Free Essay

Human Immortality

In:

Submitted By praxuss1
Words 1578
Pages 7
Jack Arnett
Technology in society
Controversy: Human Immortality The speculation and realization that within the next 50 years, it is possible to extend human life span indefinitely. The science is progressing faster than we can keep up with, and the very real possibilities are no longer something of science fiction, but rather science fact. There are many things to consider both pro and con on this subject. Some see it as a great achievement in human evolution and part of the natural progression of our race. Some see it to bring forth the very worst of society and that moral decay will spread, for no longer is the fear of death a factor to consider. There have been many movies and books on this subject, and I will explore the impact of a few of them on society. The ethical questions that are being asked are needed and to plan ahead for this event in human history will need to be closely considered and controlled. There is also religious considerations, will the religious community embrace or repulse this science? Does this make us more Godlike and are we competing with God by bending his natural ways? I will evaluate both sides of this controversy and leave you to decide based on the information I present. Ray Kurzweil, author of “The singularity is near” explores the possibility and firmly believes that the singularity is nearly here. The technological singularity is a hypothetical moment in time when artificial intelligence will have progressed to the point of a greater-than-human intelligence, radically changing civilization, and perhaps human nature. Since the capabilities of such an intelligence may be difficult for a human to comprehend, the technological singularity is often seen as an occurrence (akin to a gravitational singularity) beyond which the future course of human history is unpredictable or even unfathomable. Included in this technological boom would be the capability to extend human life. (Kurzweil, 2005) With the rate at which technology is progressing, it is not so farfetched to consider such a possibility. Many scientists are working towards the goal that will lead us to this, the first step is computers that can think, learn and evolve. That alone is cause for pause, and a subject all in its own. We are within a decade of reaching such technology at our current pace. Once this happens, computers will evolve all areas of science at a rate that Humankind cannot begin to fathom. The possibilities would then expand out in every field. We are on the nexus of the greatest expansion of technological growth in all of Human history. The cons against Human mortality and the singularity is a very long list. While at first thought, it seems to be a great thing, it has some very serious issues to consider. With the earth already reaching 10 billion people soon, there seems to be no sign of it slowing. If people stopped dying, and kept procreating, the world population would explode and our capabilities to sustain us would deplete extremely quick. If computers become so smart, would humans become less intelligent? Would the AI see us as inferior and destroy us? If humans live without fear of death, would there be decay in ethics and lead to a collapse of society? The society as we know it now would have to change drastically as well. Many things we take for granted today in society would change drastically with immortality. Things like marriage, child birth, education system, crime, punishment work and retirement just to name a few. There is also the fear of change in society. How hard would those who resist this technology push back on it? Will this lead to a war on technology? (Socrates, 2012) If we live this long with computers smarter then ourselves, what does that do for our relevance as a race? This technology presumes the role of God and will be met with resistance. Just because we can, should we? That is the big question to ask. The pros of this discussion create a shorter list, but a list that has far more reaching impact and possibilities. Immortality would mean a life without boundaries of time. We could grow as a race. Biological implants to work alongside of our biology would make sickness a thing of the past. We could enhance our memories and learning to work alongside with our computer counterparts. We could alter our looks, sex, and race on a whim. The real possibilities of a Utopian society could exist with the combined intelligence and wisdom of long lived people. No longer would famine, disease, shelter or wealth be a problem. The technologies to obliterate all those problems would make them all but a lost sad chapter of humankind. Freedom would have new meaning in a world where we could live to better society and not have to worry about the chains of short life spans. With the new technology, we could upload our memories for a backup in the event that our bodies are destroyed beyond repair to come back in a cloned body or to live in a virtual society. Will the future people of this world look back and think of us as we think of cavemen? We will see this one day; it’s just a question of when and how fast we will progress of fail to reach it. In society we both embrace it and fear it with our movies. Movies like James Cameron’s Terminator show the possibilities of technology gone amuck with the world computer network become self-aware and seeing humans as a threat and launches out a massive attack to destroy us. The road to immortality will have to pass a few big hurdles to become a reality. The movie by Andrew Niccol, “In time” looks at how society grants everyone immortality, but at the age of 25 they give you a life clock that counts down as you live. The time becomes virtual currency. Time is used to pay rent, buy food and is re-earned by work. This makes for a continuation of how we love life now. If your timer reaches 0, then you simply fall down dead. You live at the age of 25 forever locked into the same physical state until you expire. (Wikipedia, 2011) Would something like that be a way to stop abuses? Prevent moral decay? Or is it just another way for people to be exploited and we truly do not evolve as a race other than living younger and possibly longer. When I talk to people in general about the possibilities of living forever, I find myself surprised by how many people don’t want to do that. It seems to be deeply embedded in society that death is a natural part of life. I tend to argue back that progress is also a natural part of life, and yet they remain undaunted for the most part. Society needs to become aware of the likely future and how it will impact everyone. The singularity will bring about a new way of life both good and bad and many people will not know how to handle it. Religion is another major point to consider. There are billions of people of faith here on earth, and the act to playing god will not sit too well with most of them. Is this a problem that will work itself off as they naturally die off? Or will they resist and fight to stop it? Making immortality will have to remain a personal choice but I believe that as it becomes commonplace most of the people of faith will revise or abandon their faith in lieu of long youthful lives. Will the singularity be the end of God or will religion adjust? A war against technology would have to be fought with technology, and would be a bit hypocritical. I think the resistance would come in the form of passive resistance and wide spread teachings if there is to be resistance. In conclusion, the effects of human immortality are greatly uncertain and yet very intriguing. The road to get there is one of great uncertainty. If we can manage to survive our own technology, we have a great potential as a race. To know that you will live indefinitely and have your friends and family along with you, all while living youthful and healthy is indeed an exciting thing to consider. This technology would also work great with space travel as well. The time needed to reach distant stars could take hundreds of years, and the ability to live indefinitely would help us to settle and expand beyond our own planet. This technology, like any other, needs to be carefully regulated and controlled. World over population is something to consider and solutions to that need to be addressed. What solutions would work and not create new problems? One quote I like to close with is, “We live in an exciting time and yet, I am envious of what could be if I don’t live long enough to live forever.” Ray Kurweil.

