...The Leadership Grid Abstract The Leadership Grid was originally developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton during their research time at the University of Texas between 1950 and 1960. Many have compared their Leadership Grid against the Situational Leadership Theory developed by Hersey and Blanchard. Some of these differences include the degree of interaction between the two common variables addressed by both theories. These two common variables are task and people. The two theories contradict in how these variables interact. In addition, the Leadership Grid is concentrated mostly on the attitude of the leader. Situational Leadership, on the other hand, concentrates on the maturity level of the follower and the appropriate leadership behaviors that correspond with each. Finally, the Leadership Grid believes that there is one best way to react in a certain situation, while Situational Leadership contends that there is no such “one best” leadership style for any given situation. Managerial Grid History and Description The Managerial Grid was initially developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton as a diagnostic tool which would allow managers to assess their leadership style or behavior (Dictionary of Human Resource Management 2001). Blake and Mouton worked together at the psychology department at the University of Texas between 1950 and 1960. It was there that they first developed the concept of the Managerial Grid (Robert R Blake and Jane S Mouton: The Managerial...
Words: 3201 - Pages: 13
...BINDURA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE EDUCATION FACULTY OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS STUDIES MASTERS IN BUSINESS LEADERSHIP (MBL) NAME OF STUDENT: CATHERINE DOMBO REGISTRATION NUMBER: B1230847 COURSE: STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND ORGANISATIONAL DYNAMICS COURSE CODE: MBL 512 COURSE COORDINATOR: MR MASHAVIRE ASSIGNMENT: 1 DUE DATE 5/09/12 Execute an analysis of managers or leaders in your organisation on the basis of the leadership grid as was propounded by Jane Morton and Robert Black. The characteristics-traits used to classify the managers – leaders should be established. 1. Introduction It is important to understanding how organisations are managed, how activities of people are directed towards achievement of objectives and goals of the organisation. Managers and leaders are different but have complementary activities. Their activities (managers and leaders) takes place in order to make things happen to get results. 1.1 Difference between a leader and a management To manage means to bring about, to accomplish, to have charge of or responsibility for, to conduct. Management is the process of deciding what to do and then getting it done through the effective use of resources. It is about what managers do to make things happen. They define goals, determine the resources – people, finance, work systems and technology – required to achieve the goals...
Words: 3116 - Pages: 13
...Define and describe the interactional framework for analyzing leadership including the different components of the framework and how it can be used to determine effective leadership. The interactional framework for analyzing leadership depicts leadership as a function of three elements (level of analysis): the leader, the followers, and the situation. It can be used to analyze leadership scenarios from each level of analysis separately, which can be useful. However, using the framework as an analysis tool for leadership situations is more effective when analyzing the interactions between the different levels of analysis. For instance, it may be useful to examine a leadership scenario by analyzing the situation and determining the level of stress, the environment, or the task at hand but more information can be gathered by analyzing the interaction between the leader and the situation. If the leader can perform actions to modify the situation, to lessen the stress of the situation for example, there may be a resulting positive effect on the followers. This example highlights one of the unique and useful aspects of the interactional framework for analyzing leadership: the importance placed on the interactions between the leader, the followers, and the situation. The interactional framework for analyzing leadership scenarios is best represented by a Venn diagram, as drawn below, where each level of analysis (leader, followers, and situation) are drawn as open circles that overlap...
Words: 2019 - Pages: 9
...University of Santo Tomas College of Commerce and Business Administration 1st Semester, A.Y. 2015 – 2016 Leading Underneath is a copy of an article “”Understanding the differences: Leadership Vs. Management” and I will be using this article to talk about my term paper topic. UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES: LEADERSHIP VS. MANAGEMENT Is a good manager automatically a good leader? What is the difference between leadership and management? The main difference between leaders and managers is that leaders have people follow them while managers have people who work for them. A successful business owner needs to be both a strong leader and manager to get their team on board to follow them towards their vision of success. Leadership is about getting people to understand and believe in your vision and to work with you to achieve your goals while managing is more about administering and making sure the day-to-day things are happening as they should. WHILE THERE ARE MANY TRAITS THAT MAKE UP A STRONG LEADER, SOME OF THE KEY CHARACTERISTICS ARE: * Honesty & Integrity: are crucial to get your people to believe you and buy in to the journey you are taking them on * Vision: know where you are, where you want to go and enroll your team in charting a path for the future * Inspiration: inspire your team to be all they can by making sure they understand their role in the bigger picture * Ability to Challenge: do not be afraid to challenge the status quo, do things differently...
