Free Essay

Levels of Corporate Planning and Innovation

In:

Submitted By learner10
Words 2916
Pages 12
LEVELS OF CORPORATE PLANNING AND INNOVATION
Name:
Institution:
Date:

Executive Summary

One student in an Executive MBA class based his response on introduction of a self scanner in checkout terminals in a British supermarket to an assignment that required them to link a significant innovation that an organisation had introduced with strategic change in the organisation. The student failed the assignment. This report will examine the reasons why the student failed by looking at the differences between strategic, tactical and operational planning. The report analyses what causes the strategic changes in an organisation and what qualifies as strategic change. The report also discusses innovation and the different levels of innovation. This report also discusses whether the student was right to classify self-scanner checkout terminals as a significant innovation that could be linked to strategic change in the organisation.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 2

1 Introduction 4

1.1 Business Policy 4

1.2 Strategic Change 4

2 Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning 5

2.1 Statement of the Objective 5

2.2 Differences between Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning 5

3 Innovation 8

3.1 What is Innovation? 8

3.2 Impact of innovation on growth strategies 10

4 Conclusion 11

Introduction

This report will identify reasons the student failed his assignment by looking at the levels of planning and strategic change as well as innovation. The first part of this report discusses in detail the three levels of planning: strategic, tactical and operational planning. The characteristics of each type of planning are given and comparisons are made. Clear differences and distinctions are made among these types of organisational planning while trying to place the case given in the right level. The interconnections between the three levels of planning are also discussed. The second part of this report defines innovation. The levels of innovation are identified. Lastly, the report discusses the impact of innovation on the growth strategies with reference to the Joseph Schumpeter’s concepts.

1 Business Policy

A business policy can be defined as a set of principles and rules of action that lead an organisation to successfully achieve its specific objectives (Sekhar 2011). It therefore follows that; a good business policy must relate the business objectives to the personnel and the physical factors surrounding the organisation. It must help the top level management in the formulation of rules and regulations that guide the lower levels of the organisation. A good policy should also be based on facts, should be feasible to implement and it should supplement the overall corporate planning.

2 Strategic Change

Sekhar (n.d) defines strategic change as a process whereby an organisation alter its goals, procedures, objectives and strategies to become competitive and how these changes when used in totality or partially enables the organisation to adapt and be viable in the ever changing business environment. Changes are further classified into three kinds i.e. re-engineering, restructuring and innovation. Business process reengineering aims to improve the existing business processes by their increasing effectiveness and efficiency. Innovation refers to the process through which an organisation utilises the skills and resources available to them to come up with new products, services and technologies so as to satisfy the changing needs of the customer (Sekhar n.d.). According to Ahlemann, Stettiner, Messerschmidt and Legner (2012) strategic changes focuses on the improvements of the business performance.

Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning

1 Statement of the Objective

One student in an Executive MBA class failed his assignment when he based his response on introduction of a self scanner in checkout terminals in a British supermarket to an assignment that required them to link a significant innovation that an organisation had introduced with strategic change in the organisation. This discussion will revealed the reasons which I think caused him to fail. First the focus will to examine whether the introduction of the self scanner could be classified as a strategic change. Secondly, the self scanner checkout terminals will be analysed to determine if it can be classified as a significant innovation.

2 Differences between Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning

O’Regan and Ghobadian (2002) define strategic planning an attempt by a company to change its strengths in relation to its competitors in an effective and efficient way. The strategic plan will focus on the actions necessary to improve the company’s performance. Toor and Dhir (2011) identify integrated business planning process as the planning function of the company that aims at improving the financial performance as well as the organisation’s alignment. The integrated planning process will connect strategic planning to tactical and operational planning in all the levels of the organisation. Therefore, it follows that strategic planning involves the broad future of the organisation’s performance and it usually focuses on the entire organisation. The link formed among strategic, tactical and operational planning is such that the strategic planning is overall and the other plans are under it. The success of a strategic plan relies on the multilevel involvement of the other levels of planning i.e. tactical planning is charged with translating strategic plans into specific goals of the organisation while operational plans translate tactical plans into specific goals and actions.

Figure 1: A diagram showing the multi-level involvement among the three types of plans in an organisation.