Bibliography
Kurzweil, R. (2005). Technological Singularity. Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity
Socrates. (2012). Top 10 Reasons We Should Fear The Singularity. Retrieved from Top 10 Reasons We Should Fear The Singularity: http://www.singularityweblog.com/top-10-reasons-we-fear-the-singularity/
Wikipedia. (2011). In Time. Retrieved from In Time (movie): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Time

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Human Immortality In The Odyssey By Homer

...Scientific advances in the biological and medical fields have prolonged the average human lifespan by many years since the past century. New medicine and vaccines have saved the lives of billions of people. Scientists now know more about the human body than ever before in the history of mankind. Currently, scientists and researchers are tackling an ever so ambitious project: human immortality. Immortality is not a new idea; people have thought about it for ages, but never has immortality been so close to our grasp. In The Odyssey, by Homer, the state of being immortal has been criticized and looked down upon. The immortal afterlife is shown to be very boring and meaningless, conveying the ancient Greek philosophy that humans should not pursue...

Words: 691 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gilgamesh Research Paper

...Immortality Where did immortality come from? Immortality is viewed differently in each culture. One of the earliest cultures that mention the words of immortality was during the Babylonia period, and they were scribed on stone tablets from The Epic of Gilgamesh. Another culture that mentions immortality in the early years of civilization was in India. When did the human culture first discover the meaning of immortality? The meaning of immortality means different for each culture that has lived before us. One culture that believes in immorality as reincarnation is Buddhism. Buddha believes in reincarnation because there are stories on how Bodhisatta lived and reborn in different forms “while striving towards enlightenment” (Cianfarani...

Words: 962 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Sonnet 18 Analysis

...expands on the theme of immortality. The sonnet makes it clear that the individual’s beauty and vigor cannot be compared to commonplace nature and that the individual is something more than human. Sonnet 18 is part of the group of sonnets that is written to address men. In this particular one, Shakespeare compares the man’s beauty to that of nature, particularly a day in the summer. The first quatrain begins the extended metaphor by implying that the man being addressed has all the qualities of a summer’s day. This immediately associates the man with the sun and all of its qualities: he is strong, bright, and full of energy. However, by writing: “Though art more lovely and more temperate,” in line two, Shakespeare illustrates the fact that although the best thing nature has to offer, a summer’s day is far from perfect. The first shift happens in line three; the narrator stops talking about the man and begins pointing out the imperfections of summer. He employs vivid imagery to argue that summer’s beauty is hurt by “rough winds” and its “lease hath all too short a date,” (4). Shakespeare also adds that summer may sometimes be too hot, and other times its “gold complexion [is] dimm’d,” (5). This emphasizes the qualities of the man; he is not only more beautiful and serene than a summer’s day, but he is also untroubled by life’s obstacles, always stays perfect, and lasts longer than a day in summer. The last comparison is the first mention of immortality in the sonnet, but this...

