...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence shown in Sources 1,2 and 3. I believe that sources 1 and 3 both do strongly support the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525. Whereas, source 2 both supports and does not support the statement. All of the sources do suggest that there was unrest towards the grant and that the duke was very worried about the consequences that may occur. Firstly, source one agrees with the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525 because firstly, in source one it suggests ‘show the dissatisfaction prevailing’ which shows us the dissatisfaction that some people felt because of grant, mainly due to the amount of money they had to pay. This source relates well to source three because in source three the first line says ‘The people plead their poverty’ which shows us that like in source one there is resistance too many other taxes to pay so creating this one has caused an unwanted outburst from the people because of the amount that they have to pay. Also source supports source one because it reads in source three ‘arose up in arms against the commissioner’ this shows us that there was considerable resistance against the Amicable Grant as stated also in source one with the quote ‘other parliamentary grants are still to be paid’. Source one was written by the Archbishop of Canterbury...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5
...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence shown in Sources 1,2 and 3. I believe that sources 1 and 3 both do strongly support the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525. Whereas, source 2 both supports and does not support the statement. All of the sources do suggest that there was unrest towards the grant and that the duke was very worried about the consequences that may occur. Firstly, source one agrees with the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525 because firstly, in source one it suggests ‘show the dissatisfaction prevailing’ which shows us the dissatisfaction that some people felt because of grant, mainly due to the amount of money they had to pay. This source relates well to source three because in source three the first line says ‘The people plead their poverty’ which shows us that like in source one there is resistance too many other taxes to pay so creating this one has caused an unwanted outburst from the people because of the amount that they have to pay. Also source supports source one because it reads in source three ‘arose up in arms against the commissioner’ this shows us that there was considerable resistance against the Amicable Grant as stated also in source one with the quote ‘other parliamentary grants are still to be paid’. Source one was written by the Archbishop of Canterbury...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5
...“How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant of 1525?” Sources 1, 2 and 3 strongly suggest there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant as they all at least show traits of opposition from the public towards the new-implemented taxes. Source 1 is a letter from the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Warham addressed to Cardinal Wolsey. The letter begins with ‘it will be hard’ demonstrating immediately that the archbishop has an adverse stance towards the Amicable Grant. As the letter continues, it begins to seem more like Warham is warning Wolsey about the Grant as opposed to supporting it; he quotes “Reports show the dissatisfaction prevailing” and “Some commissioners only announce the King’s command without pressing it further through fear of the people.” This infers that the commissioners are afraid to even introduce the new plan, let alone explain the conditions in detail due to the daunting reactions of the public; this in itself shows there was a substantial amount of resistance towards it, for the reason that there were already too many taxes implemented and the people didn’t have enough money to cover them all “It will be hard to raise the money…especially as other parliamentary grants are still to be paid.” This source could be seen as reliable as it was from the Archbishop of Canterbury who would, under any circumstances support the decisions made by the king, therefore would not have rose this issue to Wolsey...
Words: 815 - Pages: 4
...RESISTANCE TO CHANGE AND OVERCOMING RESISTANCE This paper examines organizational change, focusing on the distinction of changes according to their scope and presenting a typology of evolutionary and strategic changes. Through empirical research, it analyzes the importance of the sources of resistance to change defined theoretically, also considering types of changes, offering hints about where organizations should pay special attention when initiating a change process. INTRODUCTION Many authors (Lawrence, 1954; Maurer, 1996; Strebel, 1994; Waddell and Sohal, 1998, among others) stress that the reasons for the failure of many change initiatives can be found in resistance to change. Resistance to change introduces costs and delays into the change process (Ansoff, 1990) that are difficult to anticipate (Lorenzo, 2000) but must be taken into consideration. Resistance has also been considered as a source of information, being useful in learning how to develop a more successful change process (Beer and Eisenstat, 1996; Goldstein, 1988; Lawrence, 1954; Piderit, 2000; Waddell and Sohal, 1998). Undoubtedly, resistance to change is a key topic in change management and should be seriously considered to help the organization to achieve the advantages of the transformation. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Organizational change is an empirical observation in an organizational entity of variations in shape, quality or state over time (Van de Ven and Poole, 1995), after the deliberate introduction of...
Words: 1310 - Pages: 6
...Thevenin’s theorem and Norton’s theorem. The verification is done by first determining the resistance of a circuit of resistances by determining the nodal voltages and nodal currents using Partsim Software. The measured currents and voltages are the used to determine the equivalent resistance of the circuit that is the used to determine the Thevenin voltage, Thevenin resistance and also the Norton circuit. Introduction Thevenin theorem states that it is possible to represent any linear power supply by using an ideal voltage source and single resistance that is connect in series to the power source. The series resistance is described as the Thevenin resistance and the power supply is known the Thevenin voltage. The Thevenin theorem is very vital to most designers since it helps in simplification of the conceptual design and operation of the circuit. This report analyses the process of determining the Thevenin circuit from the given circuit. To create a Thevenin circuit all voltages sources are taken as short circuit while all current sources are replaced by open circuit (Leach, 1976). According to the Norton’s Theorem, a circuit can be simplified so that its complexity is reduced to a simple equivalent that contains a single current source and parallel resistance and is also parallel to a load resistance. To implement the Norton’s theorem that the Norton current and Norton resistance have to be calculated. Once the two parameters have been established they will arranged as...