[pic]

Source: (Hitt, Black & Porter 2005).

According to DuBrin (2010) strategic plans come up with master plans that shape the organisation. This planning is carefully considers the external environmental demands and external resources e.g. competition and changes in customer taste and preferences. For example, after careful research, the top management may decide to introduce a new line of product in a bid to expand its market share or to capture a market that has been evasive to the organisation in the past. Once the strategic planning is done the tactical planning comes up with specific plans and goals that are relevant to the organisation and show support to the strategic plans. This level of planning will also provide details on how to make the business unit competitive in the market (DuBrin 2010). On the other hand, operational planning will identify the specific actions and procedures that are required in the day to day running of the organisation. In the example where the company has to introduce a new line of products, the operational plans will be drawn according to the details present in the tactical plans. The details on how to make the product attractive to the customer are made here.

In this view the introduction of the self-scanner checkout terminal in a British supermarket will not fall under strategic planning but under operational planning. The strategic plan that the supermarket may be seeking to fulfil could be to improve on its customer service in a bid to increase the customer satisfaction. Alternative, the supermarket may have strategic plans to cut down on the costs in a bid to improve on its performance. If the strategic plan is to increase customer satisfaction then the tactical planning may suggest ways by which this can be achieved. The operational planning the being the hands on stage then takes the plan into action by introduction of the terminals. In the second scenario if the strategic plan aims at reducing costs of doing business, the tactical and operational plans might come up with ways though which this can be done. Operational plans may include cutting down the number of employees and specifically introduce the self-scanner which lower the number of employees needed.

Strategic planning determines the nature and extent of an organisation’s diversity (Griffin 2012). It is also right to argue that the strategy plans adopted by an organisation determine its diversification i.e. single product strategy, related diversification and unrelated diversification. They are the most complex and general as the focus on the whole organisation, all sectors, departments and all units. This level of planning involves top level management and it reflects the position where the organisation is to be 3-5 years in the future. They act as a framework or guide to the lower levels of planning. On the other hand, tactical planning deals with specific parts of the organisation and the middle level managers are involved in this level of planning. They take a shorter time frame than strategic plans of between 1 and 2 years into the future. They are not as broad as the strategic plans nor are they as complex but they are more specific because the range of application is more limited. It is their responsibility and function to oversee that the lower level departments fulfil their part in the achievement of the strategic plan.

Consequently at the operational planning focus is narrower and less complex than tactical and strategic planning as they deal with departments or smaller units in the organisation, for example production, inventory, equipment, processes of business among others (Griffin 2012). However, they are very detailed, involve the lower level managers. They usually focus on more or less one year into the future.

Ahlemann, Stettiner, Messerschmidt and Legner (2012) show the impact of changes in both strategic and operational planning as the following; strategic changes are big and their impact is felt throughout the company and possible in the external environment. On the other hand operational changes are small and their impact is only felt in the unit of the organisation and barely felt beyond the organisation. Strategic changes will focus on the improvement of the business performance and the realisation of the organisation objectives while operational changes focuses on excellence and risk management (Ahlemann, Stettiner, Messerschmidt & Legner 2012). When considered in this light, the introduction of the self-scanner terminals will only bring an impact on the efficiency and excellence up to the operational level of the supermarket. The impact of this innovation will not on its own bring about achievement of organisation’s goals or improvement in performance.

Innovation

1 What is Innovation?

Griffin (2012) defines innovation as the managed efforts by an organisation to come up with new products i.e. goods and services or get new customers for existing goods and services. Innovation is classified in two categories i.e. managerial innovation/reengineering process, and technical innovation. Management innovation is the change in the process of management through which goods and services are designed, produced and delivered to the customers. Under technical innovation there are two major innovations: process innovation and product innovation. Product innovation is the changes in the physical attributes of existing goods and services or the creation of completely new brand of goods and services. Process innovation entails changes made in manufacturing, creating and distributing processes of goods or services (Griffin, 2012).

