Free Essay

Original Creation of Earth

In:

Submitted By tanitka
Words 1106
Pages 5
Original Creation of the Earth (The Big Bang vs. Six-Day Creation)

TANITKA C. SMITH

PHSC210_A24_201240

Debora Ladner

December 3, 2012

INTRODUCTION The Big-Bang Theory, accepted widely by atheists and many scientists, simply says this: between 10 and 20 billion years ago a “bang” or explosion occurred from a single point in nothingness and with the scattering of googles of atoms, the earth came into being. An eruption of sorts occurred, haphazardly distributing the smallest particles of matter that miraculously adjoined themselves to create living, breathing organisms and every other object on the earth. Every word of the Bible is true. Every day, creation scientists are finding more and more evidence to support the six days of creation. There is nothing wrong with science, but in the end it is the fallible word of man.
YOUNG EARTH
At its simplest, evolution is a hypothesis which claims that all life has descended with modification from a primitive single celled organism in the remote past. The development has been one of increasing complexity. Originally, the first cell evolved from a preexisting organic “soup” in a primeval ocean, which in turn developed from chance conglomerations of inorganic chemicals. Ultimately, these chemicals themselves were produced by the “Big Bang” origin of the actual universe. Against overwhelming evidence it is said that the Big Bang happened billions of years ago, and gives argument that the earth and the universe are only 6,000 - 10,000 years old. The Big-Bang Theory was first proposed in 1927 in an attempt to scientifically explain the shifting of distant galaxies away from the earth. It seems that many people were not satisfied to stare at the stars and remain in awe at the miraculous sight that they were perceiving or to try and fathom the incalculable distance between our galaxy and the next, knowing it was unmanageable. Therefore; this interprets all evidence in light of a traditional and literal understanding of Scripture specifically that in the space of 6 literal days, the whole known universe was spoken into existence, the earth was created, and all life forms, including humans, were created on earth within the last 10,000 years.
OLD EARTH
The account of the six days of creation in Genesis tends to be a controversial subject among Christians. There are various theories to reconcile the biblical account of creation with the secular account of creation. Creation is the belief that the account of the origin of the universe and of life given in the Bible in Genesis chapters one and two is literally true and accurate in every way. The theory of evolution as an explanation for origins is rejected as incompatible with both the Bible and the scientific evidence. The Biblical account is assumed in its plain, literal sense,a day is of 24 hours duration. For that reason, all scientific data relating to origins is to be interpreted within this Biblical basis. In order to reconcile these contradictions with secular science, Christians have proposed several theories. One is the gap theory, which claims there are billions of years between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. “In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth” and not before long after that Darwinian evolution takes place. Of course this still requires ignoring the various contradictions with secular science described in the six days of creation. Another is the day-age theory. This is the belief that each of the six days of creation could signify more than an actual day, as we know according to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, time is relative. A day to God could mean a thousand years to us. (2 Peter 3:8) Again, this does nothing to explain the contradictions between God’s Word and the word of secular science.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST
Time is a most difficult issue in the creation/evolution debate. It is also an issue on which not all Bible-believing Christians as well as active creationists agreed. Believe it or not, both evolution and creation are inferences based on circumstantial evidence. In other words, neither is actually a scientific theory. A scientific theory is our effort to observe, comprehend, and explain processes and events that are taking place repetitively in the present within our observation. Such a theory must be testable by repeatable experiments and be proficient of being falsified if false. Neither evolution nor creation satisfies these criteria. Both instead are attempts to clarify the origin of the universe and of life. And, as by definition the origin of these things is non-repeatable and cannot be observed today, both evolution and creation cannot be scientific theories. Nevertheless, both systems do own scientific character, since each attempts to associate and explain scientific data. So evolution and creation are best viewed as explanatory scientific models that are used to correlate and explain data related to origins. Thus, creation is in every sense just as scientific as evolution. Amazingly, evolution is as religious as creation because as a theory of origins it has both an ideological basis and religious implications. Evolution claims that God is not necessary to origins, that the universe effectively made itself. Such a concept constitutes a worldview that denies a Creator, simply because to create such an awesome universe just speaking a word and it is so! Is just simple impossible, as viewed by science.

