...have managed to build up and break down their country through the process of trial and error. An Absolute ruler is someone who has complete power and control over anything that has to do with to his territory. Two good examples of these kinds of rulers are Peter the Great ofRussia and Louis XIV of France. Peter the Great of Russia is a great example of an absolute ruler. Peter theGreat came into power and he was in complete control of every bit and piece of Russia. Peter wanted to form a road from Russia to the West. This road is something that would help Russia in many different ways to transport good and people, but he wasn't always helping. After Peter went to war with Sweden he lost the first time. After his defeat he built another army a new and more efficient army. This was the downfall to his rule because he didn't think about the immense loss Russia had faced with that defeat. Peter was too focused on going to war again. Being blinded by this defeat making him want to fight more was not the right move. Russia before this war had no military except the inefficient & shady Streltsky . After he died Russia had a professional military. Peter also built a Navy from the ground up. At the same time him beingblind and hungry for war made him unaware to what Russia needed for the creationof a large middle class. King Louis XIV of France was another example of an absolute ruler because hewent out to obtain anything that made him and France more powerful. King Louis forced all...
Words: 547 - Pages: 3
...An absolute monarch is someone who has absolute power among their people. One absolute monarch in history is Peter the Great. Peter was a Russian czar. Peter was considered an absolute monarch because he strengthen the government and reduce nobility. Peter rise to power when Tsar Alexi died so him and his brother Ivan shared the throne until Ivan died. After Ivan’s death, Peter was left as a solo Tsar. Around late 1600s early 1700s, Peter accomplish multiple things as ruler. He led Russia out of medieval times and made it a leading European state. In order for Russia to reach that position he strengthen the military service in Russia by adding a navy, he expanded Russia’s borders, centralize the royal power by buying all Russian institution under his control. He...
Words: 595 - Pages: 3
...stripped the nobles of their power and there land. He also refused to allow the Protestants (Huguenots) to build walls around their towns and cities for protection. France faced all areas controlled by the Habsburg. For the first 12 years the Habsburg dominated but for the last 18 years France won. Prussia was controlled by Frederick II or Frederick the great. He became king in 1749 and he died without an heir. He believed that the fundamental role of government was to expand its territories. He was one of the most powerful rulers of...
Words: 1096 - Pages: 5
...between religious unity and political unity? (pg 188) On Page 188 it says the following about King Louis XIV’s views on religions and leading a nation’ “Believing a country could not be governed by one king and one law unless it was also under one religious system…,”. This quote is very important because prior to Louis’s rule the Edict of Nantes was put in place which stated that the French Protestants could practice whatever religion they wanted, so King Louis, being Catholic, wanted his nation to be all one religion. The quote also refers to the unity of the religion in France, which in turn, would unify France under King Louis XIV, according to Louis XIV. What value did Peter the Great of Russia place on military prowess? What does this tell us about his vision of the proper role of national ruler? (pg...
Words: 1303 - Pages: 6
...Ivan the Terrible was an erratic sovereign who ruled Russia in extreme oppression, whereas Peter the Great was a Tsar that serves a better purpose for Russia. Both of these Russian rulers were raised under traumatic conditions which contributes to their actions in the future such as killing many of their own people. As the Tsars of the Russian state, they enjoyed absolute power as an autocrat. Ivan the Terrible made a series of improvement in the country’s military and judiciary structures, continuing the legacy of his predecessors in expansionism. However his efforts on annexing Livonia to gain a port at the Baltic sea was unsuccessful. After the death of his wife Anastasia, he was grieve stricken and became paranoia. As a result of his...
Words: 502 - Pages: 3
...Catherine the Great, also known as Catherine II, is the longest-ruling female of Russia. She was born on May 2, 1729 in Stettin, Prussia. In 1744, Catherine moved to Russia where she started her relationship with Grand Duke Peter. Catherine and Peter became married on August 21st, 1745 and didn’t exactly have a happy relationship. Once Empress Elizabeth died, Peter inherited the throne and Catherine received the title Empress Consort. Peter was a bad leader, he alienated nobles and angered the Orthodox Church. Within six months of rule, Peter was overthrown in a coup that Catherine was a part of and not long after being overthrown, was murdered. With Peter overthrown, Catherine became the ruler. While in power, Catherine modernized Russia, made Russia a major European power, expanded the borders of Russia, and made reforms in agriculture and education. Though Catherine did many good things for Russia, there were still rebellions. Cossack Yemelyan...