Andriopoulos and Dawson (2009) define innovation as a process through which a new element is made available to the market or introduced within an organisation to bring change to the status quo. Innovation is distinguished from creativity in that creativity comes first and forms the bases by providing the new idea on which the innovation is later based. There are three levels of innovation depending on the impact the have on the organisation. The first level is incremental innovations which refer to all the changes of small magnitude that are based on the existing knowledge and capabilities (Andriopoulos and Dawson, 2009). This level of innovations will involve modifications and improvements to goods and services. Considering the activities carried out in this level of innovation, it can be considered to be in the operational level of the organisation. The second level of innovations is the modular innovations which refer to innovations in the middle range. The third level is the radical innovations which introduce new ideas to take the place of existing ideas and knowledge that has become obsolete. The adoption of the radical innovation will bring about changes in the organisations. The changes can be strategic, tactical and operational.

When viewed in this light then it is right to argue that the student was wrong in viewing introduction of self- scanners as a significant innovation. This is because the changes that would result from the introduction could only be viewed as operational changes and not strategic changes.

2 Impact of Innovation on Growth Strategies

In a bid by the organisation to gain a competitive advantage over its competitors a continuous process of innovation and creativity has developed (Medearis 2004). Economist Joseph Schumpeter referred to the constant innovative state of the capitalist economy as creative destruction because he could see the negative effects of uncontrolled innovation and creativity. According to Schumpeter’s theory new productive combinations i.e. new products, new ways of production, marketing and distribution, were needed to stimulate development in the economy.

A study carried out by Cainelli, Evangelista and Savona (2004) concludes that innovation is an important aspect to be considered when explaining the economic performance of an organisation. Organisations that support innovation were found to have better productivity and higher economic growth levels than the organisations which do not support and embrace innovation. The extent, to which an organisation supported innovation efforts, for example through the allocation of resources for innovation purposes, is reflected in the productivity differential levels and the growth rate exhibited by the organisation. Tsai (2003) states that innovations have both positive and negative impacts which are often unanticipated and these effects often go beyond the issue that they were meant to solve. Technological innovations could be used to demonstrate the positive and negative impact of innovations to an organisation’s processes. The global market is dynamic such that the economy is shifting from the traditional model of business to e-business models. Businesses that ignore technological innovations are quickly losing their competitive advantage. Other negative impacts to these innovations are organisational inertia and resistance to change.

Reati and Toporowski (2009) point out those western economies have undergone four long waves and currently the fifth wave is in force. It is important to note that the trigger for these waves is radical innovations. The first wave was triggered by the industrial revolution. The second originated in the steam power age. The third was from the era of electrical and heavy engineering, the fourth from the era of mass production and finally the current long wave has been triggered by the computerisation of all areas of the economy (Reati & Toporowski 2009). This argument supports Joseph Schumpeter’s concept of creative destruction which points out that change is not random but occurs in radical innovation clusters that form revolutions which improve and develop the productive structure.
Therefore, could the self-scanner trigger many changes as with the innovations discussed above? The answer to this question is no, which further proves that the student failed when he classified the self-scanners as a significant innovation.

Conclusion

A successful business is one which meets the set objectives goals that it has set. These goals and objectives are of great importance such that the policies, plans and processes in the organisation are required to reflect these goals and objectives. As noted by Sekhar (n.d.) the business environment is ever changing and therefore in order to remain relevant the company should change its policies, process, strategies and goals accordingly. This need to change in order to remain competitive gives rise to strategic change. The organisation has three types of planning i.e. strategic, tactical and operational planning. Strategic, tactical and operation planning are formulated by top level management, middle level management and lower level managers respectively. Strategic planning focuses on the broad future of the organisation. The plan is broad and general. For strategic planning to succeed, there exists a link with the other levels of planning. Tactical plans convert strategic planning into specific goals for the organisation while operational planning convert tactical plans into goals and actions that are more specified. (DuBrin 2010) refers to strategic plans as master plans while Toor and Dhir (2011) view it as the organisation’s attempt to improve its effectiveness and efficiency by focusing on its strengths.

Businesses exist in an environment that keeps changing. To ensure that they remain competitive, they strive to come up with new goods and services that satisfy the customer changing preferences and help the organisation to capture a new market. Research has shown that organisations that embrace innovations perform better than those that do not support innovation.

References

Ahlemann, F, Stettiner, E, Messerschmidt, M, & Legner, C 2012, Strategic enterprise architecture management challenges, best practices, and future developments. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. .

