...person can still be killed for a crime he/she did not commit. On top of this, it is both highly immoral and costly to execute criminals on death row. For these reasons, the death penalty is unethical and should be discontinued in the United States. The Bible states in multiple places that humans are forbidden to kill other humans. Matthew 5:21 says, "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment"("Shall Not Murder"). The Bible simply states that, as humans, one does not have the right to kill another human. There is no fine print saying whether it is right or wrong to kill someone after one has committed a crime. Humans have just been taking this matter into their own hands. God also states in the Ten Commandments that one shall not murder. In Mark 10:19, Jesus says, "You know the commandments: You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother"("Shall Not Murder"). These commandments are what we are supposed to be using as a guide for our lives in order to help us live a life to the best of our ability. Some might say that because the United States has no state religion that what the Bible has to say is irrelevant. What those people fail to understand is that a large...
Words: 1203 - Pages: 5
...someone else’s death, by administering a lethal injection or by some other means. Active euthanasia is morally wrong and I strongly object to it. For Christians, life is viewed to be sacred and the bible teaches, “Thou shall not kill.” Assisting someone else commit suicide is an act of killing the person, either by administering a lethal injection or by some other means. The bible teaches that killing another person is sin. With this basic understanding, Active euthanasia remains morally wrong in my opinion. Many argue that if a person so chooses to end his or her life or have someone else assist them in doing so, then it is morally permissible as long as no harm is done to others. Advocates of this argument fail to see the emotional stress people undergo in deciding to assist others commit suicide. This argument aims at elevating the individual right of the hopeless person rather than focusing on the damage Active euthanasia can cause the individuals assisting others. The family of the person requesting assisted suicide feels the grief of suicide more. As required by the laws of many states, family members are required to give consent to such request. Losing a love one through natural death is painful, losing a love one through assisted suicide compounds that pain as family members are left with the emotional turmoil from the trauma. The American Medical Association policy states, “The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another -mercy killing -...
Words: 403 - Pages: 2
...I support the death penalty for different reasons. One reason is I believe that anybody that kills someone does not deserve another chance at life. I think the death penalty should be used for people who are 100% guilty for murdering someone or someone who repeat the same felony more than once. If someone can kill, torture, or harm someone then they should not have the right to the things they get in prison. The murderer and the felonies would have to stay in prison for the rest of their life and it would cost a lot more to keep them alive. The prison has to provide food, electricity, water, and somewhere to live with air conditioning in the summer and heat in the winter. It is also possible that they could kill someone else in the cell. Also the death...
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...Is capital punishment to violent and inhuman to think of? Do you believe that capital punishment should be abolished without question? Should a man or woman not receive the same punishment as they committed? Is it better to kill a person or allow them to sit in prison for there whole life? What do you think is right, what do you think America needs to do about capital punishment? Capital punishment dates back to the eighteenth century B.C. in the code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. At this time only twenty five crimes were punishable by death. These crimes were carried out by crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive and impalement. As you can tell capital punishment has been around for a long, long time and probably not going anywhere (DPIC). Do you know when the first form of capital punishment was performed on North American soil? The first execution in the colonies was that of Captain George Kendall. The execution took place in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608. Captain Kendall was executed for being a spy for Spain. From there on out, capital punishment continued throughout the colonies. The crimes punishable by death varied for colony to colony (DPIC). Today, there are around fifty countries that still use the death penalty. One of these countries is the United States of America. The United States has condemned over a ten thousand people to the death penalty since its beginning. Should the United States continue with the death penalty or should it...
Words: 1339 - Pages: 6
...First Degree, euthanasia is a way to end someone’s life by using lethal injection while he/she is in a serious disease condition and incurable. In his article, Buzzel also said that there are two kinds of euthanasia; first is passive euthanasia which is allowing someone to die by doing nothing when she/he has terminal disease, and second is active euthanasia which is making fast a death of someone who is in a terminal disease. Therefore, passive euthanasia is not actually wrong, but active euthanasia is a murder and it should be against because it’s unethical. So, I also disagree with euthanasia, especially active euthanasia, because my religion, Islam, said that life is in God’s hand, nobody can takes it easy. Some people interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable suffering. Euthanasia can belonging to suicide. Many people believe that suicide should be a criminal offence. Especially in sector religion, most religion disapproves of euthanasia. I am a moslem, so I disagree with euthanasia, because my religion said that life is in God’s hand, life is sacred. In Al-Quran, (Al-Maidah: 32), Allah said that whosoever kill a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Another reason why euthanasia sould...