Words: 617 - Pages: 3
...Helen Elias Mrs.Osorio World History 100 19 December 2014 Absolute Monarchs The small European country of Eurotopia, had been through a sequence of political controversies and internal power struggles slumped into disarray and mayhem. After talking about this issue, the government believes that one of these three people can handle the hardships of Eurotopia and restore the country back to peace and prosperity is former rulers of Russia, Catherine the great, Peter 1 “Peter the Great” and former ruler of Austria, Maria Theresa (Habsburg), but only one of them from their qualities and accomplishments is the best for the job. Peter the great was also Czah from Russia, and he had also made many accomplishments and greatness during his reign....
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...Absolutism of monarchs was a very popular trend in the 16th and 17th centuries. Peter the Great, Louis XIV, and the Sultans of the Ottoman empires greatly demonstrated this notion with their complete control over their subjects. This was a revival of this same idea that has existed in the Medieval era with with kings with complete control of several provinces and had knights who defended them. Absolutism was a time of complete tyranny in Europe during this time due to the selfish and vanity of the rulers, the complete dependence on the rulers, and the chaos that resulted in or because of their reign. These absolutist leaders were very prideful putting others down and setting themselves up above them. King James I said "the state of monarchy is the supreme thing upon earth" setting his reign in England above everything else (Doc 2). Some monarchs see their subjects as people who just follow their commands. This allowed for no room to give the monarch advice to help the country if their was another way to help it. Louis XIV of...
Words: 648 - Pages: 3
...In Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries, monarchs and rulers sought to increase their power both domestically within their own states and internationally by adding to their territories and populations. Both in merging their power internally and expanding their power externally, they employed three features of state-building: control, extraction, and integration. In the late 1700s, both the Industrial revolution and French revolution of 1789 strengthened the awareness in European minds not just that Europeans were different from the rest of the world, but also that Europeans were “progressing” promptly while the rest of the world seemed to be deteriorating, that Europeans were somehow exceptional—better, even—than the rest. Nineteenth century...
Words: 796 - Pages: 4
... paved roads, or other modern technology, it took weeks to convey orders from the central governments to the provinces. Rulers also suffered from a lack of information about their realms, making it virtually impossible to police and tax the population effectively. Local power structures that held legal privileges, such as nobles, the church, provincial and other national assemblies, town councils, and guilds, could not easily be rescinded. Many people also spoke a language different from that of the Crown, further decreasing their willingness to obey its commands. 4. The Thirty Years War began as a religious civil war between...
Words: 1680 - Pages: 7
...The three enlightened despots in Europe during the late 1700s were Catherine the Great of Russia, Joseph the II of the Holy Roman Empire of Austria, and Fredrick the Great of Prussia. Catherine the Great controlled Russia. She was a daughter of a German noble and married Peter II. She became ruler after the government was overthrown and her husband was killed. The focus in her rule was to westernize and modernize Russia. She created a new law code and greatly expanded Russia. She put down the Pugachev Rebellion in which the surfs wanted to rebel against their owners. She later took away a lot of the reforms she started in fear of more uprising. Joseph the II controlled Austria. He abolished serfdom and the death penalty. He tried to promote...
Words: 359 - Pages: 2
...ENLIGHTENED DESPOTISM Enlightened despots believed that political change could best come from above; from the ruler. However, they were encouraged by the philosophers to make good laws to promote human happiness. How did these monarchs differ from earlier unenlightened monarchs of the past? The difference lay in tempo. These new despots acted abruptly and desired quicker results. They were impatient with all that stood in the way of their reforms. In addition, they justified their authority on the grounds of usefulness, not divine right. These new monarchs were rational and reformist and they regarded political change as possible and desirable. Frederick the Great, Catherine the Great, and Joseph II are good examples of Enlightened Despots. Frederick II (Frederick the Great), the most famous Prussian absolute monarch and a military genius, pursued an aggressive foreign policy. In 1740 he seized from Austria the province of Silesia. His action culminated in a major European conflict, the Seven Years' War (1756-1763), in which he was pitted against a powerful European coalition of Austria, Russia, and France. Frederick, aided only by England, barely managed to retain Silesia. In 1772 Frederick shared in the first partition of Poland by annexing western Poland. Frederick the Great was an almost perfect example of the enlightened despot. He was familiar with the ideas of the eighteenth-century reformers and a friend of Voltaire. Many of the philosophers, including Voltaire...