CONCLUSION
Even though there are differences in opinion between religion and science, and within science, the decision as to which theory is right is down to the personal thoughts, judgments and opinions of an individual. As a matter of faith, we hold the Bible to be God’s unfailing and inerrant Word and therefore all science, when properly understood, will without doubt support it. In practice, we find that scientific data tremendously confirms and upholds the account of origins recorded in the Bible. The Bible includes many references to divine activity in the origins of the world, of living organisms, and of humans. Different points are given emphasis to the different passages, and one must consider all that Scripture has to say on the topic if one wishes to understand what the Bible teaches on the subject. We cannot decide which view is true based on how many people believe this or that, or on who believes it. Each Christian needs to decide what to believe based on the biblical and geological evidence, as guided by the Holy Spirit. And each Christian should be charitable to those who make a different decision.

BIBLIOGRAPHY http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v6/n1/six-days-evolution-compatible http://biologos.org/questions/early-interpretations-of-genesis

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comparative Essay Original Creation of the Earth

...Elements of Earth Science Comparative Essay Original Creation of the Earth Rhonda L. Carter 9 March 2014 PHSC 210-B13 LOU | | Introduction It should be easy to say that the Earth was created by a higher power. For a Christian this higher power is God. The Bible gives us the six day creation of the heavens and the Earth and all that dwell upon it. For anyone else, the higher power is some unknown power that science is still trying to figure out. There are a lot of theories in science about how the Earth was created. One of these theories is the big bang theory. The essay will compare the two theories and show how different they are. Old Earth View In the old Earth view of the original creation of Earth we are told about the big bang theory. In order to explain this theory one must understand what science says that it is. “According to the big bang theory, the universe began by expanding from an infinitesimal volume with extremely high density and temperature. The universe was initially significantly smaller than even a pore on your skin. With the big bang, the fabric of space itself began expanding like the surface of an inflating balloon – matter simply rode along the stretching space like dust on a balloon’s surface.” (Takahashi, 2000) When dealing with science, one can see that scientists do not believe in a divine power such as God. They deal with their theories and will tell you that they believe something was created, but not that it was created by God. Only...

Words: 1287 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Comparative Essay: “Original Creation of the Earth (the Big Bang vs. Sis Day Creation)” Phsc 210

...Contents I. Introduction II. Old - Earth View III. Young - Earth View IV. Compare and Contrast V. Conclusion Introduction Christians today have a biblical principle and opinion of the universe existence. Christians believe that God created earth and that he accomplished that in only six days. Genesis 1 explains the creation and the interpretation is so utterly clear and one writer states “Thus, any interpretation that goes beyond a clear plain meaning of the text is considered to compromise Biblical authority and capitulate to evolutionary theories”. One look at the Young Earth View is said to be formed from the Modern English Bible. Jon W Greene also writes that “Two Christian apologists state this problem well: “When the ‘young earth’ creationist insists that the biblical evidence indicates an earth only six to ten thousand years old, all communication bridges to the secular science community break down. The communication gap widens and such reactionary creationist views are labeled as ‘folk science.’ The scriptures and the gospel are consequently dismissed as meaningless.” And, “Many non-Christians are driven away from the God of the Bible by the young-earth claims which are, frankly, ridiculous to most people who love science. It is a shame that people who love science, who would like to know the One who created the universe, reject, out of hand the Christian God, because they see Christianity as so unscientific. Old - Earth View The scripture shows only six literal...

Words: 1440 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Comparative Essay

...Comparative Essay: Original creation of the Earth PHSC 210, D03-LUO I. Introduction The old-Earth evolution and young-Earth creation debate has been one that has gone on for centuries. Each viewpoint seeks to give an answer to life’s most difficult questions or origins and how the Earth came to be what it resembles today. While the Young Earth viewpoint has remained constant and unchanged throughout the centuries the Old Earth view seems to be continually evolving as new discoveries tend to discredit previous assumptions. One certainty is that both viewpoints take a dogmatic stance against each other in regards to the interpretation of scientific evidence. The purpose of this paper is to compare old-Earth and young-Earth viewpoints on the original creation of the Earth. II. Old-Earth Secular View The old-Earth evolution viewpoint on the original creation of the Earth is the nebular hypothesis. This viewpoint gave birth to evolutionary thought concerning origins. “…the history of evolution did not begin in 1859 with Charles Darwin’s ‘Origin of Species,’ but with the publication in 1796 of Pierre Simon Laplace’s so-called nebular hypothesis” (Numbers. 1977). This viewpoint suggests “About 4.6 billion years ago our solar system formed from a cloud of gas and dust which slowly contracted under the mutual gravity of all of its particles” (The Solar Nebula. N.d.). It is believed that this cloud of gas and dust was spinning at an accelerated rate and...