Andriopoulos, C, & Dawson, P 2009, Managing change, creativity and innovation. London, Sage.

Cainelli, G, Evangelista, R, & Savona, M 2004, 'The Impact of Innovation on Economic Performance in Services', Service Industries Journal, 24, 1, pp. 116-130, Hospitality & Tourism Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 3 April 2013.

DuBrin, A J 2010, Essentials of management. Australia, South-Western. Viewed 3 March 2013

Griffin, RW 2012, Fundamentals of management. Mason, OH, South-Western Cengage Learning.

Hitt, M A, Black, S & Porter, L M 2005, Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kingston, W 2006, "Schumpeter, Business Cycles and Co-evolution", Industry and Innovation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 97-106.

Medearis, J 2009, Joseph A. Schumpeter. New York, Continuum.

Reati, A, & Toporowski, J 2009, An economic policy for the fifth long wave. PSL Quarterly Review.Vol. 62, pp. 248-251, viewed 3 April 2013,

Sekhar, GVS (n.d.). Business policy and strategic management. [S.l.], I K International Publishers.

Tsai, HL 2003, Information technology and business process reengineering new perspectives and strategies. Westport, Conn, Praeger, viewed 2 April 2013, .

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Week 3 Knowledge Check Phl/320

...Week 3 Knowledge Check Study Guide Concepts Mastery Areas in which people are Score: 20 / 21 Questions 100% 1 2 3 100% 4 5 6 Strategic planning 100% 7 8 9 Levels of planning 67% 10 11 12 The creative process 100% 13 14 15 100% 16 17 18 100% 19 20 21 creative Ingredients for enhancing innovation at work and approaches to innovation Obstacles to corporate innovation Barriers to effective decision making Concept: Areas in which people are creative Mastery 100% Questions 1 2 3 1. Ramona, a member of the innovation team at Buzzer Co., a beer manufacturing company, suggests that the company use the spent grain generated through the process of beer manufacturing to create commercial products. Ramona explains how the wasted grain can be broken down through the process of fermentation to generate biogas and compounds that can be used to make personal care products and clothes. In the context of William Miller's research, into which area is Ramona channeling her creativity? A. Organization creativity B. Relationship creativity C. Event creativity D. Material creativity Correct: The Correct Answer is: D. In the context of William Miller's research, Ramona is channeling her creativity into the area of material creativity. Material creativity entails discovering new uses and inventing materials for services, products...

Words: 2503 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

3m Corporation

...practical. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Corporation (3M) is one of the companies that have successfully implemented differentiated product strategy that gives priority to innovation as a competitive advantage offered. This company believes that innovation to be the cornerstone of 3M’s future success. Current management has continued to embrace and expand these policies and philosophies. That is why researchers interested in evaluating policies and 3 M that philosophy is based on the innovation in the implementation of the strategy of differentiation 2. Motivation Motivation researchers conducted a study of control for differentiated strategies in Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Corporation (3M) because the researchers wanted to know more about the factors that influenced the design of the system and also the policies and philosophy rooted in the innovations made by 3M Corporation. By studying and examining the existing policy and philosophy that is rooted in innovation from the company, researchers can get a clearer picture of how to do a proper evaluation and what steps should be taken when problems arise in the future. 3. Research Question Evaluate the policies and philosophies of 3M from the standpoint of helping the company implement its strategy, rooted in innovation. 4. The Aim/Objectivity To provide evaluation policies and philosophies used by the 3M Corporation in implementing the strategy of differentiation that is rooted...

Words: 3697 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Texas Instruments and Hewlett-Packard Case Solution

...Hewlett Packard (HP) are two companies famous for introducing Electric and electronic products. Although competing in similar industries, their strategies are very much different. Problem Definition: Given the differences in strategy between two firms, what would you expect would be the differences between TI & HP in their planning and control system; strategic planning systems; budgeting systems; reporting systems; performance evaluation systems and incentive compensations systems. Inferred from the case, we expect some differences in planning and control system between Texas Instruments and Hewlett Packard. This paper will discuss and propose some strategic planning systems, budgeting systems, reporting systems, performance evaluation systems and incentive compensation system for each company. . Strategic Planning Systems: In term of corporate level strategy, both firms have the same definition of business in which the firm will participate. TI and Hewlett-Packard (HP) are both in high-technology electric and electronics. But, the second aspect of corporate level strategy, which is deployment of resources among the business, may be different for each firm depends on the objectives that they want to achieve and competitive advantages that they have. I am well known for its first to entry, stay and try to achieve market leadership by cost leadership strategy. Meanwhile, HP is well known for...