Words: 720 - Pages: 3
...compositions of two different, Marxist explanation of class struggles and Freudian perspective on authoritative behavior, the critical approach on media and communication have been a growing aspect of our daily life since the second war era in which rulers used the mass propaganda by using media as an ideological state apparatus especially on increasing power of Hitler’s Germany. Today, we live in a world in which this critical approach is the very canon of decreasing the exploitation of ruler class who spend huge amount of money only for media and communication. (Peter and Simmonson 2004) From the perspective of working class, the picture seems more colorful than fifteen years ago if we consider this criticism of media and its trustworthiness by the effects of social media and blogging. One may clearly say that “Now we have our own instruments to clarify the fact and enjoy publishing our own opinion.” and even I can nod my head and ignore the “dark side of the moon”1 presented by Karl Marx on the topic of exploitation, however, in this essay, I’m going to follow my ideological ancestors and say “matter a fact, it’s all dark”2 as a rejection to this very uprising idea that alternative media makes us less exploited by ruler class of Turkey because our own counter-hegemony attitudes on social media tricks us into a brand new hegemony, the hegemony that forwards our energy into the deep hole of social 1 The name of famous Pink Floyd album...
Words: 2061 - Pages: 9
...progress could form new governments, and “it inspired those who later made the great revolutions of the modern era” (Strayer, Chapter 15, 747). With human progress and human reason together, some Enlightenment thinkers began to think of humans as perfect, able to rule themselves and without worrying of another, higher being. The power of the people stood out in many of the new government ideas, giving more power to the people under monarchies. Any government should give its people their basis rights and needs. If anyone should threaten these, Enlightenment thinkers believed that the government should seek to protect those rights. If the government should fail in any of these tasks, “the people … have the right to overthrow the government and establish a better one” (Mills). The government’s basis should be, in general, the people and their wills (Rothman). Since many of the people who might believe that their government may not be ruling fair, political revolution occurred. Revolutionaries often imbedded John Locke’s ideas into the reasoning for the Atlantic Revolutions. John Locke was an influential Enlightenment philosopher who wrote a great deal about government and politics. Locke strongly believed in the rights of each person of which nobody should violate or threaten. Freedom and equality from birth are the two most important rights of any man (Mills). Not only does this go against absolute monarchies or any other oppressive government, but it also goes against slavery...
Words: 1574 - Pages: 7
...Luke Rodia HIS 1012 Assignment 2: How far were the 1848 revolutions stimulated by socio-economic rather than political factors? The revolutions of 1848 were a series of simultaneous revolutions across a number of countries, mainly in Europe. A number of different reasons brought about these revolutions but each individual country had different reasons to why they had a revolution. As a result of this we cannot fully determine whether the 1848 revolutions were driven by socioeconomic or political reasons until we have looked at each major case individually, as this will allow us to make an accurate judgement on why the revolution occurred. To look at each country and their revolutionary events will allow us to see whether the 1848 revolutions were linked in any way, either politically or socioeconomically or if they were individual events which happened at the same time. On top of this we need to address the fact that not all European countries had revolutions, and some countries did begin to have revolutionary movements but they failed to take off as full revolutions. Once these points have been addressed then we can understand what stimulated the 1848 revolutions. The years leading up to the 1848 revolutions had set the tone for revolution. Across Europe there was wide spread hunger due to a failure in crops. Jones writes in his book “But events elsewhere had already taken on dangerous proportions. The potato crop in 1846 and 1847 had been destroyed by disease, causing food...
Words: 2094 - Pages: 9