...Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant should not shut down. The plant has produced energy for us for the past 49 years. Nuclear energy has been providing efficient energy for our everyday use. Without this plant, regular needs will not be met and people will suffer living their lives. This plant uses our third most used energy source, nuclear energy. To begin, our most used renewable resources are coal. The coal in this world will eventually run out, so when we do run out we can always use nuclear energy instead. Our second most used resources is natural gas. This resource is used every day to fuel the cars that we use. In addition, almost all Americans in the United States use cars for transportation and possibly other reasons. Nuclear fuel does not cause carbon dioxide, which means it will not increase global warming. Not only does Three Mile Island provide jobs to about 700...
Words: 686 - Pages: 3
...electricity to power the nations that stretch across the globe. However, this hunger for energy has brought on problems as well. Our reliance on fossil fuels has led us to the issue of air pollution, which harms both the environment and our own personal health. Digging for these limited resources has become dangerous, to the point where accidents such as cave-ins drop down upon those mining for fuel. Lung disease from simply mining coal is responsible for the suffering of many diminished lives. Yet there is a solution, a solution that has already been implemented by modern countries, although on a small scale. Through the use of safe and nearly sustainable nuclear energy that can last hundreds of years, thousands of lives can be saved from the hazards of fossil fuels. The history of nuclear energy is relatively new. Though uranium was first discovered in 1789 by Martin Klaproth, it was not until the late 1930’s and early 40’s before experimentation with nuclear energy began. It was around this time that nuclear fission was discovered; to put into simple terms, nuclear fission is the process of splitting an atom’s nucleus, which results in the...
Words: 1191 - Pages: 5
... a war was also thrust upon India by another neighbor Chin. It is with this background that, India had to review its defense policy and defense budget. This it had to do only to be able to defend itself from onslaughts of others. Even after the wars India had to fight, in its thinking and attitude of not fighting. India did not undergo any change, but, it also realized that, with others continuing to advance in destructive management, India had to develop its knowledge of destruction, only if it was to save itself. With this background, and the scenario of the world India had to perforce plan out a strategy of defending itself. The world scenario that has developed through the years is that, the great powers have increased their knowhow and also their arsenals of nuclear weapons, by leaps and bounds, and India is expected to just wait and watch. When India became independent, illiteracy and poverty were rampant, and Nehru started the process of planning the...
Words: 1836 - Pages: 8
...PRESENTATION DESCRIPTION | |Nuclear has been the biggest fear in the world when it is used as |Nuclear Threat Nuclear weapon and its physical damage | |weapon and it has insurmountable negative effects on societies in |Nuclear weapon deterioration of health – what kinds of radiation are | |terms of its physical destruction and deterioration on human health. |emitted in a nuclear explosion and what effect do they have on human | |Not a thesis statement but a statement of fact. |beings? | |Try: Why is it best for nuclear attack victims to be right at Ground |http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/ocr_gateway_pre_2011| |Zero? |/living_future/4_nuclear_radiation1.shtml | |Working Thesis Statement: Countries may use the nuclear weapons in |Oral Presentation Thesis Statement (must be based on PART of the | |future because of the possibility of religious war and the other |research project): The time between 1946 and 2012, no atomic bomb had| |reasons. |been used even as an overt thread threat in any warpolitical crisis, | |I will argue that there is a strong possibility that nuclear weapons |the reasons … (I will find by researching.) ...
Words: 4481 - Pages: 18
...Chernobyl 31 Years after Nuclear Disaster The accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant occurred on 26 April 1986. It was the largest nuclear catastrophe ever. The explosion took place in the fourth block of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, located only 120 kilometers from the capital of Ukraine - Kiev, near the border with Belarus. However, today 31 years after the Chernobyl accident, we can see the serious consequences that have left on the economy, health and the environment, in the 3 countries involved Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. Although the country most affected has been Ukraine, the other two continue to struggle with the consequences left by the radioactive clouds that reached its territory and contaminated everything they touched...