Words: 3796 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

External and Internal Management Factors

...bit smaller. With factories in China and buyers in many countries it is easy for people to survey different products and services that may circle the globe by using Google. The way Google allows people to surf the Internet and view information has changed the way international communities do business. The four functions of management have been used by Google’s management. Planning and organizing structures in all of their business offices create a business model for others to examine, as well as proven success in leading and controlling their many internal issues. Planning and organizing, leading and controlling can be seen by every person who uses the Internet. Whenever logged onto Google their services are well-organized and give the user a massive amount of control to obtain access on just about any type of information possible. As managers and employees and companies around the world do business, it's easy to see that in any form of delegation from managers to any member of staff that Google can be used to achieve many of tasks. Whether it is a manager delegating to subordinate or upper-level management passing down larger projects to leadership, Google can be used to get the job done. Technology Google Corporation management functions have been shaped by both internal and external factors. The internal and external...

Words: 1500 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Infrastructure

...Chapter 4 Ch INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this chapter, students should be able to: Explain t e importance o mission, vision, a d pa the po ta ce of ss o , s o , and organizational objective in an organization. Describe the strategic planning in organization. Overview Resources provide the raw material, but organizational infrastructure provides the catalyst that allows innovation to occur. People individually and in groups promote innovation based on how the infrastructure responds to those new, troubling, and sometimes off‐the‐wall ideas. Overview While innovators generally become passionate about pursuing a particular activity, some minimum level of infrastructure support is absolutely essential for them to move forward. forward The infrastructure must find a way to accommodate the innovation process, or innovation will not take place. The organizational infrastructure issues are : Mission The mission of an organization is a general expression of the overall purpose of the organization. It broadly defines the scope and boundaries of the I b dl d fi h d b d i f h organisation, which should be in line with the expectations and values of major stakeholders. Mission Written declaration of a firm's core purpose and focus which normally remain unchanged, whereas business strategies and practices may frequently be altered to adapt to the changing circumstances. Some organizations find it helpful to provide a concise and clear written statement...

Words: 1306 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Proctor and Gamble

...an organization communicates the need for change, the plan for change as well as the implementation of change are the broad spectrum of the success or failure of change. Not clear. The following literature reviews attempt to This literature review support the hypothesis that Proctor and Gamble would benefit from creating desire to change, communication, planning and resources. These are four of the most important phases of successful change implementation for Proctor and Gamble. Proctor and Gamble Problem Overview Underline not needed. Proctor and Gamble is an innovative, multinational company. Currently, Proctor and Gamble lacks an effective distribution system in some segments as well as poor location in some foreign countries and high cost of inputs. Another area of weakness is the employment of foreign based local management who don’t have international business experience. doesn’t have any international business experience. This makes collaboration with headquarters a little difficult because of their inexperience in the global business.   According to the article: How Proctor and Gamble Survived Through Innovation, several challenges and factors confront management when leading and managing innovative change processes in a multicultural and diverse organization. like P&G. This case...

Words: 2291 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Evaluate How an Organisation’s Strategic Initiatives Can Be Achieved Through a Project Portfolio

...organisation”. Thus it is of great importance to structure project portfolio in alignment with the organisation’s strategy so as to archive business objectives. According to Cooper et al. (2002), the following are three main objectives for project portfolio management: • Increasing financial value • Aligning portfolio to strategic goals • Balancing the projects within the firm’s capacities In order to archive this objective there is a need to understand the strategic orientation of the firm or what we call corporate mindset (Meskendahl 2010; Talke 2007). Strategies should consider the position of the business both internally and externally for example, a company’s systematic advantage towards its competitors (Morgan & Strong, 2003). There must be a clear understanding of how strategies are mapped to address risk matters and the flexibility of applying and introducing innovations in comparison to the organisation’s competitors. The corporate mindset has a great impact on the portfolio decisions including the structure of the portfolio (Meskendahl 2010). A clear understanding of strategic orientation will help with the...