Words: 1273 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Cosmic Myth

... Eng/155 Mythology in Literature and Life Cosmic Myth Worksheet Choose two myths from each of the following myth categories: creation, flood, afterlife, and apocalypse. Answer the following questions for all eight myths. Creation Myths Myth 1: GENESIS | Religion or culture of origin: HEBREW | Myth 2: Big bang theory | Religion or culture of origin: science | * Who created the world? * * Myth 1: “GOD created the heavens and the earth.” The Earth was formless and empty.”The spirit of God was hovering over the waters. * Myth 2: Big bang theory is that the universe is a hot dense mass that was and Continues to rapidly expand. The theory is that the universe expanded so rapidly that it exploded. * Who were the main characters involved? What was the process? * Myth 1: GOD, Jesus was the main characters involved in the creation of the world. God spoke the creation of the world into existence. Jesus existed before the creation of the world. * Myth 2: Monsignor Georges Lemaitre proposed the theory in 1927. Also Alexander Friedman as well as Edwin Hubble and Fred Hoyle were involved in this theory. The process was theorized that the universes’ rapidly expansion caused it to cool and thus formed life. * What was the motivation to create...

Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Coperative Paper

...Richard D. Young Original Creation of Earth 201530 Summer 2015 PHSC 210-D07 LUO August 16, 2015 Introduction. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light day, and the darkness he called night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day. (Genesis 1-5 ESV). The topic I choose to right about is The Original Creation of Earth, I believe this debate is a great teaching tool for all walks of life, regardless of which side of the debate you are own. So in this paper I will attempt to compare nebular hypothesis vs six-day creation. Six Day Creation View. The first chapter of the Bible states that God created heaven and earth, and all living thing in six days. The Young Earth view is understood as literally six days. Many Christians believe Genesis 1 is detailing the account of creation showing God as the Creator and the beginning of all things. This view does not only shows God as the creator but it gives insight into the heart of God and his plan for all mankind. Young Earth argue that the Bible clearly teaches that the earth is young. From the beginning of the universe to the creation of man. Young Earth use data for estimating...

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Angel Orc Research Paper

...“Angel or Orc? --- Genesis & Human Nature” When you think of our origin you think of questions such as “who created me?” and “where did I come from?”. Through God and the bible it is revealed to us that God is our creator and it is God who created us in his original design. Through original design Adam was created and it is Adam who our fall of grace comes from. It is from Adam that original sin comes from. But, God sent his only son to die for us to cleanse sin. The Genesis accounts of creation in Gen 1-3 shed light on the mystery of human nature. They figuratively reveal our original design, our fall from grace, and hint at our salvation in Christ. The first person created through original design, holiness, and justice is Adam. From Adam...

Words: 741 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Popol Vuh Research Paper

...Creation Tales The Popol Vuh strongly resonates with my belief of how the Universe was created, which meant that there was void and emptiness before people inhabited the earth. According to the Popol Vuh which states that “Only the Creator, the Maker, Tepeu, Gucumatz, the forefathers, were in the waters surrounded with light; they were hidden under green and blue feathers, and were therefore called Gucumatz. By nature they were great sages and great thinkers” (Fiero, 2011). This is similar to my belief that a supreme being a sole Creator Yahweh is responsible for creating the Universe rather than multiple Deities. The Popol Vuh further elaborates that “By nature they were great sages and great thinkers. In this manner the sky existed and also the Heart of Heaven, which is the name of God and thus he is called” (Fiero, 2011). This statement demonstrates a similar belief held by myself...

Words: 482 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Eng 155

...the following myth categories: creation, flood, afterlife, and apocalypse. Answer the following questions for all eight myths. Creation Myths |Myth 1: In the beginning was Chaos. Then came Earth |Religion or culture of origin: | |which produced Sky. Covering Earth each night, Sky |Greek Creation | |fathered children upon her. Earth was personified as | | |Gaia/Terra and sky was Ouranos (Uranus). | | |Myth 2: |Religion or culture of origin: | |Their children included the Titan parents of most of |Greek Creation | |the Olympian gods and goddesses, as well as many other| | |creatures, including the Cyclopes, Giants, | | |Hecatonchires, Erinyes, and more. Aphrodite was the | | |offspring of Ouranos. | | • Who created the world? o Myth 1: The earth created the sky and the sky created...

