Premium Essay

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Case: United States V. Virginia

Submitted By
Words 959
Pages 4
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completed a lifetime's worth of work in her years before being nominated by Clinton to become an associate justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. Ginsburg was born on March 15, 1933, in Brooklyn, New York. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was repeatedly brought too the library by her mother, which instilled in her a faculty to learn. Ever since Ruth was little, her mother had played a tremendous part in her career. The day before Ruth's graduation of high school, her mother passed away due to cervical cancer. In 1954, Ruth graduated from Cornell University at the top of her class. She had met her husband, Martin David Ginsburg at Cornell University, and they married the year she graduated. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Martin …show more content…
This conclusion is based off of her opinions on cases and how she speaks during a hearing. One case that stood out that Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote an opinion on was United States v. Virginia, in 1996. In this case, the United States sued Virginia and the Virginia Military Institute, stating that VMI's solely male admission policy violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Ginsburg, a strong advocate of woman's rights, wrote and made it clear that women should be able to obtain the same privileges as men, including being allowed to apply to the Virginia Military Institute. Another case that Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a strong opinion on was Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in 2007. This case was about Lilly Ledbetter who sued her employer of 19 years, Goodyear Tire & Company, due to gender discrimination. The company had been paying the male employees more than Ledbetter because she was female and that violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in favor of Goodyear though, because Goodyear countered that same clause stating that discrimination complaints are to be filed within 180 days of the violation. Ginsburg did not agree with this ruling and argued that Ledbetter couldn't have filed her complaint sooner because she isn't know she was being discriminated against. When President Obama was elected into office in …show more content…
She seems to be one of the strongest and most dedicated justices because of the effort she puts into the cases. For instance, for the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber company, she did not just file her dissent with a clerk, she made the case known so it would get the attention it deserves. Her dedication is presented in this situation, through how hard she worked pressing Congress to amend the clause, which they eventually did, just for one woman, to show how much woman's rights matter. It is not common to see a person go out of their way to help others, so she is clearly different than all of the other justices. One imperative thing that Ruth Bader Ginsburg is noted for, is how she made the decision to resign when Hillary Clinton got into office in 2017, because she felt safe knowing a liberal would be in office. But, since Clinton did not win the election, and Donald Trump did, Ruth Bader Ginsburg is keeping her position as a Supreme Court Justice, despite the fact that she is eighty four years old. This fact proves her dedication to the United States and the Supreme

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

America Vs Virgina Case Study

...In the United States vs Virgina, Virginia Military Institute (VMI) had a long-standing tradition of male-only admission but, was being brought to attention. VMI was established in 1839 as a state supported/run institution, the institution was designed to Quote “produce citizen-soldiers who become leaders in both, military and civilian life”. This specific case started in the supreme court of Virgina when a female filed a case in the circuit court, but had ultimately failed for her with VMI getting the favorable ruling. The female argued that VMI denied her admission because of her gender, at that time nothing was yet proven.She later also stated that it also violated the 14 amendment of the united states constitution, with the evidence of the violation was considered by the circuit court it then sought approval for it to move to the supreme...

Words: 1444 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Study: US V. Virginia

...United States V. Virginia was a Supreme Court case in 1996 that argued the Virginia Military Institute only accepted men for their program was unconstitutional, it violated the 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, by which the admission policy at Virginia Military Institute only accepted males. Theodore B. Olsen, (Virginia Military Institute/Defendant) suggested to create a Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership as a way to make an alternative route for women. Paul Bender (United States/Plaintiff), argued if the all women’s institute would compare to the men’s and if it would meet the qualifications of the Equal Protections Clause. The Court found the suggestion unconstitutional in a 7-to-1 decision. Chief Justice, William Rehnquist...