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Management Planning

...Management Planning Lynette Gibson MGT/330 December 5, 2011 University of Phoenix Alvin Swanson Management planning consists of a systematic activity within an organization that determines who will and how to perform a specific job. Management planning is a detailed course of future actions the organization will engage into obtain successful organizational goals. The management planning process takes the perspective available individuals, and physical resources within the organization into consideration for the organization to achieve effective contribution, coordination, and perfect adjustments for organizational success. This paper will evaluate the planning functions of Boeing. Boeing is the largest manufacture of military planes and commercial jetliners and “One of the world’s” leading aerospace companies. Boeing specializes in manufacturing and designing of defense systems, communication systems, launch vehicles, and various other systems. Boeing operates the International Space Station and the Space Shuttle National Aeronautic Space Administration (NASA), Boeing functions of management is the important factor to the success of the company. Boeing Management Planning Functions Boeing has many departments therefore lack of planning would place the company in a vulnerable position for failure to motivate employees and meet deadlines. Boeing has developed a very unusual organizational structure, which assumes two business solutions tied together with nine levels that...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Boeing Manages to Plan

...70 countries, including the United States (Boeing.com). This company is known for its innovation and seems to constantly make plans to stay ahead of the competition. A portion of their mission statement includes “we will strive for continuous quality improvement in all that we do, so that we will rank among the world’s premier industrial firms in customer, employee, and community satisfaction” (Boeing.com). It is clear that this company relies heavily on its management staff and planning teams. It is common knowledge that Boeing consists of two business systems which are Boeing Commercial Airplanes and Boeing Defense, Space, and Security. The corporate functions that guide Boeing are Business Development and Strategy, Communications, Engineering, Operations and Technology, Finance, Human Resources and Administration, and the Office of Internal Governance. Each department has its own set of goals and objectives to evaluate and implement with the company’s overall mission in mind. The Business Development and Strategy team is an extension of the management, marketing, and research teams, they provide information and advice on the business goals. Shepard Hill is the head of Boeing’s large Business Development and Strategy team. His role includes “analyzing and developing plans to drive the company’s growth and nurture new business. In this capacity, he coordinates the company’s Corporate Development function, with responsibility for acquisitions, divestitures, mergers, equity...

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Managing Foresight for Innovation

...Managing Foresight for Innovation in Large Firms Lina Bakker & Linn Johansson Summary Corporate foresight has the potential to create competitive advantage by providing strategic orientation and supporting future insights. As humans we apply foresight every day by anticipating the future and preparing for it. Yet, in a corporate context the concept has been much less explored. There is a lack of research covering how to organise for foresight, particularly in an innovation setting. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine how large companies can manage foresight. This was investigated in a qualitative research with the means of multiple case studies and expert consultation. The findings of this study show that managing and organising for foresight in large firms can be done on the basis of two approaches, formal or informal. This is based on theory and has been extended and modified in this study. The formal approach builds on structure and processes whereas the informal approach is based on the corporate culture. Which approach is more suitable depends on the existing structures and culture in place, as well as the desired outcome of foresight. 1 Introduction Today’s business environment is defined by rapidly changing technology and intense competition, in which innovation has become a critical success factor to sustain competitive advantage. More and more companies are searching for strategic orientation and feel the need to support more future insights to...

Words: 6243 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Management Planning

...Management Planning at Boeing In this paper the planning function of management for the Boeing Company will be evaluated. In addition, this paper will discuss the influence that legal issues, ethics, and corporate social responsibility have had on management planning at Boeing. The few of many factors that influence the company's strategic, tactical, operational and contingency planning are profitability, innovation, and competition. W. James (Jim) McNerney, Jr., is chairperson of the board, president and chief executive officer of The Boeing Company. McNerney oversees the strategic direction of the Chicago-based, $68.3 billion aerospace company. With more than 157,000 employees across the United States and in 70 countries, Boeing is the world's largest aerospace company and a top U.S. exporter (Boeing, 2010). The Boeing Company's business is run by its employees, managers and corporate officers led by the chief executive officer, with oversight from the board of directors. The Board of Directors of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) has adopted the following corporate governance principles to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities and, along with Boeing’s Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws and charters of the committees of the Board, provide an effective framework for Boeing’s governance. The Board believes these Principles should be an evolving set of corporate governance guidelines, subject to review and modification by the...

