Ethically obtained data are the research findings that are brought about in an ethically sound way. This data adheres to all aspects of the codes of ethics. (Oliver, P., 2010) However, when this is breached the data becomes unethical. It can be debated that unethical data obtained over the years can help benefit the greater good of society, but the cost of utilizing this data can also be argued. I will identify both the affirmative and opposing teams arguments, and briefly drawn upon points raised in the debate. I will also identify the strengths and weaknesses within our teamwork.

I was the first speaker for my team, the opposing side. We argued that for the greater good of society, data obtained unethically should not be used today. We discussed the breach of ethical standards, outlining the long list of ways in which ethical guidelines were not taken into consideration. Victoria, our second speaker, drew upon the ethical principles instilled by the Declaration of Helsinki, allowing the audience to gain understanding in the areas that were breached. We also compared the legality of conducting and publishing unethical data, drawing on examples of where the law has been broken. I used rhetorical questions to the audience to gain an understanding of what these individuals were subject to, to try strengthening our points. The affirmative team argued that to benefit society, we must use information drawn from studies conducted unethically. They highlighted many examples of how studies have helped researchers to find cures, and gain a better knowledge of medical conditions that they would otherwise not have access to. Opening their debate, I drew upon many instances where researchers have used their data to help find cures for diseases, such as Syphilis. They also argued that the good outweighed the bad, in that we as a society have learnt invaluable knowledge