...that happiness is the aim of the good life, and that the happy person is living the good life, but that is not the only requirement for the good life. One other thing that is needed for the good life is a purpose. The center of Aristotle’s teaching is his belief that people, as everything else in nature has a distinctive end to achieve and a purpose/faction to fulfill. With these two requirements we are working toward earning the good life 3. Freedom itself does not impose any limits and boundaries the limits and boundaries are set by the society we live in and also by each individual. The three limits to freedom are: social, moral and limits to nature. Social limits are limits that are imposed by society and authority., (ex. Dress code, curfew). Moral limits are based on are actions. Acts are moral or ethical because they come from our freedom, but freedom is not duty free. Limits to nature are the areas of life that our freedom cannot budge. Our freedom needs to work with the limits set by our bodies, and our physical environment. Freedom has a price and the price is responsibility. 4. Utilitarianism is the opposite of Kantian ethics as it is duty free, and it is defined as that which provides for the greatest pleasure or well being for the greatest number. Utilitarianism has to distinctive parts, and they are: appetite and desire. Utilitarianism is irrational, it deals with finding a pleasure that is short term and not good will that is long term, so 5. Prudence is what makes...
Words: 375 - Pages: 2
...Freedom is one of the most vulnerable things in human’s life. Since the beginning of life, mankind has tried to become free. When we look at the dusty pages of history, it is obvious that, roughly all wars and struggles in history stem from passion of freedom. The importance and necessity of freedom is indisputable and M.Roshwald (2000) emphasized the importance of freedom with these words; ‘’Give me liberty, or give me death’’ (p.1). However, in today’s world, freedom is limited by dictators or majorities. J.S.Mill (1859), claims that, majority, which means the most active part of the society, may desire to oppress minorities and precautions are needed against this abuse of power. Mill raised awareness and warned against tyranny of majority. Social tyranny is more formidable than political oppressions, because tyranny of majority limits freedom of thought, prevents social progress, which is the beginning of all corruptions, and it is more difficult to escape and severer to endure than oppressive political regimes. First of all, majority’s opinions, values and norms determine all society’s values and point of views. Tyranny of majority can manipulates and suppresses minority’s thoughts and opinions. One step further, social tyranny may limit freedom of thought. According to K.Stone (2008), ‘’ Social tyranny penetrates even more deeply into everyday life, into the soul itself’’ (p.1). Starting from this point of view, tyranny of majority has a great power hence; it can manipulate...
Words: 1613 - Pages: 7
...sections? As evident in the article, section 2b: “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication,” applies to this case. In this issue, a nudist named Brian Coldin, states that his freedom of expression has been infringed upon as he is charged with several counts of public nudity because of his lifestyle. In Canada, certain laws in forbid this act, which directly affects the ability of a nudist to express themselves. In response to this, Coldin’s lawyer, Clayton Ruby, has said that these charges have limited the expression of nudists and suggest that these laws infringe on Charter rights. However, witnesses have also claimed that seeing Coldin nude in public has caused trauma and unease. But, despite these...
Words: 958 - Pages: 4
... so the government had in turn provided more security for the people. Though, many citizens would never have known that for more security, the people would be required to give up some freedom. This does not mean that more security of the nation is erroneous, by no means of course. The Constitution states that the job of the government is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” so a threat to national security would therefore be a threat to the liberties of the people. They therefore go hand in hand. If the security of the nation is being threatened, the government must compromise freedoms to ensure security of the nation and freedoms. There has been other cases and examples where the government has had to limit freedoms to ensure security...
Words: 799 - Pages: 4
...establishments and withdraw cash in India. Use of State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card: For shopping at over 5 lakh merchant outlets in India. For booking movie tickets, bill payments, travel and other online purchases and payments over the internet using secure ‘Master Secure Code’/‘Verified by Visa’. For withdrawing cash from State Bank Group ATMs or other ATMs in India. Rewards Points: FreedomRewardz State Bank Debit Card Loyalty Program State Bank Classic Debit Card earns 2.5 Freedom Points (Reward points) for every ` 100 you shop, dine out, fill fuel, book travel or spend online. These Freedom Points earned can be accumulated and redeemed for exciting gifts. Please visit www.freedomrewardz.com for more information. Daily Cash Withdrawal & Transaction Limit State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card particulars Minimum Daily Cash Limit at ATMs Maximum Minimum Daily Point of Sales/eCommerce Limit Maximum Domestic ` 500/` 40,000/No such limit ` 50,000/- Card Type Digit Mastro Visa 16 16 For ATM For purchasing on POS/ME PIN Based Signature on fall back PIN Based Singnature on fall back For purchasing on internet CVV of three digit CVV of three digit By: Amit Kumar SMS Alert for Better Tracking Get instant SMS alerts for all Cash withdrawal/Purchase transactions/Online transactions made on your State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card. Issuance and Annual Maintenance Charges Particulars Issuance...