Words: 1928 - Pages: 8
...Leadership Presentation LEADERSHIP : LEADERSHIP The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals. Not all leaders are managers nor all managers are leaders. A good leader displays the ability, creativity, and confidence. He gets co-operation, willingness and builds employee morale and motivation. Ordinary people who do extra-ordinary things. Employee Asset : Employee Asset People can be the biggest asset of a company or it can be the biggest liability. Customer is the king – customer satisfaction is the priority. Employees first, followed by customers and then the share holders Majority of the companies in India measure this asset on the profitability of the company A Good Leader : A Good Leader Has foresight Has influence Has representative role playing. Communicates properly. Commands trust and confidence. Commands attention and respect. Helps to achieve task objectives. Has concern for needs of his group. Sensitive to the task, people and environment. Builds team and become model. Ability and skill to manage the team. Ability to take decisions. Theories of Leadership : Theories of Leadership “Great man” theories – inherent – great leaders are born, not made. Trait Theories – inherent qualities- traits Contingency Theories – environmental, style, qualities of followers, and situation. Situational Theories – best course of action for situation. Behavioural Theories – great leaders are made, not born. Theory focuses on actions. Theories of Leadership...
Words: 1858 - Pages: 8
...Education An ideal administrator in my opinion would be a combination of a person who obtained the qualities of a team leader and authoritarian. It is important that administrators provide positive examples for others to follow; but as an administrator it is important to be in control as well. In choosing my topic, I decided to write about the ideology of Blake Mouton. For me to benefit from his leadership; it is important to understand where I stand in his grid test so that I may develop the skills necessary to become a good administrator. Before choosing which management style I believed to fall under; I decided to take the grid test to see what style of leadership I was most associated with. Upon taking the test I scored at 7.8 in people and 6.8 in task. It placed me within the “democratic” zone of the grid. The best in my opinion would be a combination of democratic and authoritarian styles of leadership. It is important that administrators provide positive examples for others to follow but as an administrator it is important to be in control also. I feel good with where I stand at this point in my career. I feel blessed to be apart of an organization where all teachers and administrators are a team that work together to meet our goals and help students to become successful. There is nothing that one of us would ask of another that we would not be willing to do our self. The worst type of school administrator would have to be the “country club” administrator. To me this...
Words: 827 - Pages: 4
...or a leader’s personality. 2. How is leadership behavior based on traits? - As we all know the behavioral theory should only focus on the leader’s behavior but it does not all the time. A leader’s behaviors originally come from the personal traits or attitudes that a leader has. 3. What are the University of Iowa leadership styles? - The university of Iowa leadership studies found two different leadership styles which are…. a) Autocratic Leadership style and b) Democratic Leadership style. 4. What are the University of Michigan leadership styles? - This university found two leadership styles as well which are a) job-centered Leadership style and b) employee centered leadership style. 5. What are the Ohio State University leadership styles? - Initiating structure behavior - Consideration behavior 6. What are three important contributions of the University of Michigan and Ohio State University studies? - They were able to research at the same time and found four dimensions which a leader use in an organization; low structure and high consideration, high structure and low consideration, high structure and high consideration, low structure and low consideration. 7. What are the Leadership Grid leadership styles? - the leadership grid builds on Ohio state university and the Michigan university study which are called concern for production and concern for employees. The leadership grid identifies five different leadership styles which are: a) Impoverished b)...
Words: 922 - Pages: 4
...Grid-group cultural theory Explanations > Culture > Grid-group cultural theory Description | Discussion | So what Description This model has two dimensions, each a measure of sociability. Group The group dimension describes how strongly people are bonded together. At one end there are distinct and separated individuals, perhaps with common reason to be together though with less of a sense of unity and connection. At the other end, people have a connected sense of identity, relating more deeply and personally to one another. They spend more time together and have stable relationships. When people group together, then laws are more easily defined and policed. For society to survive when bonds are weaker and central control is less possible, individuals must necessarily display self-restraint. In management, low group does not manage resources, whilst high group does. Grid The grid dimension describes how different people are in the group and how they take on different roles. At one end of this spectrum people are relatively homogeneous in their abilities, work and activity and can easily interchange roles. This makes them less dependent on one another. At the other end, there are distinct roles and positions within the group with specialization and different accountability. There are also different degrees of entitlement, depending on position and there may well be a different balance of exchange between and across individuals. This makes it advantageous...
