Introduction
I find this question to be asked when bring the state law also the federal law into this matter to law enforcement. Is the fact that the laws do not state that being married is grounds for the laws to be broken with the law for kidnapping? Are more than guidelines for which the laws happened to made to protect anyone that happens to be kidnapped?, With the disregard for the laws being in black and white they are faulted to fail cause of the simple term used is marriage so the laws cannot be broken.
My research topic is the misuse of the law for kidnapping when who are married. The terms I took a look at are of the five W's which are who, what, when, where, and why. The two states that I am going to be using are Florida and Louisiana …show more content…
The police first ask you if you are married and if custody is in effect and if no custody is not in play they won’t enforce the law even when who look up the laws. Regarding the context of the laws of the state that you live in, for me Florida, and my wife Kayleigh lives in Louisiana, both of the states have differences in contexts of the laws that they carry. Also the laws carry differences of sentencing for the law of the state you live in. All of the contents will state the content of the laws which with the police fail to uphold the law, even if they read the laws there is no a gray area for misuse of the contexts. Most contexts of the laws states in a synopsis and a quick overview is concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child's other parent or another family member. Violated rights may include, for example, custody and visitation rights. Unfortunately, thousands of children are abducted by a parent and removed from the other parent without any knowledge of what is going on with the child. Unfortunately this does not only harm the targeted parent this also harms the child, depending on the age of the child. To undo the harm because of the time the parent that caused the kidnapping will also sometimes cause the child to be unknown to mislead the child in false security and the targeted parent sometimes does not know what to do, when …show more content…
The advantage of turning a custody agreement into a court order is that the court can force the parties to follow it.
If there is no custody order, both parents have an equal right to custody, and either can lawfully take physical possession of the child at any time. However, taking the child away without the other parent’s consent can be held against you in court if that action was not reasonable. If the other parent takes the child and you cannot work out an agreement for the return of the child, you can file a custody case and ask the judge to order the child returned.
With this the other effect of this is the child can be brain washed by the other parent. Cause the child would not know what is going on with their father or mother this is very worrying for the child. The fact that courts can take a lot of time to settle cases for the child the other effect is the child could have PTSD due to not knowing the other parent. What causes that is by the time court is done with the case the parent could have made it easy to teach the child whatever they want pretty much brainwashing the child into believing what they want the child to believe that is why this is very hard for the child when the case is over. Because they will think that the other parent is a stranger in their life and will not know how to handle