Words: 581 - Pages: 3
...SOC: 101 Introduction to Sociology The Death Penalty: Is It a Crime Deterrent? The death penalty is morally permissible punishment for those who kill. Intentionally taking the life of an innocent victim is so malicious that in short supply extenuating circumstances, the murderer surrenders his or her own right to live and society is justified in sentencing him to die. Every year more people are convicted and sentenced to death row. Many are executed. Once a jury has convicted a criminal of an offense they go to the second part of the trial, the punishment phase. If the jury recommends the death penalty and the judge concurs then the criminal will face a form of execution, lethal injection is the most common form used today. There was a period from 1972 to 1976 that capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court (Honeyman & Ogloff, 1996). Their reason for this decision was that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. The decision was reversed when new methods of execution were introduced (Honeyman & Ogloff, 1996). The Gallup pole lists public opinion of the life without parole as compared to the death penalty 48% versus 47% (Stop killing, 2007). Capital punishment is a difficult issue and there are as many different opinions as there are people. There are many murders each year. Does the death penalty create a deterrent for these criminals...
Words: 1499 - Pages: 6
...suicide: a bad way to die In “Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: It`s Murder in the First Degree” Autumn Buzzell explain that euthamnasia is ending person`s life with a lethal injection because the person has terminal ill. Euthanasia is divided in two types : passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is a condition where a doctor does not a action to prevent death. In Other side, active euthanasia is where doctor do act causes death like a lethal injection. Active euthanasia is exactly wrong. It same like murdered or homicide. According to the fact, euthanasia should not be permitted in each country because it is unethical. Therefore euthanasia against in the law of nation and the law of heart. There are many reason against euthanasia such as in religious arguments, euthanasia is against the world and will of god (BBC: 2013). Religious people believe that every human being is the creation of God. Our lives is not only for us to do with as we see fit. Kill one self or allowing someone to do it, is deny God and to deny God`s right over our lives and his right to choose the length of our lives and the way our lives end. Beside that religious people argue that believers never wanna death unnatural because it will ruin their faith. In Islamic religion euthanasia is illegitimate. In Al-Qur`an says: "And whoever kills a believer intentionally, then return is Hell, there in he is eternal and God was angry with him and curse him and provides punishment for him (An-Nisa`:93)...
Words: 441 - Pages: 2
...CAPITAL PUNISHMNET: THE RIGHT TO KILL Capital Punishment: The Right to Kill Debra Gonzalez University of Phoenix Axia Capital Punishment: The Right to Kill Capital punishment has been a source of debate since its inception; the public continues to dispute this highly controversial issue. A struggle exists between Americans who are fighting for a safe and secure society and those individuals who want to abolish the death penalty. Capital punishment may be a controversial subject; however, it is a critical issue that must be addressed in today's violent society. Many people can not decide if the death penalty provides the necessary punishment and deterrent effect that is needed for criminals but, capital punishment is an aspect of criminal sentencing that needs to be evaluated. The United States Supreme Court judgment in Furman vs. Georgia in 1972 came to the decision that the death penalty was a violation of the eight amendment because of the inconsistent manner by which it was carried out. However, in the 1970s, 34 states across the nation ratified new legislation on capital punishment that met the standards set by the Supreme Court. The most significant change in the history of death penalty cases transpired when United States legislators and the Congress passed what is now know as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act .This made a capital punishment sentence possible for various federal crimes. Across this Nation there were approximately...
Words: 2408 - Pages: 10
...same done to them. Meaning if someone kill someone, they have to be killed the same way they killed that person. Do you agree or disagree? What are your feelings or saying with this. I don't like it at all! First of all, it really hard for me to say whether i agree or not on An Eye for an Eye. I do feel that the person who committed the crime should be punished. But should not killed the same way he killed that is so someone is disgusting. I mean after all he, or she is still a human. Meaning they have feeling. Even when the person say they don't care about life. They think they don't. But inside they really do! I think they should be thrown in prison for a really long time. Probably the only way they will learn. But there is a chance that prison cant help them. Prison is not a place for a human being. It makes you go insane!...