Words: 1469 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

St Augustine's Problem of Evil + Free Will

...which he made these things? Did he form and fashion it, but yet leave within it something that he would not convert into good? Why would he do it? Was he powerless to turn and change all this matter so that no evil would remain in it, even though he is all powerful?” As these questions found their way into Augustine’s mind, they also manage to exist and remain unanswered for most people today. However Augustine addresses these questions by justifying evil in this world with God’s creation of free will. By granting us free will God makes us responsible for our wrongdoings, as a result of this we can knowingly choose either right or wrong. In the infamous biblical passage on the creation of original sin, God accommodates men by giving Adam and Eve all the necessities of life: partnership, water, food and land. However, despite God’s warning Eve chose to eat the fruit from the tree of life. The serpent persuades Eve who later convinces Adam to eat from the tree. From this persuasion and act from men, original sin is born. Men are now born with a predisposition to sin; in other words, they can knowingly choose what places them further away from God. Choosing the lesser good, in Adam and Eve’s case eating from the forbidden tree, explains the nature of evil as a hierarchy of goods. Augustine’s response to theodicy is heavily influenced by the Neoplatonic view of evil not existing in itself but in relation to other goods, a hierarchy of goods. Despite knowing that a perversion of will...

Words: 3329 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Weekly Study Questions 1

...MODULE ONE AN INTRODUCTION TO GENESIS Bible Topics | * Mosaic Authorship * Dating of Genesis * Purpose of Writing * Theological Themes of Genesis | People to Know | Places to Know | Terms to Know | SpinozaAstruc | | Documentary TheoryCovenant History | Study Questions: Answer the following questions (based on the reading), save it and then submit it to the professor. 1. What is the Documentary Theory? The Documentary Source Theory states the belief that Torah was not written by Moses, but rather, four independent authors. (Ch. 1 Pg. 21 ) 2. Give the “contributions” Spinoza and Astruc made to this theory. Spinoza developed a "higher criticism" of the Bible to analyze its contents internally, rather than through the text, which is tagged "lower criticism". (Ch.1 Pg. 21) 3. How does Davis refute this theory? Because it takes everything God made as a farse considering there is scientific evidence to back up this theory 4. Give several examples of external evidences for Mosaic authorship? The external evidences are contained with in the Torah, which contains references to Mosaic authorship. Exod. 17 :14; 24:4; 34:27; Num. 33:1, 2; Deut. 31:9. Numerous references :n the New Testament also allude to Mosaic authorship, and many are direct quotes from Christ Him- self. For example, Jesus asked the Sadducees, "Have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God...

Words: 1940 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Comparative Essay

...I. Introduction For Christians and creationists, the clear and only answer is that the Lord created the Earth in six literal days and on the seventh day the Lord rested. But to evolutionists the answer to how the Earth came about is the Big Bang theory. This topic has been debated for centuries now, and yet some people will never believe the truth. II. Old-Earth View The old-earth view to the original creation of this earth is the Big Bang theory. Most scientists that do not believe in a divine creator, being our Heavenly Father, believe in this theory. The dictionary definition for the Big Bang theory’s of creation of the Earth is, “the theory that the universe originated sometime between ten billion and twenty billion years ago from the cataclysmic explosion of a small volume of matter at extremely high density and temperature” (TheFreeDictionary, 2011). Like the definition has said, evolutionists believe that this theory happened billions of years ago. What most scientists believe concerning the theory is that some form of matter was struck by what they think is lightning, which created the infamous amoeba. From the amoeba, evolutionists believe everything has been created and continued to evolve and progress. III. Young-Earth View The young-earth theory proves to have a divine creator, God. Christians and creationists profess to believe in this view because of their relationship with the Lord and I am in full agreement. I believe this theory to be the most precise and...

