. Lecture 1 The nature and identity of the dark matter of the Universe is one of the most challenging problems facing modern cosmology. The problem is a long-standing one, going back to early observations of mass-to-light ratios by Zwicky1 . Given the distribution (by number) of galaxies with total luminosity L, φ(L), one can compute the mean luminosity density of galaxies L= which is determined to be2 L ≃ 2 ± 0.2 × 108 ho L⊙ M pc−3 (2) Lφ(L)dL (1) where L⊙ = 3.8 × 1033 erg s−1 is the solar luminosity. In the absence of a cosmological constant, one can define a critical energy density, ρc = 3H 2 /8πGN = 1.88 × 10−29 ho 2 g cm−3 , such that ρ = ρc for three-space curvature k = 0, where the present value of the Hubble parameter has been defined by Ho = 100ho km Mpc−1 s−1 . We can now define a critical mass-to-light ratio is given by (M/L)c = ρc /L ≃ 1390ho(M⊙ /L⊙ ) (3) ∗ Summary of lectures given at the Theoretical Advanced...

Words: 19854 - Pages: 80

Premium Essay

The Endosymbiotic Theory: Cellular Theory

...conceptually against standard evolutionary theory. Although there are several older claims to this effect, Lynn Margulis’s conjectures about how endosymbioses can be interpreted as posing problems for neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. During the 1960’s, there was a lot going on historically. The Sixties was dominated by the Vietnam War, Civil Rights Protests, the 60s also saw the assassinations of US President John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Cuban Missile Crisis, and finally ended on a good note when the first man is landed on the moon. During the 1960’s, the Voting Acts Right was also enabled. There were many scientific discoveries throughout the world in the 1960”s. In Britain, in 1964, the first theory of the Higgs boson is put forward by Peter Higgs, a particle-physics theorist at the University of Edinburgh, and five other physicists. The particle is discovered in 2012 at CERN's Large Hadron Collider and its existence is confirmed in 2013. In the 1960’s, the English had their first use of sodium cromoglycate for asthma prophylaxis associated with Roger Altounyan. In South Africa, in the 1960's, Helikon vortex separation processis, an aerodynamic uranium enrichment process designed around a device called a vortex tube, developed the process, operating a facility at Pelindaba near Pretoria. The United States competed with all of this by diving deeper into the endosymbiotic theory. It was greatly evolved within the 1960’s. These were just a few of the leading scientific...

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Mackenzie

...Philosophy  144:  Introduction  to  the  Philosophy  of  Science     Professor  Andersen     Spring  2013   Monday  and  Wednesday,  12:30-­‐1:20PM   Blusson  9660     Email:  handerse@sfu.ca     Office  phone:  778-­‐782-­‐4851  (does  not  accept  messages)   Office:  WMX  5611   Office  hours:  Monday  10:30AM-­‐11:30;  Tuesday  1PM-­‐2PM;  or  by  appointment       Overview:  This  course  will  provide  an  introduction  to  issues  surrounding  the  history   and  philosophy  of  the  sciences.  We  will  consider  the  trajectory  of  how  science  as  we   now  think  of  it  came  to  be,  where  new  ideas  and  new  technologies  transformed  major   worldviews  into  what  we  now  recognize  as  the  beginnings  of  modern  science.  The   historical  part  of  this  course  will  begin  with  the  physics  of  Aristotle,  look  at  important   episodes  in  the  development  of  science  such  as  the  work  of  Copernicus  and  Galileo,   and  conclude  with  Newton  and  his  massive  achievement  in  creating  a  framework  for   modern ...

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Personal Change

...You better look up theory and see what it means, the concept of God or Godhood is a theory, "A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact." Notice that a scientific theory is a well- substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world. The bible says the same thing, we can prove the existence of God and eternal life though the study of nature. Romans 1:20 "For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse." You want to find God then look no further than the heavens, study the stars, the life and death of the Suns of God. How does a Son(Sun) of God become flesh? One of the last elements a Star produces before it dies is the carbon atom. As Stars go Supernova these atoms explode out into the Universe. We are carbon based life forms. Meaning the very carbon atoms that make up our being only came into...

Words: 1188 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Multiverse

...Mysteries of the Multiverse Name: Assif Khan Student no: Subject: PCS-181 The term multiverse has many nicknames including but not limited to quantum universes, alternate universes, alternate realities etc. But, what is the multiverse? If one was to look up the meaning of the word, the definition that is provided in the Oxford Dictionary states “a hypothetical space or realm consisting of a number of universes, of which our own universe is only one”1. The use of the term multiverse or its other moniker parallel universe, has been used in cosmology, physics, and philosophy to perhaps more prominently in science-fiction literature and movies for decades. Ever since Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding in the 1920s, there have been questions regarding the possibility of there being more than one universe. However, there has been no evidence to support the existence of multiverse. Interestingly, despite us humans being inherently logical beings, we still entertain the notion of multiverse which someone has yet to discover or observe. Why should the notion of having more than one universe than our own be any more valid than other scientific idiosyncrasies? As it turns out, the existence of parallel universes was not readily acceptable to physicists either. However, Eternal Inflations theory, String theory; which predicts the possibility of the existence of more than trillions of universes within multiverse as well as there being more than three dimensions...

Words: 1339 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Physicist

...Arturo Alcaraz  (Philippines) - Instrumental in a team of scientists, who in 1967 were able to harness steam from a volcano resulting in the production of electricity. Diosdado Banatao (Philippines) - Improved computer performance throughthe development of accelerator chips, helping to make the Internet a reality. Marie Curie (Poland) - Winner of two Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physicsfor her studies into Radioactivity and her discoveries of Radium and Polonium. Paul Dirac (England) - An important contributor in the fields of QuantumMechanics and Electro Dynamics, Dirac was co-winner of the Nobel Prize inPhysics (1933). Albert Einstein (Germany) - Arguably needing no introduction, the most famous scientist that lived and a name that has become synonymous in popular culture with the highest intelligence. Enrico Fermi (Italy) - Heavily involved in the development of the world's first nuclear reactor and his work in induced radioactivity saw him awarded with the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics. Vitaly Ginzburg (Russia) - One of three recipients of the 2003 Nobel inPhysics for their pioneering work in the theory of superconductors and superfluids. Christiaan Huygens (Netherlands) - Most well known for his wave theory of light, Huygens is credited with discovering the first of Saturn's moons. Werner Israel (Canada) - In 1990 Israel co-pioneered a study on black hole interiors. Ali Javan (Iran) - Born in Tehran, Ali Javan is listed as one of the top 100 living...

Words: 10739 - Pages: 43