Words: 1116 - Pages: 5
...Nuclear Thoughts The United States has held a central role in the nuclear arms race since its development over sixty years ago. They were the creators, the first and only nation to ever deploy the weapon against a foreign power, effectively ending Japan’s role in WWII, and still continue to invest millions annually into their nuclear arms program. Over twenty years has passed since the end of the Cold War, and the conception of MAD, mutually assured destruction, the United States continues to fund a program whose by-product may never again be utilized, by our counrty. Nuclear arms are no longer the deterrent they once were. The list of countries that have access to this technology has grown from what was two world powers, the United States and former USSR, to include many of today’s industrialized nations and continues to grow. However, the threat of nuclear attack from one of these nations continues to diminish, and in today’s global climate the United States is more likely to sustain a nuclear attack from a terrorist or independent organization. Retaliation to this type of attack is limited, as we see from our past experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead time and resources should be spent on what happens in the worst case scenario and what can be done to minimize the damages. Today The United States currently has an insufficient capacity to respond to a nuclear accident or attack in a way that would minimize casualties. Although continually working to prevent the possibility...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...Nuclear Thoughts The United States has held a central role in the nuclear arms race since its development over sixty years ago. They were the creators, the first and only nation to ever deploy the weapon against a foreign power, effectively ending Japan’s role in WWII, and still continue to invest millions annually into their nuclear arms program. Over twenty years has passed since the end of the Cold War, and the conception of MAD, mutually assured destruction, the United States continues to fund a program whose by-product may never again be utilized, by our counrty. Nuclear arms are no longer the deterrent they once were. The list of countries that have access to this technology has grown from what was two world powers, the United States and former USSR, to include many of today’s industrialized nations and continues to grow. However, the threat of nuclear attack from one of these nations continues to diminish, and in today’s global climate the United States is more likely to sustain a nuclear attack from a terrorist or independent organization. Retaliation to this type of attack is limited, as we see from our past experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead time and resources should be spent on what happens in the worst case scenario and what can be done to minimize the damages. Today The United States currently has an insufficient capacity to respond to a nuclear accident or attack in a way that would minimize casualties. Although continually working to prevent the possibility...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...Nuclear Thoughts The United States has held a central role in the nuclear arms race since its development over sixty years ago. They were the creators, the first and only nation to ever deploy the weapon against a foreign power, effectively ending Japan’s role in WWII, and still continue to invest millions annually into their nuclear arms program. Over twenty years has passed since the end of the Cold War, and the conception of MAD, mutually assured destruction, the United States continues to fund a program whose by-product may never again be utilized, by our counrty. Nuclear arms are no longer the deterrent they once were. The list of countries that have access to this technology has grown from what was two world powers, the United States and former USSR, to include many of today’s industrialized nations and continues to grow. However, the threat of nuclear attack from one of these nations continues to diminish, and in today’s global climate the United States is more likely to sustain a nuclear attack from a terrorist or independent organization. Retaliation to this type of attack is limited, as we see from our past experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead time and resources should be spent on what happens in the worst case scenario and what can be done to minimize the damages. Today The United States currently has an insufficient capacity to respond to a nuclear accident or attack in a way that would minimize casualties. Although continually working to prevent the possibility...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...Have nuclear weapons reduced the number of worldwide conflicts? The correlation between nuclear weapons and world stability has been a controversial topic and the subject of heated discussions in recent years – there is a growing widespread belief that nuclear weapons create a more secure world by preventing hostilities from escalating. However, while nuclear weapons certainly do bring positive aspects, there is a good amount of evidence to suggest that they might not discourage but actually increase armed conflicts. This report will go over the benefits and downsides of nuclear weapons, and will examine specific examples in order to determine whether they have had a positive or negative effect in the number of worldwide-armed conflicts. Nuclear weapons were first created in the form of a bomb, during World War 2. They were the product of extensive research, known as the Manhattan Project, funded by the United States government and under the direction of J. Robert Oppenheimer and the military supervision of General Leslie Groves. Created by means of atomic fusion and fission, they were intended to give the US the upper hand in the war and mark the beginning of American hegemony in the world. The atomic bomb was tested on July 16, 1945 at Trinity site, in New Mexico. After a successful explosion, the bomb was ready to use against Japan and end the war in the Pacific. Officials agreed the attack had to be powerful and shocking so the world would see the United States was in control;...
Words: 2148 - Pages: 9
...12/11/2015 Who should have the power? Power can be defined as the ability to influence other people’s life and behavior. It has been common since thousands years ago that a group of people chooses someone to lead them and make important decisions that affect everybody’s life, as today people elect president and senates or before they chose kings and advisors. Usually leaders make up rules and regulation to control the people’s behavior, solve the problems and move towards a goal that a society is seeking. For instance, in the “lord of the flies” novel, one of the first things that kids, who were stuck in an island, did was to choose a leader. After that the leader, who was Ralph made a goal, which was being rescued form the island and made a rule for talking, that was “whoever wanted to talk should have hold the conch”(Golding 43). People who have the power and lead a society, basically directly or indirectly influence everyone’s life, even people who didn’t choose them as a leader or even people of other countries. For example the conflict between Iran’s and U.S or U.S and Russia’s government affects civilians of these countries, as U.S puts economic sanctions against Iran or Russia, it influences the income of these counties citizens. It was only a simple example that how a U.S president can affect an Iranian civilian’s business. I believe in our century people should get selected to have power, which are not thirsty of having power. Wise people who really care...
