Miranda v. Arizona What are the important facts? Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnaping of an 18 year old girl. He was taken in custody. He was then interrogated by two police officers for two hours, which resulted in a signed, written confession. A written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were
Words: 415 - Pages: 2
Abstract The Communication Process that is based on the synergetic model has various factors that come into play in order for the communication process to function correctly. The Synergetic model needs many factors to in order to have a successful communication the factors are individual forces, societal forces, culture, and context. Each factor that is used in the synergetic model serves its purpose but overall work together with one another to help each other of the factor to complete the communication
Words: 985 - Pages: 4
the Supreme Court ruling and must be read to the suspect before any questioning of a suspect who have been obtained. In this famous case, Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that suspects can only be interrogated after the police read them their legal rights. In reading on I have learn more about the details and legal legacy of Miranda v. Arizona. This cases ended up as a lock case. Some may have felt that the way to handle this was to lock away the Mr. Miranda based on the evidence. However
Words: 253 - Pages: 2
In 1966 there was a case by the name of Miranda v. Arizona. It started off with a girl who was kidnapped and raped. She then went to the police and gave a confession. Shortly after Ernesto Miranda was captured and told to give a written confession of everything he told to the police. He also signed with an oath, which says that he was made aware of his rights and anything he says can be used against him in court. After conviction, his defense attorney appealed on behalf of the 5th and 6th amendments
Words: 424 - Pages: 2
“Exploited Youth Testifies Against Alleged ISIS-Funder; Ali Al-Talebi to Stand in Court” The prosecution’s witness, an unnamed young man, asserts that Ali Al-Talebi together with Omarjan Azari are involved in the count of an attempt to provide the terrorist group ISIS with financial support. The young man was allegedly ordered by Al-Talebi to send two packages of $3,000 all the way to Pakistan. It was also claimed by the witness that the alleged ISIS-Funder arranged for the youth to turnover $9
Words: 313 - Pages: 2
In March 1963, Ernesto Miranda, of Phoenix, Arizona, was arrested in connection with the rape and kidnapping of women. While in custody and after 2 hours of interrogation, he confessed of robbery and attempted rape. His confession and the testimony of the victim were used in the trial. The judge of the Superior Court allowed the confession was used and Miranda was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison Miranda appealed the case to the Arizona Supreme Court; His lawyer argues that his confession
Words: 510 - Pages: 3
Rights the respondent requested to have his probation officer present. The police denied his request and he agreed to be questioned. The court however denied the motion due to the respondent waiving his rights to have legal counsel. Miranda v. Arizona covers having legal counsel present when being questioned and that the accused can refuse to talk. The respondent in the case wanted his probation officer to be present, however a probation officer is not legal counsel and cannot give legal advice
Words: 906 - Pages: 4
However there are Miranda exception; The Supreme Court here, in a 5-4 decision, announces a "Public-Safety" exception to Miranda. If there's indication of a missing weapon, the officer may resolve that issue prior to worrying about Miranda warning (New York v. Quarles). On the off chance that a law enforcement officer is challenged with the risk of threat to people in general safety, law enforcement officers are not required to instantly read suspects in criminal cases their Miranda warnings first
Words: 264 - Pages: 2
1.2 Miranda Warning and Waiver of Rights 1.2.1 Miranda Warning A. Definition 1. Miranda warning/rights- The Miranda warning or the Miranda rights as it is also known as is a right to a suspect that they can or may remain silent and is given by a police officer in the United States to a criminal suspect when they are in custody (or in a custodial interrogation). Furthermore, these rights or warning is done prior to them being interrogated in order to preserve the admissibility of their
Words: 1113 - Pages: 5
Do you know the Miranda rights.The Miranda rights give the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in court of law,you have the right to an attorney,if you can't afford an attorney one will be provided for you,do you understand these rights I have just read you. With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me.These are the Miranda rights and everyone deserve them. People don’t have to say anything without their lawyer.The people all have these rights.
Words: 475 - Pages: 2