Words: 1171 - Pages: 5
...Week 2 Brian Blubaum, RN BSN Grand Canyon University Leadership Styles and Development LDR 600 Dr. Erick Aguilar July 15, 2014 Knight and Krzyzewski Case Study– Week 2 “Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2013).” It’s a series of decisions, actions and beliefs that are intertwined with a number of other things. This paper will examine the unique leadership approaches of two very prominent basketball coaches who have become legends on and off the basketball court; Duke University basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski and Indiana University’s Coach Bobby Knight. Coach Krzyzewski’s Leadership Approach Coach Krzyzewski was an excellent basketball player. Basketball Hall of Fame recipient in 2001. He gained great notoriety not only as a coach but as a basketball player as well. In reviewing the article from the Harvard Business School regarding Coach Krzyzewski, it is quite evident that his leadership encompassed positive reinforcement for his players. He was quoted as saying, “I don’t want to be a manager or a dictator. I want to be a leader – and leadership is ongoing, adjustable, flexible, and dynamic. As such, leaders have to maintain a certain amount of discretion” (Krzyzewski, 2000). He respected his players and cultivated trust and respect amongst the team. He truly cared for his players and their well-being. Coach Knight’s Leadership Approach Coach Knight played basketball for Ohio State...
Words: 1080 - Pages: 5
...one who efficiently and successfully can achieve the objectives of the organization. Managerial work can also be summarized as clarification of objects, planning, organizing, directing and controlling. ‘Effective Manager' can thus be defined in the terms of the quantity and quality of standards of performance, and the satisfaction and commitment of subordinates. Leadership is often linked with reference to one person leading. Leadership is a self-motivated and involves four components. First, to lead involves influencing others. Second, where there are leaders there are followers. Third, leaders seem to come to the forefront when there is a crisis or special problem. In other words, they often become visible when a ground-breaking response is needed. Fourth, leaders are people who have a clear idea of what they want to achieve and why. Thus, leaders are people who are able to think and act creatively in non-routine situations and who set out to influence the actions, beliefs and feelings of others. It is very difficult to form an accurate definition of leadership, as there are many factors involved in leadership. But, basically, a leader can be defined as a person who is in charge of others, and had a relationship with them through which he can influence their actions or behavior . While...
Words: 2158 - Pages: 9
...Leadership Theories Shaleen Brown Capella University The three leadership theories I have opted to write about are The Great Man Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Contingency Theories. The Great Man Theory is the oldest of all leadership theories and has more to do with presumptions made at the turn of the century then actual data. The Behavioral Theories, which are Role Theory and The Managerial Grid reflect what the leader does more than the traits of an individual. The Contingency Theories, Fiedler’s least-preferred co-worker (LPC) theory, Cognitive Resource Theory and the Strategic Contingencies Theory show how matching leadership in a situation with a leader’s personality. Relationships are important for these types of leaders. The Great Man Theory became popular during the 19th century. Many believed that great men were born not made. This theory was used to describe great leaders such as Abraham Lincoln and Alexander the Great. Inherent characteristics are what make these people effective leaders. The Great Man was used primary because leaders during this period of time were predominantly male. This theory could be very influential to both individuals and teams. Many of these individuals were born into the position; many of these leaders often “magically” appeared at the right time to lead their people into safety or success. Role Theory was formalized in the 1920’s. Many are given credit for creating this theory such as Margaret Mead, Talcott...