Words: 471 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Reverse Discrimination

...Affirmative Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Remedial Purpose as a Justification for Affirmative Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. The Diversity Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. The Arguments Against Affirmative Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . V. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. INTRODUCTION The blockbuster race discrimination cases in recent years have all involved affirmative action and reverse discrimination. The Supreme Court has made it clear that race classifications, whether benign or invidious, will trigger rigid strict scrutiny analysis, which requires that the government prove its program is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest. In 2003, the Court, in Gratz v. Bollinger,1 ruled that while student diversity in educational institutions may be a compelling interest, an affirmative action program that assigned points to applicants of minority races was unconstitutional.2 In 2007, in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1,3 it held that two public school district plans that used race-based enrollment targets for student assignments failed strict scrutiny because the districts neither proved a compelling interest, nor demonstrated that the plans were...

Words: 19597 - Pages: 79

Premium Essay

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

...Test 1 (Ch 1-2) ANSWERS | Judge J. D. Langley | Govt 2305 |   | 1. Ch01-001-p002 The Jamestown settlement was funded by c. The London Company. 2. Ch01-002-p004 The Preamble to the Constitution begins a. "We the People . . ." 3. Ch01-003-p005 Which of the following is the best explanation of why most American Indian reservations are in the West today? b. European settlers and the U.S. government pushed Indian tribes westward. 4. Ch01-004-p006 Enlightenment thinkers argued that the world could be improved through b. human reason, science, and religious toleration. 5. Ch01-005-p007 The House of Burgesses was c. the first representative assembly in North America. 6. Ch01-006-p008 A social contract theory of government was proposed by d. Locke and Hobbes. 7. Ch01-007-p009 Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government sets out a theory of e. natural rights. 8. Ch01-008-p010 Congress's authority to check the president's judicial appointment power is a concept that can be attributed largely to the ideas of d. Charles-Louis, the Second Baron of Montesquieu. 9. Ch01-009-p010 Why was indirect democracy a necessary alternative to direct democracy? b. It became increasingly difficult to bring all the colonists together in the decision-making process. 10. Ch01-010-p010 Aristotle attempted to devise a way to classify governments. Critical to his analyses was knowledge of d. whom citizens were ruled...

Words: 4920 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

End of Life

...On July 26, 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld decisions in New York and Washington state that criminalized assisted suicide. These decisions overturned rulings in the 2nd and 9th Circuit Courts of Appeal which struck down state statutes banning physician-assisted suicide. Those courts had found that the statutes, which prohibited doctors from prescribing lethal medication to competent, terminally ill adults, violated the 14th Amendment. In striking the appellate decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court found that there was no constitutional "right to die," but left it to individual states to enact legislation permitting or prohibiting physician-assisted suicide. (The full text of these decisions, plus reports and commentary, can be found at the Washinton Post web site.) As of April 1999, physician-assisted suicide is illegal in all but a handful of states. Over thirty states have enacted statutes prohibiting assisted suicide, and of those that do not have statutes, a number of them arguably prohibit it through common law. In Michigan, Jack Kevorkian was initially charged with violating the state statute, in addition to first-degree murder and delivering a controlled substance without a license. The assisted suicide charge was dropped, however, and he was eventually convicted of second degree murder and delivering a controlled substance without a license. Only one state, Oregon, has legalized assisted suicide. The Oregon statute, which went into effect in October 1997...

Words: 13101 - Pages: 53

Free Essay

Cjs 230

...29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Step 7 A Judge Is Assigned to Hear the Case ❖ 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 N 30 L In the previous two chapters, we learned about the two attorneys in the courtroom drama, the prosecutor and the defense attorney. In this chapter, we turn our attention to the third member of the courtroom work group, the judge. We will learn what judges do and how they become judges. Then, we will look at judges’ discretion and how it affects their relationships with others. INTRODUCTION Judges are by far the most easily recognized member of the courtroom work group, both by their conspicuous robes and by their prominent position in the courtroom. They are also the subject of many stereotypes because the public wants to believe that judges combine patience, wisdom, and compassion to arrive at fair decisions, while they eschew the character flaws that sometimes form the basis of decisions by others, including prejudice, intolerance, favoritism, and hostility. Unfortunately, judges are human and their decisions occasionally reflect such a reality. One West Virginia judge, for example, became so enraged at a defendant who began cursing at him in court that he jumped down from his bench, tore off his judicial robe, and bit the tip off the defendant’s nose (Smith, 1998). He served five days in jail on state assault charges, and was then tried in federal court for violating the defendant’s civil...