Words: 606 - Pages: 3
...British medical journal The Lancet, a team of medical researchers found serious flaws in how lethal injections were being administered, causing extreme suffering to the prisoners being executed. The report found “that in 43 of the 49 executed prisoners studied the anesthetic administered during lethal injection was lower than required for surgery. On December 13, 2006, Angel Nieves Diaz was the victim of a botched execution so terrible that it led Florida’s Republican Governor and death penalty enthusiast Jeb Bush to issue an executive order halting executions in the state. On December 13, 2006, Angel Nieves Diaz was the victim of a botched execution so terrible that it led Florida’s Republican Governor and death penalty enthusiast Jeb Bush to issue an executive order halting executions in the state. Technicians wrongly inserted the needles carrying the poisons that were to kill Diaz. The caustic chemicals poured into his soft tissues instead of his veins, as intended. This left Diaz struggling and mouthing words in pain for over 34 minutes, when a second set of needles were inserted. The county medical examiner found 12-inch chemical burns inside both of his arms after the execution Sounds like a pasted sleeping like a baby. This is not the only time this has happen. In 2007, executions are on hold in over a dozen states and botched executions have put the lethal injection...
Words: 608 - Pages: 3
...argue against the death penalty. Although this is a sound reason to be against this, it is not the death penalty that is at fault. The one who are at fault are the ones who place the victims there in the first place. The system that is in charge of condemning criminals to death needs to be developed and worked on to be more accurate results.(Acknowledge/Refute + Ethos). Right now it is the achilles’ heel to the whole idea of the death penalty.(Allusion). With having this as a weakness it is obvious that mistakes are going to be made. Actual progress is in the far future anyhow, and humans will never be perfect, yet, prosecuting more of those who ‘do’ deserve it is the goal. A life is a small price to pay if that life is meant to save other lives. So it is clear that although the bible says, "thou shalt not kill", but the death penalty should be allowed for one main reason. And that is that the death penalty would be preventing them from killing other people.(Restated Thesis/Key...
Words: 927 - Pages: 4
... etc. These principles are the foundation of how nursing care is structured and carried out. When these principles are dismissed, the individual is no longer acting as a nurse. In the decision scenario 8, Shawn is acting as an executioner rather than a nurse. Shawn’s job is to kill people by lethal injection. Shawn’s job description does not state he should organize a plan of care around the patient’s wishes nor does it...
Words: 926 - Pages: 4
...death penalty, also including any counter arguments that can be used for a use of the death penalty. The arguments made in this essay for death-penalty abolition are its devaluation of human life, eliminating of the possibility for revenge, its violation of human rights, as well as including the view of religious groups. This essay argues that all of these arguments address that human life cannot be taken away from a person, even if the person is a murder, simply because then the society is not being better than the murder him- or herself. I have investigated many research and scientific studies in order to back up my arguments as best as possible. Furthermore I have also investigated into the methods of death penalty, such as lethal injection. This essay views practice of capital punishment as an expression of anxiety about safety, in particular it counteracts the argument that death penalty would deter any future crime, and terrorist attacks. I also looked up numbers in order to show how costly death penalty is, in order to emphasize that there are more cheaper and less inhumane methods to sentence a murder. I also draw attention to countries that use death penalty as a way to eliminate any enemies, using it as a political weapon to silence any troublesome individuals. I suggest that every life is valuable, and that death penalty does not consider the risk of killing an innocent person, but rather emphasize that killing one innocent people, saves the lives of many. In the conclusion...
Words: 2476 - Pages: 10
...LETHAL INJECTION IN CALIFORNIA. Lethal injection involves injecting a person with drugs for the purpose of killing that person. This procedure is also known as capital punishment. It kills the person by putting the person to sleep, followed by stopping of breath then eventually the heart. Usually a barbiturate, paralytic and potassium solution is used. Lethal injection was declared unlawful in California by Jones V Chapel a federal judge in on July 16, 2014. A former NFL star had his family murdered in 1984 by gang members one night in Los Angele's. Kermit Alexander was full of rage that he prowled the streets to find the killers and exact revenge. The only reason he stopped was because the then mayor Tom Bradley made him promise that he would...
Words: 833 - Pages: 4
...statement that Capital Punishment should very well be abolished. Throughout its lifetime, Capital punishment has seemed, in many cases to be the most sane and respectable thing to condemn on a person, deserving of such direct discipline. For example, a case held in 1977 that had eventually resulted in the accused's death, was the case of Coker v. Georgia, an alleged murderer, and rapist. In 1974, he was given several sentences on murder, rape and assault charges. He then 3 years into his sentence, escaped Georgia prison, and after breaking into the home of Allen and Elnita Carver, raped Elnita, and stole the family’s vehicle. Cover was convicted of rape, armed robbery, and other offenses, and in June of 1977, was put to death via lethal injection. It was spread over a total span of 4 months and 1 day, and it became the backbone of many cases, like the 2007 Kennedy v. Louisiana case. This case, like the majority of others similar to it, is one people would have a hard time disagreeing with, and most definitely puts...
Words: 1147 - Pages: 5