Words: 843 - Pages: 4
...EXPERIMENT # 1 OBJECTIVE: The Basic DC Circuit and the use of an Instrument for the Measurement of Voltage, Current and Resistance. Equipment Required: • Circuit #1 of D3000 - 1.1 DC Circuits-1 Module • Shorting links and connecting leads. • Multimeter. CIRCUIT DIAGRAM: [pic] [pic] THEORY: Measurement of Voltage: [pic] Voltage is measured using a multimeter set to a voltage range, or using a dedicated instrument called a voltmeter. The meter is connected across (in parallel with) the circuit component under test as shown in Fig 1.2. With analog meters, the meter leads must be connected with the correct polarity, as indicated in Fig 1.2. If the lead polarity is incorrect, the pointer will try to move in the wrong direction and the meter could be permanently damaged. With digital multimeters however, should the meter be connected with incorrect polarity, damage will not occur, and a - symbol is shown on the display. Measurement of Current: [pic] Current is measured using a multimeter set to a current range, or using a dedicated instrument called an ammeter. The meter is connected in series with the circuit so that the circuit current flows through the meter as shown in Fig 1.3. Measurement of Resistance: Resistance is measured using a multimeter set to a resistance range, or a dedicated instrument called an ohmmeter. The meter is connected across the resistor being measured as shown in Fig 1.4. [pic] ...
Words: 7438 - Pages: 30
...University of North Carolina at Charlotte Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory Experimentation Report Name: Langston Tucker Date: September 28, 2014 Course Number: ECGR 2155 Section: L05 Experiment Titles: Experiment Number: 2, 3, & 4 Lab 2: Basic Circuit Elements Lab 3: DC Voltage and Current Sources Lab 4: Series Circuit Characteristics Lab Partners: James Henderson and Joshua Sayles Equipment List: Objective: Experiment 2 The purpose of this lab was to familiarize ourselves with basic circuit elements. Those being, resistors, capacitors, inductors. Furthermore using basic calculations we determined the dissipated power in our elements. Experiment 3 The purpose of this...
Words: 2987 - Pages: 12
...q/t. * Where: q is in COULOMBS, t is in SECONDS and I is in AMPERES (1A = 1C/s). * BATTERY * A battery is a source of electrical energy. * If no internal energy losses occurs in the battery then the potential difference between its terminals is called the ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE (emf) of the battery. * The unit for emf is the same as the unit for potential difference, the VOLT. * RESISTANCE * The resistance of wire or other object is a measure of the potential difference that must be impressed across the object to cause a current of one ampere to flow through it. * R = V/I * The unit of resistance is OHMS (Ω), 1Ω = 1V/A. * OHM’s LAW * Ohm’s Law originally contained two parts. * The defining equation for resistance, V = IR, also stated the R is a constant independent of V and I. * The relation V = IR can be applied to any resistor, where V is the potential difference between the two ends of the resistor, I is the current through the resistor, and R is the resistance of the resistor under those conditions. * GEORG SIMON OHM * 1787-1854 * A high school teacher in Cologne and later a professor at Munich * Formulated the concept of resistance and discovered the proportionalities expressed in * MEASUREMENT OF RESISTANCE BY AMMETER AND VOLTMETER * A series circuit consisting of the resistance to be measured, an ammeter, and a battery is used. * The current is measured by the ammeter. * The potential difference...
Words: 960 - Pages: 4
...IB Higher Physics Internal Assessment Candidate Name: Aleksei Kuryla Candidate Number: Title: resistivity of nichrome |D |DCP |CE | | | | | DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING | |Criteria |( |Mark |Comments | |Aspect 1 |Raw results only shown | | | | | |Correct units | | | | | |Uncertainties shown | | | | | |Uncertainties justified | | | | | |Uncertainties to 1 sig fig | | | | | |Decimal places consistent with uncertainty | | | | |Aspect 2 |Processed...
Words: 1924 - Pages: 8
...Summary of the research question and outcome (148 Words) My research project topic was inspired by my aspiration to work in the medical field. Literature reviews indicated the upcoming threat of antimicrobial resistance, knowing that bacterial infections are a significant risk factor in surgical procedures, I centred my topic around the effect of antimicrobial resistance on the efficacy of surgical procedures. My outcome was written in the form of a report detailing the results of research. It first considers background information regarding antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance such as, what they are and how they work. The key findings of my research were that, 38.7% to 50.9% of pathogens which cause surgical site infections are resistant to standard prophylactic drugs, that these...