Words: 1199 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Basic

...Management 1. Production/operations management is the process, which combines and transforms various resources used in the production/operations subsystem of the organization into value added product/services in a controlled manner as per the policies of the organization. Therefore, it is that part of an organization, which is concerned with the transformation of a range of inputs into the required (products/services) having the requisite quality level. Production function is that part of an organization, which is concerned with the transformation of a range of inputs into the required outputs (products) having the requisite quality level. Production is defined as “the step-by-step conversion of one form of material into another form through chemical or mechanical process to create or enhance the utility of the product to the user.” Thus production is a value addition process. At each stage of processing, there will be value addition. 2. Operations Management The study of set of activities comprising supervision, planning and designing of business operations in the field of manufacturing of goods and services is termed as operations management. The purpose of operations management is to make certain that the operations of a business are efficient and effective and result in minimum of wastage. Operations management tries to cut down resources involved in operations while at the same time making operations more effective and productive. In fact operations management is...

Words: 1742 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Management

...criticism in the 1990s………………………………………………………….5 b. Responding to the criticism and repair Nike’s image………………………………...5 3. Organizational culture related to sustainability…………………………………………..6 a. Impact of organizational culture to sustainability…………………………………….6 b. Building organizational culture………………………………………………………6 4. Product innovation……………………………………………………………………….7 5. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………..8 6. Recommendation…………………………………………………………………………8 References list……………………………………………………………………………10 Executive summary Management sustainability is the responsibility of organizations to ensure their operations give economic, social and environmental value while maintaining the resources required for future generation. Sustainability is a part of business strategy today and it can bring competitive advantages for companies if it is well considered. Nike is the world leading company in shoes and sport equipment industry. It was established in 1964 and located near Oregon, United States. This report will discuss, analyse and evaluate how Nike company uses planning and organizing functions to maximize its benefits from sustainability. It will start with how Nike repair its negative reputation of sweatshop in its factories in developing countries, and then look at how it...

Words: 2469 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

External & Internal Factors

...External and Internal Factors External and Internal Factors Management is a universal concept because its principles and techniques are used all over the world, irrespective of their level of development. The basic objective of the management is the progress of people and not the direction of things. The conservative explanation of management is obtaining work done through its people, but the factual management refers to the development of people through work. The management should make the difficulties interesting and their solutions productive for the team members so that everyone can deal with these situations. Management has to provide effective leadership, promote team spirit, set in motion bilateral and multi-lateral channels of communication and enroll the participation of its people, commitment and contribution through an appropriate system of financial and non-financial incentives. Functions of Management The four basic functions of management are planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. The internal or external factors of an organization influence the ongoing process of an organization. They create an impact on the above-mentioned functions of the management. An impact of these internal and external factors will help in modifying the organization culture. Planning refers to designing policies and procedures to build up production or service capabilities, or to diversify its business and extend its existing capacities. Organizing refers to as the management...

Words: 1724 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Res/351 Week 2 Reflection Summary

...Internal and External Factors Team A Executives, managers and companies, would not exist if these four fundamentals were not applied; planning, organizing, leading and managing. It takes these four key elements to run a business no matter how small or large the business is. Planning is the first function; here is where expectations and goals are set to be achieved. Organizing is next, here is where management assembles and coordinates human, financial, physical, informational and other resources needed to achieve the goals (Bateman & Snell, 2011). From there, we move onto leading; where management shows that they are good leaders. By stimulating their employees in a positive way to produce and perform at exceptional high rates with quality work. Lastly, there is managing. Bateman and Snell (2011) stated, "By managing, managers make sure the company's resources are being used as planned and that the business is meeting its goals" (p. 16). These four functions affect a business internally as well as externally as well as globalization, technology, innovation, diversity and ethics. Globalization externally has become more popular since companies now able to access the internet. Before the internet companies would have to search for a product locally, now with the internet companies have the option to search and order a part from any part of the world as well as selling their product. Globalization internally allows a business to be based in another country; managers would...

Words: 1060 - Pages: 5