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Plato vs. Christianity

...Christianity are no different; between the two ideas there are many similarities and differences that can be distinguished. Plato believed in the idea of immortality and dualism. He believed that the soul was immortal both before and after death, and that the body was mortal and ceased to function after death. Plato believed that your soul has always existed and always will, and that your embodied life as a human is just a small part of your existence. Plato believed that the disembodied soul was the highest form of survival because the immaterial realm of the forms is the highest form of existence. In other words Plato suggests that your embodied existence is not nearly as ideal as your disembodied existence. The basis of Christianity is bodily resurrection. Like Plato’s theory Christianity also believes in the cessation of bodily functions after death, and also believes that the soul does exist for a time disembodied. However in Christianity the soul begins at birth and is not immortal, it dies with the body, and then is resurrected after an unknown period of time by God. Christianity suggests the theory that people follow the Christian Doctrine of Predestination. This is essentially the theory that humans cannot chose whether they will be saved to heaven and from hell. It is the idea that some humans are chosen by God as elect, and some humans are damned by God. In other words; a person can do nothing about their predestination. The idea of predestination is not contingent upon status...

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

...Name: Thomson Levi’s Tutor: Dr. Francis Ochola Course: English Date: 23/10/2012 The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks In 1951, Henrietta Lacks, a poor young woman goes to the clinic for a physician to examine a perceived knot on her womb. The lady has been under pain for one year and explained the matter to the cousins; however, they did nothing until the pain became severe. The local physician had executed tests on syphilis that was negative, and advised her to visit the area main hospital for further medication. Unfortunately, she was diagnosed at Johns Hopkins Hospital with cervical cancer. In chapter 3, there is a presentation of medical conceptualization and treatment of cervical cancer, and description of the treatment of Henrietta at Johns Hospital. Dr. TeLinde at the Johns Hopkins was a leader researcher in this field, and interested in the demonstration of the then debate claiming noninvasive cervical cancer was merely invasive cancer. Cells were taken from her in the course of that exam and used without her consent in order to build up the first immortal cell line. In telling the story, the author draws from personal interviews and primary sources to offer insightful narrative accounts of the childhood of Henrietta, adulthood, her diagnosis, the illness, and tragic death. Rebecca expounds the HeLa’s birth and life and shows changes on the research concerning the realm of medical research, leading to both medical and scientific breakthroughs; however, also...

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Strongest Support of the Soul

...The Strongest Support of the Soul ——Appreciation of the eternal artistry in Ode on a Grecian Urn and Sailing to Byzantine Abstract: From the romantic poet John Keats to symbolical poet W. B. Yeats, both of them were persistently searching the eternity in the long journey of life. This paper tries to through the analysis of the two poems, Keats' Ode on a Grecian Urn and Yeats' Sailing to Byzantium to reveal the truth that the strongest support of the soul not lies in the empty and rapidly decayed body but relies on the eternal artistry which transcends the time and space. Although the former comes from the romantic imagination of an exquisite works of art---an ancient Grecian urn, the latter originates from the Byzantium which is the symbol of art, of eternity, both of them contain the similar life philosophy, that is the immortal life lies in the art of eternal. Key words: Ode on a Grecian Urn ; Sailing to Byzantium; eternal artistry; timeless Introduction Life is limited, yet it is possible to find the eternal life. Is it contradictory? How can life be limited as well as eternal at the same time? Could it be true that life has no ending? Actually, as we all know, no matter who you are, rich or poor, beautiful or ugly, smart or mediocre, eventually you will die. However, there is one thing will never die, which is not belong to this dusty world.—that is the eternal artistry. It is true that the art will never die. Only...

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Emily Dickinson Comparison

...or as a hopeless distraction. Dickinson portrays these contrasting views of death in her poems: “Because I could not stop for Death” and “I heard a Fly buzz- when I died.” Kreidler, Michele L. "Emily Dickinson "Because I Could Not Stop For Death." Literary Contexts In Poetry: Emily Dickinson's 'Because I Could Not Stop For Death' (2009): 1. Literary Reference Center. Web. 29 May 2014. Meyer, Michael. "The Study of Emily Dickinson." The compact Bedford introduction to literature: reading, thinking, writing. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2012. . Print Emily Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not stop for Death,” follows a woman’s passage from expiry into eternal life. The carriage that picks her up is a representation of immortality, while death is embodied as a gentleman that is taking a friend on a carriage ride. The driver “knew no haste” as they slowly drove. This personified version of death is kind and peaceful. As they continue on their trip, it is understood that death is a normal part of existence as they ride passed ordinary events of being; students playing, beautiful fields, and the setting sun. The conclusion of the poem is the speaker notes that since the coming of demise, centuries have passed and yet the experience of passing into perpetuity seemed fleeting. The voyage between death and eternity is explained as a calm and tranquil experience in this literary work. Nesmith, Christopher. "Dickinson's I HEARD A FLY BUZZ." Explicator 69.4 (2011):...