Words: 2017 - Pages: 9
...Freedom is commonly defined as the ability to act, speak, or think as one wants without resistance or hindrance from outside sources, such as from individuals or society. This definition is flawed though, as it assumes that people have the power to do as they want. In society, this is simply not true, with freedom being not entirely free. Freedom has its limits, just like everything else. In ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’, the emperor seemed to be incredibly free; he had wealth, power, and nobody could question his will. Seemingly fitting the definitions of freedom, the emperor could do, say, or think anything he wanted without anyone being able to stop him. However, because the emperor was so vain, he was limited by what his subjects thought...
Words: 390 - Pages: 2
...In the cases R v Zundel and R v Keegstra the court states that the relationship between form and content in relation to freedom of expression are guaranteed by the Charter. Freedom of expression guarantees one’s freedom to express their own opinion, and beliefs. In addition, section 2(b) of the Charter does not guarantee ones protection from some forms of communicating statements. In R v Keegstra, Mr. Keegstra decides to express his opinion on the holocaust with his class. Furthermore while Mr. Keegstra unknowingly promotes hatred against jews. In Mr. Zundel case he promotes hatred through the publication of the statements that he knew to be false and that were likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest. 2a) R v Zundel and R...
Words: 1327 - Pages: 6
...people may think otherwise, saying that many metaphorical walls need to separate us in order to keep peace between certain things. Whether it be countries or certain groups of people. The other half of people that think differently, think that there would be no need for these “walls” if we could get rid of them slowly and find a way for everyone to work together. These barriers tend to have overall negative effects on people if they don’t have any “wiggle” room. These enclosures limit the freedom of an individual. They are no longer able to move about freely when you have certain barricades in the way. Next, dividers limit the person’s mindset. “Walls” can cause people to feel less than important by restricting their freedom of thought. And last, obstructions can end up causing problems or altercations. This is caused when a barrier is broken and the individual has to overcome the impending hurdles being thrown at them. “Walls” are not necessary in society because they limit freedom to “roam,” freedom to think, and they force people to have conflicts. “Good fences make good neighbors.” This is what the neighbor said in a poem by Robert Frost called Mending Wall. What the neighbor means is that “good fences” create good relations between both sides of the fence. While this may be true in a suburb, it has a larger effect in society. Compare the “fence” to the Berlin Wall. Shortly following Hitler’s death and World War II, East and West Germany were divided into two halves. West...
Words: 1470 - Pages: 6
...that the independent media also provide a voice to the neglected and disadvantaged while simultaneously preventing governments from insulating themselves from public criticism. 2. LIMITS: Freedom of speech has to be UNCENSORED, because when you start putting limits or barriers where do you draw the line? When does it become manipulation of power? When you give the ability of putting limits in press you create the risk off putting this power in the hands to censure and manipulate news in their personal/ political interest. A free press is not a luxury. It’s the start of an equal development. The media can expose corruption. They can keep a check on public policy by throwing a spotlight on government action. They let people voice diverse opinions on governance and reform, and help build public consensus to bring about change. Such media help markets work better. They can facilitate trade, transmitting ideas and innovation across boundaries. The media are also important for human development, bringing health and education information to remote villages in countries from Uganda to Nicaragua. But as experience has shown, the independence of the media can be fragile and easily compromised. It is clear that to support development, media need the right environment-in terms of freedoms,...
Words: 959 - Pages: 4
...What is freedom? Freedom is the ability to act, think or speak freely without limitation. The United States of America is notorious for being founded on the basis of freedom and democracy. Freedom is an amazing thing to have but there are times where it is used excessively causing harm around us. It is wonderful to be able to express opinions but there should be a limit as to what we should say to others or in public. John Stuart Mill argues that the government must never censor its citizens, no matter their opinion and that is agreeable to certain extent. The Bill of Rights is one of the nations essential founding documents added to the constitution in 1791. The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments to the constitution that limit the power of the United Stated federal government and itemizes fundamental rights and liberties provided to the people. The Founding fathers wanted to create a strong national government in which its citizens were able to have a voice in what goes on in the government. Though the constitution had already certain rights protected for the citizens many argued that those amendments weren’t enough for many citizens. Thomas Jefferson, one of the founding fathers was pressuring the government to pass the bill of rights. “ A bill of rights he insisted is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular and what no just government should refuse” (Bessette and Pitney p.57). In other words, Jefferson wanted the...
Words: 1344 - Pages: 6
...Sartre’s Bad Faith Sartre’s says that a man is free and responsible for himself. Many people can agree and many disagree, but Sartre’s has many good points in thinking this way. With freedom comes responsibility is a well-known saying. Which is basically part of what Sartre’s is trying to explain? Freedom is existence and source of all values. We are free to do what we want, but the things we do and the way you act determines your qualities. Each of us is responsible for everything we do because we are free to make our own decisions and choices. We are our choices and within everything we do we make a choice. Therefore, if you chose to do anything or whatever you have chosen to do, you are responsible for that choice. Even if you don’t choose, you have “chosen” to not choose, so you did still make a choice. You can only either chose sincerity or self-deception which is to be or not to be. According to Sartre’s, Bad faith is not accepting freedom and responsibility and the outcome of them. One of the main forms of bad faith believes in God. Humans use religion to escape from the reality of human situations. They try to escape because they can’t accept or deal with the consequences of human responsibility. Humans have to make decisions and live with their decisions; not God, nature, nor society has anything to do with it. Good faith is living in reality and accepting the fact that God does not exist. Presidential candidate Herman Cain was accused of sexual harassment. He claims...
