Premium Essay

John Immerwahr: Article Analysis

Submitted By
Words 546
Pages 3
Today academic grading is nourishing debate concerning its affects on college students. In 2011, two articles addressing the debate of the considerations of grading. John Immerwahr, in his article “The Case for Motivational Grading,” argues that the purpose of grading to encourage student behaviors to improve theirs learning (335). Alfie Kohn, on the other hand, in his article “The Case Against Grades” suggests that grading is not the way to assess students learning. John Immerwahr and Alfie Kohn both present the keys, and continue the debate. John Immerwahr’s article “The Case for Motivational Grading” agrees with much of what Close says about questioning the grading practices. Despite that, Immerwahr argues that grading is more than providing

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Business

...ARTICLES A Kind Word for Theory X: Or Why So Many Newfangled Management Techniques Quickly Fail Michael P. Bobic Emmanuel College William Eric Davis Community College Southern Nevada ABSTRACT Forty-three years ago, Douglas McGregor’s The Human Side of Enterprise offered managers a new assumption of management (Theory Y), which would be more effective than what he considered then-current management assumptions (Theory X). While McGregor’s Theory Y model has been widely adopted in management literature as the preferred model, Theory X management still persists in practice. Moreover, many efforts to introduce management initiatives based on Theory Y have failed to reform the workplace or worker attitudes. While most explanations of these failures focus on training, implementation, or sabotage, this article proposes several defects in Theory Y that have contributed to these failures. Theory Y is based upon an incomplete theory of human motivation that erroneously assumes that all people are creative (and want to be creative) in the same way. Important research by Michael Kirton presents a different model of creativity that explains the failure of Theory Y and justifies Theory X as an important managerial theory and strategy. Theory X persists not because of circumstances or the nature of particular jobs, but because different people have personalities that respond to Theory X management better than to Theory Y management. But if the times and circumstances change, [a...

Words: 14544 - Pages: 59