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Effects of Mass Media Has on American Pop Culutre

...Dear Jake, I am writing you to explain Simmias analogy to Socrates in Phaedo. Socrates presents his third argument for the immortality of the soul, called Affinity Argument, where he shows that the soul most resembles that which is invisible and divine, and the body resembles that which is visible and mortal. From this, it is concluded that while the body may be seen to exist after death in the form of a corpse, as the body is mortal and the soul is divine, the soul must outlast the body. Simmias draws an extended comparison between a human being and a musical instrument, the lyre. In Simmias analogy he says, the body is visible, composite and mortal. A harp is visible composite and mortal. When the harp is destroyed, the tune which is ethereal, invisible and divine is also destroyed. The soul is like a tune it is ethereal, invisible and divine. If the body is destroyed the soul cannot survive. The argument I believe Simmias is making to Socrates is that nothing can exist prior to the things which it was created from. Simmias argument talks about the body being a lyre and the soul being the body and the harmony being the soul. With this in mind he explains that if the lyre rots then the harmony must also change. In the same way if the body is ravaged by disease then the soul must also be destroyed. The question I believe Simmias is attempting to ask is how can the soul exist before the body? Simmias argument is that the soul is a harmony dependent on the body. If the body is...

Words: 463 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gcu Personhood Chart

...the question of personhood. Complete the following chart in the context of defining what it means to be human according to Christianity, Materialism, and your own Personal View. Refer to the assigned reading for explanation of characteristics listed on the left. | Christianity | Materialism | Personal View | Relational | The building block of the church, the community. | Relationships built off of materials for beneficence for someone. | I believe this is to be building a relationship with God and with those who will do you good. | Multidimensional | One believing or serving more than 1 God, believing in or seeing different dimensions such as the heavenly realms. | Humans are material objects because of their body parts (veins, blood, etc.). | I believe this is to be believing in multiple Gods. This is also how we act as a human which is important since we are seen as multidimensional. | Sexual | Part of human nature, not meant to be thought of as a defining human characteristic. | Modern attitude towards sexuality. | I believe this should wait until one is married but this is not realistic in today’s time. | Moral | One is aware they are were made in an Image of God and his application of laws come into effect such as different behaviors. | Society that excels in creativity. Values can only be mad made related to humans. | I believe this to be human rights, a description of obligations and what is right and wrong. | Mortal | A deadly sin. | Subject...

Words: 366 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Daodejing Characterization of Early Daoist Teachers

...mysterious. The early teachers of the Daodejing seemed to pass things down that was difficult for ordinary minds to comprehend as a way to get people to analyze and understand the world around them. Meanings encrypted in different ways and metaphors constantly used seem to be a common characteristic between the early teachers. Although they were oddly written, all of the passages seemed to give a basic insight on the early teachers’ perspective of things. The Daodejing characterizes common human weakness and meant to effect the way people think or react. Early teachers believed that the truth about the “human mind” can only be sought from within. Outside influences and worldly thing will not guide you to understand yourself. Based on the Daodejing, the early teachers also believed that the understanding of self is given as a gift from nature not acquired knowledge that you just so happen to stumble upon. The text of the Daodejing offers a practical way of life and dismisses any ideas of human immortality. These passages were intended to restore peace and harmony to a world that the early teachers believed was in disarray. The text stresses the importance of learning to resolve things naturally and to restrain from unnatural reactions. The Daodejing was written to explore the natural meaning and value of life itself. Daoist Teachings I see the Daoist teachings as effortless kind of go with the flow beliefs. When I read of the teachings and research the ways of a Daoist, it seems similar...

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Tuck Everlasting

...Cavite State University - Carmona Campus Carmona, Cavite Book Review HUMN 6 Tuck Everlasting Natalie Babbit Romero, Maria Lourdes N. BS Business Management 4 Ms. Sherry Rose Luya February 2012 Table of Contents Page Sypnosis 3 Summary 3 The Most Favorite Part 4 5 Sentences/Phrases 4 The Things Learned from the Book 5 Recommendation 5 Sypnosis This story is a fantasy about a family named Tuck who accidentally stumble upon a spring in a wood, which has the ability to give eternal life. They don’t realize at first what they have drunk until they realize that their bodies are not aging and they cannot be hurt or harmed in any way. They travel quietly around the countryside; never staying in one place too long so that people will not realize their secret. Into this family comes Winnie Foster, a little girl in search of freedom. She learns their secret and falls in love with them so deeply that she will do anything to protect them. The family and Winnie then must face a villain who would steal their secret for himself. Summary A ten year old Winnie comes from a well-bred and strait-laced family who keep her safe behind a four-foot iron fence that surrounds their home. She lives a life of boredom and frustration. They are the oldest family in the town, and...

Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Socrates’ Courageousness

...Anna Lin Exam 1 6/18/14 Socrates’ Courageousness Socrates should not be classified as a Sophist for many reasons. He did not take money from those whom he spoke to; sophists did not care if their conclusions were true, yet Socrates used his ways of dialectic to try to find the absolute truths and he tries to proof to people that the immortal soul exists that is why he does not fear death. Socrates tries to let people know that there is life after death by proving himself right; he is not afraid of death. For instance, “Socrates claims that the death is nothing more than the separation of the soul from the body and although some group of people denies it, the soul is immortal considering the cycle of life and death, the theory of recollection and the affinity argument” (Makaleler). Makaleler tells the audience that Socrates is so certain that the soul is immortal. He also says death is just the soul leaving the body, yet many people don’t believe what he says. People denies Socrates’ way of thinking is mainly because they are scared of changes, they fear the unknown of what exactly will happen to them when the soul leaves the body. This is a good example of why Socrates is not a sophist because if he was a sophist he would have collected money then tell people what they want to hear, as this quotes states people do not believe in him. Socrates is not trying to please anyone to get money, he is just stating what the divine voice had told him. Again, “The soul can be...

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Epic of Gilgamesh

...both works. Gilgamesh is blessed with a perfect body, beauty, and courage. “Two thirds they made him God and one third man” (Fiero 19). Job was blessed with flocks of animals, a large family, and protected land. Job is said to be “blameless and upright” (Fiero 34). Although blessed both men were pushed to their mental and physical limits to see what they were made of. “Job and Gilgamesh are tested by superhuman forces, and both come to realize that misfortune and suffering are typical of the human condition” (Fiero 37). Gilgamesh is tested when Ishtar, the Goddess of love, takes the life of his companion Enkidu for rejecting her affections for him. “Because I am afraid of death I will go as best I can to find Utnapishtim whom they call the Faraway for he has entered the assembly of the Gods” (Fiero 21). In result of his fear of death his worthiness for personal immortality is what’s tested. Gilgamesh embarks on his journey to conquer the test and obtain his goal of personal immortality. Job, on the other hand, is tested because his questionable fear of God. “But...

Words: 1717 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Hell Debate

...place that a person could ever go after they die. As everyone knows our beliefs are part of the good news of God. God wants us to love him freely, He loves us and wants to be loved in return. Love cannot be forced, it has to be given freely and hell represents the possibility of saying no to God finally. Hell is not God’s choice as much as it is ours. Hell is more about refusing life than suffering punishment, because God loves us even in his judging of us.[1] It has been said that hell is a spiritual and material furnace of fire where its victims are delicately tortured in their minds and in their bodies, by God, the devils, and damned humans including themselves. Harsh as it may seem, traditionalists see any challenge to this position as diminishing the glory of the divine judgment, taking away from the dignity of our immortality, and making hell less of a punishment than it actually is. Several critics to the traditional views to hell have come up with questions about the beliefs...

Words: 2658 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Miss

...Yet the speaker, Tithonus, is cursed to live forever. Tithonus tells Aurora, goddess of the dawn, that he grows old slowly in her arms like a “white-hair’d shadow” roaming in the east. Tithonus laments that while he is now a “gray shadow” he was once a beautiful man chosen as Aurora’s lover. He remembers that he long ago asked Aurora to grant him eternal life: “Give me immortality!” Aurora granted his wish generously, like a rich philanthropist who has so much money that he gives charity without thinking twice. However, the Hours, the goddesses who accompany Aurora, were angry that Tithonus was able to resist death, so they took their revenge by battering him until he grew old and withered. Now, though he cannot die, he remains forever old; and he must dwell in the presence of Aurora, who renews herself each morning and is thus forever young. Tithonus appeals to Aurora to take back the gift of immortality while the “silver star” of Venus rises in the morning. He now realizes the ruin in desiring to be different from all the rest of mankind and in living beyond the “goal of ordinance,” the normal human lifespan. Just before the sun rises, Tithonus catches sight of the “dark world” where he was born a mortal. He witnesses the coming of Aurora, the dawn: her cheek begins to turn red and her eyes grow so bright that they overpower the light of the stars. Aurora’s team of horses awakes and converts the twilight into fire. The poet now addresses Aurora, telling her that she...

Words: 509 - Pages: 3