Words: 1010 - Pages: 5
...Summary: In the essay, "Auto Liberation," Brent Knutson argues that we should repeal speed limits on U.S. highways. Knutson uses one scenario, the Japanese sports car's driver showed his excellent driving ability, to support his viewpoint. Knutson concludes by referring to personal freedoms of American citizens and the most compelling "driving fast is enjoyable" reason. Knutson also reports the opposite view, those people do not believe American drivers have the enough capacity of operating vehicles and driving without speed limits. And it's not responsive to others. Knutson claims that nowadays automobiles are able to travel safely at highways. The speed is not the cause of accidents but incompetence, alcohol or hazardous conditions. What’s more, Knutson states that some activities will make Americans drive responsibly, such as intensive driver-education, stringent licensing criteria and public-service announcement campaigns. Knutson also give some data which shows the accident rates declined since the interstate speed limits increased. Knutson concludes that we should take control of the automobiles and free from speed slavery. Test-Based Analysis: I disagree with Knutson's point of repealing speed limits on U.S. highways. First, the scenario Knutson presents in this essay is quite inconclusive. Then he claims that “In fact, there is solid reasoning to support...should be repealed,” The reader can only admit that this driver who drives the Japanese sports car has a pretty...
Words: 413 - Pages: 2
...441 2006 BCPC 67 Nanaimo Registry No. 57412-1 British Columbia Provincial Court (Criminal Division) Nanaimo, British Columbia Saunders Prov. Ct. J. Heard: November 1, 14 and 28, 2005. Judgment: January 20, 2006. Constitutional law — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Fundamental freedoms — Freedom of expression — Reasonable limits — Oakes test — Motion to declare that a bylaw of the City of Nanaimo restricting large portable advertising boards to new businesses violated the Charter right to freedom of expression dismissed — City's objective to control proliferation of portable signs to address problem of visual pollution and balance public interests with commercial interests was pressing and substantive — Bylaw rationally connected to objective, as evidence indicated that number of signs dropped since bylaw — Bylaw minimally impaired right to freedom of expression, as smaller portable signs and other advertising means were available for businesses — Means used by city to address objective and its effects were proportional. Motion to declare that a bylaw of the City of Nanaimo restricting large portable advertising boards to new businesses violated the Charter right to freedom of expression — In order to curb proliferation of portable advertising signs, City of Nanaimo passed bylaw restricting use of portable boards 32 square feet in dimension to new businesses — Northridge Fitness Centre was a business located away from the highway that used a 32 square...
Words: 1940 - Pages: 8
...The First Amendment is all about having the freedom of speech. A few people think that the first amendment should have some limits. Many schools are suspending students for going too far with first amendment. Some students are even cyberbullying and being rude to people like Blacks and Mexicans. Students are expressing themselves online, wearing the American on their shirt, and wearing a black armband using the first amendment. Students have the right use the first amendment but there should be some limits. Using the First Amendment should be limited in school because students use it to be racist, cyberbullies, and express themselves. Everyone thinks students should have some limits for the use of the First Amendment granted by the Constitution. In 2010, some students at Live Oak High School wore shirts with the American flag to school on Cinco de Mayo (Cinco de Mayo is a celebration held on May 5th). The assistant principal told the student “there might be problems”. A year before, Mexican American students had reacted with foul language and when some white students hung a makeshift American flag and chanted “USA.” To a Mexican American student particularly a confident display of the U.S. flag by a...
Words: 451 - Pages: 2
...What is freedom? Is it an absolute right? We are born to become free. Freedom is defined from different aspects ,and according to different cultures, freedom varies from culture to another. Some define freedom as a natural right, the human being is born with. Everyone wants to be free and independent from others. Freedom is the right to do what one wants, live where he wants, eat what he wants, learns what he wants, and chooses the religion in which he believes, without ignoring or harming other rights. How can we live free? From my point of view, we can live free by respecting other’s rights to live free too. We cannot ignore the rights of people with whom we live in the society. We cannot simply do what we want and ignore others. We must take other people rights into consideration. The idea behind freedom is to be respectful and useful to our society. Freedom is important to everyone. If someone is derived from this innate right, he will definitely feel as if he is not a respectful human being. When freedom is guaranteed, I can think freely, go where i want, say my opinion without fear from people who would not like my opinion. Freedom of opinion is among the most important branches of freedom .In some societies where freedom of opinion is not guaranteed by the authority, the creativity of mind is killed and buried. Society is the largest and biggest loser from this lack of creativity. Someone once said, Freedom of opinion will never result in animosity among people if they...
Words: 887 - Pages: 4