Words: 825 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Biblical Worldview

...ESSAY CHARLIE MITCHELL THEO 104-D59 “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14). When one speak of, “foundational to the Christian faith is the belief that mankind is created in the image of God” (Biblical Worldview Essay instructions).It goes without saying, we cannot overlook the passage that indoctrinate our thoughts of this phenomena event. Very early in the writing of the bible, God set the stage for what his intentions were to be. The writing of Genesis sets that stage in the creation, from the first verse, “In the beginning God created the heaven and earth” (Genesis 1:1). Through the final creation, “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). Thesis: There is no argument, “Let us make human beings in our image, to be like us” (Etzel, Gutierrez, 2012). The question lies in, is he (man) living out that creed? Has man’s perspective of God’s commandments gone off the beaten path? Where did man sway? In my profession, there are no less than 10,000 personnel that makeup our company structure. All with varying demographic makeup, yet all are considered as one from our CEO perspective. We have a product to market to the general public, each employee are given the necessary...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

B3606490

...also: Adam and Eve Adam Hands of God and Adam.jpg Detail from Michelangelo's The Creation of Adam, Sistine Chapel ceiling Spouse(s) Eve Lilith (folklore) Children Cain Abel Seth Creation of Adam, Michelangelo Adam (Hebrew: אָדָם‎) is a figure from the Book of Genesis, also mentioned in the New Testament, the Quran, the Book of Mormon, and the Book of Iqan. According to Womack's creation myth[1] of Abrahamic religions, and also according to the Holy Bible, he is the first human. In the Genesis creation narratives, he was created by Yahweh-Elohim ("Yahweh-God", the god of Israel), though the term "adam" can refer to both the first individual person, as well as to the general creation of humankind. Christian churches differ on how they view Adam's subsequent behavior of disobeying God (often called the Fall of man), and to the consequences that those actions had on the rest of humanity. Christian and Jewish teachings sometimes hold Adam and Eve (the first woman) to a different level of responsibility for the Fall, though Islamic teaching holds both equally responsible. In addition, Islam holds that Adam was eventually forgiven, while Christianity holds that redemption occurred only later through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Bahá'í Faith, Islam and some Christian denominations consider Adam to be the first prophet. Contents [hide] 1 Etymology 2 Adam in Genesis 2.1 Creation 2.2 Expulsion from Eden 2.3 Post-expulsion 3 Adam in other works 4 Religious views ...

Words: 1427 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Luther's Argument

...many ways innovative. His vision of worship music as a way of propagating the Scripture eventually led to the use of vernacular in place of Latin in church singing, as well as constituting the foreground of the rich tradition of German music. As a matter of fact, the importance which all the protestant churches give to music nowadays, as well as their typical vitality when it comes to produce new worship music, is arguably a result of “Luther’s spirit” living on in his spiritual successors. This, constitutes a picture where tradition concerning what music is was grafted on innovation concerning what its use was and what shape it should take – that is, the late-scholastic framework inherited by Luther became an organic part of his highly original theological thought. In this paper I set out to explore some aspects of Luther’s thought concerning music, as well as to unpack their theological and philosophical implications. In this sense, apart from reading Luther and his interpreters, I will establish I dialogue between him and the orthodox theologian Pavel Florensky. While not a friend to Protestantism, I believe that Florensky’s last work – a study on the nature and role of icons published under the title of Iconostasis – provides with fruitful insights which can be applied for unfolding the deeper nuances of Luther’s ideas. In this regard, his reliance on the pre-reformed tradition allows for this comparison with the practices of the orthodox church to be established, thereby producing...

Words: 1945 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Professor of Theology

...then claimed that George H. Pember further elaborated the theory in his work (Earth’s Earliest Ages) in 1876, and the theory was finally popularized in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible beginning in 1917. Today, it is said that only pinheads and nitwits of dubious scholastic background maintain a belief in the “Gap Theory”. If, as it is today asserted, the theory can only be traced back to Dr. Chalmers, then the statement of its reason for introduction should not be discounted. On the other hand, if the theory antedates both Dr. Chalmers and any uniformitarian geologist, then it should and indeed must be investigated by any serious student of scripture to determine why such a Gap exist. Mark E. Howerter, in his work “Creation VS Evolution: The Gap Theory Explained”, follows the now accepted view when he wrote: Uninformed Christians have propagated two theories that have tried to reconcile the Bible with evolution. They have done this because from kindergarten through graduate school it is taught that evolution is a proven scientific fact. Christians have swallowed this hook, line and sinker. They have tried to get God out of a bind, so to speak, because the Bible is in direct contradiction with the theory of evolution. People who take the Bible seriously and literally have introduced two theories to explain how the Bible and evolution can be reconciled. These theories are commonly known as the Gap Theory and the Day-Age Theory. Again, the above statement...

Words: 4453 - Pages: 18