Words: 21662 - Pages: 87

Premium Essay

Sex and Gender

...Sex and Gender are Different: Sexual Identity and Gender Identity are Different Milton Diamond, Ph.D. University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology Pacific Center for Sex and Society Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry - Special Issue In Press for July 2002 Special Editors: Bernadette Wren, Portman Clinic Fiona Tasker, University of London | | | | | | | |Sex and Gender are Different: | |Sexual Identity and Gender Identity | |are Different | | | |Abstract: | |This paper attempts to enhance understanding and communication about different sexual issues. It starts by offering definitions to| |common...

Words: 8070 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Evidence-Park & Waltz

...RULE 101. SCOPE; DEFINITIONS (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in United States courts. The specific courts and proceedings to which the rules apply, along with exceptions, are set out in Rule 1101. (b) Definitions. In these rules: (1) “civil case” means a civil action or proceeding; (2) “criminal case” includes a criminal proceeding; (3) “public office” includes a public agency; (4) “record” includes a memorandum, report, or data compilation; (5) a “rule prescribed by the Supreme Court” means a rule adopted by the Supreme Court under statutory authority; and (6) a reference to any kind of written material or any other medium includes electronically stored information. RULE 102. PURPOSE These rules should be construed so as to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination. RULE 103. RULINGS ON EVIDENCE (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and: (1) if the ruling admits evidence, a party, on the record: (A) timely objects or moves to strike; and (B) states the specific ground, unless it was apparent from the context; or (2) if the ruling excludes evidence, a party informs the court of its substance by an offer of proof, unless the substance was apparent from the context. (b) Not Needing...

Words: 49736 - Pages: 199

Free Essay

Asdasdasd

...[pic] FIRST ARMY EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REPRESENTATIVE COURSE STUDENT GUIDE TO CULTURAL AWARENESS INDEX LESSON TITLE PAGE 1 Philosophical Aspects of Culture SG- 3 C1 Native American Experience SG- 4 C2 White American Experience SG- 23 C3 Arab American Experience SG- 43 C4 Hispanic American Experience SG- 53 C5 Black American Experience SG- 76 C6 Asian American Experience SG-109 C7 Jewish American Experience SG-126 C8 Women in the Military SG-150 C9 Extremist Organizations/Gangs SG-167 STUDENTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIARIZED WITH ALL CLASS MATERIAL PRIOR TO CLASS. INFORMATION PAPER ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF CULTURAL DIFFERENCE Developed by Edwin J. Nichols, Ph.D. |Ethnic Groups/ |Axiology |Epistemology |Logic |Process | |World Views | | | | | |European |Member-Object |Cognitive |Dichotomous |Technology | |Euro-American |The highest value lies in the object |One knows through counting |Either/Or...

Words: 63019 - Pages: 253

Free Essay

Living History

...___________________________ LIVING HISTORY Hillary Rodham Clinton Simon & Schuster New York • London • Toronto • Sydney • Singapore To my parents, my husband, my daughter and all the good souls around the world whose inspiration, prayers, support and love blessed my heart and sustained me in the years of living history. AUTHOR’S NOTE In 1959, I wrote my autobiography for an assignment in sixth grade. In twenty-nine pages, most half-filled with earnest scrawl, I described my parents, brothers, pets, house, hobbies, school, sports and plans for the future. Forty-two years later, I began writing another memoir, this one about the eight years I spent in the White House living history with Bill Clinton. I quickly realized that I couldn’t explain my life as First Lady without going back to the beginning―how I became the woman I was that first day I walked into the White House on January 20, 1993, to take on a new role and experiences that would test and transform me in unexpected ways. By the time I crossed the threshold of the White House, I had been shaped by my family upbringing, education, religious faith and all that I had learned before―as the daughter of a staunch conservative father and a more liberal mother, a student activist, an advocate for children, a lawyer, Bill’s wife and Chelsea’s mom. For each chapter, there were more ideas I wanted to discuss than space allowed; more people to include than could be named; more places visited than could be described...

Words: 217937 - Pages: 872