Words: 2028 - Pages: 9
...Case Study N0 5 SEC – 320: Risk Loss Prevention, Emergency Planning Professor: S. W. Smith DeVry University Prepared by: MLZ Sunday, November 16, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Municipal Emergency Response to a Dirty Bomb Incident (Orlando, FL) 4 Low-level Nuclear Material Stateside and Abroad 5 Logistics of Decontamination 6 Disposal of Contaminated Property 7 Clean-Up Materials 8 Conclusion 10 References 11 Introduction According to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission a “Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) commonly known as Dirty Bomb is the combination of conventional explosives for example plain dynamite mixed with some radioactive materials.” If detonation of a dirty bomb would occur in a place consider as a vacation destination such as Orlando, Florida which happens to be a dense populated tourist location, where we find many Theme Park attractions, a major international airport, and location for many manufacturing facilities and important businesses, it would create great chaos, mayhem and devastation. Reason for the major chaos and despair is because as I just explained a dirty bomb uses dynamite, and other explosives to scatter radioactive dust, smoke, and other materials in order to inflict bodily harm, destroy property, and finally cause overwhelming mayhem with a dose of radioactive contamination. Most of the danger of a dirty bomb would come from the blast of the explosion itself; this in metropolitan populated...
Words: 2802 - Pages: 12
...Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power and Climate Change in Britain Two Years after the Fukushima Accident Summary findings of a survey conducted in March 2013 Wouter Poortinga, Nick F. Pidgeon, Stuart Capstick, and Midori Aoyagi Working Paper 19 September 2013: REF UKERC/WP/ES/2013/006 This document has been prepared to enable results of on-going work to be made available rapidly. It has not been subject to review and approval, and does not have the authority of a full Research Report. 1 T H E U K E N E R G Y R E S E A R C H C E N T R E carries out world-class research into sustainable future energy systems. It is the hub of UK energy research and the gateway between the UK and the international energy research communities. Our interdisciplinary, whole systems research informs UK policy development and research strategy. Contact Details Dr Wouter Poortinga Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University Bute Building, King Edward VII Avenue Cardiff, Wales, UK, CF10 3NB Prof Nick F. Pidgeon, Dr Stuart Capstick Understanding Risk Research Group School of Psychology, Cardiff University 51 Park Place Cardiff, Wales, UK, CF10 3AT Dr Midori Aoyagi Social and Environmental Systems Research Center, National Institute for Environmental studies (NIES), 16-2, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan PoortingaW@cardiff.ac.uk PidgeonN@cardiff.ac.uk CapstickSB@cardiff.ac.uk Aoyagi@nies.go.jp 2 Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................
Words: 12471 - Pages: 50
...In this day and age, nuclear power is seen as a menacing and unnecessary solution to providing the world with its energy and electricity. However, when looking at the facts nuclear power is far more beneficial than harmful, especially compared to some of the most common sources of energy being widely used today. Nuclear power has many advantages, some of them being environmental, international relations and safety. Some may argue that nuclear power may damage the environment with waste and mining, however recent research has proved that nuclear power is one of the more environmentally friendly sources of energy. These advantages greatly outweigh the possible disadvantages, making nuclear power the better alternative for energy and electricity....
Words: 1289 - Pages: 6
...On March 11, 2011 a magnitude-9 earthquake shook northeastern Japan for 6 whole minutes. Not even an hour later the first of many tsunami waves, reaching up to 128 feet, began crashing onto Japans coastline and traveled as far as 6 miles inland destroying everything in its destructive path. This tsunami not only was the cause for 18,000 deaths, but also the reason for a cooling system failure at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant which then resulted in a level 7 nuclear meltdown and the release of radioactive materials. I am first going to discuss how TEPCO, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, reacted to the meltdown and how they continue to store and reuse the nuclear waste, and then will discuss my opinion on what they are doing and future steps I believe they should take. When the tsunami swamped the plant, the power to vital cooling systems for three of the reactors were cut. These began to melt and leaked radioactive material in the atmosphere. In order to cool these down TEPCO began pumping hundreds of tons of water into the plant. This now highly radioactive water was stored in makeshift, hastily built containers that were meant for temporary holding and have hardly held up 3 years after the catastrophe. The operator of the plant Toshimitsu Motegi compared the way they are dealing with leaking containers to a game of “whack-a-mole” and after 300 tons of radioactive waste leaking from one container, he decided it was time for the government to step in. Current...
Words: 734 - Pages: 3
...Whitaker ENGL 1101-08 November 17, 2012 The Nuclear Solution The need for electricity has risen to an all time high, as the number of electronic devices in use increases along side that of America’s growing population, consumption has began to exceed that of production. In order to meet these demands energy needs to be produced in a more efficient and effective manner. Although there is no shortage of renewable resources such as water, wind, and the sun, these resources have yet prove their ability to provide us with the extensive amount of energy we require. On the other hand nuclear power has shown great success and I believe may be the solution to the energy crisis. Nuclear power plants split uranium and plutonium atoms, a process known as fission, to produce high amounts of heat within a reactor, turning water into steam used to power generators (Introduction to Nuclear Energy). Twenty percent of America's energy already comes from nuclear power (Alexander); thus arising an essential question, why have we not expanded this technology? America should turn to nuclear power as its primary source of energy because it will help stimulate the economy, create new advancements in nuclear technology, limit the stress put on our environment, and is much more safe than once believed. Increasing the number of nuclear power plants would be positive to the economy in an array of ways. Some people argue that the cost of nuclear power plants are more expensive to build compared to...
Words: 1664 - Pages: 7