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
...Leadership Meaning of Leadership Leadership is an important function of management. It is the key to effective managerial performance. Organizational performance depends on the quality of leadership. According to Stephen Robbins: “leadership is the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of goals”. According to Hersey and Blanchard: “leadership is the process of influencing the activities of an individual or a group in efforts towards goal achievement in a given situation”. Meaning of Leadership can be categorized into two categories: i. leadership as process: As a process, leadership uses its influence of position to direct, motivate and coordinate the group activities to achieve the organizational goals. ii. Leadership as a property: The property concept of leadership believes that leaders possess basic characteristics or traits. Leaders to influence the group activities successfully, use these characteristics. This view considers leadership as a part of one’s personality. Importance of leadership: The importance of leadership can be: 1.Goal Determination: leadership provides vision, mission and direction. It is concerned with establishing goals for the organization. It integrates goals of the individual and the organization 2.Environmental adaptation: leadership is innovative and change oriented. It adapts the organization to the dynamic changes in the environment. 3.Task focus: leadership gives close attention to planning and organizing of task...
Words: 2100 - Pages: 9
...Skills and Style Approaches to Leadership Introduction The skills approach emphasizes skills that can be learned, thus representing a shift away from the perspective that people are born into/with leadership. In addition to exploring the skills approach, this module will provide a discussion of the style approach which provides a focus upon the behavior manifest in effective leaders. The Skills Approach Katz's Three Basic Administrative Skills Katz (1955) suggests that three basic administrative needs must be present for managers to be effective: technical, human, and conceptual. This skills model of organizational leadership was based on the development of the bases of competencies and was part of a long-term research project entitled Making the Match between University Graduates and Corporate Employers (Evers & Rush, 1996). Using a survey-based analysis, four distinct bases of key competencies of a leader emerged: 1. Mobilizing Innovation and Change: the leader's ability to conceptualize, use creativity/innovation/change, take risks, and engage in visioning for the future. 2. Managing People and Tasks: involves coordinating, decision making, leadership/influence, managing conflict, and planning, leading, controlling, and organizing. 3. Communicating: the leader uses interpersonal, listening, oral, and written communication skills to communicate the organization's goals and the leader's vision. 4. Managing Self: the important keys to success are...
Words: 1516 - Pages: 7
... Mike Krzyzewski (aka Coach K) and Coach Bobby Knight (aka The General) are the most colorful basketball coaches in American collegiate history. Their similarities are striking. They have shared the same arenas as coach and player at West Point; they are coaching contemporaries; they are competitors, highest winning coaches, and lifelong friends. And, Coach K and Coach Knight have both achieved brilliant success during their college coaching careers. But that’s where their similarities end. Their leadership styles have been the subject of debate around coffee tables, pizza places and beer joints for years. For the curious, there are models of management, though, that can give us yet some more insight into their methods and madness. Robert Katz identified a leadership leaning that made simple the behaviors of leaders based on people and results: Task and Human Skills Approach. The Task Approach favors task and production foremost, while the Human Approach favors relationship and people foremost (Northouse, 2012). Embracing this model, we can understand these coaches a little more by looking at the Katz approach. Coach K was all about the people-relationship skills as priority for results; while Coach Knight was highly adept at task-producing skills for results. Following the Robert Katz studies, it is clear Coach K identifies as promoting development...
Words: 978 - Pages: 4
...1-leadership effectiveness? فعالية القيادة Fiedler model Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory leader member exchange theory The path-goal Leader-participation models 2- Reward power, Legitimate power, Information power and Expert power? Reward power: People comply with the wishes or directives of another because doing so produces positive benefitsالناس الامتثال لرغبات أو توجيهات أخرى لأن القيام بذلك ينتج فوائد إيجابية Legitimate power: represents the formal authority to control and use organizational resourcesتمثل السلطة الرسمية لمراقبة واستخدام الموارد التنظيمية Information power: comes from access to and control over informationيأتي من الوصول إلى المعلومات والتحكم فيها Expert power: effect wielded as a result of expertise, special skill, or knowledge. 3-Scandinavian Studies the previous behavioral approaches that focused in on only two behaviors may not appropriately capture leadership in the twenty-first century. Moreover, while initial conclusions need to be guarded without more confirming evidence, it also appears that leaders who demonstrate development-oriented behavior have more satisfied employees and are seen as more competent by those employees 4_Span of control? How many employees can a manager efficiently and effectively direct? The wider or larger the span, the more efficient the organization. كيف يمكن ان العديد من الموظفين مدير بكفاءة وفعالية مباشرة؟ على نطاق أوسع أو أكبر وتمتد ، وأكثر كفاءة المنظمة. Assuming Span of 8 Assuming...
Words: 531 - Pages: 3