Words: 1754 - Pages: 8
...He was waiting for it to happen and was making the world aware of how oppressive the United States was on Cuba. Castro had his troops and militia ready regardless of where he thought the landing was going to be. He could have increased his pressure on the resistance currently on the island to prevent them from helping the invasion force. Additionally, he could have interrogated captured resistance fighters and known about the specifics of the invasion. Captured communication equipment could also have been used to access the invasion. Also, with use of the Soviet support they could have intercepted the communications between the resistance and the invading force and Castro’s forces could still be waiting for them. Some key assumptions here are the Soviets had the ability to intercept the communications and willing to provide it to Castro. Another would be his command and control ability of his forces. The last would be the apprehension of CIA HUMINT sources or contacts within the...
Words: 1868 - Pages: 8
...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant of 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence of sources 1, 2 and 3 Sources 1 and 3 agree that there was considerable reistance to the Amicable Grant of 1525, however source 2 suggest that there was conformity to the Amicable grant Source 1 agrees that there was a considerable resistance to the amicable grant of 1525, as it says ‘Reports for the secret ears of the Cardinal, show the dissatisfaction prevailing.’ This suggests that people are unhappy with the amicable grant and there’s growing rest in payments. In comparison to source 1, source 2 disagrees that there was a resistance to the Amicable Grant. Source 2 states that ‘People now conform to king’s request’ this suggest that people are happy to pay the tax this also shows that there was no resistance to the grant and that the ‘clergy will not fail to pay double’. This suggests that people have changed their mind and are happy to pay. However this source is coming from ‘Suffolk’ where people are conforming and paying the tax, whereas in Kent people are refusing to conform to the king’s request. This suggests that people are acting differently in different areas of England. Similarly, source 3 Agrees with source 1; it suggests that people were not comfortable with the amicable grant as they ‘arose up in arms against the commissioners’. Source 1 has been written by Archbishop of Canterbury, William Warham to Wolsey. Warham...
Words: 364 - Pages: 2
...technological environment and economic uncertainties. It is imperative for management to understand resistance for change in workforce and implementing corrective measures for the same. Individuals have different egos and reasons for resistance of change. Individual positive attitude and negative attitude about change also play a vital role in resistance. We can categorize resistance to change in two categories like Individual Sources and Organizational Sources. Individual Sources includes like habit, Security, Economic Factors, Fears of unknown and selective information processing (Robbins & Judge, 2013). Organizational Sources includes Structural inertia (structural inertia works as a counterbalance during organization changes), Limited focus of change (limited change nullified due to large system in place), Group inertia (Group resistance to change), Threat to expertise (threatening of specialized groups) and Threat to established power relationships (redistributing decision-making power) (Robbins & Judge, 2013). There are number of ways management can help employees to overcome resistance of changes. Management can reduce the resistance by communicating and educating workforce for any changes in organization. Workforce participation is essential for any changes required within and outside organization. Positive relationship, support and commitment can reduce the resistance significantly. Management should implement any changes fairly and manipulation and coercion should...
Words: 568 - Pages: 3
...Solutions Internal Report Organizational Structure Simulation COM/530 Synergetic Solutions Internal Report Organizational Structure Simulation Socrates stated, “The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new.” Change can happen naturally or it can be planned. Both cases need appropriate strategies. This internal report will briefly explain those strategies that Synergetic Solutions must take as the company prepares for its new focus. The focus of this report will be to describe the internal and external forces that Synergetic Solutions has to confront, the potential change models our leaders might use, and the kinds of resistance that can be expected along with strategies to manage the resistance. Internal and External Forces There are several internal forces that Synergetic Solutions expects to confront. One of the main internal forces that the company will focus on is the labor force. Synergetic Solutions must know its people and how to manage changing their routine and skillset. People tend to be resistant to change (Robbins & Judge, 2011, Chapter 18, Organizational Change and Stress Management). The company will be sensitive and attentive to improve overall employee well-being. This leads to the next internal force that the company must confront and that is the leadership. More specifically, the management team must be able to form strategies so the vision of Harold Redd, CEO...
Words: 1443 - Pages: 6
...Chapter 25 – Current, Resistance and Electromotive Force - Current - Resistivity - Resistance - Electromotive Force and Circuits Current Electric current: charges in motion from one region to another. Electric circuit: conducting path that forms a closed loop in which charges move. In these circuits, energy is conveyed from one place to another. Electrostatics: E = 0 within a conductor _ Current (I) = 0, but not all charges are at rest, free electrons can move (v ~ 106 m/s). Electrons are attracted to + ions in material _ do not escape. Electron motion is random _ no net charge flow Non-electrostatic: E ≠ 0 inside conductor _ F = q E Charged particle moving in vacuum _ steady acceleration // F Charged particle moving in a conductor _ collisions with “nearly” stationary massive ions in material change random motion of charged particles. Due to E, superposition of random motion of charge + slow net motion (drift) of charged particles as a group in direction of F = q E _ net current in conductor. Drift velocity (vd) = 10-4 m/s (slow) Direction of current flow: - In the absence of an external field, electrons move randomly in a conductor. If a field exists near the conductor, its force on the electron imposes a drift. - E does work on moving charges _ transfer of KE to the conductor through collisions with ions _ increase in vibrational energy of ions _ increase T. - Much of W done by E goes into heating the conductor, not into accelerating charges...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5